Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
12-13-2003, 12:12 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
> bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not
> make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a
> pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and
> get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> couplers are black with AEM written on them.
>
>
Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning
Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did
flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N
filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
The "Bomz" CAI I put on my 94 GSR made a -very- noticeable increase in
power,even below the VTEC point.I believe that has to be more than a half
or 2.5 HP increase.
--
Jim Yanik,NRA member
jyanik-at-kua.net
news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
> bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not
> make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a
> pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and
> get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> couplers are black with AEM written on them.
>
>
Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning
Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did
flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N
filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
The "Bomz" CAI I put on my 94 GSR made a -very- noticeable increase in
power,even below the VTEC point.I believe that has to be more than a half
or 2.5 HP increase.
--
Jim Yanik,NRA member
jyanik-at-kua.net
12-13-2003, 12:12 PM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
> bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not
> make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a
> pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and
> get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> couplers are black with AEM written on them.
>
>
Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning
Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did
flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N
filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
The "Bomz" CAI I put on my 94 GSR made a -very- noticeable increase in
power,even below the VTEC point.I believe that has to be more than a half
or 2.5 HP increase.
--
Jim Yanik,NRA member
jyanik-at-kua.net
news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
> bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not
> make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a
> pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and
> get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> couplers are black with AEM written on them.
>
>
Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning
Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did
flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N
filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
The "Bomz" CAI I put on my 94 GSR made a -very- noticeable increase in
power,even below the VTEC point.I believe that has to be more than a half
or 2.5 HP increase.
--
Jim Yanik,NRA member
jyanik-at-kua.net
12-13-2003, 12:51 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. .
> "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
> news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
>
> > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not
> > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a
> > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and
> > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> > couplers are black with AEM written on them.
> >
> >
>
> Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning
> Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did
> flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N
> filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious
stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one.
How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder?
12-13-2003, 12:51 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. .
> "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
> news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
>
> > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not
> > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a
> > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and
> > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> > couplers are black with AEM written on them.
> >
> >
>
> Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning
> Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did
> flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N
> filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious
stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one.
How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder?
12-13-2003, 12:51 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. .
> "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
> news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
>
> > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not
> > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a
> > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and
> > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> > couplers are black with AEM written on them.
> >
> >
>
> Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning
> Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did
> flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N
> filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious
stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one.
How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder?
12-13-2003, 12:51 PM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. .
> "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
> news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
>
> > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not
> > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a
> > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and
> > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> > couplers are black with AEM written on them.
> >
> >
>
> Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning
> Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did
> flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N
> filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious
stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one.
How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder?
12-13-2003, 08:56 PM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
>
> "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
> news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. .
> > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
> > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
> >
> > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not
> > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a
> > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and
> > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> > > couplers are black with AEM written on them.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning
> > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did
> > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the
K&N
> > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
>
> Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious
> stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one.
>
> How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder?
>
>
DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF
POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM REDLINE
.. THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS
NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF
YOU DONT THINK THAT THESE GAINS ARE POSSIBIBLE THEN READ IMPORT TUNER,SUPER
STREET, AND IMPORT MAGAZINES, AND CHECK OUT THE OFFICIAL AEM WEBSITE FOR
APPLICATIONS, PRICES, AND DYNO SHEETS.FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE NOT INFORMED
ABOUT CARS AND LIKE THAT ,WELL, YOU MIGHT WANT TO RESEARCH YOUR ANSWERS
AND INFO FIRST BEFORE EXPRESSING YOUR 2 CENTS.
P.S. AND FOR THE RECORD THE V2 IS UNLIKE ANYOTHER INTAKE BECAUSE IT USES A
DUAL CHAMBER INTAKE PIPE TO CREATE MULTIPLE FREQUENCIE SOUND WAVES WHICH IS
THE REASON THE GAINS ARE SO HIGH.
-"DEFEAT"
FOR EVERY WINNER, THERE ARE DOZENS OF LOSERS.
ODDS ARE YOU'RE ONE OF THEM.
12-13-2003, 08:56 PM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
>
> "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
> news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. .
> > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
> > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
> >
> > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not
> > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a
> > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and
> > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> > > couplers are black with AEM written on them.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning
> > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did
> > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the
K&N
> > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
>
> Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious
> stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one.
>
> How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder?
>
>
DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF
POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM REDLINE
.. THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS
NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF
YOU DONT THINK THAT THESE GAINS ARE POSSIBIBLE THEN READ IMPORT TUNER,SUPER
STREET, AND IMPORT MAGAZINES, AND CHECK OUT THE OFFICIAL AEM WEBSITE FOR
APPLICATIONS, PRICES, AND DYNO SHEETS.FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE NOT INFORMED
ABOUT CARS AND LIKE THAT ,WELL, YOU MIGHT WANT TO RESEARCH YOUR ANSWERS
AND INFO FIRST BEFORE EXPRESSING YOUR 2 CENTS.
P.S. AND FOR THE RECORD THE V2 IS UNLIKE ANYOTHER INTAKE BECAUSE IT USES A
DUAL CHAMBER INTAKE PIPE TO CREATE MULTIPLE FREQUENCIE SOUND WAVES WHICH IS
THE REASON THE GAINS ARE SO HIGH.
-"DEFEAT"
FOR EVERY WINNER, THERE ARE DOZENS OF LOSERS.
ODDS ARE YOU'RE ONE OF THEM.
12-13-2003, 08:56 PM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
>
> "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
> news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. .
> > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
> > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
> >
> > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not
> > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a
> > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and
> > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> > > couplers are black with AEM written on them.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning
> > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did
> > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the
K&N
> > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
>
> Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious
> stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one.
>
> How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder?
>
>
DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF
POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM REDLINE
.. THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS
NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF
YOU DONT THINK THAT THESE GAINS ARE POSSIBIBLE THEN READ IMPORT TUNER,SUPER
STREET, AND IMPORT MAGAZINES, AND CHECK OUT THE OFFICIAL AEM WEBSITE FOR
APPLICATIONS, PRICES, AND DYNO SHEETS.FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE NOT INFORMED
ABOUT CARS AND LIKE THAT ,WELL, YOU MIGHT WANT TO RESEARCH YOUR ANSWERS
AND INFO FIRST BEFORE EXPRESSING YOUR 2 CENTS.
P.S. AND FOR THE RECORD THE V2 IS UNLIKE ANYOTHER INTAKE BECAUSE IT USES A
DUAL CHAMBER INTAKE PIPE TO CREATE MULTIPLE FREQUENCIE SOUND WAVES WHICH IS
THE REASON THE GAINS ARE SO HIGH.
-"DEFEAT"
FOR EVERY WINNER, THERE ARE DOZENS OF LOSERS.
ODDS ARE YOU'RE ONE OF THEM.
12-13-2003, 08:56 PM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
>
> "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
> news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. .
> > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
> > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
> >
> > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not
> > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a
> > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and
> > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> > > couplers are black with AEM written on them.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning
> > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did
> > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the
K&N
> > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
>
> Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious
> stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one.
>
> How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder?
>
>
DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF
POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM REDLINE
.. THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS
NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF
YOU DONT THINK THAT THESE GAINS ARE POSSIBIBLE THEN READ IMPORT TUNER,SUPER
STREET, AND IMPORT MAGAZINES, AND CHECK OUT THE OFFICIAL AEM WEBSITE FOR
APPLICATIONS, PRICES, AND DYNO SHEETS.FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE NOT INFORMED
ABOUT CARS AND LIKE THAT ,WELL, YOU MIGHT WANT TO RESEARCH YOUR ANSWERS
AND INFO FIRST BEFORE EXPRESSING YOUR 2 CENTS.
P.S. AND FOR THE RECORD THE V2 IS UNLIKE ANYOTHER INTAKE BECAUSE IT USES A
DUAL CHAMBER INTAKE PIPE TO CREATE MULTIPLE FREQUENCIE SOUND WAVES WHICH IS
THE REASON THE GAINS ARE SO HIGH.
-"DEFEAT"
FOR EVERY WINNER, THERE ARE DOZENS OF LOSERS.
ODDS ARE YOU'RE ONE OF THEM.
12-13-2003, 09:19 PM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"EPSYCHOBOB" <BILLTHEBUM2001@VERIZON.NET> wrote in message
news:2rPCb.6683$xO.3337@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
> "Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
> >
> > "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
> > news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. .
> > > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
> > > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
> > >
> > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> > > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do
not
> > > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality,
a
> > > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent*
and
> > > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> > > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> > > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> > > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> > > > couplers are black with AEM written on them.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda
Tuning
> > > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They
did
> > > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the
> K&N
> > > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
> >
> > Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious
> > stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one.
> >
> > How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder?
> >
> >
> DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF
> POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM
REDLINE
> . THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS
> NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF
As I suspected. One.
Thanks!
12-13-2003, 09:19 PM
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"EPSYCHOBOB" <BILLTHEBUM2001@VERIZON.NET> wrote in message
news:2rPCb.6683$xO.3337@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
> "Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
> >
> > "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
> > news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. .
> > > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
> > > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
> > >
> > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> > > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do
not
> > > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality,
a
> > > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent*
and
> > > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> > > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> > > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> > > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> > > > couplers are black with AEM written on them.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda
Tuning
> > > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They
did
> > > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the
> K&N
> > > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
> >
> > Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious
> > stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one.
> >
> > How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder?
> >
> >
> DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF
> POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM
REDLINE
> . THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS
> NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF
As I suspected. One.
Thanks!
12-13-2003, 09:19 PM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"EPSYCHOBOB" <BILLTHEBUM2001@VERIZON.NET> wrote in message
news:2rPCb.6683$xO.3337@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
> "Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
> >
> > "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
> > news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. .
> > > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
> > > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
> > >
> > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> > > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do
not
> > > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality,
a
> > > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent*
and
> > > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> > > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> > > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> > > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> > > > couplers are black with AEM written on them.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda
Tuning
> > > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They
did
> > > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the
> K&N
> > > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
> >
> > Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious
> > stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one.
> >
> > How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder?
> >
> >
> DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF
> POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM
REDLINE
> . THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS
> NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF
As I suspected. One.
Thanks!
12-13-2003, 09:19 PM
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"EPSYCHOBOB" <BILLTHEBUM2001@VERIZON.NET> wrote in message
news:2rPCb.6683$xO.3337@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
> "Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
> >
> > "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
> > news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. .
> > > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
> > > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
> > >
> > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> > > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do
not
> > > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality,
a
> > > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent*
and
> > > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> > > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> > > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> > > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> > > > couplers are black with AEM written on them.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda
Tuning
> > > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They
did
> > > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the
> K&N
> > > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
> >
> > Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an atrocious
> > stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one.
> >
> > How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder?
> >
> >
> DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF
> POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM
REDLINE
> . THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS
> NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT 9.5HP@8500RPM,IF
As I suspected. One.
Thanks!
12-13-2003, 09:37 PM
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:3NPCb.58085$VEd1.42762@news02.bloor.is.net.ca ble.rogers.com...
>
> "EPSYCHOBOB" <BILLTHEBUM2001@VERIZON.NET> wrote in message
> news:2rPCb.6683$xO.3337@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
> >
> > "Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message
> > news:wkICb.10688$%TO.5697@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
> > >
> > > "Jim Yanik" <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote in message
> > > news:Xns94507C4B38DAEjyanikkuanet@204.117.192.21.. .
> > > > "M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
> > > > news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
> > > >
> > > > > bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and
a
> > > > > normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do
> not
> > > > > make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for
quality,
> a
> > > > > pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent*
> and
> > > > > get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> > > > > probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and
get
> > > > > the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get
the
> > > > > AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> > > > > couplers are black with AEM written on them.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda
> Tuning
> > > > Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They
> did
> > > > flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and
the
> > K&N
> > > > filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
> > >
> > > Yep. I believe they tested the RSX because it must have had an
atrocious
> > > stock intake tract, resulting in big gains from an aftermarket one.
> > >
> > > How many other cars will see those kinds of gains, I wonder?
> > >
> > >
> > DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHER CARS ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING THAT KIND OF
> > POWER MOST HONDA'S AND ACURA'S AND IMPORT CARS THAT HAVE A HIGH RPM
> REDLINE
> > . THE V6 HONDA ACCORD GOT 18.7HP @6500 RPM,A 94-01 INTEGRA LS/GS/RS
> > NON-VTECH GOT 9.1HP@4250RPM (STICK SHIFT),HONDA S200 GOT
9.5HP@8500RPM,IF
>
> As I suspected. One.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> YOU SAY THAT ONE RIGHT WELL SHOW ME AN INTAKE THAT COULD GIVE THE ACCORD
18.7HP THAT IS NOT MADE BY AEM AND THAT IS STREET LEGAL.
>
>
>
>