Honda I-4 smoothness
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
MAT wrote:
> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
> > more compact or what?
>
> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
Not any that I know of. In fact very few bikes have V-4 either.
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
MAT wrote:
> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
> > more compact or what?
>
> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
Not any that I know of. In fact very few bikes have V-4 either.
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
MAT wrote:
> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>> more compact or what?
>
> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>
>
Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
off a riding mower.
I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
John
> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>> more compact or what?
>
> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>
>
Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
off a riding mower.
I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
John
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
MAT wrote:
> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>> more compact or what?
>
> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>
>
Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
off a riding mower.
I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
John
> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>> more compact or what?
>
> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>
>
Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
off a riding mower.
I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
John
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
MAT wrote:
> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>> more compact or what?
>
> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>
>
Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
off a riding mower.
I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
John
> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>> more compact or what?
>
> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>
>
Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
off a riding mower.
I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
John
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
MAT wrote:
> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>> more compact or what?
>
> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>
>
Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
off a riding mower.
I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
John
> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>> more compact or what?
>
> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>
>
Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
off a riding mower.
I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
John
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
John Horner wrote:
> MAT wrote:
>
>> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>>
>>> more compact or what?
>>
>>
>> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>>
>
> Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
> early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
> off a riding mower.
>
> I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
> MAT wrote:
>
>> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>>
>>> more compact or what?
>>
>>
>> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>>
>
> Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
> early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
> off a riding mower.
>
> I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
John Horner wrote:
> MAT wrote:
>
>> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>>
>>> more compact or what?
>>
>>
>> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>>
>
> Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
> early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
> off a riding mower.
>
> I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
> MAT wrote:
>
>> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>>
>>> more compact or what?
>>
>>
>> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>>
>
> Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
> early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
> off a riding mower.
>
> I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
John Horner wrote:
> MAT wrote:
>
>> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>>
>>> more compact or what?
>>
>>
>> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>>
>
> Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
> early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
> off a riding mower.
>
> I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
> MAT wrote:
>
>> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>>
>>> more compact or what?
>>
>>
>> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>>
>
> Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
> early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
> off a riding mower.
>
> I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
John Horner wrote:
> MAT wrote:
>
>> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>>
>>> more compact or what?
>>
>>
>> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>>
>
> Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
> early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
> off a riding mower.
>
> I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
> MAT wrote:
>
>> "> P.S. Why there are no V-4 in Honda cars? No carbs - no pain. I4s are
>>
>>> more compact or what?
>>
>>
>> Pardon my ignorance as it's never crossed my mind, waht cars have V-4s?
>>
>
> Years ago Ford of England made a small V-4 which was also used in some
> early Saabs. It was a cute little motor, almost looked like something
> off a riding mower.
>
> I don't know of any cars since 1970 or so which have used a V-4.
Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
Matt Ion wrote:
> Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
> one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
> too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
I'm pretty sure Subaru still uses flat-4's.
> Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
> one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
> too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
I'm pretty sure Subaru still uses flat-4's.
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
Matt Ion wrote:
> Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
> one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
> too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
I'm pretty sure Subaru still uses flat-4's.
> Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
> one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
> too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
I'm pretty sure Subaru still uses flat-4's.
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
Matt Ion wrote:
> Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
> one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
> too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
I'm pretty sure Subaru still uses flat-4's.
> Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
> one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
> too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
I'm pretty sure Subaru still uses flat-4's.
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
Matt Ion wrote:
> Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
> one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
> too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
I'm pretty sure Subaru still uses flat-4's.
> Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru had
> one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a lot
> too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
I'm pretty sure Subaru still uses flat-4's.
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Honda I-4 smoothness
"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:18jssgu03all3$.dlg@hightech.misfit...
> Matt Ion wrote:
>
>> Some use a flat-4 though, which is like a V flattened out. My '82 Subaru
>> had
>> one, it was an incredibly durable engine. Lowers the center of gravity a
>> lot
>> too, for great stability. Dunno if Subaru is still using them
>
> I'm pretty sure Subaru still uses flat-4's.
Can you say "boxer design" Subaru still uses it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizon...opposed_engine