Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was test
driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway, stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't need to down shift at all. In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004 CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the CR-V was heavier? (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.) I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space. After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change. - Dave "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com... > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back> > wrote: > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4 cyl > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My wife > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too. > > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway. > > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty > (mph) without any fuss at all. > > J. > |
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was test
driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway, stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't need to down shift at all. In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004 CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the CR-V was heavier? (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.) I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space. After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change. - Dave "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com... > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back> > wrote: > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4 cyl > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My wife > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too. > > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway. > > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty > (mph) without any fuss at all. > > J. > |
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was test
driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway, stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't need to down shift at all. In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004 CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the CR-V was heavier? (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.) I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space. After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change. - Dave "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com... > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back> > wrote: > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4 cyl > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My wife > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too. > > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway. > > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty > (mph) without any fuss at all. > > J. > |
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was test
driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway, stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't need to down shift at all. In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004 CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the CR-V was heavier? (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.) I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space. After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change. - Dave "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com... > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back> > wrote: > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4 cyl > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My wife > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too. > > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway. > > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty > (mph) without any fuss at all. > > J. > |
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
Maybe the 5 speed Automatic tanny...
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote in message news:ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.c om... > I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was test > driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway, > stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't > need to down shift at all. > > In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine > immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004 > CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same > engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the > CR-V was heavier? > > (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder > if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.) > > I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space. > After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change. > > - Dave > > > > "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message > news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com... > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back> > > wrote: > > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4 > cyl > > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My > wife > > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor > > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too. > > > > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway. > > > > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty > > (mph) without any fuss at all. > > > > J. > > > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004 |
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
Maybe the 5 speed Automatic tanny...
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote in message news:ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.c om... > I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was test > driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway, > stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't > need to down shift at all. > > In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine > immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004 > CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same > engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the > CR-V was heavier? > > (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder > if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.) > > I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space. > After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change. > > - Dave > > > > "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message > news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com... > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back> > > wrote: > > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4 > cyl > > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My > wife > > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor > > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too. > > > > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway. > > > > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty > > (mph) without any fuss at all. > > > > J. > > > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004 |
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
Maybe the 5 speed Automatic tanny...
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote in message news:ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.c om... > I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was test > driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway, > stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't > need to down shift at all. > > In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine > immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004 > CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same > engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the > CR-V was heavier? > > (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder > if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.) > > I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space. > After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change. > > - Dave > > > > "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message > news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com... > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back> > > wrote: > > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4 > cyl > > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My > wife > > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor > > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too. > > > > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway. > > > > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty > > (mph) without any fuss at all. > > > > J. > > > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004 |
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
Maybe the 5 speed Automatic tanny...
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote in message news:ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.c om... > I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was test > driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway, > stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't > need to down shift at all. > > In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine > immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004 > CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same > engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the > CR-V was heavier? > > (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder > if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.) > > I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space. > After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change. > > - Dave > > > > "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message > news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com... > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back> > > wrote: > > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4 > cyl > > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My > wife > > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor > > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too. > > > > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway. > > > > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty > > (mph) without any fuss at all. > > > > J. > > > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004 |
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
In article <ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com >,
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote: > (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder > if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.) No. The Pilot/Odyssey/MDX share a 3.5 liter engine, while the new Accord V6 engine is 3.0 liters. |
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
In article <ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com >,
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote: > (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder > if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.) No. The Pilot/Odyssey/MDX share a 3.5 liter engine, while the new Accord V6 engine is 3.0 liters. |
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
In article <ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com >,
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote: > (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder > if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.) No. The Pilot/Odyssey/MDX share a 3.5 liter engine, while the new Accord V6 engine is 3.0 liters. |
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
In article <ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com >,
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote: > (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder > if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.) No. The Pilot/Odyssey/MDX share a 3.5 liter engine, while the new Accord V6 engine is 3.0 liters. |
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
"Brian Smith" <Halifax@NovaScotia.Canada> wrote in message news:ijiRb.4543$Ja2.55262@nnrp1.uunet.ca... > > "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message > news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com... > > > > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway. > > You're kidding? I have a '01 V6 Accord (auto), and I get (summer months) > between 38 and 42 mpg highway. Thanks to those Imperial Gallons I assume. |
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
"Brian Smith" <Halifax@NovaScotia.Canada> wrote in message news:ijiRb.4543$Ja2.55262@nnrp1.uunet.ca... > > "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message > news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com... > > > > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway. > > You're kidding? I have a '01 V6 Accord (auto), and I get (summer months) > between 38 and 42 mpg highway. Thanks to those Imperial Gallons I assume. |
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
"Brian Smith" <Halifax@NovaScotia.Canada> wrote in message news:ijiRb.4543$Ja2.55262@nnrp1.uunet.ca... > > "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message > news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com... > > > > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway. > > You're kidding? I have a '01 V6 Accord (auto), and I get (summer months) > between 38 and 42 mpg highway. Thanks to those Imperial Gallons I assume. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands