|
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On 2007-10-26 17:32:34 -0700, Hachiroku ãƒãƒãƒã‚¯ <Trueno@ae86.GTS> said:
WHY, you freaking A-HOLE!?!?! What the hell did we do to you? > You know, if you weren't such an idiot, I'd just say, You go your way and > I'll go mine; believe what you want and I'll do likewise." But these > morons blame the US for their ills, and call us Infidels and that we don't > follow the Koran, and our women don't cover themselves, so we must be > irradicated. And what you describe differs not a bit from every two-bit dictator in the world today. Read the speeches of former Soviet premiers. Read Castro, Chavez, or countless others who need a boogeyman to lead their weak-minded. Instead of gratitude for what the U.S. gives the world in aid during crises, these cretins need us as a bad guy. Why? It takes their minds off of their misery, starvation, and the wallets they've never seen full so as to support the very few in the country who live above poverty. Any communist regime of past or present fits this nicely. BTW, for any idiot thinking they can twist the above to apply in any way, shape, or form, to fit our current or past leadership, be it on the left or right, I've chosen my words carefully. You'll not make the fit, as the U.S. simply does not fall into this description. If it did, then people from the applicable areas wouldn't be fighting to get here. I've yet to see illegals trying to sneak into Venezuela or Cuba. The issue is control. Always has been, and always will be. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
witfal wrote:
> On 2007-10-26 17:32:34 -0700, Hachiroku ãƒãƒãƒã‚¯ <Trueno@ae86.GTS> said: > WHY, you freaking A-HOLE!?!?! What the hell did we do to you? >> You know, if you weren't such an idiot, I'd just say, You go your way and >> I'll go mine; believe what you want and I'll do likewise." But these >> morons blame the US for their ills, and call us Infidels and that we >> don't >> follow the Koran, and our women don't cover themselves, so we must be >> irradicated. > > And what you describe differs not a bit from every two-bit dictator in > the world today. > > Read the speeches of former Soviet premiers. Read Castro, Chavez, or > countless others who need a boogeyman to lead their weak-minded. The Irony of the Month award goes to......., Witless, who already forgot Saddam Hussein and the "Axis of Evil." |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
witfal wrote:
> On 2007-10-26 17:32:34 -0700, Hachiroku ãƒãƒãƒã‚¯ <Trueno@ae86.GTS> said: > WHY, you freaking A-HOLE!?!?! What the hell did we do to you? >> You know, if you weren't such an idiot, I'd just say, You go your way and >> I'll go mine; believe what you want and I'll do likewise." But these >> morons blame the US for their ills, and call us Infidels and that we >> don't >> follow the Koran, and our women don't cover themselves, so we must be >> irradicated. > > And what you describe differs not a bit from every two-bit dictator in > the world today. > > Read the speeches of former Soviet premiers. Read Castro, Chavez, or > countless others who need a boogeyman to lead their weak-minded. The Irony of the Month award goes to......., Witless, who already forgot Saddam Hussein and the "Axis of Evil." |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Oct 26, 8:40 pm, witfal <nos...@all4.me> wrote:
> On 2007-10-26 17:32:34 -0700, Hachiroku <Tru...@ae86.GTS> said: > WHY, you freaking A-HOLE!?!?! What the hell did we do to you? > > > You know, if you weren't such an idiot, I'd just say, You go your way and > > I'll go mine; believe what you want and I'll do likewise." But these > > morons blame the US for their ills, and call us Infidels and that we don't > > follow the Koran, and our women don't cover themselves, so we must be > > irradicated. > > And what you describe differs not a bit from every two-bit dictator in > the world today. > > Read the speeches of former Soviet premiers. Read Castro, Chavez, or > countless others who need a boogeyman to lead their weak-minded. > Instead of gratitude for what the U.S. gives the world in aid during > crises, these cretins need us as a bad guy. Why? It takes their minds > off of their misery, starvation, and the wallets they've never seen > full so as to support the very few in the country who live above > poverty. Any communist regime of past or present fits this nicely. > > BTW, for any idiot thinking they can twist the above to apply in any > way, shape, or form, to fit our current or past leadership, be it on > the left or right, I've chosen my words carefully. You'll not make the > fit, as the U.S. simply does not fall into this description. If it > did, then people from the applicable areas wouldn't be fighting to get > here. I've yet to see illegals trying to sneak into Venezuela or Cuba. > > The issue is control. Always has been, and always will be. The amazing thing is there is a school in Virginia run by SAUDI ARABIA that teachs hate against Americans. But then all the 9/11 hijackers except one were from Saudi Arabia. It's a much deeper problem than what they wear on their heads or how brown they are. American oil companies will sell you and me and our families down the river for oil and profits while they protect oil producing states. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Oct 26, 8:40 pm, witfal <nos...@all4.me> wrote:
> On 2007-10-26 17:32:34 -0700, Hachiroku <Tru...@ae86.GTS> said: > WHY, you freaking A-HOLE!?!?! What the hell did we do to you? > > > You know, if you weren't such an idiot, I'd just say, You go your way and > > I'll go mine; believe what you want and I'll do likewise." But these > > morons blame the US for their ills, and call us Infidels and that we don't > > follow the Koran, and our women don't cover themselves, so we must be > > irradicated. > > And what you describe differs not a bit from every two-bit dictator in > the world today. > > Read the speeches of former Soviet premiers. Read Castro, Chavez, or > countless others who need a boogeyman to lead their weak-minded. > Instead of gratitude for what the U.S. gives the world in aid during > crises, these cretins need us as a bad guy. Why? It takes their minds > off of their misery, starvation, and the wallets they've never seen > full so as to support the very few in the country who live above > poverty. Any communist regime of past or present fits this nicely. > > BTW, for any idiot thinking they can twist the above to apply in any > way, shape, or form, to fit our current or past leadership, be it on > the left or right, I've chosen my words carefully. You'll not make the > fit, as the U.S. simply does not fall into this description. If it > did, then people from the applicable areas wouldn't be fighting to get > here. I've yet to see illegals trying to sneak into Venezuela or Cuba. > > The issue is control. Always has been, and always will be. The amazing thing is there is a school in Virginia run by SAUDI ARABIA that teachs hate against Americans. But then all the 9/11 hijackers except one were from Saudi Arabia. It's a much deeper problem than what they wear on their heads or how brown they are. American oil companies will sell you and me and our families down the river for oil and profits while they protect oil producing states. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:40:54 -0700, Fartus Ignitus wrote:
> On Oct 26, 8:40 pm, witfal <nos...@all4.me> wrote: >> On 2007-10-26 17:32:34 -0700, Hachiroku <Tru...@ae86.GTS> said: >> WHY, you freaking A-HOLE!?!?! What the hell did we do to you? >> >> > You know, if you weren't such an idiot, I'd just say, You go your way >> > and I'll go mine; believe what you want and I'll do likewise." But >> > these morons blame the US for their ills, and call us Infidels and >> > that we don't follow the Koran, and our women don't cover themselves, >> > so we must be irradicated. >> >> And what you describe differs not a bit from every two-bit dictator in >> the world today. >> >> Read the speeches of former Soviet premiers. Read Castro, Chavez, or >> countless others who need a boogeyman to lead their weak-minded. Instead >> of gratitude for what the U.S. gives the world in aid during crises, >> these cretins need us as a bad guy. Why? It takes their minds off of >> their misery, starvation, and the wallets they've never seen full so as >> to support the very few in the country who live above poverty. Any >> communist regime of past or present fits this nicely. >> >> BTW, for any idiot thinking they can twist the above to apply in any >> way, shape, or form, to fit our current or past leadership, be it on the >> left or right, I've chosen my words carefully. You'll not make the fit, >> as the U.S. simply does not fall into this description. If it did, then >> people from the applicable areas wouldn't be fighting to get here. I've >> yet to see illegals trying to sneak into Venezuela or Cuba. >> >> The issue is control. Always has been, and always will be. > > The amazing thing is there is a school in Virginia run by SAUDI ARABIA > that teachs hate against Americans. But then all the 9/11 hijackers > except one were from Saudi Arabia. > > It's a much deeper problem than what they wear on their heads or how brown > they are. American oil companies will sell you and me and our families > down the river for oil and profits while they protect oil producing > states. I...I...AGREE with Fartus Ignitus?!?!?! <THUD!!!> BTW, how did this get crossed to so many groups...? |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:40:54 -0700, Fartus Ignitus wrote:
> On Oct 26, 8:40 pm, witfal <nos...@all4.me> wrote: >> On 2007-10-26 17:32:34 -0700, Hachiroku <Tru...@ae86.GTS> said: >> WHY, you freaking A-HOLE!?!?! What the hell did we do to you? >> >> > You know, if you weren't such an idiot, I'd just say, You go your way >> > and I'll go mine; believe what you want and I'll do likewise." But >> > these morons blame the US for their ills, and call us Infidels and >> > that we don't follow the Koran, and our women don't cover themselves, >> > so we must be irradicated. >> >> And what you describe differs not a bit from every two-bit dictator in >> the world today. >> >> Read the speeches of former Soviet premiers. Read Castro, Chavez, or >> countless others who need a boogeyman to lead their weak-minded. Instead >> of gratitude for what the U.S. gives the world in aid during crises, >> these cretins need us as a bad guy. Why? It takes their minds off of >> their misery, starvation, and the wallets they've never seen full so as >> to support the very few in the country who live above poverty. Any >> communist regime of past or present fits this nicely. >> >> BTW, for any idiot thinking they can twist the above to apply in any >> way, shape, or form, to fit our current or past leadership, be it on the >> left or right, I've chosen my words carefully. You'll not make the fit, >> as the U.S. simply does not fall into this description. If it did, then >> people from the applicable areas wouldn't be fighting to get here. I've >> yet to see illegals trying to sneak into Venezuela or Cuba. >> >> The issue is control. Always has been, and always will be. > > The amazing thing is there is a school in Virginia run by SAUDI ARABIA > that teachs hate against Americans. But then all the 9/11 hijackers > except one were from Saudi Arabia. > > It's a much deeper problem than what they wear on their heads or how brown > they are. American oil companies will sell you and me and our families > down the river for oil and profits while they protect oil producing > states. I...I...AGREE with Fartus Ignitus?!?!?! <THUD!!!> BTW, how did this get crossed to so many groups...? |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Oct 26, 10:40 pm, Fartus Ignitus <fartusigni...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 26, 8:40 pm, witfal <nos...@all4.me> wrote: > > > > > On 2007-10-26 17:32:34 -0700, Hachiroku <Tru...@ae86.GTS> said: > > WHY, you freaking A-HOLE!?!?! What the hell did we do to you? > > > > You know, if you weren't such an idiot, I'd just say, You go your way and > > > I'll go mine; believe what you want and I'll do likewise." But these > > > morons blame the US for their ills, and call us Infidels and that we don't > > > follow the Koran, and our women don't cover themselves, so we must be > > > irradicated. > > > And what you describe differs not a bit from every two-bit dictator in > > the world today. > > > Read the speeches of former Soviet premiers. Read Castro, Chavez, or > > countless others who need a boogeyman to lead their weak-minded. > > Instead of gratitude for what the U.S. gives the world in aid during > > crises, these cretins need us as a bad guy. Why? It takes their minds > > off of their misery, starvation, and the wallets they've never seen > > full so as to support the very few in the country who live above > > poverty. Any communist regime of past or present fits this nicely. > > > BTW, for any idiot thinking they can twist the above to apply in any > > way, shape, or form, to fit our current or past leadership, be it on > > the left or right, I've chosen my words carefully. You'll not make the > > fit, as the U.S. simply does not fall into this description. If it > > did, then people from the applicable areas wouldn't be fighting to get > > here. I've yet to see illegals trying to sneak into Venezuela or Cuba. > > > The issue is control. Always has been, and always will be. > > The amazing thing is there is a school in Virginia run by SAUDI ARABIA > that teachs hate against Americans. But then all the 9/11 hijackers > except one were from Saudi Arabia. > > It's a much deeper problem than what they wear on their heads or how > brown they are. American oil companies will sell you and me and our > families down the river for oil and profits while they protect oil > producing states. Yes, it goes to the oil companies trying to accomplish the maximizing of profits. it goes to the devout Islamics who believe the Koran when it says "kill the unbeliever wherever you may find him". It goes to our western liberals who have so little respect for other cultures that they set up "womens shelters" in Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan where women openly flaunt the law of the land. It goes to commuters who want their 4 bedroom house so badly that they are willing to drive for 2 hours a day to get it. It goes to our leadership which blathers about hydrogen and ethanol as though those can possibly have relevance. It goes to Christian fundamentalists who are basically bin laden minus the turban. It goes to the The prophet Muhammed who said "the laws of god supersede the laws of man", which means that a Muslim is a Muslim first and an American second. It goes to Bill Clinton who signed the law that the CIA cannot buy information from criminals (as though Polly homemaker has info about Al-Qaeda). It goes to the environmentalist movement here which blocked the construction of nuclear plants for 40 years so far. These problems can be laid at anyone's feet with justice. The sad truth is that this is a problem caused by, ignored by, exacerbated by, and continued by, YOU AND I and every other specific person. In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Oct 26, 10:40 pm, Fartus Ignitus <fartusigni...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 26, 8:40 pm, witfal <nos...@all4.me> wrote: > > > > > On 2007-10-26 17:32:34 -0700, Hachiroku <Tru...@ae86.GTS> said: > > WHY, you freaking A-HOLE!?!?! What the hell did we do to you? > > > > You know, if you weren't such an idiot, I'd just say, You go your way and > > > I'll go mine; believe what you want and I'll do likewise." But these > > > morons blame the US for their ills, and call us Infidels and that we don't > > > follow the Koran, and our women don't cover themselves, so we must be > > > irradicated. > > > And what you describe differs not a bit from every two-bit dictator in > > the world today. > > > Read the speeches of former Soviet premiers. Read Castro, Chavez, or > > countless others who need a boogeyman to lead their weak-minded. > > Instead of gratitude for what the U.S. gives the world in aid during > > crises, these cretins need us as a bad guy. Why? It takes their minds > > off of their misery, starvation, and the wallets they've never seen > > full so as to support the very few in the country who live above > > poverty. Any communist regime of past or present fits this nicely. > > > BTW, for any idiot thinking they can twist the above to apply in any > > way, shape, or form, to fit our current or past leadership, be it on > > the left or right, I've chosen my words carefully. You'll not make the > > fit, as the U.S. simply does not fall into this description. If it > > did, then people from the applicable areas wouldn't be fighting to get > > here. I've yet to see illegals trying to sneak into Venezuela or Cuba. > > > The issue is control. Always has been, and always will be. > > The amazing thing is there is a school in Virginia run by SAUDI ARABIA > that teachs hate against Americans. But then all the 9/11 hijackers > except one were from Saudi Arabia. > > It's a much deeper problem than what they wear on their heads or how > brown they are. American oil companies will sell you and me and our > families down the river for oil and profits while they protect oil > producing states. Yes, it goes to the oil companies trying to accomplish the maximizing of profits. it goes to the devout Islamics who believe the Koran when it says "kill the unbeliever wherever you may find him". It goes to our western liberals who have so little respect for other cultures that they set up "womens shelters" in Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan where women openly flaunt the law of the land. It goes to commuters who want their 4 bedroom house so badly that they are willing to drive for 2 hours a day to get it. It goes to our leadership which blathers about hydrogen and ethanol as though those can possibly have relevance. It goes to Christian fundamentalists who are basically bin laden minus the turban. It goes to the The prophet Muhammed who said "the laws of god supersede the laws of man", which means that a Muslim is a Muslim first and an American second. It goes to Bill Clinton who signed the law that the CIA cannot buy information from criminals (as though Polly homemaker has info about Al-Qaeda). It goes to the environmentalist movement here which blocked the construction of nuclear plants for 40 years so far. These problems can be laid at anyone's feet with justice. The sad truth is that this is a problem caused by, ignored by, exacerbated by, and continued by, YOU AND I and every other specific person. In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
bill wrote:
> On Oct 26, 10:40 pm, Fartus Ignitus <fartusigni...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Oct 26, 8:40 pm, witfal <nos...@all4.me> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 2007-10-26 17:32:34 -0700, Hachiroku <Tru...@ae86.GTS> said: >>> WHY, you freaking A-HOLE!?!?! What the hell did we do to you? >>>> You know, if you weren't such an idiot, I'd just say, You go your way and >>>> I'll go mine; believe what you want and I'll do likewise." But these >>>> morons blame the US for their ills, and call us Infidels and that we don't >>>> follow the Koran, and our women don't cover themselves, so we must be >>>> irradicated. >>> And what you describe differs not a bit from every two-bit dictator in >>> the world today. >>> Read the speeches of former Soviet premiers. Read Castro, Chavez, or >>> countless others who need a boogeyman to lead their weak-minded. >>> Instead of gratitude for what the U.S. gives the world in aid during >>> crises, these cretins need us as a bad guy. Why? It takes their minds >>> off of their misery, starvation, and the wallets they've never seen >>> full so as to support the very few in the country who live above >>> poverty. Any communist regime of past or present fits this nicely. >>> BTW, for any idiot thinking they can twist the above to apply in any >>> way, shape, or form, to fit our current or past leadership, be it on >>> the left or right, I've chosen my words carefully. You'll not make the >>> fit, as the U.S. simply does not fall into this description. If it >>> did, then people from the applicable areas wouldn't be fighting to get >>> here. I've yet to see illegals trying to sneak into Venezuela or Cuba. >>> The issue is control. Always has been, and always will be. >> The amazing thing is there is a school in Virginia run by SAUDI ARABIA >> that teachs hate against Americans. But then all the 9/11 hijackers >> except one were from Saudi Arabia. >> >> It's a much deeper problem than what they wear on their heads or how >> brown they are. American oil companies will sell you and me and our >> families down the river for oil and profits while they protect oil >> producing states. > > Yes, it goes to the oil companies trying to accomplish the > maximizing of profits. it goes to the devout Islamics who believe the > Koran when it says "kill the unbeliever wherever you may find him". > It goes to our western liberals who have so little respect for other > cultures that they set up "womens shelters" in Saudi Arabia and > Afghanistan where women openly flaunt the law of the land. It goes to > commuters who want their 4 bedroom house so badly that they are > willing to drive for 2 hours a day to get it. It goes to our > leadership which blathers about hydrogen and ethanol as though those > can possibly have relevance. It goes to Christian fundamentalists who > are basically bin laden minus the turban. It goes to the The prophet > Muhammed who said "the laws of god supersede the laws of man", which > means that a Muslim is a Muslim first and an American second. It goes > to Bill Clinton who signed the law that the CIA cannot buy information > from criminals (as though Polly homemaker has info about Al-Qaeda). > It goes to the environmentalist movement here which blocked the > construction of nuclear plants for 40 years so far. > > These problems can be laid at anyone's feet with justice. The > sad truth is that this is a problem caused by, ignored by, exacerbated > by, and continued by, YOU AND I and every other specific person. > > In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It > is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned > nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and > never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to > stop. Heh, an accurate assessment. Especially the "It goes to Christian fundamentalists who are basically bin laden minus the turban." Welcome to Rome, circa 2007. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
bill wrote:
> On Oct 26, 10:40 pm, Fartus Ignitus <fartusigni...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Oct 26, 8:40 pm, witfal <nos...@all4.me> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 2007-10-26 17:32:34 -0700, Hachiroku <Tru...@ae86.GTS> said: >>> WHY, you freaking A-HOLE!?!?! What the hell did we do to you? >>>> You know, if you weren't such an idiot, I'd just say, You go your way and >>>> I'll go mine; believe what you want and I'll do likewise." But these >>>> morons blame the US for their ills, and call us Infidels and that we don't >>>> follow the Koran, and our women don't cover themselves, so we must be >>>> irradicated. >>> And what you describe differs not a bit from every two-bit dictator in >>> the world today. >>> Read the speeches of former Soviet premiers. Read Castro, Chavez, or >>> countless others who need a boogeyman to lead their weak-minded. >>> Instead of gratitude for what the U.S. gives the world in aid during >>> crises, these cretins need us as a bad guy. Why? It takes their minds >>> off of their misery, starvation, and the wallets they've never seen >>> full so as to support the very few in the country who live above >>> poverty. Any communist regime of past or present fits this nicely. >>> BTW, for any idiot thinking they can twist the above to apply in any >>> way, shape, or form, to fit our current or past leadership, be it on >>> the left or right, I've chosen my words carefully. You'll not make the >>> fit, as the U.S. simply does not fall into this description. If it >>> did, then people from the applicable areas wouldn't be fighting to get >>> here. I've yet to see illegals trying to sneak into Venezuela or Cuba. >>> The issue is control. Always has been, and always will be. >> The amazing thing is there is a school in Virginia run by SAUDI ARABIA >> that teachs hate against Americans. But then all the 9/11 hijackers >> except one were from Saudi Arabia. >> >> It's a much deeper problem than what they wear on their heads or how >> brown they are. American oil companies will sell you and me and our >> families down the river for oil and profits while they protect oil >> producing states. > > Yes, it goes to the oil companies trying to accomplish the > maximizing of profits. it goes to the devout Islamics who believe the > Koran when it says "kill the unbeliever wherever you may find him". > It goes to our western liberals who have so little respect for other > cultures that they set up "womens shelters" in Saudi Arabia and > Afghanistan where women openly flaunt the law of the land. It goes to > commuters who want their 4 bedroom house so badly that they are > willing to drive for 2 hours a day to get it. It goes to our > leadership which blathers about hydrogen and ethanol as though those > can possibly have relevance. It goes to Christian fundamentalists who > are basically bin laden minus the turban. It goes to the The prophet > Muhammed who said "the laws of god supersede the laws of man", which > means that a Muslim is a Muslim first and an American second. It goes > to Bill Clinton who signed the law that the CIA cannot buy information > from criminals (as though Polly homemaker has info about Al-Qaeda). > It goes to the environmentalist movement here which blocked the > construction of nuclear plants for 40 years so far. > > These problems can be laid at anyone's feet with justice. The > sad truth is that this is a problem caused by, ignored by, exacerbated > by, and continued by, YOU AND I and every other specific person. > > In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It > is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned > nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and > never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to > stop. Heh, an accurate assessment. Especially the "It goes to Christian fundamentalists who are basically bin laden minus the turban." Welcome to Rome, circa 2007. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
F.H. wrote:
> bill wrote: >> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >> nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and >> never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to >> stop. > > Heh, an accurate assessment. Really?! So, if a wind farm is shut down and seabrook is kaput, where did the information come from to do so? Now, I expect 'the liberal left'. So, does this 'the liberal left' own the media? Sounds like a contradiction to me as 'owners' are typically business people, not bleeding hearts. Why are folks on usenet so braindead? Oh, maybe you are well educated..... http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...otes102407.DTL Get off your high horse of being better than the next guy. 'We' are all on this planet together.... Nothing is accomplished by saying we could'a or it is 'their' fault. It just feeds a puny ego...... Start addressing our present condition if you believe there is something to be done. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
F.H. wrote:
> bill wrote: >> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >> nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and >> never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to >> stop. > > Heh, an accurate assessment. Really?! So, if a wind farm is shut down and seabrook is kaput, where did the information come from to do so? Now, I expect 'the liberal left'. So, does this 'the liberal left' own the media? Sounds like a contradiction to me as 'owners' are typically business people, not bleeding hearts. Why are folks on usenet so braindead? Oh, maybe you are well educated..... http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...otes102407.DTL Get off your high horse of being better than the next guy. 'We' are all on this planet together.... Nothing is accomplished by saying we could'a or it is 'their' fault. It just feeds a puny ego...... Start addressing our present condition if you believe there is something to be done. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
"Dan Bloomquist" <public21@lakeweb.com> wrote in message news:P6BUi.19712$ya1.10386@news02.roc.ny... > F.H. wrote: >> bill wrote: >>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >>> nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and >>> never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to >>> stop. >> >> Heh, an accurate assessment. > > Really?! So, if a wind farm is shut down and seabrook is kaput, where did > the information come from to do so? Now, I expect 'the liberal left'. So, > does this 'the liberal left' own the media? Sounds like a contradiction to > me as 'owners' are typically business people, not bleeding hearts. > > Why are folks on usenet so braindead? Oh, maybe you are well educated..... > > http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...otes102407.DTL > > Get off your high horse of being better than the next guy. 'We' are all on > this planet together.... Nothing is accomplished by saying we could'a or > it is 'their' fault. It just feeds a puny ego...... > > Start addressing our present condition if you believe there is something > to be done. Dear Dumbass, Yes, the "liberal left" owns most of the media in this country. You see it in the blame game already starting up about how Bush is responsible for the California wildfires. I've been fighting the loony liberal left's lies since 1970, WTF have you been doing? And they have practically anointed Hillary the next Prasident and Reich Chancellor, or is that Party Secretary? Our 'present condition' is this: 1. The Democrats want to be in power and run things just like the Communists did in Russia. 2. The Republicans have lost their way and got whipped at the polls in 06, because the average American doesn't want 1 and the Republicans appear to be caving to 1. 3. The media are trying to hide fact 1 and 2 by spinning it to appear that something else is happening. 4. We could be tapping ANWR, and drilling for oil off the coast of Florida and California instead of paying ragheads for their oil, but environmental whack-jobs don't want to do that. 5. We could be using nuclear power, but after the China Syndrome, the environmental panic babies don't want that either. 6. We could be developing alternative fuel sources, but Big Oil wants to make sure that any such alternates to oil stay costly and inefficient with a little help from the environmental nut-cases. Now go get your nurse to give you a high colonic. Now hold it and go do a 20 mile hike. That ought to clear out your brains. Charles of Schaumburg Aged 50 years. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
"Dan Bloomquist" <public21@lakeweb.com> wrote in message news:P6BUi.19712$ya1.10386@news02.roc.ny... > F.H. wrote: >> bill wrote: >>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >>> nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and >>> never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to >>> stop. >> >> Heh, an accurate assessment. > > Really?! So, if a wind farm is shut down and seabrook is kaput, where did > the information come from to do so? Now, I expect 'the liberal left'. So, > does this 'the liberal left' own the media? Sounds like a contradiction to > me as 'owners' are typically business people, not bleeding hearts. > > Why are folks on usenet so braindead? Oh, maybe you are well educated..... > > http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...otes102407.DTL > > Get off your high horse of being better than the next guy. 'We' are all on > this planet together.... Nothing is accomplished by saying we could'a or > it is 'their' fault. It just feeds a puny ego...... > > Start addressing our present condition if you believe there is something > to be done. Dear Dumbass, Yes, the "liberal left" owns most of the media in this country. You see it in the blame game already starting up about how Bush is responsible for the California wildfires. I've been fighting the loony liberal left's lies since 1970, WTF have you been doing? And they have practically anointed Hillary the next Prasident and Reich Chancellor, or is that Party Secretary? Our 'present condition' is this: 1. The Democrats want to be in power and run things just like the Communists did in Russia. 2. The Republicans have lost their way and got whipped at the polls in 06, because the average American doesn't want 1 and the Republicans appear to be caving to 1. 3. The media are trying to hide fact 1 and 2 by spinning it to appear that something else is happening. 4. We could be tapping ANWR, and drilling for oil off the coast of Florida and California instead of paying ragheads for their oil, but environmental whack-jobs don't want to do that. 5. We could be using nuclear power, but after the China Syndrome, the environmental panic babies don't want that either. 6. We could be developing alternative fuel sources, but Big Oil wants to make sure that any such alternates to oil stay costly and inefficient with a little help from the environmental nut-cases. Now go get your nurse to give you a high colonic. Now hold it and go do a 20 mile hike. That ought to clear out your brains. Charles of Schaumburg Aged 50 years. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
"bill" <ford_prefect42@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193456816.362356.101020@z9g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com... > The most recent planned > nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and > never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to > stop. > It never went operational? Are you sure about that? |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
"bill" <ford_prefect42@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193456816.362356.101020@z9g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com... > The most recent planned > nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and > never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to > stop. > It never went operational? Are you sure about that? |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Oct 27, 8:16 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "bill" <ford_prefec...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1193456816.362356.101020@z9g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com... > > > The most recent planned > > nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and > > never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to > > stop. > > It never went operational? Are you sure about that? Well, that's the way I remembered it, however, on further research, unit 2 never went operational. Unit 1 merely suffered 4 years of delays in going operational after construction was completed. I stand corrected. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Oct 27, 8:16 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "bill" <ford_prefec...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1193456816.362356.101020@z9g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com... > > > The most recent planned > > nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and > > never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to > > stop. > > It never went operational? Are you sure about that? Well, that's the way I remembered it, however, on further research, unit 2 never went operational. Unit 1 merely suffered 4 years of delays in going operational after construction was completed. I stand corrected. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
> F.H. wrote: >> bill wrote: >>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >>> nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and >>> never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to >>> stop. >> >> Heh, an accurate assessment. > > Really?! So, if a wind farm is shut down and seabrook is kaput, where > did the information come from to do so? Now, I expect 'the liberal > left'. So, does this 'the liberal left' own the media? Sounds like a > contradiction to me as 'owners' are typically business people, not > bleeding hearts. Dan, you snipped everything but what I *didn't* agree with. Why snip "Welcome to Rome, circa 2007" and then post a link that says pretty much the same thing? I'm all for wind farms and Mark Morford is a long time favorite of mine. > Why are folks on usenet so braindead? Oh, maybe you are well educated..... > > http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...otes102407.DTL > > Get off your high horse of being better than the next guy. 'We' are all > on this planet together.... Nothing is accomplished by saying we could'a > or it is 'their' fault. It just feeds a puny ego...... I'm with you except I pass on the pop psychoanalysis. ;) > Start addressing our present condition if you believe there is something > to be done. Heh, you have identified the key element, not "brain death" or "education" but 'believing.' Seems like those in power these days only believe in profit and killing and feeding *that* beast is done through the manipulation of belief (and it damn sure ain't by the *liberal* media. Morford strikes a cord with me in saying "it might be no stretch at all to say the biggest threat facing America is perhaps not global warming, not perpetual warmongering, not garbage food or low-level radiation or way too much Lindsay Lohan, but a populace far too ignorant to know how to properly manage any of it, much less change it all for the better." To Rome, circa 2007, add: foreign wars. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
> F.H. wrote: >> bill wrote: >>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >>> nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and >>> never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to >>> stop. >> >> Heh, an accurate assessment. > > Really?! So, if a wind farm is shut down and seabrook is kaput, where > did the information come from to do so? Now, I expect 'the liberal > left'. So, does this 'the liberal left' own the media? Sounds like a > contradiction to me as 'owners' are typically business people, not > bleeding hearts. Dan, you snipped everything but what I *didn't* agree with. Why snip "Welcome to Rome, circa 2007" and then post a link that says pretty much the same thing? I'm all for wind farms and Mark Morford is a long time favorite of mine. > Why are folks on usenet so braindead? Oh, maybe you are well educated..... > > http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...otes102407.DTL > > Get off your high horse of being better than the next guy. 'We' are all > on this planet together.... Nothing is accomplished by saying we could'a > or it is 'their' fault. It just feeds a puny ego...... I'm with you except I pass on the pop psychoanalysis. ;) > Start addressing our present condition if you believe there is something > to be done. Heh, you have identified the key element, not "brain death" or "education" but 'believing.' Seems like those in power these days only believe in profit and killing and feeding *that* beast is done through the manipulation of belief (and it damn sure ain't by the *liberal* media. Morford strikes a cord with me in saying "it might be no stretch at all to say the biggest threat facing America is perhaps not global warming, not perpetual warmongering, not garbage food or low-level radiation or way too much Lindsay Lohan, but a populace far too ignorant to know how to properly manage any of it, much less change it all for the better." To Rome, circa 2007, add: foreign wars. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Satanist Banksters?
On Oct 27, 10:19 am, "F.H." <connec...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Dan Bloomquist wrote: > > F.H. wrote: > >> bill wrote: > >>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It > >>> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned > >>> nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and > >>> never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to > >>> stop. > > >> Heh, an accurate assessment. > > > Really?! So, if a wind farm is shut down and seabrook is kaput, where > > did the information come from to do so? Now, I expect 'the liberal > > left'. So, does this 'the liberal left' own the media? Sounds like a > > contradiction to me as 'owners' are typically business people, not > > bleeding hearts. > > Dan, you snipped everything but what I *didn't* agree with. Why snip > "Welcome to Rome, circa 2007" and then post a link that says pretty much > the same thing? I'm all for wind farms and Mark Morford is a long time > favorite of mine. > > > Why are folks on usenet so braindead? Oh, maybe you are well educated..... > > >http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...0/24/notes1024... > > > Get off your high horse of being better than the next guy. 'We' are all > > on this planet together.... Nothing is accomplished by saying we could'a > > or it is 'their' fault. It just feeds a puny ego...... > > I'm with you except I pass on the pop psychoanalysis. ;) > > > Start addressing our present condition if you believe there is something > > to be done. > > Heh, you have identified the key element, not "brain death" or > "education" but 'believing.' Seems like those in power these days only > believe in profit and killing and feeding *that* beast is done through > the manipulation of belief (and it damn sure ain't by the *liberal* media. > > Morford strikes a cord with me in saying "it might be no stretch at all > to say the biggest threat facing America is perhaps not global warming, > not perpetual warmongering, not garbage food or low-level radiation or > way too much Lindsay Lohan, but a populace far too ignorant to know how > to properly manage any of it, much less change it all for the better." > > To Rome, circa 2007, add: foreign wars.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - They think they are "managing" us just fine. They are lining their pokets with death and destruction while they hide out underground. http://www.fknnewz.com/signup.php |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Satanist Banksters?
On Oct 27, 10:19 am, "F.H." <connec...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Dan Bloomquist wrote: > > F.H. wrote: > >> bill wrote: > >>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It > >>> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned > >>> nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and > >>> never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to > >>> stop. > > >> Heh, an accurate assessment. > > > Really?! So, if a wind farm is shut down and seabrook is kaput, where > > did the information come from to do so? Now, I expect 'the liberal > > left'. So, does this 'the liberal left' own the media? Sounds like a > > contradiction to me as 'owners' are typically business people, not > > bleeding hearts. > > Dan, you snipped everything but what I *didn't* agree with. Why snip > "Welcome to Rome, circa 2007" and then post a link that says pretty much > the same thing? I'm all for wind farms and Mark Morford is a long time > favorite of mine. > > > Why are folks on usenet so braindead? Oh, maybe you are well educated..... > > >http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...0/24/notes1024... > > > Get off your high horse of being better than the next guy. 'We' are all > > on this planet together.... Nothing is accomplished by saying we could'a > > or it is 'their' fault. It just feeds a puny ego...... > > I'm with you except I pass on the pop psychoanalysis. ;) > > > Start addressing our present condition if you believe there is something > > to be done. > > Heh, you have identified the key element, not "brain death" or > "education" but 'believing.' Seems like those in power these days only > believe in profit and killing and feeding *that* beast is done through > the manipulation of belief (and it damn sure ain't by the *liberal* media. > > Morford strikes a cord with me in saying "it might be no stretch at all > to say the biggest threat facing America is perhaps not global warming, > not perpetual warmongering, not garbage food or low-level radiation or > way too much Lindsay Lohan, but a populace far too ignorant to know how > to properly manage any of it, much less change it all for the better." > > To Rome, circa 2007, add: foreign wars.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - They think they are "managing" us just fine. They are lining their pokets with death and destruction while they hide out underground. http://www.fknnewz.com/signup.php |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
n5hsr wrote:
> "Dan Bloomquist" <public21@lakeweb.com> wrote in message > news:P6BUi.19712$ya1.10386@news02.roc.ny... >> F.H. wrote: >>> bill wrote: >>>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>>> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >>>> nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and >>>> never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to >>>> stop. >>> Heh, an accurate assessment. >> Really?! So, if a wind farm is shut down and seabrook is kaput, where did >> the information come from to do so? Now, I expect 'the liberal left'. So, >> does this 'the liberal left' own the media? Sounds like a contradiction to >> me as 'owners' are typically business people, not bleeding hearts. >> >> Why are folks on usenet so braindead? Oh, maybe you are well educated..... >> >> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...otes102407.DTL >> >> Get off your high horse of being better than the next guy. 'We' are all on >> this planet together.... Nothing is accomplished by saying we could'a or >> it is 'their' fault. It just feeds a puny ego...... >> >> Start addressing our present condition if you believe there is something >> to be done. > > Dear Dumbass, > > Yes, the "liberal left" owns most of the media in this country. The public is *not* primarily informed by newspapers and the media that most influences public opinion is mostly right wing. Rupert Murdoch is hardly "liberal" nor is Clear Channel who owns over 1200 radio stations in the United States. The so called "liberal" LA Times sports a bevy of right wing columnist and recently ran a piece by Niall Ferguson entitled "One Strike, Iran Could be Wiped Out." > Our 'present condition' is this: > > 1. The Democrats want to be in power and run things just like the > Communists did in Russia. Gosh! How did you manipulate your way around the "liberal" media to find these crucial 'facts?' > 2. The Republicans have lost their way and got whipped at the polls in 06, > because the average American doesn't want 1 and the Republicans appear to be > caving to 1. LOL, right. > 3. The media are trying to hide fact 1 and 2 by spinning it to appear that > something else is happening. *Something* is spinning that's for sure. Ask your doctor about Meclizine (Antivert®). ;) > 4. We could be tapping ANWR, and drilling for oil off the coast of Florida > and California instead of paying ragheads for their oil Merciful snip / / / / / |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
n5hsr wrote:
> "Dan Bloomquist" <public21@lakeweb.com> wrote in message > news:P6BUi.19712$ya1.10386@news02.roc.ny... >> F.H. wrote: >>> bill wrote: >>>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>>> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >>>> nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and >>>> never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to >>>> stop. >>> Heh, an accurate assessment. >> Really?! So, if a wind farm is shut down and seabrook is kaput, where did >> the information come from to do so? Now, I expect 'the liberal left'. So, >> does this 'the liberal left' own the media? Sounds like a contradiction to >> me as 'owners' are typically business people, not bleeding hearts. >> >> Why are folks on usenet so braindead? Oh, maybe you are well educated..... >> >> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...otes102407.DTL >> >> Get off your high horse of being better than the next guy. 'We' are all on >> this planet together.... Nothing is accomplished by saying we could'a or >> it is 'their' fault. It just feeds a puny ego...... >> >> Start addressing our present condition if you believe there is something >> to be done. > > Dear Dumbass, > > Yes, the "liberal left" owns most of the media in this country. The public is *not* primarily informed by newspapers and the media that most influences public opinion is mostly right wing. Rupert Murdoch is hardly "liberal" nor is Clear Channel who owns over 1200 radio stations in the United States. The so called "liberal" LA Times sports a bevy of right wing columnist and recently ran a piece by Niall Ferguson entitled "One Strike, Iran Could be Wiped Out." > Our 'present condition' is this: > > 1. The Democrats want to be in power and run things just like the > Communists did in Russia. Gosh! How did you manipulate your way around the "liberal" media to find these crucial 'facts?' > 2. The Republicans have lost their way and got whipped at the polls in 06, > because the average American doesn't want 1 and the Republicans appear to be > caving to 1. LOL, right. > 3. The media are trying to hide fact 1 and 2 by spinning it to appear that > something else is happening. *Something* is spinning that's for sure. Ask your doctor about Meclizine (Antivert®). ;) > 4. We could be tapping ANWR, and drilling for oil off the coast of Florida > and California instead of paying ragheads for their oil Merciful snip / / / / / |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
n5hsr wrote:
> Yes, the "liberal left" owns most of the media in this country. New Item: WASHINGTON, Oct. 17 — The head of the Federal Communications Commission has circulated an ambitious plan to relax the decades-old media ownership rules, including repealing a rule that forbids a company to own both a newspaper and a television or radio station in the same city. Kevin J. Martin, chairman of the commission, wants to repeal the rule in the next two months — a plan that, if successful, would be a big victory for some executives of media conglomerates. Among them are Samuel Zell, the Chicago investor who is seeking to complete a buyout of the Tribune Company, and Rupert Murdoch, who has lobbied against the rule for years so that he can continue controlling both The New York Post and a Fox television station in New York. http://action.freepress.net/campaign/fcc_oversight |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
n5hsr wrote:
> Yes, the "liberal left" owns most of the media in this country. New Item: WASHINGTON, Oct. 17 — The head of the Federal Communications Commission has circulated an ambitious plan to relax the decades-old media ownership rules, including repealing a rule that forbids a company to own both a newspaper and a television or radio station in the same city. Kevin J. Martin, chairman of the commission, wants to repeal the rule in the next two months — a plan that, if successful, would be a big victory for some executives of media conglomerates. Among them are Samuel Zell, the Chicago investor who is seeking to complete a buyout of the Tribune Company, and Rupert Murdoch, who has lobbied against the rule for years so that he can continue controlling both The New York Post and a Fox television station in New York. http://action.freepress.net/campaign/fcc_oversight |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
"F.H." <connectu2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:g5LUi.394$%r.365@trnddc01... > n5hsr wrote: > >> Yes, the "liberal left" owns most of the media in this country. > > New Item: > > WASHINGTON, Oct. 17 — The head of the Federal Communications Commission > has circulated an ambitious plan to relax the decades-old media ownership > rules, including repealing a rule that forbids a company to own both a > newspaper and a television or radio station in the same city. > > Kevin J. Martin, chairman of the commission, wants to repeal the rule in > the next two months — a plan that, if successful, would be a big victory > for some executives of media conglomerates. > > Among them are Samuel Zell, the Chicago investor who is seeking to > complete a buyout of the Tribune Company, and Rupert Murdoch, who has > lobbied against the rule for years so that he can continue controlling > both The New York Post and a Fox television station in New York. > > http://action.freepress.net/campaign/fcc_oversight Great news for Clear Channel, which operates the right wing radio station here that pukes Limbaugh onto the airwaves. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
"F.H." <connectu2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:g5LUi.394$%r.365@trnddc01... > n5hsr wrote: > >> Yes, the "liberal left" owns most of the media in this country. > > New Item: > > WASHINGTON, Oct. 17 — The head of the Federal Communications Commission > has circulated an ambitious plan to relax the decades-old media ownership > rules, including repealing a rule that forbids a company to own both a > newspaper and a television or radio station in the same city. > > Kevin J. Martin, chairman of the commission, wants to repeal the rule in > the next two months — a plan that, if successful, would be a big victory > for some executives of media conglomerates. > > Among them are Samuel Zell, the Chicago investor who is seeking to > complete a buyout of the Tribune Company, and Rupert Murdoch, who has > lobbied against the rule for years so that he can continue controlling > both The New York Post and a Fox television station in New York. > > http://action.freepress.net/campaign/fcc_oversight Great news for Clear Channel, which operates the right wing radio station here that pukes Limbaugh onto the airwaves. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
Going back to the original post. Hachi, dont get too upset, that is
exactly how they want *US* to feel. So there will be war and then prices of oil will sky rocket.. again and again. The best way to solve the problem is fight fire with fire. Don't buy oil from them, build more nuclear power plants, nuclear radiation waste will be used as WMD, use more electric cars, electric cars recharge from nuclear power plants. No oil , no war, no pollution, no . Its either that or use the technology US have learned from Roswell. Sweet! |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
Going back to the original post. Hachi, dont get too upset, that is
exactly how they want *US* to feel. So there will be war and then prices of oil will sky rocket.. again and again. The best way to solve the problem is fight fire with fire. Don't buy oil from them, build more nuclear power plants, nuclear radiation waste will be used as WMD, use more electric cars, electric cars recharge from nuclear power plants. No oil , no war, no pollution, no . Its either that or use the technology US have learned from Roswell. Sweet! |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:46:56 -0700, bill wrote:
> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It > is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned nuclear > power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never went > operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. Are you in Mass by any chance? There was one that was killed about 15 miles from where I live, and the company went further west to the next best site, where they are also meeting strong opposition. The funny thing is, the one posing the opposition are also the ones crying for independance from Foreign Oil and coal and nuclear power plants. Can't have it ALL ways, people! |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:46:56 -0700, bill wrote:
> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It > is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned nuclear > power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never went > operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. Are you in Mass by any chance? There was one that was killed about 15 miles from where I live, and the company went further west to the next best site, where they are also meeting strong opposition. The funny thing is, the one posing the opposition are also the ones crying for independance from Foreign Oil and coal and nuclear power plants. Can't have it ALL ways, people! |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
F.H. wrote:
> Dan Bloomquist wrote: >> F.H. wrote: >>> bill wrote: >>>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>>> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >>>> nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and >>>> never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to >>>> stop. >>> >>> Heh, an accurate assessment. >> >> Really?! So, if a wind farm is shut down and seabrook is kaput, where >> did the information come from to do so? Now, I expect 'the liberal >> left'. So, does this 'the liberal left' own the media? Sounds like a >> contradiction to me as 'owners' are typically business people, not >> bleeding hearts. > > Dan, you snipped everything but what I *didn't* agree with. Why snip > "Welcome to Rome, circa 2007" and then post a link that says pretty much > the same thing? I'm all for wind farms and Mark Morford is a long time > favorite of mine. Well, I'm sorry for snipping. But I do not agree with what was posted. For instance: "It goes to Christian fundamentalists.." Well, no it doesn't. It goes for the leadership of the fundamentalists. And: "Muhammed who said "the laws of god supersede the laws of man", which means that a Muslim is a Muslim first and an American second." Retarded on its face. "The sad truth is that this is a problem caused by, ignored by, exacerbated by, and continued by, YOU AND I and every other specific person." This guy is a victim of the the very thing he rants about but is so overwhelmed by the talking heads, he can't see it. >> Why are folks on usenet so braindead? Oh, maybe you are well >> educated..... >> >> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...otes102407.DTL >> >> >> Get off your high horse of being better than the next guy. 'We' are >> all on this planet together.... Nothing is accomplished by saying we >> could'a or it is 'their' fault. It just feeds a puny ego...... > > I'm with you except I pass on the pop psychoanalysis. ;) If usenet is not about ego, what is it? And I'm not setting my self apart, before the claims of such start..... >> Start addressing our present condition if you believe there is >> something to be done. > > Heh, you have identified the key element, not "brain death" or > "education" but 'believing.' Yes, I've done it for years here. Belief is just what humans do. They can't be 'blamed'. But the leadership that takes advantage of the weak minded.... > Seems like those in power these days only > believe in profit and killing and feeding *that* beast is done through > the manipulation of belief (and it damn sure ain't by the *liberal* media. It is what humans do. If more folks on usenet would just get a clue, the world might be different. But to talk about all those nuclear plants we 'could'a' built.... What a stupid continuation of the same old stuff. > Morford strikes a cord with me in saying "it might be no stretch at all > to say the biggest threat facing America is perhaps not global warming, > not perpetual warmongering, not garbage food or low-level radiation or > way too much Lindsay Lohan, but a populace far too ignorant to know how > to properly manage any of it, much less change it all for the better." Three cheers. So, I'll hunker down as I've bothered to learn from history. > To Rome, circa 2007, add: foreign wars. Iran, before the next election from what I see so far...... |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
F.H. wrote:
> Dan Bloomquist wrote: >> F.H. wrote: >>> bill wrote: >>>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>>> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >>>> nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and >>>> never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to >>>> stop. >>> >>> Heh, an accurate assessment. >> >> Really?! So, if a wind farm is shut down and seabrook is kaput, where >> did the information come from to do so? Now, I expect 'the liberal >> left'. So, does this 'the liberal left' own the media? Sounds like a >> contradiction to me as 'owners' are typically business people, not >> bleeding hearts. > > Dan, you snipped everything but what I *didn't* agree with. Why snip > "Welcome to Rome, circa 2007" and then post a link that says pretty much > the same thing? I'm all for wind farms and Mark Morford is a long time > favorite of mine. Well, I'm sorry for snipping. But I do not agree with what was posted. For instance: "It goes to Christian fundamentalists.." Well, no it doesn't. It goes for the leadership of the fundamentalists. And: "Muhammed who said "the laws of god supersede the laws of man", which means that a Muslim is a Muslim first and an American second." Retarded on its face. "The sad truth is that this is a problem caused by, ignored by, exacerbated by, and continued by, YOU AND I and every other specific person." This guy is a victim of the the very thing he rants about but is so overwhelmed by the talking heads, he can't see it. >> Why are folks on usenet so braindead? Oh, maybe you are well >> educated..... >> >> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...otes102407.DTL >> >> >> Get off your high horse of being better than the next guy. 'We' are >> all on this planet together.... Nothing is accomplished by saying we >> could'a or it is 'their' fault. It just feeds a puny ego...... > > I'm with you except I pass on the pop psychoanalysis. ;) If usenet is not about ego, what is it? And I'm not setting my self apart, before the claims of such start..... >> Start addressing our present condition if you believe there is >> something to be done. > > Heh, you have identified the key element, not "brain death" or > "education" but 'believing.' Yes, I've done it for years here. Belief is just what humans do. They can't be 'blamed'. But the leadership that takes advantage of the weak minded.... > Seems like those in power these days only > believe in profit and killing and feeding *that* beast is done through > the manipulation of belief (and it damn sure ain't by the *liberal* media. It is what humans do. If more folks on usenet would just get a clue, the world might be different. But to talk about all those nuclear plants we 'could'a' built.... What a stupid continuation of the same old stuff. > Morford strikes a cord with me in saying "it might be no stretch at all > to say the biggest threat facing America is perhaps not global warming, > not perpetual warmongering, not garbage food or low-level radiation or > way too much Lindsay Lohan, but a populace far too ignorant to know how > to properly manage any of it, much less change it all for the better." Three cheers. So, I'll hunker down as I've bothered to learn from history. > To Rome, circa 2007, add: foreign wars. Iran, before the next election from what I see so far...... |
Re: (OT:) New Energy Sources... Was: Why do I have such a strongdislike for Ragheads?
Hachiroku ãƒãƒãƒã‚¯ wrote: > On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:46:56 -0700, bill wrote: > > >> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned nuclear >>power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never went >>operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. > > > > Are you in Mass by any chance? There was one that was killed about 15 > miles from where I live, and the company went further west to the next > best site, where they are also meeting strong opposition. > > The funny thing is, the one posing the opposition are also the ones crying > for independance from Foreign Oil and coal and nuclear power plants. > > Can't have it ALL ways, people! > That's for sure. To clarify, the original Seabrook (Unit 1) was completed and is operational today. It is Unit 2 that was never completed and later canceled. That said, nuclear power is the only interim option for energy independence or at least a reduction in dependence on foreign sources of fossil fuels. I'm afraid that we have lost our way and are doomed to a role of third world status and already have made considerable progress in that direction. Sometimes, I think that the country would be better off under a benevolent dictator than our current free for all form of government. At least we would not be subject to continuous political bombardment that never seems to end or ever produces anything of worth for that matter... JT |
Re: (OT:) New Energy Sources... Was: Why do I have such a strongdislike for Ragheads?
Hachiroku ãƒãƒãƒã‚¯ wrote: > On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:46:56 -0700, bill wrote: > > >> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned nuclear >>power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never went >>operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. > > > > Are you in Mass by any chance? There was one that was killed about 15 > miles from where I live, and the company went further west to the next > best site, where they are also meeting strong opposition. > > The funny thing is, the one posing the opposition are also the ones crying > for independance from Foreign Oil and coal and nuclear power plants. > > Can't have it ALL ways, people! > That's for sure. To clarify, the original Seabrook (Unit 1) was completed and is operational today. It is Unit 2 that was never completed and later canceled. That said, nuclear power is the only interim option for energy independence or at least a reduction in dependence on foreign sources of fossil fuels. I'm afraid that we have lost our way and are doomed to a role of third world status and already have made considerable progress in that direction. Sometimes, I think that the country would be better off under a benevolent dictator than our current free for all form of government. At least we would not be subject to continuous political bombardment that never seems to end or ever produces anything of worth for that matter... JT |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Oct 27, 9:48 pm, Hachiroku <Tru...@AE86.gts> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:46:56 -0700, bill wrote: > > In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It > > is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned nuclear > > power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never went > > operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. > > Are you in Mass by any chance? There was one that was killed about 15 > miles from where I live, and the company went further west to the next > best site, where they are also meeting strong opposition. > > The funny thing is, the one posing the opposition are also the ones crying > for independance from Foreign Oil and coal and nuclear power plants. > > Can't have it ALL ways, people! Right. brings to mind ted kennedy killing the offshore windfarm near the cape. Fact is, if ya can't build anything, anywhere, then how do you intend to produce anything? If you cannot drill where the oil is, you will need to import it from countries that aren't as stupid. If you cannot build CTL plants, then you'll need to burn oil. If you cannot build coal or nuclear power plants then you'll need to squander the remaining natural gas. We simply have entirely too many cocksuckers in this country who expect leaders selected by the populace to be different to the populace. Our people are dumber than dirt, so we select leaders whose plans are even dumber. Problem isn't Bush or any leadership, we live in a world where the leadership is the people, problem is, the people are a bunch of stupid shits who just wait for "leadership", as a result of which, we are where we are. solution is easy. Drill in anwr to buy a little time, build nuclear power plants to replace the coal and natural gas plants, Build coal to liquid plants and gas to liquid plants to cover the next 30 or 50 years, and start heavy research on PHEVs while realigning our development style to support public transportation. it's simple, it's feasible, and it would work. we are not doing it for the same reason we aren't doing anything else, we are simply too dumb. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Oct 27, 9:48 pm, Hachiroku <Tru...@AE86.gts> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:46:56 -0700, bill wrote: > > In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It > > is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned nuclear > > power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never went > > operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. > > Are you in Mass by any chance? There was one that was killed about 15 > miles from where I live, and the company went further west to the next > best site, where they are also meeting strong opposition. > > The funny thing is, the one posing the opposition are also the ones crying > for independance from Foreign Oil and coal and nuclear power plants. > > Can't have it ALL ways, people! Right. brings to mind ted kennedy killing the offshore windfarm near the cape. Fact is, if ya can't build anything, anywhere, then how do you intend to produce anything? If you cannot drill where the oil is, you will need to import it from countries that aren't as stupid. If you cannot build CTL plants, then you'll need to burn oil. If you cannot build coal or nuclear power plants then you'll need to squander the remaining natural gas. We simply have entirely too many cocksuckers in this country who expect leaders selected by the populace to be different to the populace. Our people are dumber than dirt, so we select leaders whose plans are even dumber. Problem isn't Bush or any leadership, we live in a world where the leadership is the people, problem is, the people are a bunch of stupid shits who just wait for "leadership", as a result of which, we are where we are. solution is easy. Drill in anwr to buy a little time, build nuclear power plants to replace the coal and natural gas plants, Build coal to liquid plants and gas to liquid plants to cover the next 30 or 50 years, and start heavy research on PHEVs while realigning our development style to support public transportation. it's simple, it's feasible, and it would work. we are not doing it for the same reason we aren't doing anything else, we are simply too dumb. |
Re: (OT:) New Energy Sources... Was: Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
"Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote in message news:1i1Vi.290291$ax1.99282@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... > > > Hachiroku ???? wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:46:56 -0700, bill wrote: >> >> >>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>>is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >>>nuclear >>>power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never went >>>operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. >> >> >> >> Are you in Mass by any chance? There was one that was killed about 15 >> miles from where I live, and the company went further west to the next >> best site, where they are also meeting strong opposition. The funny thing >> is, the one posing the opposition are also the ones crying >> for independance from Foreign Oil and coal and nuclear power plants. >> Can't have it ALL ways, people! >> > > > > That's for sure. > > To clarify, the original Seabrook (Unit 1) was completed and is > operational today. It is Unit 2 that was never completed and later > canceled. > > That said, nuclear power is the only interim option for energy > independence or at least a reduction in dependence on foreign sources of > fossil fuels. > > I'm afraid that we have lost our way and are doomed to a role of third > world status and already have made considerable progress in that > direction. > > Sometimes, I think that the country would be better off under a benevolent > dictator than our current free for all form of government. At least we > would not be subject to continuous political bombardment that never seems > to end or ever produces anything of worth for that matter... > > JT "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." -- C.S. Lewis |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:48 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands