Test drive them.

<vze33sg4@mail.verizon.net> wrote in message
news:3F972D29.5B66FBE9@mail.verizon.net...
> I know this is a Honda forum , but , I have a 1992 Accord.I've been
> offered a "93 Camry....As far as reliability which would be the
> best?..both have been maintained thru the years and mileage is very
> close....comments?
>

 

Test drive them.

<vze33sg4@mail.verizon.net> wrote in message
news:3F972D29.5B66FBE9@mail.verizon.net...
> I know this is a Honda forum , but , I have a 1992 Accord.I've been
> offered a "93 Camry....As far as reliability which would be the
> best?..both have been maintained thru the years and mileage is very
> close....comments?
>

 

Test drive them.

<vze33sg4@mail.verizon.net> wrote in message
news:3F972D29.5B66FBE9@mail.verizon.net...
> I know this is a Honda forum , but , I have a 1992 Accord.I've been
> offered a "93 Camry....As far as reliability which would be the
> best?..both have been maintained thru the years and mileage is very
> close....comments?
>

 

i would definately stick with your camry. Having worked for toyota and now
for honda i believe your honda will last longer and have less problems in
the years to come. The problem with that year camry is the oil ports. they
were made too small so if you (or the person who owned it before) don't
change the oil religiously every 3,000 miles, the ports will clog up due to
sludge and then goodbye engine. By the way I own a 92 accord with 140k on it
and it still purrs like a kitten.
<vze33sg4@mail.verizon.net> wrote in message
news:3F972D29.5B66FBE9@mail.verizon.net...
> I know this is a Honda forum , but , I have a 1992 Accord.I've been
> offered a "93 Camry....As far as reliability which would be the
> best?..both have been maintained thru the years and mileage is very
> close....comments?
>

 

i would definately stick with your camry. Having worked for toyota and now
for honda i believe your honda will last longer and have less problems in
the years to come. The problem with that year camry is the oil ports. they
were made too small so if you (or the person who owned it before) don't
change the oil religiously every 3,000 miles, the ports will clog up due to
sludge and then goodbye engine. By the way I own a 92 accord with 140k on it
and it still purrs like a kitten.
<vze33sg4@mail.verizon.net> wrote in message
news:3F972D29.5B66FBE9@mail.verizon.net...
> I know this is a Honda forum , but , I have a 1992 Accord.I've been
> offered a "93 Camry....As far as reliability which would be the
> best?..both have been maintained thru the years and mileage is very
> close....comments?
>

 

i would definately stick with your camry. Having worked for toyota and now
for honda i believe your honda will last longer and have less problems in
the years to come. The problem with that year camry is the oil ports. they
were made too small so if you (or the person who owned it before) don't
change the oil religiously every 3,000 miles, the ports will clog up due to
sludge and then goodbye engine. By the way I own a 92 accord with 140k on it
and it still purrs like a kitten.
<vze33sg4@mail.verizon.net> wrote in message
news:3F972D29.5B66FBE9@mail.verizon.net...
> I know this is a Honda forum , but , I have a 1992 Accord.I've been
> offered a "93 Camry....As far as reliability which would be the
> best?..both have been maintained thru the years and mileage is very
> close....comments?
>

 

i would definately stick with your camry. Having worked for toyota and now
for honda i believe your honda will last longer and have less problems in
the years to come. The problem with that year camry is the oil ports. they
were made too small so if you (or the person who owned it before) don't
change the oil religiously every 3,000 miles, the ports will clog up due to
sludge and then goodbye engine. By the way I own a 92 accord with 140k on it
and it still purrs like a kitten.
<vze33sg4@mail.verizon.net> wrote in message
news:3F972D29.5B66FBE9@mail.verizon.net...
> I know this is a Honda forum , but , I have a 1992 Accord.I've been
> offered a "93 Camry....As far as reliability which would be the
> best?..both have been maintained thru the years and mileage is very
> close....comments?
>