GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks.

GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks. (https://www.gtcarz.com/)
-   Honda Mailing List (https://www.gtcarz.com/honda-mailing-list-327/)
-   -   2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto (https://www.gtcarz.com/honda-mailing-list-327/2004-accord-4-cyl-5-spd-auto-277339/)

Brian Smith 01-26-2004 07:31 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 

"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
>
> 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.


You're kidding? I have a '01 V6 Accord (auto), and I get (summer months)
between 38 and 42 mpg highway.

--
Brian
www.accesswave.ca/~orion







Brian Smith 01-26-2004 07:31 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 

"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
>
> 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.


You're kidding? I have a '01 V6 Accord (auto), and I get (summer months)
between 38 and 42 mpg highway.

--
Brian
www.accesswave.ca/~orion







Randolph 01-26-2004 07:56 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 
>
> 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.


Nah, he is Canadian. They get bigger gallons up there (20.1% bigger to
be precise) 44 mpg Imperial is about 36 mpg US.

Randolph 01-26-2004 07:56 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 
>
> 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.


Nah, he is Canadian. They get bigger gallons up there (20.1% bigger to
be precise) 44 mpg Imperial is about 36 mpg US.

Randolph 01-26-2004 07:56 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 
>
> 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.


Nah, he is Canadian. They get bigger gallons up there (20.1% bigger to
be precise) 44 mpg Imperial is about 36 mpg US.

Randolph 01-26-2004 07:56 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 
>
> 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.


Nah, he is Canadian. They get bigger gallons up there (20.1% bigger to
be precise) 44 mpg Imperial is about 36 mpg US.

LBJGH 01-26-2004 08:15 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 
Hey Ron, to be honest I never test drove the Toyota. The Toyota uses
MacPherson Struts and the Honda uses multilink suspension. Also the Toyota
doesn't come with ABS standard on the 4cyl model like the Honda.

As far as the ride and looks... the Toyota is closer to something my mom
would like. I've always driven smaller cars so I kinda like a firm ride.


"Ron" <Homer@Simpson.com> wrote in message
news:CphRb.17767$P51.16189@clgrps12...
> Just wondering.... why did you not try out a Toyota Camry.... much nicer
> ride than the Accord, better pick up, smoother, far quiter and better
> looking too!
>
> "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back> wrote in message
> news:5XgRb.3700$9Ce1.495@news04.bloor.is.net.cable .rogers.com...
> > Well, did some test drives...
> >
> > Well I had a chance to drive a few vehicles today.
> >
> > 1. Subaru Impreza TS Wagon (auto)- Nice enough but quite gutless

> considering
> > it is supposed to be 165hp.
> >
> > 2. Subaru Impreza WRX (std) - OMFG! This is one VERY fast car! I just

> can't
> > see spending an extra $12,000 over the non-turbo TS Wagon. Did I mention

> the
> > thing is really fast?
> >
> > 3. Forester Turbo (auto) - seemed a little too tipsy (truck-like) but

wow,
> > lots of go-straight-fast performance with the turbo. Damn thing was

> $37,000!
> > :o Again too much to spend.
> >
> > 4. Acura EL (auto) - I didn't bother test-driving it. I sat inside and

> found
> > it a little too small for our primary family vehicle.
> >
> > 5. Honda Element (auto) - don't ask.... Damn nice utility on the inside,
> > ugly as sin on the outside, terrible driving dynamics (especially with
> > today's cross winds) I went two blocks and took the thing right back to

> the
> > dealer.
> >
> > Which leaves me with the last test drive...
> >
> > 6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4

cyl
> > and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My

> wife
> > actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the

motor
> > wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
> >
> > Now to sign up to the APA, Car Cost Canada or similar organization to

get
> > the real cost of the car to start negotiations.
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004
> >
> >
> >

>
>



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004



LBJGH 01-26-2004 08:15 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 
Hey Ron, to be honest I never test drove the Toyota. The Toyota uses
MacPherson Struts and the Honda uses multilink suspension. Also the Toyota
doesn't come with ABS standard on the 4cyl model like the Honda.

As far as the ride and looks... the Toyota is closer to something my mom
would like. I've always driven smaller cars so I kinda like a firm ride.


"Ron" <Homer@Simpson.com> wrote in message
news:CphRb.17767$P51.16189@clgrps12...
> Just wondering.... why did you not try out a Toyota Camry.... much nicer
> ride than the Accord, better pick up, smoother, far quiter and better
> looking too!
>
> "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back> wrote in message
> news:5XgRb.3700$9Ce1.495@news04.bloor.is.net.cable .rogers.com...
> > Well, did some test drives...
> >
> > Well I had a chance to drive a few vehicles today.
> >
> > 1. Subaru Impreza TS Wagon (auto)- Nice enough but quite gutless

> considering
> > it is supposed to be 165hp.
> >
> > 2. Subaru Impreza WRX (std) - OMFG! This is one VERY fast car! I just

> can't
> > see spending an extra $12,000 over the non-turbo TS Wagon. Did I mention

> the
> > thing is really fast?
> >
> > 3. Forester Turbo (auto) - seemed a little too tipsy (truck-like) but

wow,
> > lots of go-straight-fast performance with the turbo. Damn thing was

> $37,000!
> > :o Again too much to spend.
> >
> > 4. Acura EL (auto) - I didn't bother test-driving it. I sat inside and

> found
> > it a little too small for our primary family vehicle.
> >
> > 5. Honda Element (auto) - don't ask.... Damn nice utility on the inside,
> > ugly as sin on the outside, terrible driving dynamics (especially with
> > today's cross winds) I went two blocks and took the thing right back to

> the
> > dealer.
> >
> > Which leaves me with the last test drive...
> >
> > 6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4

cyl
> > and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My

> wife
> > actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the

motor
> > wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
> >
> > Now to sign up to the APA, Car Cost Canada or similar organization to

get
> > the real cost of the car to start negotiations.
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004
> >
> >
> >

>
>



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004



LBJGH 01-26-2004 08:15 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 
Hey Ron, to be honest I never test drove the Toyota. The Toyota uses
MacPherson Struts and the Honda uses multilink suspension. Also the Toyota
doesn't come with ABS standard on the 4cyl model like the Honda.

As far as the ride and looks... the Toyota is closer to something my mom
would like. I've always driven smaller cars so I kinda like a firm ride.


"Ron" <Homer@Simpson.com> wrote in message
news:CphRb.17767$P51.16189@clgrps12...
> Just wondering.... why did you not try out a Toyota Camry.... much nicer
> ride than the Accord, better pick up, smoother, far quiter and better
> looking too!
>
> "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back> wrote in message
> news:5XgRb.3700$9Ce1.495@news04.bloor.is.net.cable .rogers.com...
> > Well, did some test drives...
> >
> > Well I had a chance to drive a few vehicles today.
> >
> > 1. Subaru Impreza TS Wagon (auto)- Nice enough but quite gutless

> considering
> > it is supposed to be 165hp.
> >
> > 2. Subaru Impreza WRX (std) - OMFG! This is one VERY fast car! I just

> can't
> > see spending an extra $12,000 over the non-turbo TS Wagon. Did I mention

> the
> > thing is really fast?
> >
> > 3. Forester Turbo (auto) - seemed a little too tipsy (truck-like) but

wow,
> > lots of go-straight-fast performance with the turbo. Damn thing was

> $37,000!
> > :o Again too much to spend.
> >
> > 4. Acura EL (auto) - I didn't bother test-driving it. I sat inside and

> found
> > it a little too small for our primary family vehicle.
> >
> > 5. Honda Element (auto) - don't ask.... Damn nice utility on the inside,
> > ugly as sin on the outside, terrible driving dynamics (especially with
> > today's cross winds) I went two blocks and took the thing right back to

> the
> > dealer.
> >
> > Which leaves me with the last test drive...
> >
> > 6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4

cyl
> > and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My

> wife
> > actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the

motor
> > wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
> >
> > Now to sign up to the APA, Car Cost Canada or similar organization to

get
> > the real cost of the car to start negotiations.
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004
> >
> >
> >

>
>



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004



LBJGH 01-26-2004 08:15 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 
Hey Ron, to be honest I never test drove the Toyota. The Toyota uses
MacPherson Struts and the Honda uses multilink suspension. Also the Toyota
doesn't come with ABS standard on the 4cyl model like the Honda.

As far as the ride and looks... the Toyota is closer to something my mom
would like. I've always driven smaller cars so I kinda like a firm ride.


"Ron" <Homer@Simpson.com> wrote in message
news:CphRb.17767$P51.16189@clgrps12...
> Just wondering.... why did you not try out a Toyota Camry.... much nicer
> ride than the Accord, better pick up, smoother, far quiter and better
> looking too!
>
> "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back> wrote in message
> news:5XgRb.3700$9Ce1.495@news04.bloor.is.net.cable .rogers.com...
> > Well, did some test drives...
> >
> > Well I had a chance to drive a few vehicles today.
> >
> > 1. Subaru Impreza TS Wagon (auto)- Nice enough but quite gutless

> considering
> > it is supposed to be 165hp.
> >
> > 2. Subaru Impreza WRX (std) - OMFG! This is one VERY fast car! I just

> can't
> > see spending an extra $12,000 over the non-turbo TS Wagon. Did I mention

> the
> > thing is really fast?
> >
> > 3. Forester Turbo (auto) - seemed a little too tipsy (truck-like) but

wow,
> > lots of go-straight-fast performance with the turbo. Damn thing was

> $37,000!
> > :o Again too much to spend.
> >
> > 4. Acura EL (auto) - I didn't bother test-driving it. I sat inside and

> found
> > it a little too small for our primary family vehicle.
> >
> > 5. Honda Element (auto) - don't ask.... Damn nice utility on the inside,
> > ugly as sin on the outside, terrible driving dynamics (especially with
> > today's cross winds) I went two blocks and took the thing right back to

> the
> > dealer.
> >
> > Which leaves me with the last test drive...
> >
> > 6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4

cyl
> > and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My

> wife
> > actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the

motor
> > wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
> >
> > Now to sign up to the APA, Car Cost Canada or similar organization to

get
> > the real cost of the car to start negotiations.
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004
> >
> >
> >

>
>



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004



LBJGH 01-26-2004 08:17 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 
bingo. 44mpg (imperial) 6.5l/100km = 44mpg


"Randolph" <trash@junkmail.com> wrote in message
news:4015B782.43888FDA@junkmail.com...
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.

>
> Nah, he is Canadian. They get bigger gallons up there (20.1% bigger to
> be precise) 44 mpg Imperial is about 36 mpg US.



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004



LBJGH 01-26-2004 08:17 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 
bingo. 44mpg (imperial) 6.5l/100km = 44mpg


"Randolph" <trash@junkmail.com> wrote in message
news:4015B782.43888FDA@junkmail.com...
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.

>
> Nah, he is Canadian. They get bigger gallons up there (20.1% bigger to
> be precise) 44 mpg Imperial is about 36 mpg US.



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004



LBJGH 01-26-2004 08:17 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 
bingo. 44mpg (imperial) 6.5l/100km = 44mpg


"Randolph" <trash@junkmail.com> wrote in message
news:4015B782.43888FDA@junkmail.com...
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.

>
> Nah, he is Canadian. They get bigger gallons up there (20.1% bigger to
> be precise) 44 mpg Imperial is about 36 mpg US.



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004



LBJGH 01-26-2004 08:17 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 
bingo. 44mpg (imperial) 6.5l/100km = 44mpg


"Randolph" <trash@junkmail.com> wrote in message
news:4015B782.43888FDA@junkmail.com...
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.

>
> Nah, he is Canadian. They get bigger gallons up there (20.1% bigger to
> be precise) 44 mpg Imperial is about 36 mpg US.



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004



Ron 01-26-2004 08:22 PM

Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
 
The accord definatly has a more "sporty" feel to it than the camry, but
typiclly i thought that accord buyers were looking for luxery, not something
sporty, and i thought the camry was more luxuries.... in any case, both are
awsome cars

"LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back> wrote in message
news:2ZiRb.6817$fgk.1373@news01.bloor.is.net.cable .rogers.com...
> Hey Ron, to be honest I never test drove the Toyota. The Toyota uses
> MacPherson Struts and the Honda uses multilink suspension. Also the

Toyota
> doesn't come with ABS standard on the 4cyl model like the Honda.
>
> As far as the ride and looks... the Toyota is closer to something my mom
> would like. I've always driven smaller cars so I kinda like a firm ride.
>
>
> "Ron" <Homer@Simpson.com> wrote in message
> news:CphRb.17767$P51.16189@clgrps12...
> > Just wondering.... why did you not try out a Toyota Camry.... much nicer
> > ride than the Accord, better pick up, smoother, far quiter and better
> > looking too!
> >
> > "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back> wrote in message
> > news:5XgRb.3700$9Ce1.495@news04.bloor.is.net.cable .rogers.com...
> > > Well, did some test drives...
> > >
> > > Well I had a chance to drive a few vehicles today.
> > >
> > > 1. Subaru Impreza TS Wagon (auto)- Nice enough but quite gutless

> > considering
> > > it is supposed to be 165hp.
> > >
> > > 2. Subaru Impreza WRX (std) - OMFG! This is one VERY fast car! I just

> > can't
> > > see spending an extra $12,000 over the non-turbo TS Wagon. Did I

mention
> > the
> > > thing is really fast?
> > >
> > > 3. Forester Turbo (auto) - seemed a little too tipsy (truck-like) but

> wow,
> > > lots of go-straight-fast performance with the turbo. Damn thing was

> > $37,000!
> > > :o Again too much to spend.
> > >
> > > 4. Acura EL (auto) - I didn't bother test-driving it. I sat inside and

> > found
> > > it a little too small for our primary family vehicle.
> > >
> > > 5. Honda Element (auto) - don't ask.... Damn nice utility on the

inside,
> > > ugly as sin on the outside, terrible driving dynamics (especially with
> > > today's cross winds) I went two blocks and took the thing right back

to
> > the
> > > dealer.
> > >
> > > Which leaves me with the last test drive...
> > >
> > > 6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4

> cyl
> > > and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold!

My
> > wife
> > > actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the

> motor
> > > wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
> > >
> > > Now to sign up to the APA, Car Cost Canada or similar organization to

> get
> > > the real cost of the car to start negotiations.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > > Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004
> > >
> > >
> > >

> >
> >

>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004
>
>





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:01 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.09741 seconds with 5 queries