s2000
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: s2000
"Michael Selin" <mselin@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
news:Q9HOe.659485$cg1.564304@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> Hi
> Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda
> s2000. I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
> PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
> resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>
>
I have an 06. In 04 they torqued up and regeared I find it civilized enough
for everyday use, and fast, responsive and a little nuts if you keep it
above 6500 rpm (second cam zone) Had a couple Preludes, nice rides, but
dont miss the torque steer
news:Q9HOe.659485$cg1.564304@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> Hi
> Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda
> s2000. I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
> PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
> resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>
>
I have an 06. In 04 they torqued up and regeared I find it civilized enough
for everyday use, and fast, responsive and a little nuts if you keep it
above 6500 rpm (second cam zone) Had a couple Preludes, nice rides, but
dont miss the torque steer
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: s2000
"Michael Selin" <mselin@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
news:Q9HOe.659485$cg1.564304@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> Hi
> Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda
> s2000. I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
> PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
> resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>
>
I have an 06. In 04 they torqued up and regeared I find it civilized enough
for everyday use, and fast, responsive and a little nuts if you keep it
above 6500 rpm (second cam zone) Had a couple Preludes, nice rides, but
dont miss the torque steer
news:Q9HOe.659485$cg1.564304@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> Hi
> Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda
> s2000. I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
> PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
> resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>
>
I have an 06. In 04 they torqued up and regeared I find it civilized enough
for everyday use, and fast, responsive and a little nuts if you keep it
above 6500 rpm (second cam zone) Had a couple Preludes, nice rides, but
dont miss the torque steer
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: s2000
"Michael Selin" <mselin@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
news:Q9HOe.659485$cg1.564304@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> Hi
> Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda
> s2000. I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
> PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
> resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>
>
I have an 06. In 04 they torqued up and regeared I find it civilized enough
for everyday use, and fast, responsive and a little nuts if you keep it
above 6500 rpm (second cam zone) Had a couple Preludes, nice rides, but
dont miss the torque steer
news:Q9HOe.659485$cg1.564304@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> Hi
> Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda
> s2000. I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
> PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
> resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>
>
I have an 06. In 04 they torqued up and regeared I find it civilized enough
for everyday use, and fast, responsive and a little nuts if you keep it
above 6500 rpm (second cam zone) Had a couple Preludes, nice rides, but
dont miss the torque steer
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: s2000
"Michael Selin" <mselin@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
news:Q9HOe.659485$cg1.564304@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> Hi
> Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda
> s2000. I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
> PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
> resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>
>
I have an 06. In 04 they torqued up and regeared I find it civilized enough
for everyday use, and fast, responsive and a little nuts if you keep it
above 6500 rpm (second cam zone) Had a couple Preludes, nice rides, but
dont miss the torque steer
news:Q9HOe.659485$cg1.564304@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> Hi
> Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda
> s2000. I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
> PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
> resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>
>
I have an 06. In 04 they torqued up and regeared I find it civilized enough
for everyday use, and fast, responsive and a little nuts if you keep it
above 6500 rpm (second cam zone) Had a couple Preludes, nice rides, but
dont miss the torque steer
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)