GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks.

GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks. (https://www.gtcarz.com/)
-   Honda Mailing List (https://www.gtcarz.com/honda-mailing-list-327/)
-   -   Accord LX seat belt signal hassle (https://www.gtcarz.com/honda-mailing-list-327/accord-lx-seat-belt-signal-hassle-287443/)

LBJGH 12-09-2004 06:18 PM

Re: Accord LX seat belt signal hassle
 
Ron, I found that video if you want to watch it...

http://members.rogers.com/5555/seatbelt.wmv



Ron 12-11-2004 09:53 AM

Re: Accord LX seat belt signal hassle
 
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 13:24:05 GMT, Dave Kelsen
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>On 12/8/2004 8:40 AM Ron spake these words of knowledge:
>
>> On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 12:41:28 GMT, Dave Kelsen
>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On 12/7/2004 8:58 PM Ron spake these words of knowledge:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 23:21:28 GMT, "Net-Doctor"
>>>> <bgreene1@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On the other hand Ron, I have to admit to being guilty as well. I have
>>>>>held off buying a new mower, partly because I couldn't stand it if the motor
>>>>>died everytime I let go of that stupid handle thing. In my mind, THAT would
>>>>>be annoying. I think I would probably wrap it with a cable tie on day one.
>>>>
>>>> ...as many users do. Personally, I prefer the blade to stop, so
>>>> bought a Honda mower with a blade clutch. Rather than cut the
>>>> engine, it disengages the blade. Offers better safety, too, since
>>>> the blade stops in about 1 Second, vs. 2 or 3 Seconds for the type
>>>> that cuts the engine.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, this has nothing to do with the Honda (car, not mower)
>>>> seat belt switch. I am not seeking to disable the belt, just to stop
>>>> the annoying beep. The beeping 'feature' has NOTHING to do with
>>>> safety. If anything, it reduces safety, by irritating the driver.
>>>>
>>>> Havr a nice day,
>>>>
>>>> -- Ron
>>>
>>>That's simply disingenuous. If you're using the seatbelt properly
>>>(which certainly does have something to do with safety), there *is* no
>>>beeping feature.

>>
>> But when I am not, there *is* a beep, that adds nothing to safety
>> and, if fact, may detract from it.
>>
>> Suppose that, if you did not use the belt, a club would come out and
>> hit you on the head, once every 30 seconds. Would *that* be a
>> 'safety feature?
>>
>> The seat belt is a safety feature. The beep is not.
>>
>> -- Ron

>
>The lamp that comes on when your oil pressure is low has nothing to do
>with your engine running properly. Oil pressure is required. The lamp
>is not.
>
>The flashing dash lights that tell you when your turn signals are on
>have nothing to do with the complying with law. The turn signals are
>legally required. The inside indicators are not.
>
>The ... I could go on, but the fact is that you're wrong, in every
>meaningful way. You are correct in only a narrow semantic interpretation.
>
>But of course, I recognize your right to be wrong. I recognize your
>right to not use seatbelts. As a motorcyclist for just over 30 years
>now, I recognize an individual's right to abstain from wearing a helmet.
>
>It's just stupid; people have a right to be stupid. That's how we get
>competitors for the Darwin awards...
>
>
>RFT!!!
>Dave Kelsen


LOL...

You fail to comrehend an argument, then provide a a series of
non-sequitur examples to prove it...

You characterize anyone that disagrees with you as wrong, then call
them stupid...

Smart, Dave. Very smant.


Ron 12-11-2004 09:53 AM

Re: Accord LX seat belt signal hassle
 
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 13:24:05 GMT, Dave Kelsen
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>On 12/8/2004 8:40 AM Ron spake these words of knowledge:
>
>> On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 12:41:28 GMT, Dave Kelsen
>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On 12/7/2004 8:58 PM Ron spake these words of knowledge:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 23:21:28 GMT, "Net-Doctor"
>>>> <bgreene1@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On the other hand Ron, I have to admit to being guilty as well. I have
>>>>>held off buying a new mower, partly because I couldn't stand it if the motor
>>>>>died everytime I let go of that stupid handle thing. In my mind, THAT would
>>>>>be annoying. I think I would probably wrap it with a cable tie on day one.
>>>>
>>>> ...as many users do. Personally, I prefer the blade to stop, so
>>>> bought a Honda mower with a blade clutch. Rather than cut the
>>>> engine, it disengages the blade. Offers better safety, too, since
>>>> the blade stops in about 1 Second, vs. 2 or 3 Seconds for the type
>>>> that cuts the engine.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, this has nothing to do with the Honda (car, not mower)
>>>> seat belt switch. I am not seeking to disable the belt, just to stop
>>>> the annoying beep. The beeping 'feature' has NOTHING to do with
>>>> safety. If anything, it reduces safety, by irritating the driver.
>>>>
>>>> Havr a nice day,
>>>>
>>>> -- Ron
>>>
>>>That's simply disingenuous. If you're using the seatbelt properly
>>>(which certainly does have something to do with safety), there *is* no
>>>beeping feature.

>>
>> But when I am not, there *is* a beep, that adds nothing to safety
>> and, if fact, may detract from it.
>>
>> Suppose that, if you did not use the belt, a club would come out and
>> hit you on the head, once every 30 seconds. Would *that* be a
>> 'safety feature?
>>
>> The seat belt is a safety feature. The beep is not.
>>
>> -- Ron

>
>The lamp that comes on when your oil pressure is low has nothing to do
>with your engine running properly. Oil pressure is required. The lamp
>is not.
>
>The flashing dash lights that tell you when your turn signals are on
>have nothing to do with the complying with law. The turn signals are
>legally required. The inside indicators are not.
>
>The ... I could go on, but the fact is that you're wrong, in every
>meaningful way. You are correct in only a narrow semantic interpretation.
>
>But of course, I recognize your right to be wrong. I recognize your
>right to not use seatbelts. As a motorcyclist for just over 30 years
>now, I recognize an individual's right to abstain from wearing a helmet.
>
>It's just stupid; people have a right to be stupid. That's how we get
>competitors for the Darwin awards...
>
>
>RFT!!!
>Dave Kelsen


LOL...

You fail to comrehend an argument, then provide a a series of
non-sequitur examples to prove it...

You characterize anyone that disagrees with you as wrong, then call
them stupid...

Smart, Dave. Very smant.


Ron 12-11-2004 10:29 AM

Re: Accord LX seat belt signal hassle
 
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:18:44 -0500, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
wrote:

>Ron, I found that video if you want to watch it...
>
>http://members.rogers.com/5555/seatbelt.wmv
>


Thanks.

This shows a driver hurled into the passenger seat, then the back
seat, followingt a very high speed collission. In that particular
situation, a seat belt would have been beneficial.

This does does not apply when driving forward, at very low speed,
frequently stopping and getting out of the car.

-- Ron


Ron 12-11-2004 10:29 AM

Re: Accord LX seat belt signal hassle
 
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:18:44 -0500, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
wrote:

>Ron, I found that video if you want to watch it...
>
>http://members.rogers.com/5555/seatbelt.wmv
>


Thanks.

This shows a driver hurled into the passenger seat, then the back
seat, followingt a very high speed collission. In that particular
situation, a seat belt would have been beneficial.

This does does not apply when driving forward, at very low speed,
frequently stopping and getting out of the car.

-- Ron


Michael Pardee 12-11-2004 11:06 AM

Re: Accord LX seat belt signal hassle
 
"Ron" <ronami@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7j2mr0lvkoiitb7i4vk9emckbvcpjih10t@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:18:44 -0500, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> wrote:
>
>>Ron, I found that video if you want to watch it...
>>
>>http://members.rogers.com/5555/seatbelt.wmv
>>

>
> Thanks.
>
> This shows a driver hurled into the passenger seat, then the back
> seat, followingt a very high speed collission. In that particular
> situation, a seat belt would have been beneficial.
>
> This does does not apply when driving forward, at very low speed,
> frequently stopping and getting out of the car.
>
> -- Ron
>

My son was injured under those exact circumstances. He was working as a
night security guard and didn't buckle up when creeping from one location to
another. The door didn't latch, and when he tried to close it he was pulled
out and injured his knee. He was fired for violating company safety policy
regarding seat belt use and he couldn't deny a belt would have held him in
the vehicle. And my wife's colleague was medevac'd with a broken vertebra
after sliding off the road at an estimated 20 mph. Seat belts are always
beneficial at lower speeds, although occasional stop-and-creep maneuvers may
require unfastening the belt to get a better view. I have to do that
occasionally in my off-road driving at work, but the times I apply the
parking brake and survey the unknown area on foot outnumbers those times at
least 10:1.

Remember, a 15 mph collision is like falling off a roof and landing face
down. The last I heard (decades ago), the low speed record for a driver
fatality was 7 mph in a parking lot collision. The driver ruptured his
spleen when he hit the steering wheel, went home, got drowsy and died.

But, do what you want.

Mike



Michael Pardee 12-11-2004 11:06 AM

Re: Accord LX seat belt signal hassle
 
"Ron" <ronami@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7j2mr0lvkoiitb7i4vk9emckbvcpjih10t@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:18:44 -0500, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> wrote:
>
>>Ron, I found that video if you want to watch it...
>>
>>http://members.rogers.com/5555/seatbelt.wmv
>>

>
> Thanks.
>
> This shows a driver hurled into the passenger seat, then the back
> seat, followingt a very high speed collission. In that particular
> situation, a seat belt would have been beneficial.
>
> This does does not apply when driving forward, at very low speed,
> frequently stopping and getting out of the car.
>
> -- Ron
>

My son was injured under those exact circumstances. He was working as a
night security guard and didn't buckle up when creeping from one location to
another. The door didn't latch, and when he tried to close it he was pulled
out and injured his knee. He was fired for violating company safety policy
regarding seat belt use and he couldn't deny a belt would have held him in
the vehicle. And my wife's colleague was medevac'd with a broken vertebra
after sliding off the road at an estimated 20 mph. Seat belts are always
beneficial at lower speeds, although occasional stop-and-creep maneuvers may
require unfastening the belt to get a better view. I have to do that
occasionally in my off-road driving at work, but the times I apply the
parking brake and survey the unknown area on foot outnumbers those times at
least 10:1.

Remember, a 15 mph collision is like falling off a roof and landing face
down. The last I heard (decades ago), the low speed record for a driver
fatality was 7 mph in a parking lot collision. The driver ruptured his
spleen when he hit the steering wheel, went home, got drowsy and died.

But, do what you want.

Mike



LBJGH 12-11-2004 12:51 PM

Re: Accord LX seat belt signal hassle
 
I guess you could assume you'd be hitting someone at low speed and you want
be thrown around in the car but what if some goofball blows a stop sign
doing 50mph? I played high school football years ago and can tell you being
hit by a 200lb person running at about 10mph... I can only imagine what
2000lbs @ 50mph would do.

Glad you at least watched the video. :)



"Ron" <ronami@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7j2mr0lvkoiitb7i4vk9emckbvcpjih10t@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:18:44 -0500, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> wrote:
>
>>Ron, I found that video if you want to watch it...
>>
>>http://members.rogers.com/5555/seatbelt.wmv
>>

>
> Thanks.
>
> This shows a driver hurled into the passenger seat, then the back
> seat, followingt a very high speed collission. In that particular
> situation, a seat belt would have been beneficial.
>
> This does does not apply when driving forward, at very low speed,
> frequently stopping and getting out of the car.
>
> -- Ron
>




LBJGH 12-11-2004 12:51 PM

Re: Accord LX seat belt signal hassle
 
I guess you could assume you'd be hitting someone at low speed and you want
be thrown around in the car but what if some goofball blows a stop sign
doing 50mph? I played high school football years ago and can tell you being
hit by a 200lb person running at about 10mph... I can only imagine what
2000lbs @ 50mph would do.

Glad you at least watched the video. :)



"Ron" <ronami@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7j2mr0lvkoiitb7i4vk9emckbvcpjih10t@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:18:44 -0500, "LBJGH" <bite_mee@hotsnail.back>
> wrote:
>
>>Ron, I found that video if you want to watch it...
>>
>>http://members.rogers.com/5555/seatbelt.wmv
>>

>
> Thanks.
>
> This shows a driver hurled into the passenger seat, then the back
> seat, followingt a very high speed collission. In that particular
> situation, a seat belt would have been beneficial.
>
> This does does not apply when driving forward, at very low speed,
> frequently stopping and getting out of the car.
>
> -- Ron
>




Randolph 12-11-2004 12:58 PM

Re: Accord LX seat belt signal hassle
 

Ron wrote:

> This shows a driver hurled into the passenger seat, then the back
> seat, followingt a very high speed collission. In that particular
> situation, a seat belt would have been beneficial.
>
> This does does not apply when driving forward, at very low speed,
> frequently stopping and getting out of the car.
>
> -- Ron


After decades of driving and riding in cars, I can say that a seat belt
has never been of any benefit to me whatsoever, regardless of speed and
other circumstances. Yet I buckle up every time I get in a car and have
thus far never seen any reason not to.

Randolph 12-11-2004 12:58 PM

Re: Accord LX seat belt signal hassle
 

Ron wrote:

> This shows a driver hurled into the passenger seat, then the back
> seat, followingt a very high speed collission. In that particular
> situation, a seat belt would have been beneficial.
>
> This does does not apply when driving forward, at very low speed,
> frequently stopping and getting out of the car.
>
> -- Ron


After decades of driving and riding in cars, I can say that a seat belt
has never been of any benefit to me whatsoever, regardless of speed and
other circumstances. Yet I buckle up every time I get in a car and have
thus far never seen any reason not to.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:39 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.05284 seconds with 5 queries