|
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. The "Bomz" CAI I put on my 94 GSR made a -very- noticeable increase in power,even below the VTEC point.I believe that has to be more than a half or 2.5 HP increase. -- Jim Yanik,NRA member jyanik-at-kua.net |
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. The "Bomz" CAI I put on my 94 GSR made a -very- noticeable increase in power,even below the VTEC point.I believe that has to be more than a half or 2.5 HP increase. -- Jim Yanik,NRA member jyanik-at-kua.net |
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. . > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > > > > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one. How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder? |
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. . > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > > > > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one. How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder? |
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. . > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > > > > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one. How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder? |
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. . > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > > > > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one. How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder? |
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com... > > "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message > news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. . > > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in > > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > > > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not > > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a > > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and > > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > > > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > > > > > > > > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning > > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did > > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N > > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. > > Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious > stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one. > > How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder? > > DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM REDLINE .. THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF YOU DONT THINK THAT THESE GAINS ARE POSSIBIBLE THEN READ IMPORT TUNER,SUPER STREET, AND IMPORT MAGAZINES, AND CHECK OUT THE OFFICIAL AEM WEBSITE FOR APPLICATIONS, PRICES, AND DYNO SHEETS.FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE NOT INFORMED ABOUT CARS AND LIKE THAT ,WELL, YOU MIGHT WANT TO RESEARCH YOUR ANSWERS AND INFO FIRST BEFORE EXPRESSING YOUR 2 CENTS. P.S. AND FOR THE RECORD THE V2 IS UNLIKE ANYOTHER INTAKE BECAUSE IT USES A DUAL CHAMBER INTAKE PIPE TO CREATE MULTIPLE FREQUENCIE SOUND WAVES WHICH IS THE REASON THE GAINS ARE SO HIGH. -"DEFEAT" FOR EVERY WINNER, THERE ARE DOZENS OF LOSERS. ODDS ARE YOU'RE ONE OF THEM. |
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com... > > "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message > news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. . > > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in > > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > > > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not > > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a > > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and > > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > > > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > > > > > > > > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning > > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did > > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N > > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. > > Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious > stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one. > > How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder? > > DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM REDLINE .. THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF YOU DONT THINK THAT THESE GAINS ARE POSSIBIBLE THEN READ IMPORT TUNER,SUPER STREET, AND IMPORT MAGAZINES, AND CHECK OUT THE OFFICIAL AEM WEBSITE FOR APPLICATIONS, PRICES, AND DYNO SHEETS.FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE NOT INFORMED ABOUT CARS AND LIKE THAT ,WELL, YOU MIGHT WANT TO RESEARCH YOUR ANSWERS AND INFO FIRST BEFORE EXPRESSING YOUR 2 CENTS. P.S. AND FOR THE RECORD THE V2 IS UNLIKE ANYOTHER INTAKE BECAUSE IT USES A DUAL CHAMBER INTAKE PIPE TO CREATE MULTIPLE FREQUENCIE SOUND WAVES WHICH IS THE REASON THE GAINS ARE SO HIGH. -"DEFEAT" FOR EVERY WINNER, THERE ARE DOZENS OF LOSERS. ODDS ARE YOU'RE ONE OF THEM. |
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com... > > "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message > news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. . > > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in > > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > > > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not > > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a > > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and > > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > > > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > > > > > > > > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning > > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did > > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N > > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. > > Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious > stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one. > > How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder? > > DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM REDLINE .. THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF YOU DONT THINK THAT THESE GAINS ARE POSSIBIBLE THEN READ IMPORT TUNER,SUPER STREET, AND IMPORT MAGAZINES, AND CHECK OUT THE OFFICIAL AEM WEBSITE FOR APPLICATIONS, PRICES, AND DYNO SHEETS.FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE NOT INFORMED ABOUT CARS AND LIKE THAT ,WELL, YOU MIGHT WANT TO RESEARCH YOUR ANSWERS AND INFO FIRST BEFORE EXPRESSING YOUR 2 CENTS. P.S. AND FOR THE RECORD THE V2 IS UNLIKE ANYOTHER INTAKE BECAUSE IT USES A DUAL CHAMBER INTAKE PIPE TO CREATE MULTIPLE FREQUENCIE SOUND WAVES WHICH IS THE REASON THE GAINS ARE SO HIGH. -"DEFEAT" FOR EVERY WINNER, THERE ARE DOZENS OF LOSERS. ODDS ARE YOU'RE ONE OF THEM. |
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com... > > "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message > news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. . > > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in > > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > > > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not > > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a > > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and > > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > > > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > > > > > > > > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning > > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did > > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N > > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. > > Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious > stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one. > > How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder? > > DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM REDLINE .. THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF YOU DONT THINK THAT THESE GAINS ARE POSSIBIBLE THEN READ IMPORT TUNER,SUPER STREET, AND IMPORT MAGAZINES, AND CHECK OUT THE OFFICIAL AEM WEBSITE FOR APPLICATIONS, PRICES, AND DYNO SHEETS.FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE NOT INFORMED ABOUT CARS AND LIKE THAT ,WELL, YOU MIGHT WANT TO RESEARCH YOUR ANSWERS AND INFO FIRST BEFORE EXPRESSING YOUR 2 CENTS. P.S. AND FOR THE RECORD THE V2 IS UNLIKE ANYOTHER INTAKE BECAUSE IT USES A DUAL CHAMBER INTAKE PIPE TO CREATE MULTIPLE FREQUENCIE SOUND WAVES WHICH IS THE REASON THE GAINS ARE SO HIGH. -"DEFEAT" FOR EVERY WINNER, THERE ARE DOZENS OF LOSERS. ODDS ARE YOU'RE ONE OF THEM. |
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"EPSYCHOBOB" <BILLTHEBUM2001@VERIZON.NET> wrote in message news:2rPCb.6683$xO.3337@nwrddc02.gnilink.net... > > "Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message > news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com... > > > > "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message > > news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. . > > > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in > > > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > > > > > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > > > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not > > > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a > > > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and > > > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > > > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > > > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > > > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > > > > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning > > > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did > > > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the > K&N > > > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. > > > > Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious > > stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one. > > > > How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder? > > > > > DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF > POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM REDLINE > . THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS > NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF As I suspected. One. Thanks! |
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"EPSYCHOBOB" <BILLTHEBUM2001@VERIZON.NET> wrote in message news:2rPCb.6683$xO.3337@nwrddc02.gnilink.net... > > "Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message > news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com... > > > > "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message > > news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. . > > > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in > > > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > > > > > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > > > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not > > > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a > > > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and > > > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > > > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > > > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > > > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > > > > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning > > > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did > > > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the > K&N > > > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. > > > > Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious > > stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one. > > > > How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder? > > > > > DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF > POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM REDLINE > . THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS > NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF As I suspected. One. Thanks! |
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"EPSYCHOBOB" <BILLTHEBUM2001@VERIZON.NET> wrote in message news:2rPCb.6683$xO.3337@nwrddc02.gnilink.net... > > "Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message > news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com... > > > > "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message > > news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. . > > > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in > > > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > > > > > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > > > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not > > > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a > > > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and > > > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > > > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > > > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > > > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > > > > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning > > > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did > > > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the > K&N > > > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. > > > > Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious > > stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one. > > > > How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder? > > > > > DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF > POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM REDLINE > . THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS > NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF As I suspected. One. Thanks! |
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"EPSYCHOBOB" <BILLTHEBUM2001@VERIZON.NET> wrote in message news:2rPCb.6683$xO.3337@nwrddc02.gnilink.net... > > "Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message > news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com... > > > > "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message > > news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. . > > > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in > > > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > > > > > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > > > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not > > > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a > > > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and > > > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > > > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > > > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > > > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > > > > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning > > > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did > > > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the > K&N > > > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. > > > > Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious > > stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one. > > > > How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder? > > > > > DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF > POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM REDLINE > . THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS > NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF As I suspected. One. Thanks! |
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message news:3NPCb.58085$VEd1.42762@news02.bloor.is.net.ca ble.rogers.com... > > "EPSYCHOBOB" <BILLTHEBUM2001@VERIZON.NET> wrote in message > news:2rPCb.6683$xO.3337@nwrddc02.gnilink.net... > > > > "Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message > > news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com... > > > > > > "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message > > > news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. . > > > > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in > > > > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net: > > > > > > > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a > > > > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do > not > > > > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, > a > > > > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* > and > > > > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll > > > > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get > > > > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the > > > > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the > > > > > couplers are black with AEM written on them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda > Tuning > > > > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They > did > > > > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the > > K&N > > > > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too. > > > > > > Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious > > > stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one. > > > > > > How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder? > > > > > > > > DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF > > POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM > REDLINE > > . THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS > > NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF > > As I suspected. One. > > Thanks! > > > YOU SAY THAT ONE RIGHT WELL SHOW ME AN INTAKE THAT COULD GIVE THE ACCORD 18.7HP THAT IS NOT MADE BY AEM AND THAT IS STREET LEGAL. > > > > |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands