General Automotive Chat all general talk about cars. if they dont have a home below or you feel it doesnt fit, post in here.

07 Camaro?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-28-2004, 05:39 PM
  #1  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Thread Starter
 
95BlackZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 153
Rep Power: 713
95BlackZ street rep is low. keep going
07 Camaro?

Here is a site on the 07 Camaro

http://www.autoblog.com/entry/5685815371424560

What does everyone think
95BlackZ is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 05:47 PM
  #2  
GTcars - Post God !
iTrader: (1)
 
Mike Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,249
Rep Power: 0
Mike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep going
I hope the Camaro doesn't look like any of those.
Mike Jones is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 08:38 PM
  #3  
Experienced GTcars Poster
 
imported_blade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,540
Rep Power: 805
imported_blade street rep is low. keep going
i'm with chad on that one, none of those look good enough.
imported_blade is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 08:39 PM
  #4  
GTcars Regular
 
1hottcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,262
Rep Power: 741
1hottcamaro street rep is low. keep going
I like that orange and black one that that guy designed for Popular Hot Rodding Magazine
1hottcamaro is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 08:40 PM
  #5  
GTcars Regular
 
1hottcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,262
Rep Power: 741
1hottcamaro street rep is low. keep going
Yeah i still dont think they look good enuf to be the new camaro though
1hottcamaro is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 10:13 PM
  #6  
Experienced GTcars Poster
 
NCamaro94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,663
Rep Power: 755
NCamaro94 street rep is low. keep going
they'll do what ford did make a car with some modern and retro look.
NCamaro94 is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 11:08 PM
  #7  
RFF
~~~ SITE SPONSOR ~~~
 
RFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,073
Rep Power: 884
RFF street rep is low. keep going
This form is used for reviewing products and mods. So why is this here?
RFF is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 11:13 PM
  #8  
GTcars - Post God !
 
archemedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Saraland AL
Posts: 15,868
Rep Power: 1051
archemedes street rep is low. keep going
I like the second gen looking one. No offense to anyone but styling peaked for the camaro in '73 then they went bland and wedge
archemedes is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 11:26 PM
  #9  
GTcars - Post God !
 
69z-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: palatine,il (chicago)
Posts: 6,626
Rep Power: 848
69z-28 street rep is low. keep going
x2. 74-81 i think were the worst years, and 82-84 wasnt the best either, 85-02 were all pretty good i think. i dont like the look of ne 1st gens cept the 69' and the 68 with hideaways.
69z-28 is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 11:29 PM
  #10  
GTcars - Post God !
 
archemedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Saraland AL
Posts: 15,868
Rep Power: 1051
archemedes street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by 69z-28
x2. 74-81 i think were the worst years, and 82-84 wasnt the best either, 85-02 were all pretty good i think. i dont like the look of ne 1st gens cept the 69' and the 68 with hideaways.
'82 to '92 were the same body design with a small facelift (the fenders even interchange)
archemedes is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 11:57 PM
  #11  
Post Wench
 
camaro94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nemacolin, PA
Posts: 10,392
Rep Power: 972
camaro94 street rep is low. keep going
I have to disagree with the styling thing... 67-69 were great. I hate the early 70s, much, much prefer the late 70s til 81....the early 3rds were okay, but toward the latter years with the newer style front were nice. And all 4ths are great....
camaro94 is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 11:58 PM
  #12  
Post Wench
 
camaro94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nemacolin, PA
Posts: 10,392
Rep Power: 972
camaro94 street rep is low. keep going
some of those ideas aren't too bad for the camaro... but I'm not really sold on any of them....
camaro94 is offline  
Old 12-29-2004, 12:11 AM
  #13  
GTcars - Post God !
 
69z-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: palatine,il (chicago)
Posts: 6,626
Rep Power: 848
69z-28 street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by archemedes
'82 to '92 were the same body design with a small facelift (the fenders even interchange)
yea i know thats what i meant i dont like the front ends on the 82-84 even tho there is a really small difference. also the tail lights are slightly different as well as the engine options. the horsepower never broke 200 for ne thirdgen until 85. also i like the iroc hood and later z-28 hood better than the 82-84 z-28 hoods.
69z-28 is offline  
Old 12-29-2004, 01:03 AM
  #14  
GTcars - Post God !
 
meissen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Macomb, Michigan
Posts: 6,032
Rep Power: 878
meissen has a spectacular aura aboutmeissen has a spectacular aura aboutmeissen has a spectacular aura about
I love the Kris Horton renders. I also sent them an email telling them about that PDF file and telling them that I have it if they want it.
meissen is offline  
Old 12-29-2004, 04:14 AM
  #15  
GTcars - Post God !
 
NoRiceInside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Valencia, CA
Posts: 7,173
Rep Power: 893
NoRiceInside street rep is low. keep going
the orange one is alright, but the rest are ugly. i have a feeling if even the orange one becomes the new design we will grow to like it. i remember when the 350z came out i hated it, now i love it. and the new mustang, i hate it, but after playing with it on NFSU2 and tricking it out, i like it
NoRiceInside is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 07 Camaro?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 AM.

Page generated in 0.16586 seconds with 23 queries