I say the Camaro. Its faster than the Mustang anyways.

Any 1988 to 1994 stock Mustang 5.0 GT can beat any stock 1994-1996 Z28 Camaro. My dad has been working with Mustangs for a long time and he said the 5.0's are faster then people realize. The Mustangs weight much less then Camaro's.

I beg to differ I have beat a few with a v6 sunbird (at the track) they run mid to high 14's stock

you raced a v6 sunbird in 1/4 mile? lmao

yep and ran 14.2 too it was slightly modified

wtf did u have done!?lol

all minor bolt ons (ok and some head work and cam) was a fun car until it got stolen with all my track stuff in it

How can you beg to differ? Check the stats on the 5.0 GT then the stats on the older Z28's. It does also depend on the driver. But in all sense the Mustang is faster.

most of the stats I've ever seen say different. There isn't a tremendous amount of weight difference, and the Camaro's had higher HP ratings.

im gonna say camaro..

just cause..uhm..yeah i shouldn't have to explain..

Arent some of them turbocharged when I was at the junkyard I thougth I saw one or two with turbochargers???


I would say the camaros are faster stock to stock my friend had a 5.0 mustang and sold it and bought a 94 Z28 he says it would smoke his stang.

the turbo ones were junk the 3.1 was rated at 190 hp

right now my stang has the rebuilt 302 motor, cai, flowmaster exhaust,and a new clutch.My 94z has a cai,ported maf sensor,mallory ignition and can tell u right now that my camaro will kill that stang.

Kyle, just thought I'd point this out, in that CarDomain that you've got the 1997 3800 Camaro in, that car isn't an RS. And I'm going to assume you bought the car used, and the previous owner put the 93-96 salad shooters on.

Here's a HP comparison:

http://home.pon.net/hunnicutt/history_mustVScam.htm