ford explorer, f series, mustang, probe, ranger, thunderbird, windstar, focus

What is better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-07-2005, 01:53 AM
  #1  
GTcars Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ALLAN_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,080
Rep Power: 720
ALLAN_M has a spectacular aura aboutALLAN_M has a spectacular aura about
What is better?

what should i do i have a 2000 Mustang GT n i wanna either supercharge it or turbo it

can ne of u guys give me some ideas such as:
what make
how much
PSI #
ALLAN_M is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 11:19 AM
  #2  
GTcars Regular
 
SuprAdam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brampton
Posts: 1,437
Rep Power: 0
SuprAdam can only hope to improve
Supercharging is alot simplier and more common for Rustangs, but I am partial to turbos, so I say turbo the bitch.

Although there are a few Mustang guys on here, you will get a better response posting somewhere such as http://www.gtamc.com/

HTH

Good luck.
SuprAdam is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 06:00 PM
  #3  
Average GTcars Poster
 
skillton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Scarborough
Posts: 480
Rep Power: 712
skillton will become famous soon enough
T76 BB turbo, 25psi
skillton is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 08:14 PM
  #4  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
midnighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 197
Rep Power: 705
midnighter street rep is low. keep going
Keep in mind those rods can't handle over 400 hp, so there's not much of a point in turbo'ing if you're keeping the power low.. I'd say a 6 psi Kenne Bell supercharger would be your best bet. Those things make incredible power throughout the whole RPM range.. or you could pick up a cheap Vortech kit and only run a little boost. That'll also put you around 350-400 hp.
midnighter is offline  
Old 04-18-2005, 06:22 PM
  #5  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Fast Eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 705
Fast Eddie street rep is low. keep going
http://www.turbomustangs.com

Fast Eddie is offline  
Old 03-30-2006, 04:27 PM
  #6  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
hpcraver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 695
hpcraver street rep is low. keep going
turbomustangs.com should help if u decide to go turbo
hpcraver is offline  
Old 06-17-2006, 01:36 PM
  #7  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
K20_teg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oakville
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 667
K20_teg street rep is low. keep going
bummmp
K20_teg is offline  
Old 06-17-2006, 07:14 PM
  #8  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
90Tbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 670
90Tbird street rep is low. keep going
turboing it will definitly make it bad ***, I would definity go with that, but check out prices first i beleive theres a section in turbo mustangs where it shows how to put together a kit yourself.
90Tbird is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 05:13 PM
  #9  
Skilled GTcars Poster
 
Fresh_Prince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto,On
Posts: 797
Rep Power: 668
Fresh_Prince street rep is low. keep going
sts turbo (Y)
mount it on the back
Fresh_Prince is offline  
Old 10-07-2006, 05:54 PM
  #10  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
horseplayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mississauga,ON
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 0
horseplayer street rep is low. keep going
supercharger kits are more readily available and are in the $3-5 grand range for your car. a turbo kit would prolly give you better performance, but you'd spend a little more and they are not as mainstream for these cars right now.
horseplayer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StealthZ
Chit Chat
57
01-22-2007 04:51 PM
NoRiceInside
chevy / gmc
6
11-23-2005 09:30 PM
93gsrhatch
Want To Buy
0
04-26-2005 12:20 AM
Wopsicle69
Automotive Pictures & videos
2
04-04-2005 11:47 PM
STREET
Automotive Pictures & videos
5
03-17-2005 03:58 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: What is better?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 PM.

Page generated in 0.15954 seconds with 19 queries