Matt Ion wrote:
>
> Tegger wrote:
> > Matt Ion <soundy106@gmail.com> wrote in
> > newsvefh.470560$R63.142904@pd7urf1no:
> >
> >
> >>sharx333 wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi, was checking my '95 Civic 1.6L today. It was idling, and I heard
> >>>the idle sound change: it seemed higher. I stepped on the gas a bit,
> >>>and I heard a soft electrical "pop" near the stereo panel. I
> >>>hurriedly shut down the engine, I found that the negative battery
> >>>cable had come off! (It had a quick-release connection). I connected
> >>>it, restarted and found everything working fine, even checked all the
> >>>stereo functions, LEDs, and the ECU.
> >>>
> >>>I've read that the battery acts as a big capacitor to smooth out
> >>>voltage spikes. The entire episode didn't take more that 10 seconds,
> >>>but I'm worried... could there be any permanent damage?
> >>
> >>You read wrong. The battery reacts too slowly to absorb spikes, it
> >>lives at 12V versus your alternator's typical 13.5-14.5V, your
> >>alternator wouldn't produce a spike unless it failed spectacularly,
> >>and having the terminal come off wouldn't cause a spike either.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It absolutely would. Damage may not always occur, but there will be spikes.
>
> Fair enough - a SIGNIFICANT spike.
>
> > The battery's secondary function IS to provide a buffer for the
> > alternator's pulses.
>
> And pray, how does it do that? It's not a voltage regulator, it's not a
> capacitor. Internal resistance limits how quickly it can react to voltage
> changes.
>

Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor. Capacitors are
the main components of voltage "smoothing." You know, like radio noise
suppression etc.

JT

 

Matt Ion wrote:
>
> Tegger wrote:
> > Matt Ion <soundy106@gmail.com> wrote in
> > newsvefh.470560$R63.142904@pd7urf1no:
> >
> >
> >>sharx333 wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi, was checking my '95 Civic 1.6L today. It was idling, and I heard
> >>>the idle sound change: it seemed higher. I stepped on the gas a bit,
> >>>and I heard a soft electrical "pop" near the stereo panel. I
> >>>hurriedly shut down the engine, I found that the negative battery
> >>>cable had come off! (It had a quick-release connection). I connected
> >>>it, restarted and found everything working fine, even checked all the
> >>>stereo functions, LEDs, and the ECU.
> >>>
> >>>I've read that the battery acts as a big capacitor to smooth out
> >>>voltage spikes. The entire episode didn't take more that 10 seconds,
> >>>but I'm worried... could there be any permanent damage?
> >>
> >>You read wrong. The battery reacts too slowly to absorb spikes, it
> >>lives at 12V versus your alternator's typical 13.5-14.5V, your
> >>alternator wouldn't produce a spike unless it failed spectacularly,
> >>and having the terminal come off wouldn't cause a spike either.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It absolutely would. Damage may not always occur, but there will be spikes.
>
> Fair enough - a SIGNIFICANT spike.
>
> > The battery's secondary function IS to provide a buffer for the
> > alternator's pulses.
>
> And pray, how does it do that? It's not a voltage regulator, it's not a
> capacitor. Internal resistance limits how quickly it can react to voltage
> changes.
>

Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor. Capacitors are
the main components of voltage "smoothing." You know, like radio noise
suppression etc.

JT

 

Matt Ion wrote:
>
> Tegger wrote:
> > Matt Ion <soundy106@gmail.com> wrote in
> > newsvefh.470560$R63.142904@pd7urf1no:
> >
> >
> >>sharx333 wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi, was checking my '95 Civic 1.6L today. It was idling, and I heard
> >>>the idle sound change: it seemed higher. I stepped on the gas a bit,
> >>>and I heard a soft electrical "pop" near the stereo panel. I
> >>>hurriedly shut down the engine, I found that the negative battery
> >>>cable had come off! (It had a quick-release connection). I connected
> >>>it, restarted and found everything working fine, even checked all the
> >>>stereo functions, LEDs, and the ECU.
> >>>
> >>>I've read that the battery acts as a big capacitor to smooth out
> >>>voltage spikes. The entire episode didn't take more that 10 seconds,
> >>>but I'm worried... could there be any permanent damage?
> >>
> >>You read wrong. The battery reacts too slowly to absorb spikes, it
> >>lives at 12V versus your alternator's typical 13.5-14.5V, your
> >>alternator wouldn't produce a spike unless it failed spectacularly,
> >>and having the terminal come off wouldn't cause a spike either.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It absolutely would. Damage may not always occur, but there will be spikes.
>
> Fair enough - a SIGNIFICANT spike.
>
> > The battery's secondary function IS to provide a buffer for the
> > alternator's pulses.
>
> And pray, how does it do that? It's not a voltage regulator, it's not a
> capacitor. Internal resistance limits how quickly it can react to voltage
> changes.
>

Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor. Capacitors are
the main components of voltage "smoothing." You know, like radio noise
suppression etc.

JT

 

Matt Ion wrote:
>
> Tegger wrote:
> > Matt Ion <soundy106@gmail.com> wrote in
> > newsvefh.470560$R63.142904@pd7urf1no:
> >
> >
> >>sharx333 wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi, was checking my '95 Civic 1.6L today. It was idling, and I heard
> >>>the idle sound change: it seemed higher. I stepped on the gas a bit,
> >>>and I heard a soft electrical "pop" near the stereo panel. I
> >>>hurriedly shut down the engine, I found that the negative battery
> >>>cable had come off! (It had a quick-release connection). I connected
> >>>it, restarted and found everything working fine, even checked all the
> >>>stereo functions, LEDs, and the ECU.
> >>>
> >>>I've read that the battery acts as a big capacitor to smooth out
> >>>voltage spikes. The entire episode didn't take more that 10 seconds,
> >>>but I'm worried... could there be any permanent damage?
> >>
> >>You read wrong. The battery reacts too slowly to absorb spikes, it
> >>lives at 12V versus your alternator's typical 13.5-14.5V, your
> >>alternator wouldn't produce a spike unless it failed spectacularly,
> >>and having the terminal come off wouldn't cause a spike either.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It absolutely would. Damage may not always occur, but there will be spikes.
>
> Fair enough - a SIGNIFICANT spike.
>
> > The battery's secondary function IS to provide a buffer for the
> > alternator's pulses.
>
> And pray, how does it do that? It's not a voltage regulator, it's not a
> capacitor. Internal resistance limits how quickly it can react to voltage
> changes.
>

Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor. Capacitors are
the main components of voltage "smoothing." You know, like radio noise
suppression etc.

JT

 

Grumpy AuContraire wrote:

> Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor.

Actually, they're not. Capacitors /store/ electrical energy. Batteries
/create/ it via a chemical reaction. Charging a battery is not storing energy;
it's (to oversimplify) merely reversing the checmical reaction.

 

Grumpy AuContraire wrote:

> Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor.

Actually, they're not. Capacitors /store/ electrical energy. Batteries
/create/ it via a chemical reaction. Charging a battery is not storing energy;
it's (to oversimplify) merely reversing the checmical reaction.

 

Grumpy AuContraire wrote:

> Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor.

Actually, they're not. Capacitors /store/ electrical energy. Batteries
/create/ it via a chemical reaction. Charging a battery is not storing energy;
it's (to oversimplify) merely reversing the checmical reaction.

 

Grumpy AuContraire wrote:

> Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor.

Actually, they're not. Capacitors /store/ electrical energy. Batteries
/create/ it via a chemical reaction. Charging a battery is not storing energy;
it's (to oversimplify) merely reversing the checmical reaction.

 

Matt Ion wrote:
>
> Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
>
> > Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor.
>
> Actually, they're not. Capacitors /store/ electrical energy. Batteries
> /create/ it via a chemical reaction. Charging a battery is not storing energy;
> it's (to oversimplify) merely reversing the checmical reaction.


Technically yes, but both smooth voltage..

JT

 

Matt Ion wrote:
>
> Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
>
> > Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor.
>
> Actually, they're not. Capacitors /store/ electrical energy. Batteries
> /create/ it via a chemical reaction. Charging a battery is not storing energy;
> it's (to oversimplify) merely reversing the checmical reaction.


Technically yes, but both smooth voltage..

JT

 

Matt Ion wrote:
>
> Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
>
> > Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor.
>
> Actually, they're not. Capacitors /store/ electrical energy. Batteries
> /create/ it via a chemical reaction. Charging a battery is not storing energy;
> it's (to oversimplify) merely reversing the checmical reaction.


Technically yes, but both smooth voltage..

JT

 

Matt Ion wrote:
>
> Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
>
> > Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor.
>
> Actually, they're not. Capacitors /store/ electrical energy. Batteries
> /create/ it via a chemical reaction. Charging a battery is not storing energy;
> it's (to oversimplify) merely reversing the checmical reaction.


Technically yes, but both smooth voltage..

JT

 

Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
>
> Matt Ion wrote:
>
>>Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor.
>>
>>Actually, they're not. Capacitors /store/ electrical energy. Batteries
>>/create/ it via a chemical reaction. Charging a battery is not storing energy;
>>it's (to oversimplify) merely reversing the checmical reaction.
>
>
>
> Technically yes, but both smooth voltage..

Batteries do, to a degree. That's not what they're designed for though.

 

Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
>
> Matt Ion wrote:
>
>>Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor.
>>
>>Actually, they're not. Capacitors /store/ electrical energy. Batteries
>>/create/ it via a chemical reaction. Charging a battery is not storing energy;
>>it's (to oversimplify) merely reversing the checmical reaction.
>
>
>
> Technically yes, but both smooth voltage..

Batteries do, to a degree. That's not what they're designed for though.

 

Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
>
> Matt Ion wrote:
>
>>Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Uh, the battery is nothing more thann a large capacitor.
>>
>>Actually, they're not. Capacitors /store/ electrical energy. Batteries
>>/create/ it via a chemical reaction. Charging a battery is not storing energy;
>>it's (to oversimplify) merely reversing the checmical reaction.
>
>
>
> Technically yes, but both smooth voltage..

Batteries do, to a degree. That's not what they're designed for though.