Rep Power: 728

I'm not aruging the point either, i'm just saying its my opinion that that pericular picture looks good, and i get all these comments back saying that no it doesnt and all this, all i was stating in the first place was that I like the picture, its a interesting look, thats all i was saying, i didnt ask for everyone to get in a bunch about it not being a good picture

excuse me if i have diffent taste in photography than you guys...tahts my opinion, i dont feel my opinion on this should be argued....

 
Rep Power: 728

actually you know what, forget i said anything in regards to any of the pictures ok...make it easy.

 
Rep Power: 773

I have to agree with you Lisa, that picture taken under the tree is actually quite interesting, in fact I had no idea such a bright car could blend in with the surroundings so well but it does. That's a first for me seeing a picture like that. Most people wouldn't think to go there, but you did!

Ya know, I could actually see #3 or #5 as a Calendar shot myself. I'd say #3 is almost the perfect size.....meaning it takes up most of the picture, so that one definitely focuses on the car itself. Eh, so there's a little glare on the front GFX.....but it's not that much.

I absolutely love how the car looks in the first shot, and I personally think that if you were to go back to that same spot, and take more of a front-side shot like you did in #3, but maybe take it up high like you did in the first shot so you can still see the front end, but also see the side and the stripes on the tonnau cover......basically the same as #1, only more from the side. I think that would look Bad-A$$ personally.

Just my .02 cents worth

 
Rep Power: 824

im staying outta this one lol