Re: Disabling ABS
"joe" <joe@yahoo.org> wrote in message news:09ahs19fm68qbftpi6s6t708vt6ciqldu3@4ax.com... > Sounds like the best solution is to have a toggle switch to turn ABS > on and off as appropriate. Does anyone know of an easy way to do this > without damaging the car? That would be tricky since I think the fuse for the ABS system is under the hood as opposed to in the dash. I would also be a little concerned about the legality of disabling a safety feature that the car came equipped with. I think some jurisdiction forbid the disabling of standard safety features. This became an issue when some people wanted to disable air bags for personal safety reasons. I've been told for example, that in many Canadian provinces, disabling the air bags is illegal since they came with the car as a safety feature. ABS may also fall under that category. In addition, if you were to have an accident and your insurance company discovered that you disabled your ABS, they could technically refuse coverage by arguing that the missing safety feature was a contributing factor in the accident. Just a little food for thought. |
Re: Disabling ABS
You are all overlooking a key feature of ABS... that nobody has
mentioned. It's the ability to steer after you stomp on the brake in a panic situation. This steering ability could be key in crash avoidance... Professor www.telstar-electronics.com |
Re: Disabling ABS
Professor wrote:
> You are all overlooking a key feature of ABS... that nobody has > mentioned. It's the ability to steer after you stomp on the brake in a > panic situation. This steering ability could be key in crash > avoidance... > > Professor > www.telstar-electronics.com > dude, you can /only/ steer if you have sufficient adhesion. just because you have abs doesn't mean you can steer. all that abs achieves, and my grandmother is a great example of this, is some hope of crash-avoidance in a situation where a panicking driver locks the wheels and won't release them again. /you/ seem to be overlooking the key disclaimer of the owners manual. |
Re: Disabling ABS
I think you better sit back and have another whiskey... Jim Beam
Professor www.telstar-electronics.com |
Re: Disabling ABS
"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message news:McWdnZWvKfZRFFTeRVn-qw@speakeasy.net... > Professor wrote: > > You are all overlooking a key feature of ABS... that nobody has > > mentioned. It's the ability to steer after you stomp on the brake in a > > panic situation. This steering ability could be key in crash > > avoidance... > > > > Professor > > www.telstar-electronics.com > > > dude, "you can /only/ steer if you have sufficient adhesion." Exactly, it's anti-LOCK brakes, not anti-skid brakes. If you are doing 30 miles per hour on an icy turn and you slam on the brakes, the wheel may not lock but there is a decent chance the car's inertia will make you slide on the ice because of the sudden deceleration, front tires without traction don't steer, even if they are turning. Mr. Professor seems to assume that all people slam on the brakes with full force in a panic situation. There are some of us who have had driver training and learned "threshold braking". It's basically the manual way of doing what ABS is doing. There's called skills. ABS was invented to protect the people who don't know that technique. As for the professor's question in an earlier post about some being able to outperform the computer, properly exacuted threshold braking can stop a car in a shorter distance than ABS. No computer system will ever be able to outperform a skilled driver. The key word being "skilled". Not everyone is. This is why ABS exist. > because you have abs doesn't mean you can steer. all that abs achieves, > and my grandmother is a great example of this, is some hope of > crash-avoidance in a situation where a panicking driver locks the wheels > and won't release them again. /you/ seem to be overlooking the key > disclaimer of the owners manual. |
Re: Disabling ABS
|
Re: Disabling ABS
Sean D wrote:
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message > news:McWdnZWvKfZRFFTeRVn-qw@speakeasy.net... > >>Professor wrote: >> >>>You are all overlooking a key feature of ABS... that nobody has >>>mentioned. It's the ability to steer after you stomp on the brake in a >>>panic situation. This steering ability could be key in crash >>>avoidance... >>> >>>Professor >>>www.telstar-electronics.com >>> >> >>dude, > > > "you can /only/ steer if you have sufficient adhesion." > > Exactly, it's anti-LOCK brakes, not anti-skid brakes. If you are doing 30 > miles per hour on an icy turn and you slam on the brakes, the wheel may not > lock but there is a decent chance the car's inertia will make you slide on > the ice because of the sudden deceleration, front tires without traction > don't steer, even if they are turning. > > Mr. Professor seems to assume that all people slam on the brakes with full > force in a panic situation. There are some of us who have had driver > training and learned "threshold braking". It's basically the manual way of > doing what ABS is doing. There's called skills. ABS was invented to > protect the people who don't know that technique. As for the professor's > question in an earlier post about some being able to outperform the > computer, properly exacuted threshold braking can stop a car in a shorter > distance than ABS. > > No computer system will ever be able to outperform a skilled driver. technically, that's not quite correct, but the conditions under which abs outperforms a skilled driver are fairly narrow in scope and require the abs to "know" the difference between tires, road conditions, etc. all current abs systems "know" [afaik] is whether the wheel is locked or not, and that's "dumb". > The > key word being "skilled". Not everyone is. This is why ABS exist. my experience with abs is that it's actually a very good idea on garbage slush boxes like buicks. for cars like that, the suspension is so soft, that sudden application of the brakes is initially taken up in the "slush" of suspension travel, not road resistance, and the wheel can almost instantaneously lock. as there's almost no driver feedback, the driver doesn't know what's going on until the whole car is starting to break loose - not good. and in this situation, i think the compromise that is abs is on balance a good idea. with a honda otoh, it's light, tight, and the driver can instantly feel what's going on, /way/ before the car brakes loose. the suspension is /not/ sloppy, so the "instant lock" phenomenon is not a feature of daily driving. in this case, i think abs is an option, and something i personally declined when i bought a new civic back in 2000. > > > >>because you have abs doesn't mean you can steer. all that abs achieves, >>and my grandmother is a great example of this, is some hope of >>crash-avoidance in a situation where a panicking driver locks the wheels >>and won't release them again. /you/ seem to be overlooking the key >>disclaimer of the owners manual. > > > |
Re: Disabling ABS
Professor wrote:
> I'm just glad you guys aren't designing my car!... LOL > > Professor > www.telstar-electronics.com > don't you think it a high risk strategy to call yourself "professor" if you don't know what you're talking about? and worse, don't know when to not /prove/ you don't know what you're talking about? |
Re: Disabling ABS
On 14 Jan 2006 13:36:44 -0800, "Professor"
<briangriffey@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >You are all overlooking a key feature of ABS... that nobody has >mentioned. It's the ability to steer after you stomp on the brake in a >panic situation. This steering ability could be key in crash >avoidance... > >Professor >www.telstar-electronics.com You are absolutely correct. I have seen this demonstrated at two performance driving schools I attented. After the instructors finished the demonstration, the students got a chance to try it. It made me a believer. I'm sure I'll get replies saying I don't know what I'm talking about and the instructors didn't either. I'll give my response ahead of time. Spend a few days and a little money and go to a school taught by professional drivers. You will be amazed at what you will learn. |
Re: Disabling ABS
jerri wrote:
> On 14 Jan 2006 13:36:44 -0800, "Professor" > <briangriffey@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > >>You are all overlooking a key feature of ABS... that nobody has >>mentioned. It's the ability to steer after you stomp on the brake in a >>panic situation. This steering ability could be key in crash >>avoidance... >> >>Professor >>www.telstar-electronics.com > > > You are absolutely correct. I have seen this demonstrated at two > performance driving schools I attented. After the instructors finished > the demonstration, the students got a chance to try it. It made me a > believer. I'm sure I'll get replies saying I don't know what I'm > talking about and the instructors didn't either. I'll give my response > ahead of time. Spend a few days and a little money and go to a > school taught by professional drivers. You will be amazed at what you > will learn. the place for abs is on slush buckets where the driver has no feedback on what's happening with the wheels, trucks where the driver has no feedback on what's happening with the wheels, locomotives where the driver has no feedback on what's happening with the wheels, planes where... get the idea? for a light & tight vehicle like a honda [this /is/ a honda group, right?] it's only necessary if the driver can't/won't/doesn't threshold brake. braking distance is a function of energy absorbed. abs chops up the absorption curve into chunks as it goes above and below threshold repeatedly. the abs can't moderate the degree of pressure to achieve threshold, nor can it hold it at threshold. all it can do is sense whether the wheel is locked, release, and so on. each time it releases, it passes threshold, each time it releases, it passes threshold. this may be fine in reasonable friction conditions where the braking effect between each release is considerable and the total energy absorbed quickly accumulates, but in low friction conditions, this can introduce considerable time delay into the energy absorption equation. try stopping quickly in snow with abs and see where it gets you. |
Re: Disabling ABS
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:18:13 -0800, jim beam <nospam@example.net>
wrote: >jerri wrote: >> On 14 Jan 2006 13:36:44 -0800, "Professor" >> <briangriffey@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >> >>>You are all overlooking a key feature of ABS... that nobody has >>>mentioned. It's the ability to steer after you stomp on the brake in a >>>panic situation. This steering ability could be key in crash >>>avoidance... >>> >>>Professor >>>www.telstar-electronics.com >> >> >> You are absolutely correct. I have seen this demonstrated at two >> performance driving schools I attented. After the instructors finished >> the demonstration, the students got a chance to try it. It made me a >> believer. I'm sure I'll get replies saying I don't know what I'm >> talking about and the instructors didn't either. I'll give my response >> ahead of time. Spend a few days and a little money and go to a >> school taught by professional drivers. You will be amazed at what you >> will learn. > >the place for abs is on slush buckets where the driver has no feedback >on what's happening with the wheels, trucks where the driver has no >feedback on what's happening with the wheels, locomotives where the >driver has no feedback on what's happening with the wheels, planes >where... get the idea? > >for a light & tight vehicle like a honda [this /is/ a honda group, >right?] it's only necessary if the driver can't/won't/doesn't threshold >brake. > >braking distance is a function of energy absorbed. abs chops up the >absorption curve into chunks as it goes above and below threshold >repeatedly. the abs can't moderate the degree of pressure to achieve >threshold, nor can it hold it at threshold. all it can do is sense >whether the wheel is locked, release, and so on. each time it releases, >it passes threshold, each time it releases, it passes threshold. this >may be fine in reasonable friction conditions where the braking effect >between each release is considerable and the total energy absorbed >quickly accumulates, but in low friction conditions, this can introduce >considerable time delay into the energy absorption equation. try >stopping quickly in snow with abs and see where it gets you. My prediction was correct. I knew it would be. IRMC. BTW: Your "Shift Key" isn't working. PLONK! You won't stir my pot again. |
Re: Disabling ABS
jerri wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:18:13 -0800, jim beam <nospam@example.net> > wrote: > > >>jerri wrote: >> >>>On 14 Jan 2006 13:36:44 -0800, "Professor" >>><briangriffey@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>You are all overlooking a key feature of ABS... that nobody has >>>>mentioned. It's the ability to steer after you stomp on the brake in a >>>>panic situation. This steering ability could be key in crash >>>>avoidance... >>>> >>>>Professor >>>>www.telstar-electronics.com >>> >>> >>>You are absolutely correct. I have seen this demonstrated at two >>>performance driving schools I attented. After the instructors finished >>>the demonstration, the students got a chance to try it. It made me a >>>believer. I'm sure I'll get replies saying I don't know what I'm >>>talking about and the instructors didn't either. I'll give my response >>>ahead of time. Spend a few days and a little money and go to a >>>school taught by professional drivers. You will be amazed at what you >>>will learn. >> >>the place for abs is on slush buckets where the driver has no feedback >>on what's happening with the wheels, trucks where the driver has no >>feedback on what's happening with the wheels, locomotives where the >>driver has no feedback on what's happening with the wheels, planes >>where... get the idea? >> >>for a light & tight vehicle like a honda [this /is/ a honda group, >>right?] it's only necessary if the driver can't/won't/doesn't threshold >>brake. >> >>braking distance is a function of energy absorbed. abs chops up the >>absorption curve into chunks as it goes above and below threshold >>repeatedly. the abs can't moderate the degree of pressure to achieve >>threshold, nor can it hold it at threshold. all it can do is sense >>whether the wheel is locked, release, and so on. each time it releases, >>it passes threshold, each time it releases, it passes threshold. this >>may be fine in reasonable friction conditions where the braking effect >>between each release is considerable and the total energy absorbed >>quickly accumulates, but in low friction conditions, this can introduce >>considerable time delay into the energy absorption equation. try >>stopping quickly in snow with abs and see where it gets you. > > > > My prediction was correct. I knew it would be. IRMC. BTW: Your "Shift > Key" isn't working. PLONK! You won't stir my pot again. a worthy technical analysis. thanks for contributing to the knowledge pool by sharing your expertise. |
Re: Disabling ABS
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:50:40 -0500, "Sean D" <sdonaher@sympatico.ca>
wrote: > >"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >news:McWdnZWvKfZRFFTeRVn-qw@speakeasy.net... >> Professor wrote: >> > You are all overlooking a key feature of ABS... that nobody has >> > mentioned. It's the ability to steer after you stomp on the brake in a >> > panic situation. This steering ability could be key in crash >> > avoidance... >> > >> > Professor >> > www.telstar-electronics.com >> > >> dude, > >"you can /only/ steer if you have sufficient adhesion." > >Exactly, it's anti-LOCK brakes, not anti-skid brakes. If you are doing 30 >miles per hour on an icy turn and you slam on the brakes, the wheel may not >lock but there is a decent chance the car's inertia will make you slide on >the ice because of the sudden deceleration, front tires without traction >don't steer, even if they are turning. > >Mr. Professor seems to assume that all people slam on the brakes with full >force in a panic situation. There are some of us who have had driver >training and learned "threshold braking". Actually, its properly called Cadence braking > It's basically the manual way of >doing what ABS is doing. There's called skills. ABS was invented to >protect the people who don't know that technique. As for the professor's >question in an earlier post about some being able to outperform the >computer, properly exacuted threshold braking can stop a car in a shorter >distance than ABS. > >No computer system will ever be able to outperform a skilled driver. The >key word being "skilled". Not everyone is. This is why ABS exist. > > >> because you have abs doesn't mean you can steer. all that abs achieves, >> and my grandmother is a great example of this, is some hope of >> crash-avoidance in a situation where a panicking driver locks the wheels >> and won't release them again. /you/ seem to be overlooking the key >> disclaimer of the owners manual. > |
Re: Disabling ABS
"flobert" <nomail@here.NOT> wrote in message news:i0k2t1t94gr91ve2nj0183ejkaptgk1mm2@4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:50:40 -0500, "Sean D" <sdonaher@sympatico.ca> > wrote: > > > > >"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message > >news:McWdnZWvKfZRFFTeRVn-qw@speakeasy.net... > >> Professor wrote: > >> > You are all overlooking a key feature of ABS... that nobody has > >> > mentioned. It's the ability to steer after you stomp on the brake in a > >> > panic situation. This steering ability could be key in crash > >> > avoidance... > >> > > >> > Professor > >> > www.telstar-electronics.com > >> > > >> dude, > > > >"you can /only/ steer if you have sufficient adhesion." > > > >Exactly, it's anti-LOCK brakes, not anti-skid brakes. If you are doing 30 > >miles per hour on an icy turn and you slam on the brakes, the wheel may not > >lock but there is a decent chance the car's inertia will make you slide on > >the ice because of the sudden deceleration, front tires without traction > >don't steer, even if they are turning. > > > >Mr. Professor seems to assume that all people slam on the brakes with full > >force in a panic situation. There are some of us who have had driver > >training and learned "threshold braking". > > Actually, its properly called Cadence braking If you'd bothered to google both terms you'd know that they are both equally accepted terms for basically the same technique. > > > It's basically the manual way of > >doing what ABS is doing. There's called skills. ABS was invented to > >protect the people who don't know that technique. As for the professor's > >question in an earlier post about some being able to outperform the > >computer, properly exacuted threshold braking can stop a car in a shorter > >distance than ABS. > > > >No computer system will ever be able to outperform a skilled driver. The > >key word being "skilled". Not everyone is. This is why ABS exist. > > > > > >> because you have abs doesn't mean you can steer. all that abs achieves, > >> and my grandmother is a great example of this, is some hope of > >> crash-avoidance in a situation where a panicking driver locks the wheels > >> and won't release them again. /you/ seem to be overlooking the key > >> disclaimer of the owners manual. > > > |
Re: Disabling ABS
Sean D wrote:
> "flobert" <nomail@here.NOT> wrote in message > news:i0k2t1t94gr91ve2nj0183ejkaptgk1mm2@4ax.com... > >>On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:50:40 -0500, "Sean D" <sdonaher@sympatico.ca> >>wrote: >> >> >>>"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>>news:McWdnZWvKfZRFFTeRVn-qw@speakeasy.net... >>> >>>>Professor wrote: >>>> >>>>>You are all overlooking a key feature of ABS... that nobody has >>>>>mentioned. It's the ability to steer after you stomp on the brake in > > a > >>>>>panic situation. This steering ability could be key in crash >>>>>avoidance... >>>>> >>>>>Professor >>>>>www.telstar-electronics.com >>>>> >>>> >>>>dude, >>> >>>"you can /only/ steer if you have sufficient adhesion." >>> >>>Exactly, it's anti-LOCK brakes, not anti-skid brakes. If you are doing > > 30 > >>>miles per hour on an icy turn and you slam on the brakes, the wheel may > > not > >>>lock but there is a decent chance the car's inertia will make you slide > > on > >>>the ice because of the sudden deceleration, front tires without traction >>>don't steer, even if they are turning. >>> >>>Mr. Professor seems to assume that all people slam on the brakes with > > full > >>>force in a panic situation. There are some of us who have had driver >>>training and learned "threshold braking". >> >>Actually, its properly called Cadence braking > > > If you'd bothered to google both terms you'd know that they are both equally > accepted terms for basically the same technique. not really. cadence, like abs, is where you pass /through/ the threshold of adhesion, lock and have to release. threshold is where you brake /at/ the adhesion limit, but don't pass through it. > > >>>It's basically the manual way of >>>doing what ABS is doing. There's called skills. ABS was invented to >>>protect the people who don't know that technique. As for the professor's >>>question in an earlier post about some being able to outperform the >>>computer, properly exacuted threshold braking can stop a car in a shorter >>>distance than ABS. >>> >>>No computer system will ever be able to outperform a skilled driver. The >>>key word being "skilled". Not everyone is. This is why ABS exist. >>> >>> >>> >>>>because you have abs doesn't mean you can steer. all that abs > > achieves, > >>>>and my grandmother is a great example of this, is some hope of >>>>crash-avoidance in a situation where a panicking driver locks the > > wheels > >>>>and won't release them again. /you/ seem to be overlooking the key >>>>disclaimer of the owners manual. >>> > > |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands