Re: Normal Brake pad wear time in hilly areas?
Caroline wrote:
> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote > snip > >>like i said, i had 50k of sf driving on my car, original pads, and that >>/included/ regularly doing the lombard st tourist thing when i had >>friends in from out of town. > > > Fair enough. > > I'll just throw in that the original pads on my 1991 Civic lasted only 43k miles > and 1.75 years. Maybe two weeks of this was spent driving in mountainous areas. > The rest of the driving was in very flat areas. i think the '88-'91's has a softer pad material because the vacuum servo on my '89 is much smaller than my 2000 but the brake feels the same. both have 13/16" brake cylinders. > > >>unless the o.p. does 100 miles a night with a dominos pizza delivery >>job, 10% is something of a stretch. > > > Depends on driving habits. > > To the previous list, add: Is it a manual transmission where the driver often > uses the engine to brake? that's a good point! mine's an auto, but it still engine brakes - programmed in depending on deceleration rate & initial speed. > > I do agree that plenty of shops (dealer and otherwise) are into ripping off > customers for brake pads. Checking brake pad thickness is not difficult, even > for someone who has minimal mechanical experience. At the least, stick around > the shop who's checking the pads and make the technician show you the brake pad > thickness up close and personal. > > |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands