Honda Civic - Del Sol - CRX Honda Civic EF, EK,EP, etc , Del Sol, and CRX

honda civic' 00?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-15-2008, 10:04 AM
  #1  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Thread Starter
 
jazzgrl02's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
jazzgrl02 street rep is low. keep going
honda civic' 00?

I'm looking into buying a Honda Civic, any input on a 2000 honda civic?
jazzgrl02 is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 10:17 AM
  #2  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
thewild0ne69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
thewild0ne69 street rep is low. keep going
You should prolly look into the '01 and newer civics, as they have a newer body style. The 2000 down to about '93 look very similiar and old.































But they are decent cars with great mpg!
thewild0ne69 is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 10:35 AM
  #3  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Keuno's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Keuno street rep is low. keep going
I would look for a newer honda civic. Even now the new 2008 honda civic aren't that much and extrememly cheap compared to other new cars. There about $16,000 and they hold their value extremely well.. Honda civic is a really good choice for a car. Great Gas Milage too
Keuno is offline  
Old 06-19-2008, 02:35 AM
  #4  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Rays_EK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 114
Rep Power: 611
Rays_EK street rep is low. keep going
i suggest going for the 2003-2006 model of civic's , they are sporty and have the power also aren't too expensive:righton
Rays_EK is offline  
Old 06-24-2008, 04:42 PM
  #5  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
thetunersource's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 0
thetunersource street rep is low. keep going
id rather have a 2000 civic si than any out right now...
thetunersource is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 PM.

Page generated in 0.07292 seconds with 13 queries