Re: FIT or Yaris - Element or xB
> Why exactly is AWD necessary in your area? If you are referring to winter
> conditions, all you need is a good set of winter tires. I live in northwestern Connecticut, and my other car is a 1993 Volvo 940 -- excellent in the summer, but it has a huge weight bias and rear wheel drive...even with winter tires it is one of the worst cars I've ever driven in winter conditions (unfortunately, I overlooked this when I bought in the summer, and I fell in love with it ever since.) |
Re: FIT or Yaris - Element or xB
Robert wrote:
>> Why exactly is AWD necessary in your area? If you are referring to winter >> conditions, all you need is a good set of winter tires. > > I live in northwestern Connecticut, and my other car is a 1993 Volvo > 940 -- excellent in the summer, but it has a huge weight bias and rear > wheel drive...even with winter tires it is one of the worst cars I've > ever driven in winter conditions (unfortunately, I overlooked this when > I bought in the summer, and I fell in love with it ever since.) But that's a rear-wheel drive car. An Element is front-wheel drive, so it's still better in snow than a rear-wheel drive car. I live in central Canada, so obviously I've experienced winter weather too. |
Re: FIT or Yaris - Element or xB
Robert wrote:
>> Why exactly is AWD necessary in your area? If you are referring to winter >> conditions, all you need is a good set of winter tires. > > I live in northwestern Connecticut, and my other car is a 1993 Volvo > 940 -- excellent in the summer, but it has a huge weight bias and rear > wheel drive...even with winter tires it is one of the worst cars I've > ever driven in winter conditions (unfortunately, I overlooked this when > I bought in the summer, and I fell in love with it ever since.) But that's a rear-wheel drive car. An Element is front-wheel drive, so it's still better in snow than a rear-wheel drive car. I live in central Canada, so obviously I've experienced winter weather too. |
Re: FIT or Yaris - Element or xB
Robert wrote:
>> Why exactly is AWD necessary in your area? If you are referring to winter >> conditions, all you need is a good set of winter tires. > > I live in northwestern Connecticut, and my other car is a 1993 Volvo > 940 -- excellent in the summer, but it has a huge weight bias and rear > wheel drive...even with winter tires it is one of the worst cars I've > ever driven in winter conditions (unfortunately, I overlooked this when > I bought in the summer, and I fell in love with it ever since.) But that's a rear-wheel drive car. An Element is front-wheel drive, so it's still better in snow than a rear-wheel drive car. I live in central Canada, so obviously I've experienced winter weather too. |
Re: FIT or Yaris - Element or xB
FWIW - I bought a 2006 used Saturn Ion 2 with all the options,
sunroof, 11000 miles. It just came off 1 year lease. I was very interested in either a FIT or YARIS, however every one of those vehicles coming into this area until the end of the year is already sold. I had the option to buy one sight unseen, and I would have received it in January. The Saturn I got, in a new 2007 version costs $17000. I got it for $12000. It will be garaged and cared for so even though I would agree F/Y are better quality, this vehicle should certainly provide satisfactory service to us. Also, it will tow 1000# in case we want to pull a small fishing boat to the lake, which is only 3 blocks from the house. Thanks to everyone for your input. It was valuable information in making my decision. On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:58:35 GMT, clamb1@new.rr.com (Chris Lamb) wrote: >I need some wheels. Cost is the primary determinant, but I want to >spend my money wisely, and a couple thousand more for a vehicle that >gives me more utility may be money well spent. Second determinant is >fuel economy. I don't haul anything, it is just me going many miles. >I have looked at the Fit and Yaris and they fit for cost and economy. >But I have read some real horror stories about the FIT. > >This does not HAVE TO be a determinant, but it would be nice if the >vehicle could pull say a 1000# trailer, little fishing boat. But that >is just a nice to have. > >I like the looks of both the Element and the Scion xB. > >Of those 4 vehicles, and understanding my determinants, and hopefully >YOU knowing a whole lot more about these vehicles than I do, which >would you buy and why? |
Re: FIT or Yaris - Element or xB
FWIW - I bought a 2006 used Saturn Ion 2 with all the options,
sunroof, 11000 miles. It just came off 1 year lease. I was very interested in either a FIT or YARIS, however every one of those vehicles coming into this area until the end of the year is already sold. I had the option to buy one sight unseen, and I would have received it in January. The Saturn I got, in a new 2007 version costs $17000. I got it for $12000. It will be garaged and cared for so even though I would agree F/Y are better quality, this vehicle should certainly provide satisfactory service to us. Also, it will tow 1000# in case we want to pull a small fishing boat to the lake, which is only 3 blocks from the house. Thanks to everyone for your input. It was valuable information in making my decision. On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:58:35 GMT, clamb1@new.rr.com (Chris Lamb) wrote: >I need some wheels. Cost is the primary determinant, but I want to >spend my money wisely, and a couple thousand more for a vehicle that >gives me more utility may be money well spent. Second determinant is >fuel economy. I don't haul anything, it is just me going many miles. >I have looked at the Fit and Yaris and they fit for cost and economy. >But I have read some real horror stories about the FIT. > >This does not HAVE TO be a determinant, but it would be nice if the >vehicle could pull say a 1000# trailer, little fishing boat. But that >is just a nice to have. > >I like the looks of both the Element and the Scion xB. > >Of those 4 vehicles, and understanding my determinants, and hopefully >YOU knowing a whole lot more about these vehicles than I do, which >would you buy and why? |
Re: FIT or Yaris - Element or xB
FWIW - I bought a 2006 used Saturn Ion 2 with all the options,
sunroof, 11000 miles. It just came off 1 year lease. I was very interested in either a FIT or YARIS, however every one of those vehicles coming into this area until the end of the year is already sold. I had the option to buy one sight unseen, and I would have received it in January. The Saturn I got, in a new 2007 version costs $17000. I got it for $12000. It will be garaged and cared for so even though I would agree F/Y are better quality, this vehicle should certainly provide satisfactory service to us. Also, it will tow 1000# in case we want to pull a small fishing boat to the lake, which is only 3 blocks from the house. Thanks to everyone for your input. It was valuable information in making my decision. On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:58:35 GMT, clamb1@new.rr.com (Chris Lamb) wrote: >I need some wheels. Cost is the primary determinant, but I want to >spend my money wisely, and a couple thousand more for a vehicle that >gives me more utility may be money well spent. Second determinant is >fuel economy. I don't haul anything, it is just me going many miles. >I have looked at the Fit and Yaris and they fit for cost and economy. >But I have read some real horror stories about the FIT. > >This does not HAVE TO be a determinant, but it would be nice if the >vehicle could pull say a 1000# trailer, little fishing boat. But that >is just a nice to have. > >I like the looks of both the Element and the Scion xB. > >Of those 4 vehicles, and understanding my determinants, and hopefully >YOU knowing a whole lot more about these vehicles than I do, which >would you buy and why? |
Re: FIT or Yaris - Element or xB
tww wrote:
> "ego" <jung@freud.id> wrote in message > news:Z3QUg.228$gU6.77@tornado.socal.rr.com... >> We drove Yaris(2), Fit(sport), Scions(2), Hyundai - and the Fit stood >> out as more solid-feeling when stressed. 45 years ago I raced SCCA (all >> RWD), and it's my inclination to push a car pretty hard. The Fit did >> great, the Hyundai was flaky, and the several Toyotas were in between. >> I'll go further - pushed hard, the Hyundai was so scary at the edge that >> I pulled over to check tire pressure. The Fit came loose gently and >> predictably, and never felt out of control. The brakes were about the >> same but I didn't measure. Overall, the Fit seemed safest in emergencies >> and with its superior handling and adequate engine would win most Class >> H or so of the early 60s. > > Off topic -- but you probably remember the Sunbeam Tiger given your > background. > > Wasn't exactly SCCA, but what a rocketship. And even further from topic was a friend with an MGTC sporting a (gasp) Studebaker V8. Hopefully, someone somewhere has returned that car to its proper state... Those were the days... Now, how to get a V8 into a Fit, and back on topic. |
Re: FIT or Yaris - Element or xB
tww wrote:
> "ego" <jung@freud.id> wrote in message > news:Z3QUg.228$gU6.77@tornado.socal.rr.com... >> We drove Yaris(2), Fit(sport), Scions(2), Hyundai - and the Fit stood >> out as more solid-feeling when stressed. 45 years ago I raced SCCA (all >> RWD), and it's my inclination to push a car pretty hard. The Fit did >> great, the Hyundai was flaky, and the several Toyotas were in between. >> I'll go further - pushed hard, the Hyundai was so scary at the edge that >> I pulled over to check tire pressure. The Fit came loose gently and >> predictably, and never felt out of control. The brakes were about the >> same but I didn't measure. Overall, the Fit seemed safest in emergencies >> and with its superior handling and adequate engine would win most Class >> H or so of the early 60s. > > Off topic -- but you probably remember the Sunbeam Tiger given your > background. > > Wasn't exactly SCCA, but what a rocketship. And even further from topic was a friend with an MGTC sporting a (gasp) Studebaker V8. Hopefully, someone somewhere has returned that car to its proper state... Those were the days... Now, how to get a V8 into a Fit, and back on topic. |
Re: FIT or Yaris - Element or xB
tww wrote:
> "ego" <jung@freud.id> wrote in message > news:Z3QUg.228$gU6.77@tornado.socal.rr.com... >> We drove Yaris(2), Fit(sport), Scions(2), Hyundai - and the Fit stood >> out as more solid-feeling when stressed. 45 years ago I raced SCCA (all >> RWD), and it's my inclination to push a car pretty hard. The Fit did >> great, the Hyundai was flaky, and the several Toyotas were in between. >> I'll go further - pushed hard, the Hyundai was so scary at the edge that >> I pulled over to check tire pressure. The Fit came loose gently and >> predictably, and never felt out of control. The brakes were about the >> same but I didn't measure. Overall, the Fit seemed safest in emergencies >> and with its superior handling and adequate engine would win most Class >> H or so of the early 60s. > > Off topic -- but you probably remember the Sunbeam Tiger given your > background. > > Wasn't exactly SCCA, but what a rocketship. And even further from topic was a friend with an MGTC sporting a (gasp) Studebaker V8. Hopefully, someone somewhere has returned that car to its proper state... Those were the days... Now, how to get a V8 into a Fit, and back on topic. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands