jim beam

bill wrote:
> On May 25, 4:53 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> jp2express wrote:
>>> I am a Software Engineer,
>> that explain a lot.
>>
>>> bright and open minded.
>> evidently not regarding "automation".
>>
>>> Therefore, so being an
>>> engineer must not be where those traits come from.
>> eh? are you e.s.l. perchance?
>>
>>
>>
>>> The topic wasn't even about whether or not we were dealing with automation.
>>> It is how the term "Automatic" is used in the automotive industry. You might
>>> want to go back over some of the older posts to refresh your memory.
>> er, you may want to read my previous posts.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Did you get your degree from an accredited University? Which one?
>> i found my degrees in the mens room after a party. one still smells a
>> bit strong. but it's ok, i can pose as a rocket surgeon on usenet.
>> unless i get it wrong of course.
>>
>> now, "Therefore, so being an engineer" what does "automation" mean again?
>>
>>
>>
>>> "jim beam" <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote in message
>>> news:1IednZZwx98xmcrbnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t...
>>>> jp2express wrote:
>>>>> Obviously, being an engineer does not make one bright or open minded.
>>>> from that statement, i have to assume that you're not an engineer. in
>>>> which case, arguing about "automation" is a pointless exercise.
>>>>> "jim beam" wrote:
>>>>>> bullshit. i'm an engineer, and method's go nothing to do with it. it's
>>>>>> the effect achieved that matters. you can have your transmission
>>>>>> controlled by a cage of hamsters if achieves the "automatic" effect
>>>>>> without manual intervention.
>
>
> "automation" means machines performing functionality that had
> previously een performed by people.
> "automatic transmission" is used in the automotive industry to
> indicate a specific type of self-shifting transmission. "automatic
> transmission" is also used to indicate any transmission that changes
> gear ratios without human intervention by certain pompous *********
> who can never seem to admit that 2 people can look at the same thing
> and come to 2 different conclusions.
>

self-induced myopia or name-calling doesn't change facts.

jim beam

bill wrote:
> On May 25, 4:53 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> jp2express wrote:
>>> I am a Software Engineer,
>> that explain a lot.
>>
>>> bright and open minded.
>> evidently not regarding "automation".
>>
>>> Therefore, so being an
>>> engineer must not be where those traits come from.
>> eh? are you e.s.l. perchance?
>>
>>
>>
>>> The topic wasn't even about whether or not we were dealing with automation.
>>> It is how the term "Automatic" is used in the automotive industry. You might
>>> want to go back over some of the older posts to refresh your memory.
>> er, you may want to read my previous posts.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Did you get your degree from an accredited University? Which one?
>> i found my degrees in the mens room after a party. one still smells a
>> bit strong. but it's ok, i can pose as a rocket surgeon on usenet.
>> unless i get it wrong of course.
>>
>> now, "Therefore, so being an engineer" what does "automation" mean again?
>>
>>
>>
>>> "jim beam" <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote in message
>>> news:1IednZZwx98xmcrbnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t...
>>>> jp2express wrote:
>>>>> Obviously, being an engineer does not make one bright or open minded.
>>>> from that statement, i have to assume that you're not an engineer. in
>>>> which case, arguing about "automation" is a pointless exercise.
>>>>> "jim beam" wrote:
>>>>>> bullshit. i'm an engineer, and method's go nothing to do with it. it's
>>>>>> the effect achieved that matters. you can have your transmission
>>>>>> controlled by a cage of hamsters if achieves the "automatic" effect
>>>>>> without manual intervention.
>
>
> "automation" means machines performing functionality that had
> previously een performed by people.
> "automatic transmission" is used in the automotive industry to
> indicate a specific type of self-shifting transmission. "automatic
> transmission" is also used to indicate any transmission that changes
> gear ratios without human intervention by certain pompous *********
> who can never seem to admit that 2 people can look at the same thing
> and come to 2 different conclusions.
>

self-induced myopia or name-calling doesn't change facts.

bill

On May 25, 7:08 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> bill wrote:
> > On May 25, 4:53 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >> jp2express wrote:
> >>> I am a Software Engineer,
> >> that explain a lot.
>
> >>> bright and open minded.
> >> evidently not regarding "automation".
>
> >>> Therefore, so being an
> >>> engineer must not be where those traits come from.
> >> eh? are you e.s.l. perchance?
>
> >>> The topic wasn't even about whether or not we were dealing with automation.
> >>> It is how the term "Automatic" is used in the automotive industry. You might
> >>> want to go back over some of the older posts to refresh your memory.
> >> er, you may want to read my previous posts.
>
> >>> Did you get your degree from an accredited University? Which one?
> >> i found my degrees in the mens room after a party. one still smells a
> >> bit strong. but it's ok, i can pose as a rocket surgeon on usenet.
> >> unless i get it wrong of course.
>
> >> now, "Therefore, so being an engineer" what does "automation" mean again?
>
> >>> "jim beam" <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote in message
> >>>news:1IednZZwx98xmcrbnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@speakeasy .net...
> >>>> jp2express wrote:
> >>>>> Obviously, being an engineer does not make one bright or open minded.
> >>>> from that statement, i have to assume that you're not an engineer. in
> >>>> which case, arguing about "automation" is a pointless exercise.
> >>>>> "jim beam" wrote:
> >>>>>> bullshit. i'm an engineer, and method's go nothing to do with it. it's
> >>>>>> the effect achieved that matters. you can have your transmission
> >>>>>> controlled by a cage of hamsters if achieves the "automatic" effect
> >>>>>> without manual intervention.
>
> > "automation" means machines performing functionality that had
> > previously een performed by people.
> > "automatic transmission" is used in the automotive industry to
> > indicate a specific type of self-shifting transmission. "automatic
> > transmission" is also used to indicate any transmission that changes
> > gear ratios without human intervention by certain pompous *********
> > who can never seem to admit that 2 people can look at the same thing
> > and come to 2 different conclusions.
>
> self-induced myopia or name-calling doesn't change facts.

Nor does slinging poo create them. It isn't an insult to call a
poo flinging moron a poo flinging moron, it's an accurate label.

bill

On May 25, 7:08 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> bill wrote:
> > On May 25, 4:53 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >> jp2express wrote:
> >>> I am a Software Engineer,
> >> that explain a lot.
>
> >>> bright and open minded.
> >> evidently not regarding "automation".
>
> >>> Therefore, so being an
> >>> engineer must not be where those traits come from.
> >> eh? are you e.s.l. perchance?
>
> >>> The topic wasn't even about whether or not we were dealing with automation.
> >>> It is how the term "Automatic" is used in the automotive industry. You might
> >>> want to go back over some of the older posts to refresh your memory.
> >> er, you may want to read my previous posts.
>
> >>> Did you get your degree from an accredited University? Which one?
> >> i found my degrees in the mens room after a party. one still smells a
> >> bit strong. but it's ok, i can pose as a rocket surgeon on usenet.
> >> unless i get it wrong of course.
>
> >> now, "Therefore, so being an engineer" what does "automation" mean again?
>
> >>> "jim beam" <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote in message
> >>>news:1IednZZwx98xmcrbnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@speakeasy .net...
> >>>> jp2express wrote:
> >>>>> Obviously, being an engineer does not make one bright or open minded.
> >>>> from that statement, i have to assume that you're not an engineer. in
> >>>> which case, arguing about "automation" is a pointless exercise.
> >>>>> "jim beam" wrote:
> >>>>>> bullshit. i'm an engineer, and method's go nothing to do with it. it's
> >>>>>> the effect achieved that matters. you can have your transmission
> >>>>>> controlled by a cage of hamsters if achieves the "automatic" effect
> >>>>>> without manual intervention.
>
> > "automation" means machines performing functionality that had
> > previously een performed by people.
> > "automatic transmission" is used in the automotive industry to
> > indicate a specific type of self-shifting transmission. "automatic
> > transmission" is also used to indicate any transmission that changes
> > gear ratios without human intervention by certain pompous *********
> > who can never seem to admit that 2 people can look at the same thing
> > and come to 2 different conclusions.
>
> self-induced myopia or name-calling doesn't change facts.

Nor does slinging poo create them. It isn't an insult to call a
poo flinging moron a poo flinging moron, it's an accurate label.

Jack

What's this bullshit doing in this newsgroup. I come here to try to learn
something about my Toyota and lately all I've seen is bullshit about
Volkswagens. Who gives a about Volkswagens or Hondas or anything
other than Toyotas.
Cut the bullshit and say something about Toyota trucks or take it to an
appropriate newsgroup.
jack



In article <1180464281.985572.150820@k79g2000hse.googlegroups .com>,
ford_prefect42@hotmail.com says...
>
>
>On May 25, 7:08 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> bill wrote:
>> > On May 25, 4:53 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> >> jp2express wrote:
>> >>> I am a Software Engineer,
>> >> that explain a lot.
>>
>> >>> bright and open minded.
>> >> evidently not regarding "automation".
>>
>> >>> Therefore, so being an
>> >>> engineer must not be where those traits come from.
>> >> eh? are you e.s.l. perchance?
>>
>> >>> The topic wasn't even about whether or not we were dealing with
>> >>> automation.
>> >>> It is how the term "Automatic" is used in the automotive industry.
You
>> >>> might
>> >>> want to go back over some of the older posts to refresh your
memory.
>> >> er, you may want to read my previous posts.
>>
>> >>> Did you get your degree from an accredited University? Which one?
>> >> i found my degrees in the mens room after a party. one still smells
a
>> >> bit strong. but it's ok, i can pose as a rocket surgeon on usenet.
>> >> unless i get it wrong of course.
>>
>> >> now, "Therefore, so being an engineer" what does "automation" mean
again?
>>
>> >>> "jim beam" <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote in message
>> >>>news:1IednZZwx98xmcrbnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@speakeasy .net...
>> >>>> jp2express wrote:
>> >>>>> Obviously, being an engineer does not make one bright or open
minded.
>> >>>> from that statement, i have to assume that you're not an engineer.
in
>> >>>> which case, arguing about "automation" is a pointless exercise.
>> >>>>> "jim beam" wrote:
>> >>>>>> bullshit. i'm an engineer, and method's go nothing to do with
it.
>> >>>>>> it's
>> >>>>>> the effect achieved that matters. you can have your
transmission
>> >>>>>> controlled by a cage of hamsters if achieves the "automatic"
effect
>> >>>>>> without manual intervention.
>>
>> > "automation" means machines performing functionality that had
>> > previously een performed by people.
>> > "automatic transmission" is used in the automotive industry to
>> > indicate a specific type of self-shifting transmission. "automatic
>> > transmission" is also used to indicate any transmission that changes
>> > gear ratios without human intervention by certain pompous *********
>> > who can never seem to admit that 2 people can look at the same thing
>> > and come to 2 different conclusions.
>>
>> self-induced myopia or name-calling doesn't change facts.
>
> Nor does slinging poo create them. It isn't an insult to call a
>poo flinging moron a poo flinging moron, it's an accurate label.
>

Jack

What's this bullshit doing in this newsgroup. I come here to try to learn
something about my Toyota and lately all I've seen is bullshit about
Volkswagens. Who gives a about Volkswagens or Hondas or anything
other than Toyotas.
Cut the bullshit and say something about Toyota trucks or take it to an
appropriate newsgroup.
jack



In article <1180464281.985572.150820@k79g2000hse.googlegroups .com>,
ford_prefect42@hotmail.com says...
>
>
>On May 25, 7:08 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> bill wrote:
>> > On May 25, 4:53 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> >> jp2express wrote:
>> >>> I am a Software Engineer,
>> >> that explain a lot.
>>
>> >>> bright and open minded.
>> >> evidently not regarding "automation".
>>
>> >>> Therefore, so being an
>> >>> engineer must not be where those traits come from.
>> >> eh? are you e.s.l. perchance?
>>
>> >>> The topic wasn't even about whether or not we were dealing with
>> >>> automation.
>> >>> It is how the term "Automatic" is used in the automotive industry.
You
>> >>> might
>> >>> want to go back over some of the older posts to refresh your
memory.
>> >> er, you may want to read my previous posts.
>>
>> >>> Did you get your degree from an accredited University? Which one?
>> >> i found my degrees in the mens room after a party. one still smells
a
>> >> bit strong. but it's ok, i can pose as a rocket surgeon on usenet.
>> >> unless i get it wrong of course.
>>
>> >> now, "Therefore, so being an engineer" what does "automation" mean
again?
>>
>> >>> "jim beam" <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote in message
>> >>>news:1IednZZwx98xmcrbnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@speakeasy .net...
>> >>>> jp2express wrote:
>> >>>>> Obviously, being an engineer does not make one bright or open
minded.
>> >>>> from that statement, i have to assume that you're not an engineer.
in
>> >>>> which case, arguing about "automation" is a pointless exercise.
>> >>>>> "jim beam" wrote:
>> >>>>>> bullshit. i'm an engineer, and method's go nothing to do with
it.
>> >>>>>> it's
>> >>>>>> the effect achieved that matters. you can have your
transmission
>> >>>>>> controlled by a cage of hamsters if achieves the "automatic"
effect
>> >>>>>> without manual intervention.
>>
>> > "automation" means machines performing functionality that had
>> > previously een performed by people.
>> > "automatic transmission" is used in the automotive industry to
>> > indicate a specific type of self-shifting transmission. "automatic
>> > transmission" is also used to indicate any transmission that changes
>> > gear ratios without human intervention by certain pompous *********
>> > who can never seem to admit that 2 people can look at the same thing
>> > and come to 2 different conclusions.
>>
>> self-induced myopia or name-calling doesn't change facts.
>
> Nor does slinging poo create them. It isn't an insult to call a
>poo flinging moron a poo flinging moron, it's an accurate label.
>

Dan Bloomquist

Jack wrote:

> What's this bullshit doing in this newsgroup. I come here to try to learn
> something about my Toyota and lately all I've seen is bullshit about
> Volkswagens. Who gives a about Volkswagens or Hondas or anything
> other than Toyotas.
> Cut the bullshit and say something about Toyota trucks or take it to an
> appropriate newsgroup.

You must be new to usenet. You need to pop a beer and get over it......

Dan Bloomquist

Jack wrote:

> What's this bullshit doing in this newsgroup. I come here to try to learn
> something about my Toyota and lately all I've seen is bullshit about
> Volkswagens. Who gives a about Volkswagens or Hondas or anything
> other than Toyotas.
> Cut the bullshit and say something about Toyota trucks or take it to an
> appropriate newsgroup.

You must be new to usenet. You need to pop a beer and get over it......

Eeyore

Jack wrote:

> What's this bullshit doing in this newsgroup. I come here to try to learn
> something about my Toyota and lately all I've seen is bullshit about
> Volkswagens. Who gives a about Volkswagens or Hondas or anything
> other than Toyotas.

Who gives a about Toyotas ? Talk about dull cars !

Graham

Eeyore

Jack wrote:

> What's this bullshit doing in this newsgroup. I come here to try to learn
> something about my Toyota and lately all I've seen is bullshit about
> Volkswagens. Who gives a about Volkswagens or Hondas or anything
> other than Toyotas.

Who gives a about Toyotas ? Talk about dull cars !

Graham

jim beam

bill wrote:
> On May 25, 7:08 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> bill wrote:
>>> On May 25, 4:53 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>> jp2express wrote:
>>>>> I am a Software Engineer,
>>>> that explain a lot.
>>>>> bright and open minded.
>>>> evidently not regarding "automation".
>>>>> Therefore, so being an
>>>>> engineer must not be where those traits come from.
>>>> eh? are you e.s.l. perchance?
>>>>> The topic wasn't even about whether or not we were dealing with automation.
>>>>> It is how the term "Automatic" is used in the automotive industry. You might
>>>>> want to go back over some of the older posts to refresh your memory.
>>>> er, you may want to read my previous posts.
>>>>> Did you get your degree from an accredited University? Which one?
>>>> i found my degrees in the mens room after a party. one still smells a
>>>> bit strong. but it's ok, i can pose as a rocket surgeon on usenet.
>>>> unless i get it wrong of course.
>>>> now, "Therefore, so being an engineer" what does "automation" mean again?
>>>>> "jim beam" <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:1IednZZwx98xmcrbnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t...
>>>>>> jp2express wrote:
>>>>>>> Obviously, being an engineer does not make one bright or open minded.
>>>>>> from that statement, i have to assume that you're not an engineer. in
>>>>>> which case, arguing about "automation" is a pointless exercise.
>>>>>>> "jim beam" wrote:
>>>>>>>> bullshit. i'm an engineer, and method's go nothing to do with it. it's
>>>>>>>> the effect achieved that matters. you can have your transmission
>>>>>>>> controlled by a cage of hamsters if achieves the "automatic" effect
>>>>>>>> without manual intervention.
>>> "automation" means machines performing functionality that had
>>> previously een performed by people.
>>> "automatic transmission" is used in the automotive industry to
>>> indicate a specific type of self-shifting transmission. "automatic
>>> transmission" is also used to indicate any transmission that changes
>>> gear ratios without human intervention by certain pompous *********
>>> who can never seem to admit that 2 people can look at the same thing
>>> and come to 2 different conclusions.
>> self-induced myopia or name-calling doesn't change facts.
>
> Nor does slinging poo create them. It isn't an insult to call a
> poo flinging moron a poo flinging moron, it's an accurate label.
>
so self-induced myopia or name-calling doesn't change facts.

jim beam

bill wrote:
> On May 25, 7:08 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> bill wrote:
>>> On May 25, 4:53 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>> jp2express wrote:
>>>>> I am a Software Engineer,
>>>> that explain a lot.
>>>>> bright and open minded.
>>>> evidently not regarding "automation".
>>>>> Therefore, so being an
>>>>> engineer must not be where those traits come from.
>>>> eh? are you e.s.l. perchance?
>>>>> The topic wasn't even about whether or not we were dealing with automation.
>>>>> It is how the term "Automatic" is used in the automotive industry. You might
>>>>> want to go back over some of the older posts to refresh your memory.
>>>> er, you may want to read my previous posts.
>>>>> Did you get your degree from an accredited University? Which one?
>>>> i found my degrees in the mens room after a party. one still smells a
>>>> bit strong. but it's ok, i can pose as a rocket surgeon on usenet.
>>>> unless i get it wrong of course.
>>>> now, "Therefore, so being an engineer" what does "automation" mean again?
>>>>> "jim beam" <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:1IednZZwx98xmcrbnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t...
>>>>>> jp2express wrote:
>>>>>>> Obviously, being an engineer does not make one bright or open minded.
>>>>>> from that statement, i have to assume that you're not an engineer. in
>>>>>> which case, arguing about "automation" is a pointless exercise.
>>>>>>> "jim beam" wrote:
>>>>>>>> bullshit. i'm an engineer, and method's go nothing to do with it. it's
>>>>>>>> the effect achieved that matters. you can have your transmission
>>>>>>>> controlled by a cage of hamsters if achieves the "automatic" effect
>>>>>>>> without manual intervention.
>>> "automation" means machines performing functionality that had
>>> previously een performed by people.
>>> "automatic transmission" is used in the automotive industry to
>>> indicate a specific type of self-shifting transmission. "automatic
>>> transmission" is also used to indicate any transmission that changes
>>> gear ratios without human intervention by certain pompous *********
>>> who can never seem to admit that 2 people can look at the same thing
>>> and come to 2 different conclusions.
>> self-induced myopia or name-calling doesn't change facts.
>
> Nor does slinging poo create them. It isn't an insult to call a
> poo flinging moron a poo flinging moron, it's an accurate label.
>
so self-induced myopia or name-calling doesn't change facts.

rm@biteme.org

In alt.autos.toyota Jack <jmehauph@yahoo.com> wrote:

> What's this bullshit doing in this newsgroup. I come here to try
> to learn something about my Toyota and lately all I've seen is
> bullshit about Volkswagens. Who gives a about Volkswagens or
> Hondas or anything other than Toyotas. Cut the bullshit and say
> something about Toyota trucks or take it to an appropriate
> newsgroup. jack

We agree with the top-poster. All of you clowns talking about
Volkswagens and Hondas should take it to alt.politics.gwbush or
something like that.

cordially, as always,

rm

rm@biteme.org

In alt.autos.toyota Jack <jmehauph@yahoo.com> wrote:

> What's this bullshit doing in this newsgroup. I come here to try
> to learn something about my Toyota and lately all I've seen is
> bullshit about Volkswagens. Who gives a about Volkswagens or
> Hondas or anything other than Toyotas. Cut the bullshit and say
> something about Toyota trucks or take it to an appropriate
> newsgroup. jack

We agree with the top-poster. All of you clowns talking about
Volkswagens and Hondas should take it to alt.politics.gwbush or
something like that.

cordially, as always,

rm

Grumpy AuContraire

Dan Bloomquist wrote:
> Jack wrote:
>
>> What's this bullshit doing in this newsgroup. I come here to try to
>> learn something about my Toyota and lately all I've seen is bullshit
>> about Volkswagens. Who gives a about Volkswagens or Hondas or
>> anything other than Toyotas.
>> Cut the bullshit and say something about Toyota trucks or take it to
>> an appropriate newsgroup.
>
>
> You must be new to usenet. You need to pop a beer and get over it......
>



Maybe his "Delete" key is broken...

JT