91 civic crank angle senor
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
> 1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
> 2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
> 3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
> fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
> check wiring & connectors.
> 1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
> 2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
> 3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
> fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
> check wiring & connectors.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
> 1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
> 2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
> 3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
> fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
> check wiring & connectors.
> 1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
> 2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
> 3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
> fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
> check wiring & connectors.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
> 1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
> 2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
> 3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
> fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
> check wiring & connectors.
> 1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
> 2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
> 3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
> fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
> check wiring & connectors.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
Burt wrote:
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
>
>
>>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
>>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
>
>
> You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
whatever you bought a month ago.
>
>
>>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
>>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
>> check wiring & connectors.
>
>
>
>
>
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
>
>
>>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
>>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
>
>
> You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
whatever you bought a month ago.
>
>
>>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
>>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
>> check wiring & connectors.
>
>
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
Burt wrote:
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
>
>
>>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
>>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
>
>
> You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
whatever you bought a month ago.
>
>
>>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
>>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
>> check wiring & connectors.
>
>
>
>
>
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
>
>
>>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
>>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
>
>
> You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
whatever you bought a month ago.
>
>
>>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
>>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
>> check wiring & connectors.
>
>
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
Burt wrote:
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
>
>
>>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
>>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
>
>
> You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
whatever you bought a month ago.
>
>
>>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
>>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
>> check wiring & connectors.
>
>
>
>
>
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
>
>
>>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
>>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
>
>
> You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
whatever you bought a month ago.
>
>
>>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
>>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
>> check wiring & connectors.
>
>
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
Burt wrote:
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
>
>
>>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
>>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
>
>
> You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
whatever you bought a month ago.
>
>
>>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
>>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
>> check wiring & connectors.
>
>
>
>
>
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
>
>
>>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
>>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
>
>
> You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
whatever you bought a month ago.
>
>
>>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
>>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
>> check wiring & connectors.
>
>
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
don't know if this'll get buried anyway in the forum. thought i'd give
a follow up.
took my distributer to napa tonight for warranty replacement. i bought
it last year, june 17th. five days left on that one! can you say
LUCK?
the guy at napa made no hassle whatsoever. he knows me probably a
little too well.
got home, threw in the new dist. car started right up. went for a
test drive after clearing ECU. drove for at least 15 minutes and
everything seemed fine. i was doubtful the dist was faulty (i'm pretty
skeptical after all the s**t i've been thru with cars), but figured
what the heck. she ran fine. i think the timing was a tad off, but
that can wait.
so keep your fingers crossed for me! this car just dodged a bullet by
five days. if the warranty had expired it would've gone to the junk
yard.
thanks to all.
jim beam wrote:
> Burt wrote:
> > "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
> >
> >
> >>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
> >>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
> >
> >
> > You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
>
> whatever you bought a month ago.
>
> >
> >
> >>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
> >>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
> >> check wiring & connectors.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
a follow up.
took my distributer to napa tonight for warranty replacement. i bought
it last year, june 17th. five days left on that one! can you say
LUCK?
the guy at napa made no hassle whatsoever. he knows me probably a
little too well.
got home, threw in the new dist. car started right up. went for a
test drive after clearing ECU. drove for at least 15 minutes and
everything seemed fine. i was doubtful the dist was faulty (i'm pretty
skeptical after all the s**t i've been thru with cars), but figured
what the heck. she ran fine. i think the timing was a tad off, but
that can wait.
so keep your fingers crossed for me! this car just dodged a bullet by
five days. if the warranty had expired it would've gone to the junk
yard.
thanks to all.
jim beam wrote:
> Burt wrote:
> > "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
> >
> >
> >>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
> >>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
> >
> >
> > You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
>
> whatever you bought a month ago.
>
> >
> >
> >>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
> >>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
> >> check wiring & connectors.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
don't know if this'll get buried anyway in the forum. thought i'd give
a follow up.
took my distributer to napa tonight for warranty replacement. i bought
it last year, june 17th. five days left on that one! can you say
LUCK?
the guy at napa made no hassle whatsoever. he knows me probably a
little too well.
got home, threw in the new dist. car started right up. went for a
test drive after clearing ECU. drove for at least 15 minutes and
everything seemed fine. i was doubtful the dist was faulty (i'm pretty
skeptical after all the s**t i've been thru with cars), but figured
what the heck. she ran fine. i think the timing was a tad off, but
that can wait.
so keep your fingers crossed for me! this car just dodged a bullet by
five days. if the warranty had expired it would've gone to the junk
yard.
thanks to all.
jim beam wrote:
> Burt wrote:
> > "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
> >
> >
> >>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
> >>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
> >
> >
> > You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
>
> whatever you bought a month ago.
>
> >
> >
> >>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
> >>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
> >> check wiring & connectors.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
a follow up.
took my distributer to napa tonight for warranty replacement. i bought
it last year, june 17th. five days left on that one! can you say
LUCK?
the guy at napa made no hassle whatsoever. he knows me probably a
little too well.
got home, threw in the new dist. car started right up. went for a
test drive after clearing ECU. drove for at least 15 minutes and
everything seemed fine. i was doubtful the dist was faulty (i'm pretty
skeptical after all the s**t i've been thru with cars), but figured
what the heck. she ran fine. i think the timing was a tad off, but
that can wait.
so keep your fingers crossed for me! this car just dodged a bullet by
five days. if the warranty had expired it would've gone to the junk
yard.
thanks to all.
jim beam wrote:
> Burt wrote:
> > "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
> >
> >
> >>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
> >>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
> >
> >
> > You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
>
> whatever you bought a month ago.
>
> >
> >
> >>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
> >>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
> >> check wiring & connectors.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 91 civic crank angle senor
don't know if this'll get buried anyway in the forum. thought i'd give
a follow up.
took my distributer to napa tonight for warranty replacement. i bought
it last year, june 17th. five days left on that one! can you say
LUCK?
the guy at napa made no hassle whatsoever. he knows me probably a
little too well.
got home, threw in the new dist. car started right up. went for a
test drive after clearing ECU. drove for at least 15 minutes and
everything seemed fine. i was doubtful the dist was faulty (i'm pretty
skeptical after all the s**t i've been thru with cars), but figured
what the heck. she ran fine. i think the timing was a tad off, but
that can wait.
so keep your fingers crossed for me! this car just dodged a bullet by
five days. if the warranty had expired it would've gone to the junk
yard.
thanks to all.
jim beam wrote:
> Burt wrote:
> > "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
> >
> >
> >>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
> >>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
> >
> >
> > You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
>
> whatever you bought a month ago.
>
> >
> >
> >>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
> >>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
> >> check wiring & connectors.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
a follow up.
took my distributer to napa tonight for warranty replacement. i bought
it last year, june 17th. five days left on that one! can you say
LUCK?
the guy at napa made no hassle whatsoever. he knows me probably a
little too well.
got home, threw in the new dist. car started right up. went for a
test drive after clearing ECU. drove for at least 15 minutes and
everything seemed fine. i was doubtful the dist was faulty (i'm pretty
skeptical after all the s**t i've been thru with cars), but figured
what the heck. she ran fine. i think the timing was a tad off, but
that can wait.
so keep your fingers crossed for me! this car just dodged a bullet by
five days. if the warranty had expired it would've gone to the junk
yard.
thanks to all.
jim beam wrote:
> Burt wrote:
> > "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote
> >
> >
> >>1. consider returning the distributor under warranty.
> >>2. just the sensor cannot be replaced, you have to do the whole unit.
> >
> >
> > You mean just the distributor sub-assembly.
>
> whatever you bought a month ago.
>
> >
> >
> >>3. ecu's are oh so very rarely defective. you can probably count on the
> >>fingers of one hand the number of them that are genuinely bad each year.
> >> check wiring & connectors.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)