DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
#271
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:nUqdndpssbJV8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> Now THAT is funny.
>
>
> mike hunt
>
Does that mean that someone who is asleep at the wheel having pleasant drams
is less likely to be injured than someone who is asleep at the wheel having
nightmares?
--
Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)
> <eastwardbound2003@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1152209778.992820.149990@s16g2000cws.googlegr oups.com...
>>
>>>
>>> IIRC there is considerable disagreement on how much deceleration a human
>>> body can safely withstand, and air bags complicate that. The major
>>> concern
>>> is aortic rupture, and air bags alone have been known to cause aortic
>>> rupture at speeds as low as 10 mph. It still doesn't change the shape of
>>> things - longer crumple distances are effective to higher speeds than
>>> shorter ones. Where the cutoff is for the SMART car is something I
>>> couldn't
>>> find.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> DUH. Everybody is different. Depending on Age, health, lifestyle,
>> diet, genetics, gender, etc. One person may be fine sitting in a
>> Toyota Corolla as it careens into the rear of a stopped Cadillac at
>> 60mph. Bumps, bruises, broken bones, but no head trama. BUT the next
>> person 50 years older would immediately die in such an impact as the
>> brain matter sloshes around inside her head. Fatal Brain trauma and a
>> snaped neck in the blink of an eye.
>>
>> Genetics has a lot to do with how well a person fairs in a car
>> accident. Some people are just built a lot more robust than others.
>> Bone density is different from person to person. Epithelial tissue is
>> different. Even the difference of being "relaxed" at the time of the
>> collision rather than "tense" can make all the difference in what kind
>> of injuries a person sustains. One example is all the drunk drivers
>> who kill and maime other motorists while walking away from it all with
>> no injuries. The Alcohol put them in a relaxed state which prevents
>> the flesh from getting damaged as easily.
>>
>>
>> East-
>>
>
>
#272
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:nUqdndpssbJV8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> Now THAT is funny.
>
>
> mike hunt
>
Does that mean that someone who is asleep at the wheel having pleasant drams
is less likely to be injured than someone who is asleep at the wheel having
nightmares?
--
Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)
> <eastwardbound2003@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1152209778.992820.149990@s16g2000cws.googlegr oups.com...
>>
>>>
>>> IIRC there is considerable disagreement on how much deceleration a human
>>> body can safely withstand, and air bags complicate that. The major
>>> concern
>>> is aortic rupture, and air bags alone have been known to cause aortic
>>> rupture at speeds as low as 10 mph. It still doesn't change the shape of
>>> things - longer crumple distances are effective to higher speeds than
>>> shorter ones. Where the cutoff is for the SMART car is something I
>>> couldn't
>>> find.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> DUH. Everybody is different. Depending on Age, health, lifestyle,
>> diet, genetics, gender, etc. One person may be fine sitting in a
>> Toyota Corolla as it careens into the rear of a stopped Cadillac at
>> 60mph. Bumps, bruises, broken bones, but no head trama. BUT the next
>> person 50 years older would immediately die in such an impact as the
>> brain matter sloshes around inside her head. Fatal Brain trauma and a
>> snaped neck in the blink of an eye.
>>
>> Genetics has a lot to do with how well a person fairs in a car
>> accident. Some people are just built a lot more robust than others.
>> Bone density is different from person to person. Epithelial tissue is
>> different. Even the difference of being "relaxed" at the time of the
>> collision rather than "tense" can make all the difference in what kind
>> of injuries a person sustains. One example is all the drunk drivers
>> who kill and maime other motorists while walking away from it all with
>> no injuries. The Alcohol put them in a relaxed state which prevents
>> the flesh from getting damaged as easily.
>>
>>
>> East-
>>
>
>
#273
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:nUqdndpssbJV8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> Now THAT is funny.
>
>
> mike hunt
>
Does that mean that someone who is asleep at the wheel having pleasant drams
is less likely to be injured than someone who is asleep at the wheel having
nightmares?
--
Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)
> <eastwardbound2003@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1152209778.992820.149990@s16g2000cws.googlegr oups.com...
>>
>>>
>>> IIRC there is considerable disagreement on how much deceleration a human
>>> body can safely withstand, and air bags complicate that. The major
>>> concern
>>> is aortic rupture, and air bags alone have been known to cause aortic
>>> rupture at speeds as low as 10 mph. It still doesn't change the shape of
>>> things - longer crumple distances are effective to higher speeds than
>>> shorter ones. Where the cutoff is for the SMART car is something I
>>> couldn't
>>> find.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> DUH. Everybody is different. Depending on Age, health, lifestyle,
>> diet, genetics, gender, etc. One person may be fine sitting in a
>> Toyota Corolla as it careens into the rear of a stopped Cadillac at
>> 60mph. Bumps, bruises, broken bones, but no head trama. BUT the next
>> person 50 years older would immediately die in such an impact as the
>> brain matter sloshes around inside her head. Fatal Brain trauma and a
>> snaped neck in the blink of an eye.
>>
>> Genetics has a lot to do with how well a person fairs in a car
>> accident. Some people are just built a lot more robust than others.
>> Bone density is different from person to person. Epithelial tissue is
>> different. Even the difference of being "relaxed" at the time of the
>> collision rather than "tense" can make all the difference in what kind
>> of injuries a person sustains. One example is all the drunk drivers
>> who kill and maime other motorists while walking away from it all with
>> no injuries. The Alcohol put them in a relaxed state which prevents
>> the flesh from getting damaged as easily.
>>
>>
>> East-
>>
>
>
#274
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:nUqdndpssbJV8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> Now THAT is funny.
>
>
> mike hunt
>
Does that mean that someone who is asleep at the wheel having pleasant drams
is less likely to be injured than someone who is asleep at the wheel having
nightmares?
--
Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)
> <eastwardbound2003@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1152209778.992820.149990@s16g2000cws.googlegr oups.com...
>>
>>>
>>> IIRC there is considerable disagreement on how much deceleration a human
>>> body can safely withstand, and air bags complicate that. The major
>>> concern
>>> is aortic rupture, and air bags alone have been known to cause aortic
>>> rupture at speeds as low as 10 mph. It still doesn't change the shape of
>>> things - longer crumple distances are effective to higher speeds than
>>> shorter ones. Where the cutoff is for the SMART car is something I
>>> couldn't
>>> find.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> DUH. Everybody is different. Depending on Age, health, lifestyle,
>> diet, genetics, gender, etc. One person may be fine sitting in a
>> Toyota Corolla as it careens into the rear of a stopped Cadillac at
>> 60mph. Bumps, bruises, broken bones, but no head trama. BUT the next
>> person 50 years older would immediately die in such an impact as the
>> brain matter sloshes around inside her head. Fatal Brain trauma and a
>> snaped neck in the blink of an eye.
>>
>> Genetics has a lot to do with how well a person fairs in a car
>> accident. Some people are just built a lot more robust than others.
>> Bone density is different from person to person. Epithelial tissue is
>> different. Even the difference of being "relaxed" at the time of the
>> collision rather than "tense" can make all the difference in what kind
>> of injuries a person sustains. One example is all the drunk drivers
>> who kill and maime other motorists while walking away from it all with
>> no injuries. The Alcohol put them in a relaxed state which prevents
>> the flesh from getting damaged as easily.
>>
>>
>> East-
>>
>
>
#275
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:ebudnak0VJpg3jDZnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t...
> "TeGGeR??????????????????????" wrote:
> > "Michael Pardee" <michaeltnull@cybertrails.com> wrote in
> > news:Q8mdnUmJfeeV3zrZnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@sedona.net:
> >
> >
> >>"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
> >>news:VvOdne76RoD6FjvZnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@speakeasy. net...
> >>
> >>>Mike Hunter wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>They apparently use your skeleton in lue of crumple zones
> >>>
> >>>fud
> >>>
> >>
> >>Really, the physics of crumple zones is not rocket science. The
> >>stiffness of the zone determines the amount of force applied to
> >>occupants while the depth of the zone (for a given stiffness)
> >>determines the maximum impact speed the zone can absorb. Short zones
> >>work just fine, but become ineffective at lower speeds than longer
> >>zones.
> >>
> >>IIRC there is considerable disagreement on how much deceleration a
> >>human body can safely withstand, and air bags complicate that. The
> >>major concern is aortic rupture, and air bags alone have been known to
> >>cause aortic rupture at speeds as low as 10 mph. It still doesn't
> >>change the shape of things - longer crumple distances are effective to
> >>higher speeds than shorter ones. Where the cutoff is for the SMART car
> >>is something I couldn't find.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > My point exactly.
> >
> > The "Smart" is a political vehicle. It is manufactured for political
> > reasons. Politics is a poor substitute for physics.
> >
> >
> >
> dude, the /real/ political vehicles are those powered by ethanol or
> hydrogen.
Interesting article in Home Power magazine, No 114. August/September 2006
http://www.homepower.com/
The Myth of a Hydrogen Future
by Ulf Bossel, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and Engineering
High Points:
--Hydrogen is not an energy source but an energy carrier (you have to create
hydrogen from something)
--2.2 gallons of hydrogen is the energy equivalent of 1 gallon of gasoline,
you will process 2.4 gallons of water to get that kilo of hydrogen
--To satisfy present fuel needs with hydrogen, Los Angeles would have to
double it's water intake (already piped in from the Rockies) and use the
energy equivalent of 80 power stations to crack the hydrogen & compress or
liquidly it
-252.87 o C is the boiling point of hydrogen. To make it economical to
transport, some combination of super-refrigeration and pressure will be
needed to compress it
--because of low energy yield, it would take 22 gasoline truck-sized
transports (hydrogen pressurized to 3500 psi) to equal the energy found in
one tanker truck of gasoline
--it will require 30-40% of the hydrogen's energy to compress or liquefy it
for transportation
--the power plant to wheel efficiency of electric cars approaches 60-70%,
the best hydrogen fuel cells yield 17-23%
#276
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:ebudnak0VJpg3jDZnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t...
> "TeGGeR??????????????????????" wrote:
> > "Michael Pardee" <michaeltnull@cybertrails.com> wrote in
> > news:Q8mdnUmJfeeV3zrZnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@sedona.net:
> >
> >
> >>"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
> >>news:VvOdne76RoD6FjvZnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@speakeasy. net...
> >>
> >>>Mike Hunter wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>They apparently use your skeleton in lue of crumple zones
> >>>
> >>>fud
> >>>
> >>
> >>Really, the physics of crumple zones is not rocket science. The
> >>stiffness of the zone determines the amount of force applied to
> >>occupants while the depth of the zone (for a given stiffness)
> >>determines the maximum impact speed the zone can absorb. Short zones
> >>work just fine, but become ineffective at lower speeds than longer
> >>zones.
> >>
> >>IIRC there is considerable disagreement on how much deceleration a
> >>human body can safely withstand, and air bags complicate that. The
> >>major concern is aortic rupture, and air bags alone have been known to
> >>cause aortic rupture at speeds as low as 10 mph. It still doesn't
> >>change the shape of things - longer crumple distances are effective to
> >>higher speeds than shorter ones. Where the cutoff is for the SMART car
> >>is something I couldn't find.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > My point exactly.
> >
> > The "Smart" is a political vehicle. It is manufactured for political
> > reasons. Politics is a poor substitute for physics.
> >
> >
> >
> dude, the /real/ political vehicles are those powered by ethanol or
> hydrogen.
Interesting article in Home Power magazine, No 114. August/September 2006
http://www.homepower.com/
The Myth of a Hydrogen Future
by Ulf Bossel, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and Engineering
High Points:
--Hydrogen is not an energy source but an energy carrier (you have to create
hydrogen from something)
--2.2 gallons of hydrogen is the energy equivalent of 1 gallon of gasoline,
you will process 2.4 gallons of water to get that kilo of hydrogen
--To satisfy present fuel needs with hydrogen, Los Angeles would have to
double it's water intake (already piped in from the Rockies) and use the
energy equivalent of 80 power stations to crack the hydrogen & compress or
liquidly it
-252.87 o C is the boiling point of hydrogen. To make it economical to
transport, some combination of super-refrigeration and pressure will be
needed to compress it
--because of low energy yield, it would take 22 gasoline truck-sized
transports (hydrogen pressurized to 3500 psi) to equal the energy found in
one tanker truck of gasoline
--it will require 30-40% of the hydrogen's energy to compress or liquefy it
for transportation
--the power plant to wheel efficiency of electric cars approaches 60-70%,
the best hydrogen fuel cells yield 17-23%
#277
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:ebudnak0VJpg3jDZnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t...
> "TeGGeR??????????????????????" wrote:
> > "Michael Pardee" <michaeltnull@cybertrails.com> wrote in
> > news:Q8mdnUmJfeeV3zrZnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@sedona.net:
> >
> >
> >>"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
> >>news:VvOdne76RoD6FjvZnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@speakeasy. net...
> >>
> >>>Mike Hunter wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>They apparently use your skeleton in lue of crumple zones
> >>>
> >>>fud
> >>>
> >>
> >>Really, the physics of crumple zones is not rocket science. The
> >>stiffness of the zone determines the amount of force applied to
> >>occupants while the depth of the zone (for a given stiffness)
> >>determines the maximum impact speed the zone can absorb. Short zones
> >>work just fine, but become ineffective at lower speeds than longer
> >>zones.
> >>
> >>IIRC there is considerable disagreement on how much deceleration a
> >>human body can safely withstand, and air bags complicate that. The
> >>major concern is aortic rupture, and air bags alone have been known to
> >>cause aortic rupture at speeds as low as 10 mph. It still doesn't
> >>change the shape of things - longer crumple distances are effective to
> >>higher speeds than shorter ones. Where the cutoff is for the SMART car
> >>is something I couldn't find.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > My point exactly.
> >
> > The "Smart" is a political vehicle. It is manufactured for political
> > reasons. Politics is a poor substitute for physics.
> >
> >
> >
> dude, the /real/ political vehicles are those powered by ethanol or
> hydrogen.
Interesting article in Home Power magazine, No 114. August/September 2006
http://www.homepower.com/
The Myth of a Hydrogen Future
by Ulf Bossel, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and Engineering
High Points:
--Hydrogen is not an energy source but an energy carrier (you have to create
hydrogen from something)
--2.2 gallons of hydrogen is the energy equivalent of 1 gallon of gasoline,
you will process 2.4 gallons of water to get that kilo of hydrogen
--To satisfy present fuel needs with hydrogen, Los Angeles would have to
double it's water intake (already piped in from the Rockies) and use the
energy equivalent of 80 power stations to crack the hydrogen & compress or
liquidly it
-252.87 o C is the boiling point of hydrogen. To make it economical to
transport, some combination of super-refrigeration and pressure will be
needed to compress it
--because of low energy yield, it would take 22 gasoline truck-sized
transports (hydrogen pressurized to 3500 psi) to equal the energy found in
one tanker truck of gasoline
--it will require 30-40% of the hydrogen's energy to compress or liquefy it
for transportation
--the power plant to wheel efficiency of electric cars approaches 60-70%,
the best hydrogen fuel cells yield 17-23%
#278
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
news:ebudnak0VJpg3jDZnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t...
> "TeGGeR??????????????????????" wrote:
> > "Michael Pardee" <michaeltnull@cybertrails.com> wrote in
> > news:Q8mdnUmJfeeV3zrZnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@sedona.net:
> >
> >
> >>"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message
> >>news:VvOdne76RoD6FjvZnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@speakeasy. net...
> >>
> >>>Mike Hunter wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>They apparently use your skeleton in lue of crumple zones
> >>>
> >>>fud
> >>>
> >>
> >>Really, the physics of crumple zones is not rocket science. The
> >>stiffness of the zone determines the amount of force applied to
> >>occupants while the depth of the zone (for a given stiffness)
> >>determines the maximum impact speed the zone can absorb. Short zones
> >>work just fine, but become ineffective at lower speeds than longer
> >>zones.
> >>
> >>IIRC there is considerable disagreement on how much deceleration a
> >>human body can safely withstand, and air bags complicate that. The
> >>major concern is aortic rupture, and air bags alone have been known to
> >>cause aortic rupture at speeds as low as 10 mph. It still doesn't
> >>change the shape of things - longer crumple distances are effective to
> >>higher speeds than shorter ones. Where the cutoff is for the SMART car
> >>is something I couldn't find.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > My point exactly.
> >
> > The "Smart" is a political vehicle. It is manufactured for political
> > reasons. Politics is a poor substitute for physics.
> >
> >
> >
> dude, the /real/ political vehicles are those powered by ethanol or
> hydrogen.
Interesting article in Home Power magazine, No 114. August/September 2006
http://www.homepower.com/
The Myth of a Hydrogen Future
by Ulf Bossel, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and Engineering
High Points:
--Hydrogen is not an energy source but an energy carrier (you have to create
hydrogen from something)
--2.2 gallons of hydrogen is the energy equivalent of 1 gallon of gasoline,
you will process 2.4 gallons of water to get that kilo of hydrogen
--To satisfy present fuel needs with hydrogen, Los Angeles would have to
double it's water intake (already piped in from the Rockies) and use the
energy equivalent of 80 power stations to crack the hydrogen & compress or
liquidly it
-252.87 o C is the boiling point of hydrogen. To make it economical to
transport, some combination of super-refrigeration and pressure will be
needed to compress it
--because of low energy yield, it would take 22 gasoline truck-sized
transports (hydrogen pressurized to 3500 psi) to equal the energy found in
one tanker truck of gasoline
--it will require 30-40% of the hydrogen's energy to compress or liquefy it
for transportation
--the power plant to wheel efficiency of electric cars approaches 60-70%,
the best hydrogen fuel cells yield 17-23%
#279
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
>
> Does that mean that someone who is asleep at the wheel having pleasant drams
> is less likely to be injured than someone who is asleep at the wheel having
> nightmares?
> --
>
> Ray O
> (correct punctuation to reply)
>
>
In a Nut Shell, Yes.
East-
> Does that mean that someone who is asleep at the wheel having pleasant drams
> is less likely to be injured than someone who is asleep at the wheel having
> nightmares?
> --
>
> Ray O
> (correct punctuation to reply)
>
>
In a Nut Shell, Yes.
East-
#280
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
>
> Does that mean that someone who is asleep at the wheel having pleasant drams
> is less likely to be injured than someone who is asleep at the wheel having
> nightmares?
> --
>
> Ray O
> (correct punctuation to reply)
>
>
In a Nut Shell, Yes.
East-
> Does that mean that someone who is asleep at the wheel having pleasant drams
> is less likely to be injured than someone who is asleep at the wheel having
> nightmares?
> --
>
> Ray O
> (correct punctuation to reply)
>
>
In a Nut Shell, Yes.
East-
#281
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
>
> Does that mean that someone who is asleep at the wheel having pleasant drams
> is less likely to be injured than someone who is asleep at the wheel having
> nightmares?
> --
>
> Ray O
> (correct punctuation to reply)
>
>
In a Nut Shell, Yes.
East-
> Does that mean that someone who is asleep at the wheel having pleasant drams
> is less likely to be injured than someone who is asleep at the wheel having
> nightmares?
> --
>
> Ray O
> (correct punctuation to reply)
>
>
In a Nut Shell, Yes.
East-
#282
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
>
> Does that mean that someone who is asleep at the wheel having pleasant drams
> is less likely to be injured than someone who is asleep at the wheel having
> nightmares?
> --
>
> Ray O
> (correct punctuation to reply)
>
>
In a Nut Shell, Yes.
East-
> Does that mean that someone who is asleep at the wheel having pleasant drams
> is less likely to be injured than someone who is asleep at the wheel having
> nightmares?
> --
>
> Ray O
> (correct punctuation to reply)
>
>
In a Nut Shell, Yes.
East-
#283
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in
news:ebudnak0VJpg3jDZnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t:
> "TeGGeRï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï ¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï
> ¿½" wrote:
>>
>> The "Smart" is a political vehicle. It is manufactured for political
>> reasons. Politics is a poor substitute for physics.
>>
>>
>>
> dude, the /real/ political vehicles are those powered by ethanol or
> hydrogen.
Too true...
--
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
news:ebudnak0VJpg3jDZnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t:
> "TeGGeRï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï ¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï
> ¿½" wrote:
>>
>> The "Smart" is a political vehicle. It is manufactured for political
>> reasons. Politics is a poor substitute for physics.
>>
>>
>>
> dude, the /real/ political vehicles are those powered by ethanol or
> hydrogen.
Too true...
--
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
#284
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in
news:ebudnak0VJpg3jDZnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t:
> "TeGGeRï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï ¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï
> ¿½" wrote:
>>
>> The "Smart" is a political vehicle. It is manufactured for political
>> reasons. Politics is a poor substitute for physics.
>>
>>
>>
> dude, the /real/ political vehicles are those powered by ethanol or
> hydrogen.
Too true...
--
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
news:ebudnak0VJpg3jDZnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t:
> "TeGGeRï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï ¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï
> ¿½" wrote:
>>
>> The "Smart" is a political vehicle. It is manufactured for political
>> reasons. Politics is a poor substitute for physics.
>>
>>
>>
> dude, the /real/ political vehicles are those powered by ethanol or
> hydrogen.
Too true...
--
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
#285
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DaimlerChrysler to Bring Teeny Two-Seater to U.S.
jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in
news:ebudnak0VJpg3jDZnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t:
> "TeGGeRï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï ¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï
> ¿½" wrote:
>>
>> The "Smart" is a political vehicle. It is manufactured for political
>> reasons. Politics is a poor substitute for physics.
>>
>>
>>
> dude, the /real/ political vehicles are those powered by ethanol or
> hydrogen.
Too true...
--
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
news:ebudnak0VJpg3jDZnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t:
> "TeGGeRï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï ¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï
> ¿½" wrote:
>>
>> The "Smart" is a political vehicle. It is manufactured for political
>> reasons. Politics is a poor substitute for physics.
>>
>>
>>
> dude, the /real/ political vehicles are those powered by ethanol or
> hydrogen.
Too true...
--
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/