2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
01-26-2004, 09:13 PM
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was test
driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
need to down shift at all.
In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004
CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the
CR-V was heavier?
(I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change.
- Dave
"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> wrote:
> >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
cyl
> >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
wife
> >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor
> >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
>
> 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
>
> But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> (mph) without any fuss at all.
>
> J.
>
driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
need to down shift at all.
In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004
CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the
CR-V was heavier?
(I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change.
- Dave
"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> wrote:
> >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
cyl
> >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
wife
> >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor
> >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
>
> 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
>
> But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> (mph) without any fuss at all.
>
> J.
>
01-26-2004, 09:13 PM
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was test
driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
need to down shift at all.
In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004
CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the
CR-V was heavier?
(I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change.
- Dave
"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> wrote:
> >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
cyl
> >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
wife
> >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor
> >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
>
> 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
>
> But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> (mph) without any fuss at all.
>
> J.
>
driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
need to down shift at all.
In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004
CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the
CR-V was heavier?
(I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change.
- Dave
"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> wrote:
> >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
cyl
> >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
wife
> >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor
> >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
>
> 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
>
> But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> (mph) without any fuss at all.
>
> J.
>
01-26-2004, 09:13 PM
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was test
driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
need to down shift at all.
In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004
CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the
CR-V was heavier?
(I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change.
- Dave
"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> wrote:
> >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
cyl
> >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
wife
> >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor
> >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
>
> 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
>
> But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> (mph) without any fuss at all.
>
> J.
>
driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
need to down shift at all.
In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004
CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the
CR-V was heavier?
(I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change.
- Dave
"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> wrote:
> >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
cyl
> >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
wife
> >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor
> >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
>
> 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
>
> But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> (mph) without any fuss at all.
>
> J.
>
01-26-2004, 09:13 PM
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was test
driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
need to down shift at all.
In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004
CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the
CR-V was heavier?
(I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change.
- Dave
"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> wrote:
> >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
cyl
> >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
wife
> >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor
> >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
>
> 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
>
> But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> (mph) without any fuss at all.
>
> J.
>
driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
need to down shift at all.
In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The 2004
CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe the
CR-V was heavier?
(I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a change.
- Dave
"JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> wrote:
> >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
cyl
> >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
wife
> >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the motor
> >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
>
> 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
>
> But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> (mph) without any fuss at all.
>
> J.
>
01-26-2004, 09:18 PM
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
Maybe the 5 speed Automatic tanny...
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote
in message news:ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.c om...
> I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was
test
> driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
> stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
> need to down shift at all.
>
> In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
> immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The
2004
> CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
> engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe
the
> CR-V was heavier?
>
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
>
> I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
> After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a
change.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
> news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> > wrote:
> > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
> cyl
> > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
> wife
> > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the
motor
> > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
> >
> > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> > (mph) without any fuss at all.
> >
> > J.
> >
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote
in message news:ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.c om...
> I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was
test
> driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
> stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
> need to down shift at all.
>
> In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
> immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The
2004
> CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
> engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe
the
> CR-V was heavier?
>
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
>
> I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
> After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a
change.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
> news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> > wrote:
> > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
> cyl
> > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
> wife
> > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the
motor
> > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
> >
> > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> > (mph) without any fuss at all.
> >
> > J.
> >
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004
01-26-2004, 09:18 PM
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
Maybe the 5 speed Automatic tanny...
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote
in message news:ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.c om...
> I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was
test
> driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
> stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
> need to down shift at all.
>
> In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
> immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The
2004
> CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
> engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe
the
> CR-V was heavier?
>
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
>
> I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
> After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a
change.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
> news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> > wrote:
> > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
> cyl
> > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
> wife
> > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the
motor
> > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
> >
> > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> > (mph) without any fuss at all.
> >
> > J.
> >
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote
in message news:ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.c om...
> I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was
test
> driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
> stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
> need to down shift at all.
>
> In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
> immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The
2004
> CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
> engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe
the
> CR-V was heavier?
>
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
>
> I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
> After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a
change.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
> news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> > wrote:
> > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
> cyl
> > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
> wife
> > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the
motor
> > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
> >
> > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> > (mph) without any fuss at all.
> >
> > J.
> >
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004
01-26-2004, 09:18 PM
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
Maybe the 5 speed Automatic tanny...
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote
in message news:ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.c om...
> I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was
test
> driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
> stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
> need to down shift at all.
>
> In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
> immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The
2004
> CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
> engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe
the
> CR-V was heavier?
>
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
>
> I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
> After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a
change.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
> news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> > wrote:
> > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
> cyl
> > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
> wife
> > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the
motor
> > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
> >
> > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> > (mph) without any fuss at all.
> >
> > J.
> >
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote
in message news:ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.c om...
> I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was
test
> driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
> stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
> need to down shift at all.
>
> In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
> immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The
2004
> CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
> engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe
the
> CR-V was heavier?
>
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
>
> I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
> After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a
change.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
> news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> > wrote:
> > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
> cyl
> > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
> wife
> > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the
motor
> > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
> >
> > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> > (mph) without any fuss at all.
> >
> > J.
> >
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004
01-26-2004, 09:18 PM
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
Maybe the 5 speed Automatic tanny...
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote
in message news:ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.c om...
> I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was
test
> driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
> stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
> need to down shift at all.
>
> In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
> immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The
2004
> CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
> engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe
the
> CR-V was heavier?
>
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
>
> I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
> After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a
change.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
> news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> > wrote:
> > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
> cyl
> > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
> wife
> > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the
motor
> > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
> >
> > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> > (mph) without any fuss at all.
> >
> > J.
> >
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam> wrote
in message news:ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.c om...
> I totally agree that the 2004 Accord engine is smooth and quick. I was
test
> driving the automatic version several weeks ago, was entering a highway,
> stepped on the gas to accelerate from 45mph to 70mph and the engine didn't
> need to down shift at all.
>
> In comparison, I did the same with the 2004 CR-V EX, and the engine
> immediately down-shifted when I stepped on the gas to accelerate. The
2004
> CR-V engine was also rated at 160hp 4-cylinder. I thought it was the same
> engine as the Accord. I wonder why the performance was different, maybe
the
> CR-V was heavier?
>
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
>
> I ended up buying the CR-V anyways, not for the engine, but for the space.
> After driving my '91 Accord for so many years, I wanted an SUV for a
change.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
> news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:57:05 GMT, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> > wrote:
> > >6. Honda Accord (auto) - Wow, what an impressive car to drive. 160hp 4
> cyl
> > >and 5-speed automatic. The car was smooth, quick, quiet... I'm sold! My
> wife
> > >actually did 30km/hr above the average speed on highway 400 and the
motor
> > >wasn't even breathing hard. Rated at 44mpg on the highway too.
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
> >
> > But you're right, it is smooth, quick, and quiet, zips zero to eighty
> > (mph) without any fuss at all.
> >
> > J.
> >
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 01/24/2004
01-26-2004, 09:46 PM
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
In article <ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com >,
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam>
wrote:
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
No. The Pilot/Odyssey/MDX share a 3.5 liter engine, while the new
Accord V6 engine is 3.0 liters.
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam>
wrote:
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
No. The Pilot/Odyssey/MDX share a 3.5 liter engine, while the new
Accord V6 engine is 3.0 liters.
01-26-2004, 09:46 PM
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
In article <ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com >,
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam>
wrote:
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
No. The Pilot/Odyssey/MDX share a 3.5 liter engine, while the new
Accord V6 engine is 3.0 liters.
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam>
wrote:
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
No. The Pilot/Odyssey/MDX share a 3.5 liter engine, while the new
Accord V6 engine is 3.0 liters.
01-26-2004, 09:46 PM
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
In article <ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com >,
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam>
wrote:
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
No. The Pilot/Odyssey/MDX share a 3.5 liter engine, while the new
Accord V6 engine is 3.0 liters.
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam>
wrote:
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
No. The Pilot/Odyssey/MDX share a 3.5 liter engine, while the new
Accord V6 engine is 3.0 liters.
01-26-2004, 09:46 PM
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
In article <ROjRb.16626$tx.14848@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com >,
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam>
wrote:
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
No. The Pilot/Odyssey/MDX share a 3.5 liter engine, while the new
Accord V6 engine is 3.0 liters.
"Dave Hau" <nospam_dave_nospam_123@nospam_netscape_nospam.net _nospam>
wrote:
> (I also noticed that the 2004 Honda Pilot has a 240hp V6 engine. I wonder
> if that's the same engine as the Accord V6 which is also 240hp.)
No. The Pilot/Odyssey/MDX share a 3.5 liter engine, while the new
Accord V6 engine is 3.0 liters.
02-06-2004, 02:41 AM
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
"Brian Smith" <Halifax@NovaScotia.Canada> wrote in message
news:ijiRb.4543$Ja2.55262@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
>
> "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
> news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
>
> You're kidding? I have a '01 V6 Accord (auto), and I get (summer months)
> between 38 and 42 mpg highway.
Thanks to those Imperial Gallons I assume.
02-06-2004, 02:41 AM
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
"Brian Smith" <Halifax@NovaScotia.Canada> wrote in message
news:ijiRb.4543$Ja2.55262@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
>
> "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
> news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
>
> You're kidding? I have a '01 V6 Accord (auto), and I get (summer months)
> between 38 and 42 mpg highway.
Thanks to those Imperial Gallons I assume.
02-06-2004, 02:41 AM
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 Accord 4 cyl & 5 spd Auto
"Brian Smith" <Halifax@NovaScotia.Canada> wrote in message
news:ijiRb.4543$Ja2.55262@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
>
> "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
> news:vjbb10pnu3j7fkm70m7rsqj4bs0aa53@4ax.com...
> >
> > 44kpg? I think it's 34mpg highway.
>
> You're kidding? I have a '01 V6 Accord (auto), and I get (summer months)
> between 38 and 42 mpg highway.
Thanks to those Imperial Gallons I assume.
