|
To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a
Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? You guys must like getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little 4-cylinder engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or are you just trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in case, you DIDN'T know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car DOESN'T qualify as a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY does, however, is give everyone a good laugh whenever they see your joke of a car on the street. LONG LIVE THE CAMARO alt.autos.camaro |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
Okay Mr. Camaro guy. The stickers that they have on their car are probably
performance upgrades under the hood so they are relevant u dumb ass. If they're not then u are okay to assume that the Honda belongs to some wanna-be poser. But I hope u know that the fastest Civic ran below a 10 second in the quarter mile?? I believe it was somewhere around 7 seconds. Which is I believe around where ur Camaro runs... so watch ur mouth and get ur facts straight before ever confronting the import scene again, Mr. Potato Head. "98' Camaro" <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote in message news:24278-4174BC80-301@storefull-3178.bay.webtv.net... > What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a > Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy > 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? You guys must like > getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little 4-cylinder > engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or are you just > trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in case, you DIDN'T > know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car DOESN'T qualify as > a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY does, however, is give > everyone a good laugh whenever they see your joke of a car on the > street. > > LONG LIVE THE CAMARO > > alt.autos.camaro > |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
Okay Mr. Camaro guy. The stickers that they have on their car are probably
performance upgrades under the hood so they are relevant u dumb ass. If they're not then u are okay to assume that the Honda belongs to some wanna-be poser. But I hope u know that the fastest Civic ran below a 10 second in the quarter mile?? I believe it was somewhere around 7 seconds. Which is I believe around where ur Camaro runs... so watch ur mouth and get ur facts straight before ever confronting the import scene again, Mr. Potato Head. "98' Camaro" <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote in message news:24278-4174BC80-301@storefull-3178.bay.webtv.net... > What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a > Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy > 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? You guys must like > getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little 4-cylinder > engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or are you just > trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in case, you DIDN'T > know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car DOESN'T qualify as > a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY does, however, is give > everyone a good laugh whenever they see your joke of a car on the > street. > > LONG LIVE THE CAMARO > > alt.autos.camaro > |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
i saw a civic beat a dodge viper in a race once.
I would also like to say that calling honda's rice cars is racist. |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
i saw a civic beat a dodge viper in a race once.
I would also like to say that calling honda's rice cars is racist. |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:04:32 -0500, icruzn@webtv.net (98' Camaro)
wrote: >What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a >Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy >4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? When an Accord comes with 240hp and the V6 camaro around 200... Hmm.. Wait, the V8 only has another 40hp or so over that.. <rofl> >LONG LIVE THE CAMARO Uhmm.. Dipshit troll person? The Camaro lost the pony wars and is belly up. That's right. It's gone. Just run right out there and try to buy a new one. A few leftover V6 rental cars but that's it. When's the last time you saw a Honda in a rental fleet? They don't do that. <rofl> |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:04:32 -0500, icruzn@webtv.net (98' Camaro)
wrote: >What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a >Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy >4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? When an Accord comes with 240hp and the V6 camaro around 200... Hmm.. Wait, the V8 only has another 40hp or so over that.. <rofl> >LONG LIVE THE CAMARO Uhmm.. Dipshit troll person? The Camaro lost the pony wars and is belly up. That's right. It's gone. Just run right out there and try to buy a new one. A few leftover V6 rental cars but that's it. When's the last time you saw a Honda in a rental fleet? They don't do that. <rofl> |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
yawn.
I pass camaro's all the time in my wimpy cr-v. They are up on lifts, jacks, junkyards, on blocks, etc.. Yep, got to love those camaro's, they can pass anything on the street except a service station. "98' Camaro" <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote in message news:24278-4174BC80-301@storefull-3178.bay.webtv.net... > What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a > Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy > 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? You guys must like > getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little 4-cylinder > engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or are you just > trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in case, you DIDN'T > know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car DOESN'T qualify as > a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY does, however, is give > everyone a good laugh whenever they see your joke of a car on the > street. > > LONG LIVE THE CAMARO > > alt.autos.camaro > |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
yawn.
I pass camaro's all the time in my wimpy cr-v. They are up on lifts, jacks, junkyards, on blocks, etc.. Yep, got to love those camaro's, they can pass anything on the street except a service station. "98' Camaro" <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote in message news:24278-4174BC80-301@storefull-3178.bay.webtv.net... > What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a > Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy > 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? You guys must like > getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little 4-cylinder > engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or are you just > trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in case, you DIDN'T > know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car DOESN'T qualify as > a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY does, however, is give > everyone a good laugh whenever they see your joke of a car on the > street. > > LONG LIVE THE CAMARO > > alt.autos.camaro > |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
lament wrote: > I would also like to say that calling honda's rice cars is racist. Don't you mean "richest"? |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
lament wrote: > I would also like to say that calling honda's rice cars is racist. Don't you mean "richest"? |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
Randolph wrote: > > lament wrote: > > > I would also like to say that calling honda's rice cars is racist. > > Don't you mean "richest"? Damn spell checker ruined a bad joke. I meant of course to write "ricist" |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
Randolph wrote: > > lament wrote: > > > I would also like to say that calling honda's rice cars is racist. > > Don't you mean "richest"? Damn spell checker ruined a bad joke. I meant of course to write "ricist" |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
Beat me to the punch Bob. I was going to comment on how few Hondas I see on
the side of the road versus how many GM products I see on the side of the road. C B "bob" <nowhere@a.com> wrote in message news:5Fddd.962$sR2.796@fe61.usenetserver.com... > yawn. > > I pass camaro's all the time in my wimpy cr-v. They are up on lifts, > jacks, junkyards, on blocks, etc.. Yep, got to love those camaro's, they > can pass anything on the street except a service station. > > > "98' Camaro" <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote in message > news:24278-4174BC80-301@storefull-3178.bay.webtv.net... >> What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a >> Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy >> 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? You guys must like >> getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little 4-cylinder >> engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or are you just >> trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in case, you DIDN'T >> know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car DOESN'T qualify as >> a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY does, however, is give >> everyone a good laugh whenever they see your joke of a car on the >> street. >> >> LONG LIVE THE CAMARO >> >> alt.autos.camaro >> > > > |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
Beat me to the punch Bob. I was going to comment on how few Hondas I see on
the side of the road versus how many GM products I see on the side of the road. C B "bob" <nowhere@a.com> wrote in message news:5Fddd.962$sR2.796@fe61.usenetserver.com... > yawn. > > I pass camaro's all the time in my wimpy cr-v. They are up on lifts, > jacks, junkyards, on blocks, etc.. Yep, got to love those camaro's, they > can pass anything on the street except a service station. > > > "98' Camaro" <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote in message > news:24278-4174BC80-301@storefull-3178.bay.webtv.net... >> What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a >> Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy >> 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? You guys must like >> getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little 4-cylinder >> engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or are you just >> trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in case, you DIDN'T >> know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car DOESN'T qualify as >> a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY does, however, is give >> everyone a good laugh whenever they see your joke of a car on the >> street. >> >> LONG LIVE THE CAMARO >> >> alt.autos.camaro >> > > > |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
lamont1 wrote:
> > i saw a civic beat a dodge viper in a race once. > I would also like to say that calling honda's rice cars is racist. and ive seen the shadow people, but i usually dont go about stating this observation. |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
lamont1 wrote:
> > i saw a civic beat a dodge viper in a race once. > I would also like to say that calling honda's rice cars is racist. and ive seen the shadow people, but i usually dont go about stating this observation. |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
Randolph wrote: > > Randolph wrote: > > > > lament wrote: > > > > > I would also like to say that calling honda's rice cars is racist. > > > > Don't you mean "richest"? > > Damn spell checker ruined a bad joke. I meant of course to write > "ricist" The best efforts of mice 'n men are often easily foiled... <g> -- JT Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4 |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
Randolph wrote: > > Randolph wrote: > > > > lament wrote: > > > > > I would also like to say that calling honda's rice cars is racist. > > > > Don't you mean "richest"? > > Damn spell checker ruined a bad joke. I meant of course to write > "ricist" The best efforts of mice 'n men are often easily foiled... <g> -- JT Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4 |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
Camaros turned into doo doo in the mid 1970's and everything since then
produced by GM followed suite... JT (Who owns five American cars but they are all Studebakers) 1931 Studebaker President State Coupe (Q4) 1955 Studebaker President State Coupe 1955 Studebaker President State Sedan - Almost done Daily Driver 1956 Studebaker Power Hawk - Long Time Fun Car - (Will be burial container) 1964 Studebaker Champ P/U T-6 Long Bed - Daily driver 1983 Honda Civic FE Project 1956 Leica M2 C B George wrote: > > Beat me to the punch Bob. I was going to comment on how few Hondas I see on > the side of the road versus how many GM products I see on the side of the > road. > C B > > "bob" <nowhere@a.com> wrote in message > news:5Fddd.962$sR2.796@fe61.usenetserver.com... > > yawn. > > > > I pass camaro's all the time in my wimpy cr-v. They are up on lifts, > > jacks, junkyards, on blocks, etc.. Yep, got to love those camaro's, they > > can pass anything on the street except a service station. > > > > > > "98' Camaro" <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote in message > > news:24278-4174BC80-301@storefull-3178.bay.webtv.net... > >> What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a > >> Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy > >> 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? You guys must like > >> getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little 4-cylinder > >> engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or are you just > >> trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in case, you DIDN'T > >> know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car DOESN'T qualify as > >> a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY does, however, is give > >> everyone a good laugh whenever they see your joke of a car on the > >> street. > >> > >> LONG LIVE THE CAMARO > >> > >> alt.autos.camaro > >> > > > > > |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
Camaros turned into doo doo in the mid 1970's and everything since then
produced by GM followed suite... JT (Who owns five American cars but they are all Studebakers) 1931 Studebaker President State Coupe (Q4) 1955 Studebaker President State Coupe 1955 Studebaker President State Sedan - Almost done Daily Driver 1956 Studebaker Power Hawk - Long Time Fun Car - (Will be burial container) 1964 Studebaker Champ P/U T-6 Long Bed - Daily driver 1983 Honda Civic FE Project 1956 Leica M2 C B George wrote: > > Beat me to the punch Bob. I was going to comment on how few Hondas I see on > the side of the road versus how many GM products I see on the side of the > road. > C B > > "bob" <nowhere@a.com> wrote in message > news:5Fddd.962$sR2.796@fe61.usenetserver.com... > > yawn. > > > > I pass camaro's all the time in my wimpy cr-v. They are up on lifts, > > jacks, junkyards, on blocks, etc.. Yep, got to love those camaro's, they > > can pass anything on the street except a service station. > > > > > > "98' Camaro" <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote in message > > news:24278-4174BC80-301@storefull-3178.bay.webtv.net... > >> What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a > >> Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy > >> 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? You guys must like > >> getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little 4-cylinder > >> engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or are you just > >> trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in case, you DIDN'T > >> know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car DOESN'T qualify as > >> a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY does, however, is give > >> everyone a good laugh whenever they see your joke of a car on the > >> street. > >> > >> LONG LIVE THE CAMARO > >> > >> alt.autos.camaro > >> > > > > > |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
98' Camaro wrote:
> What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a > Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy > 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? Sure, with my V6 Honda. You guys must like > getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little > 4-cylinder engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or > are you just trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in > case, you DIDN'T know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car > DOESN'T qualify as a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY > does, however, is give everyone a good laugh whenever they see your > joke of a car on the street. > > LONG LIVE THE CAMARO > > alt.autos.camaro A dying breed. Long live the Rambler American Classic. |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
98' Camaro wrote:
> What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a > Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy > 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? Sure, with my V6 Honda. You guys must like > getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little > 4-cylinder engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or > are you just trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in > case, you DIDN'T know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car > DOESN'T qualify as a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY > does, however, is give everyone a good laugh whenever they see your > joke of a car on the street. > > LONG LIVE THE CAMARO > > alt.autos.camaro A dying breed. Long live the Rambler American Classic. |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
icruzn@webtv.net (98' Camaro) wrote in news:24278-4174BC80-301@storefull-
3178.bay.webtv.net: > What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a > Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy > 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? You guys must like > getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little 4-cylinder > engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or are you just > trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in case, you DIDN'T > know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car DOESN'T qualify as > a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY does, however, is give > everyone a good laugh whenever they see your joke of a car on the > street. > > LONG LIVE THE CAMARO > > alt.autos.camaro > HEY, GREASEBALL, you have NO idea what a 'Powered by Honda' sticker does for performance, so WATCH OUT! |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
icruzn@webtv.net (98' Camaro) wrote in news:24278-4174BC80-301@storefull-
3178.bay.webtv.net: > What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a > Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy > 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? You guys must like > getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little 4-cylinder > engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or are you just > trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in case, you DIDN'T > know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car DOESN'T qualify as > a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY does, however, is give > everyone a good laugh whenever they see your joke of a car on the > street. > > LONG LIVE THE CAMARO > > alt.autos.camaro > HEY, GREASEBALL, you have NO idea what a 'Powered by Honda' sticker does for performance, so WATCH OUT! |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
Here's what an idiot decided to post on alt.autos.honda. I've never read
or posted on the camaro newsgroup, nor will I likely do it again, but will you please keep your trolls in their cage? The Camaro newsgroup can be trolled as well, and to quote someone from the Honda newsgroup, "I pass camaro's all the time in my wimpy cr-v. They are up on lifts, jacks, junkyards, on blocks, etc.. Yep, got to love those camaro's, they can pass anything on the street except a service station." Cosmin 98' Camaro wrote: > What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a > Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy > 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? You guys must like > getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little 4-cylinder > engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or are you just > trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in case, you DIDN'T > know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car DOESN'T qualify as > a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY does, however, is give > everyone a good laugh whenever they see your joke of a car on the > street. > > LONG LIVE THE CAMARO > > alt.autos.camaro > |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
Here's what an idiot decided to post on alt.autos.honda. I've never read
or posted on the camaro newsgroup, nor will I likely do it again, but will you please keep your trolls in their cage? The Camaro newsgroup can be trolled as well, and to quote someone from the Honda newsgroup, "I pass camaro's all the time in my wimpy cr-v. They are up on lifts, jacks, junkyards, on blocks, etc.. Yep, got to love those camaro's, they can pass anything on the street except a service station." Cosmin 98' Camaro wrote: > What is the deal with you Honda owners trying to take on and burn a > Camaro? Do you think you will actually burn one with your wimpy > 4-cylinders, as compared to a V-6 or V-8 Camaro? You guys must like > getting burned- and what is the deal with reving your little 4-cylinder > engines at stop lights? Are trying to sound impressive or are you just > trying to keep your engine running? By the way, just in case, you DIDN'T > know, adding some stickers and a spoiler to your car DOESN'T qualify as > a "performance upgrade" in any way- all it REALLY does, however, is give > everyone a good laugh whenever they see your joke of a car on the > street. > > LONG LIVE THE CAMARO > > alt.autos.camaro > |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
In case you guys are wondering, I posted that message in
alt.autos.camaro to see what those people think when they're being trolled. Cosmin |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
In case you guys are wondering, I posted that message in
alt.autos.camaro to see what those people think when they're being trolled. Cosmin |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
>> LONG LIVE THE CAMARO
>> >> alt.autos.camaro > >A dying breed. Dying? Last time I checked it was a DEAD breed! Just try to go out and buy a brand new '05 Camaro and you'll see just how dead that breed became. At leas the new Pony Wars have much better cars: Evolution Vs. STi |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
>> LONG LIVE THE CAMARO
>> >> alt.autos.camaro > >A dying breed. Dying? Last time I checked it was a DEAD breed! Just try to go out and buy a brand new '05 Camaro and you'll see just how dead that breed became. At leas the new Pony Wars have much better cars: Evolution Vs. STi |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
DragonRider wrote: > > >> LONG LIVE THE CAMARO > >> > >> alt.autos.camaro > > > >A dying breed. > > Dying? Last time I checked it was a DEAD breed! Just try to go out and > buy a brand new '05 Camaro and you'll see just how dead that breed > became. > > At leas the new Pony Wars have much better cars: Evolution Vs. STi I would take issue in that the original Camaro was a better designed/built vehicle than the Mustang. I just could have not a bit of respect for any vehicle that incorporated the trunk floor as the top of the gas tank... <shudder> -- JT Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4 |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
DragonRider wrote: > > >> LONG LIVE THE CAMARO > >> > >> alt.autos.camaro > > > >A dying breed. > > Dying? Last time I checked it was a DEAD breed! Just try to go out and > buy a brand new '05 Camaro and you'll see just how dead that breed > became. > > At leas the new Pony Wars have much better cars: Evolution Vs. STi I would take issue in that the original Camaro was a better designed/built vehicle than the Mustang. I just could have not a bit of respect for any vehicle that incorporated the trunk floor as the top of the gas tank... <shudder> -- JT Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4 |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:35:50 GMT, Grumpy au Contraire
<Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote: >I would take issue in that the original Camaro was a better >designed/built vehicle than the Mustang. I just could have not a bit of >respect for any vehicle that incorporated the trunk floor as the top of >the gas tank... I figure there were a number of reasons the Mustang beat it. These included ease of getting in and out as well as outward visibility. The smaller overall size (real or imagined) and real storage area. One might recall that the majority of Mustangs were V6's and that of those the bulk went to ladies as owners and the rest to rental fleets. The Camaro may have been faster, and it may have done some things better, but in day to day use it fell short and the lack of sales reflected that. |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:35:50 GMT, Grumpy au Contraire
<Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote: >I would take issue in that the original Camaro was a better >designed/built vehicle than the Mustang. I just could have not a bit of >respect for any vehicle that incorporated the trunk floor as the top of >the gas tank... I figure there were a number of reasons the Mustang beat it. These included ease of getting in and out as well as outward visibility. The smaller overall size (real or imagined) and real storage area. One might recall that the majority of Mustangs were V6's and that of those the bulk went to ladies as owners and the rest to rental fleets. The Camaro may have been faster, and it may have done some things better, but in day to day use it fell short and the lack of sales reflected that. |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
DragonRider wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:35:50 GMT, Grumpy au Contraire > <Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote: > > >I would take issue in that the original Camaro was a better > >designed/built vehicle than the Mustang. I just could have not a bit of > >respect for any vehicle that incorporated the trunk floor as the top of > >the gas tank... > > I figure there were a number of reasons the Mustang beat it. These > included ease of getting in and out as well as outward visibility. The > smaller overall size (real or imagined) and real storage area. One > might recall that the majority of Mustangs were V6's and that of those > the bulk went to ladies as owners and the rest to rental fleets. The > Camaro may have been faster, and it may have done some things better, > but in day to day use it fell short and the lack of sales reflected > that. Uh, I don't think that V6's were a factor in the 1960's or a good portion of the 1970's for that matter... -- JT Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4 |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
DragonRider wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:35:50 GMT, Grumpy au Contraire > <Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote: > > >I would take issue in that the original Camaro was a better > >designed/built vehicle than the Mustang. I just could have not a bit of > >respect for any vehicle that incorporated the trunk floor as the top of > >the gas tank... > > I figure there were a number of reasons the Mustang beat it. These > included ease of getting in and out as well as outward visibility. The > smaller overall size (real or imagined) and real storage area. One > might recall that the majority of Mustangs were V6's and that of those > the bulk went to ladies as owners and the rest to rental fleets. The > Camaro may have been faster, and it may have done some things better, > but in day to day use it fell short and the lack of sales reflected > that. Uh, I don't think that V6's were a factor in the 1960's or a good portion of the 1970's for that matter... -- JT Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4 |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:04:24 GMT, Grumpy au Contraire
<Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote: > > >DragonRider wrote: >> >> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:35:50 GMT, Grumpy au Contraire >> <Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote: >> >> >I would take issue in that the original Camaro was a better >> >designed/built vehicle than the Mustang. I just could have not a bit of >> >respect for any vehicle that incorporated the trunk floor as the top of >> >the gas tank... >> >> I figure there were a number of reasons the Mustang beat it. These >> included ease of getting in and out as well as outward visibility. The >> smaller overall size (real or imagined) and real storage area. One >> might recall that the majority of Mustangs were V6's and that of those >> the bulk went to ladies as owners and the rest to rental fleets. The >> Camaro may have been faster, and it may have done some things better, >> but in day to day use it fell short and the lack of sales reflected >> that. > > > >Uh, I don't think that V6's were a factor in the 1960's or a good >portion of the 1970's for that matter... In the 60's and 70's there were still Camaro's.. ;) In the '60's there were still Camaro's worth buying! |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:04:24 GMT, Grumpy au Contraire
<Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote: > > >DragonRider wrote: >> >> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:35:50 GMT, Grumpy au Contraire >> <Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote: >> >> >I would take issue in that the original Camaro was a better >> >designed/built vehicle than the Mustang. I just could have not a bit of >> >respect for any vehicle that incorporated the trunk floor as the top of >> >the gas tank... >> >> I figure there were a number of reasons the Mustang beat it. These >> included ease of getting in and out as well as outward visibility. The >> smaller overall size (real or imagined) and real storage area. One >> might recall that the majority of Mustangs were V6's and that of those >> the bulk went to ladies as owners and the rest to rental fleets. The >> Camaro may have been faster, and it may have done some things better, >> but in day to day use it fell short and the lack of sales reflected >> that. > > > >Uh, I don't think that V6's were a factor in the 1960's or a good >portion of the 1970's for that matter... In the 60's and 70's there were still Camaro's.. ;) In the '60's there were still Camaro's worth buying! |
Re: To EVERY Honda (and Other "Rice Car") Owner...
WHAT...they don't run on rice???
"lamont1" <lamont@lamont.com> wrote in message news:rBadd.7063$n81.1502@trnddc08... > i saw a civic beat a dodge viper in a race once. > I would also like to say that calling honda's rice cars is racist. > > |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands