Still no Fit
09-15-2006, 07:25 AM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
for the Fit.
I have a 2001 CRV that is full of problems the dealers cant remedy and
when they do repairs it costs a fortune. I used to think the Japanese cars
were good but not anymore because most of the parts on american cars are
Japanese anyway and Korean parts are known for quality as well. My point
is that there are good alternatives and since its the 1st year for the Fit
you may be better off waiting till the bugs are fixed in a few years. I am
only trying to be helpful since you were complaining about the long wait
for the Fit. Buying a new car style or model in its 1st or 2nd year of
production is an expensive idea and time consuming as well.
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:00:58 -0400, High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net>
wrote:
> RickaTTic wrote:
>
>> I'd buy a Chevy Aveo instead. No wait and great cars a lot like the Fit
>> and way less costly.
>
> Are you serious?!!
>
> As the old saying goes, you get what you pay for. In the case of the
> Aveo,
> with the low price comes low quality. It is a Daewoo-built crapbox that
> gets gas mileage that's on par with my '93 Accord.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
for the Fit.
I have a 2001 CRV that is full of problems the dealers cant remedy and
when they do repairs it costs a fortune. I used to think the Japanese cars
were good but not anymore because most of the parts on american cars are
Japanese anyway and Korean parts are known for quality as well. My point
is that there are good alternatives and since its the 1st year for the Fit
you may be better off waiting till the bugs are fixed in a few years. I am
only trying to be helpful since you were complaining about the long wait
for the Fit. Buying a new car style or model in its 1st or 2nd year of
production is an expensive idea and time consuming as well.
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:00:58 -0400, High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net>
wrote:
> RickaTTic wrote:
>
>> I'd buy a Chevy Aveo instead. No wait and great cars a lot like the Fit
>> and way less costly.
>
> Are you serious?!!
>
> As the old saying goes, you get what you pay for. In the case of the
> Aveo,
> with the low price comes low quality. It is a Daewoo-built crapbox that
> gets gas mileage that's on par with my '93 Accord.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
09-15-2006, 08:25 AM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:25:37 -0400, RickaTTic <rickattic@comcast.net>
wrote:
>yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
>strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
>for the Fit.
>I have a 2001 CRV that is full of problems the dealers cant remedy and
>when they do repairs it costs a fortune. I used to think the Japanese cars
>were good but not anymore because most of the parts on american cars are
>Japanese anyway and Korean parts are known for quality as well. My point
>is that there are good alternatives and since its the 1st year for the Fit
>you may be better off waiting till the bugs are fixed in a few years. I am
>only trying to be helpful since you were complaining about the long wait
>for the Fit. Buying a new car style or model in its 1st or 2nd year of
>production is an expensive idea and time consuming as well.
>
But the Fit is just a retooled Jazz which has been sold in Europe for
years. I'm not worried about first year problems with it.
I am seriously thinking about just canceling the order and putting a
few thousand into my 91 Accord and keeping it for another two years.
wrote:
>yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
>strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
>for the Fit.
>I have a 2001 CRV that is full of problems the dealers cant remedy and
>when they do repairs it costs a fortune. I used to think the Japanese cars
>were good but not anymore because most of the parts on american cars are
>Japanese anyway and Korean parts are known for quality as well. My point
>is that there are good alternatives and since its the 1st year for the Fit
>you may be better off waiting till the bugs are fixed in a few years. I am
>only trying to be helpful since you were complaining about the long wait
>for the Fit. Buying a new car style or model in its 1st or 2nd year of
>production is an expensive idea and time consuming as well.
>
But the Fit is just a retooled Jazz which has been sold in Europe for
years. I'm not worried about first year problems with it.
I am seriously thinking about just canceling the order and putting a
few thousand into my 91 Accord and keeping it for another two years.
09-15-2006, 08:25 AM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:25:37 -0400, RickaTTic <rickattic@comcast.net>
wrote:
>yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
>strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
>for the Fit.
>I have a 2001 CRV that is full of problems the dealers cant remedy and
>when they do repairs it costs a fortune. I used to think the Japanese cars
>were good but not anymore because most of the parts on american cars are
>Japanese anyway and Korean parts are known for quality as well. My point
>is that there are good alternatives and since its the 1st year for the Fit
>you may be better off waiting till the bugs are fixed in a few years. I am
>only trying to be helpful since you were complaining about the long wait
>for the Fit. Buying a new car style or model in its 1st or 2nd year of
>production is an expensive idea and time consuming as well.
>
But the Fit is just a retooled Jazz which has been sold in Europe for
years. I'm not worried about first year problems with it.
I am seriously thinking about just canceling the order and putting a
few thousand into my 91 Accord and keeping it for another two years.
wrote:
>yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
>strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
>for the Fit.
>I have a 2001 CRV that is full of problems the dealers cant remedy and
>when they do repairs it costs a fortune. I used to think the Japanese cars
>were good but not anymore because most of the parts on american cars are
>Japanese anyway and Korean parts are known for quality as well. My point
>is that there are good alternatives and since its the 1st year for the Fit
>you may be better off waiting till the bugs are fixed in a few years. I am
>only trying to be helpful since you were complaining about the long wait
>for the Fit. Buying a new car style or model in its 1st or 2nd year of
>production is an expensive idea and time consuming as well.
>
But the Fit is just a retooled Jazz which has been sold in Europe for
years. I'm not worried about first year problems with it.
I am seriously thinking about just canceling the order and putting a
few thousand into my 91 Accord and keeping it for another two years.
09-15-2006, 08:25 AM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:25:37 -0400, RickaTTic <rickattic@comcast.net>
wrote:
>yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
>strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
>for the Fit.
>I have a 2001 CRV that is full of problems the dealers cant remedy and
>when they do repairs it costs a fortune. I used to think the Japanese cars
>were good but not anymore because most of the parts on american cars are
>Japanese anyway and Korean parts are known for quality as well. My point
>is that there are good alternatives and since its the 1st year for the Fit
>you may be better off waiting till the bugs are fixed in a few years. I am
>only trying to be helpful since you were complaining about the long wait
>for the Fit. Buying a new car style or model in its 1st or 2nd year of
>production is an expensive idea and time consuming as well.
>
But the Fit is just a retooled Jazz which has been sold in Europe for
years. I'm not worried about first year problems with it.
I am seriously thinking about just canceling the order and putting a
few thousand into my 91 Accord and keeping it for another two years.
wrote:
>yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
>strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
>for the Fit.
>I have a 2001 CRV that is full of problems the dealers cant remedy and
>when they do repairs it costs a fortune. I used to think the Japanese cars
>were good but not anymore because most of the parts on american cars are
>Japanese anyway and Korean parts are known for quality as well. My point
>is that there are good alternatives and since its the 1st year for the Fit
>you may be better off waiting till the bugs are fixed in a few years. I am
>only trying to be helpful since you were complaining about the long wait
>for the Fit. Buying a new car style or model in its 1st or 2nd year of
>production is an expensive idea and time consuming as well.
>
But the Fit is just a retooled Jazz which has been sold in Europe for
years. I'm not worried about first year problems with it.
I am seriously thinking about just canceling the order and putting a
few thousand into my 91 Accord and keeping it for another two years.
09-15-2006, 08:51 AM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
RickaTTic wrote:
> yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
> strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
> for the Fit.
If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
took with it. The Fit, along with the Civic and the Toyota Corolla and
Yaris, can get upwards of 40mpg if not more.
> I have a 2001 CRV that is full of problems the dealers cant remedy and
> when they do repairs it costs a fortune.
You either got a rare lemon, or your dealer was incompetent.
> I used to think the Japanese cars
> were good but not anymore because most of the parts on american cars are
> Japanese anyway and Korean parts are known for quality as well. My point
> is that there are good alternatives and since its the 1st year for the Fit
> you may be better off waiting till the bugs are fixed in a few years.
Actually, the Fit has been around for about 5 years in other countries
(known as the Jazz in some places) and has proven to be just as reliable as
most other Hondas. The Aveo is built by Daewoo, a Korean company who
products, unlike Hyundai for example, are not of the high Korean quality you
speak of. If you haven't had any problems with your Aveo yet, you can
consider yourself lucky for the moment.
> I am
> only trying to be helpful since you were complaining about the long wait
> for the Fit. Buying a new car style or model in its 1st or 2nd year of
> production is an expensive idea and time consuming as well.
I wasn't complaining about the long wait; the only Honda dealer in my area
has about 4 of them on the lot. Somebody else was lamenting about it. But
like I said above, the Fit (Jazz) has been around longer elsewhere and has
been reliable as expected.
> yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
> strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
> for the Fit.
If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
took with it. The Fit, along with the Civic and the Toyota Corolla and
Yaris, can get upwards of 40mpg if not more.
> I have a 2001 CRV that is full of problems the dealers cant remedy and
> when they do repairs it costs a fortune.
You either got a rare lemon, or your dealer was incompetent.
> I used to think the Japanese cars
> were good but not anymore because most of the parts on american cars are
> Japanese anyway and Korean parts are known for quality as well. My point
> is that there are good alternatives and since its the 1st year for the Fit
> you may be better off waiting till the bugs are fixed in a few years.
Actually, the Fit has been around for about 5 years in other countries
(known as the Jazz in some places) and has proven to be just as reliable as
most other Hondas. The Aveo is built by Daewoo, a Korean company who
products, unlike Hyundai for example, are not of the high Korean quality you
speak of. If you haven't had any problems with your Aveo yet, you can
consider yourself lucky for the moment.
> I am
> only trying to be helpful since you were complaining about the long wait
> for the Fit. Buying a new car style or model in its 1st or 2nd year of
> production is an expensive idea and time consuming as well.
I wasn't complaining about the long wait; the only Honda dealer in my area
has about 4 of them on the lot. Somebody else was lamenting about it. But
like I said above, the Fit (Jazz) has been around longer elsewhere and has
been reliable as expected.
09-15-2006, 08:51 AM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
RickaTTic wrote:
> yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
> strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
> for the Fit.
If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
took with it. The Fit, along with the Civic and the Toyota Corolla and
Yaris, can get upwards of 40mpg if not more.
> I have a 2001 CRV that is full of problems the dealers cant remedy and
> when they do repairs it costs a fortune.
You either got a rare lemon, or your dealer was incompetent.
> I used to think the Japanese cars
> were good but not anymore because most of the parts on american cars are
> Japanese anyway and Korean parts are known for quality as well. My point
> is that there are good alternatives and since its the 1st year for the Fit
> you may be better off waiting till the bugs are fixed in a few years.
Actually, the Fit has been around for about 5 years in other countries
(known as the Jazz in some places) and has proven to be just as reliable as
most other Hondas. The Aveo is built by Daewoo, a Korean company who
products, unlike Hyundai for example, are not of the high Korean quality you
speak of. If you haven't had any problems with your Aveo yet, you can
consider yourself lucky for the moment.
> I am
> only trying to be helpful since you were complaining about the long wait
> for the Fit. Buying a new car style or model in its 1st or 2nd year of
> production is an expensive idea and time consuming as well.
I wasn't complaining about the long wait; the only Honda dealer in my area
has about 4 of them on the lot. Somebody else was lamenting about it. But
like I said above, the Fit (Jazz) has been around longer elsewhere and has
been reliable as expected.
> yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
> strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
> for the Fit.
If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
took with it. The Fit, along with the Civic and the Toyota Corolla and
Yaris, can get upwards of 40mpg if not more.
> I have a 2001 CRV that is full of problems the dealers cant remedy and
> when they do repairs it costs a fortune.
You either got a rare lemon, or your dealer was incompetent.
> I used to think the Japanese cars
> were good but not anymore because most of the parts on american cars are
> Japanese anyway and Korean parts are known for quality as well. My point
> is that there are good alternatives and since its the 1st year for the Fit
> you may be better off waiting till the bugs are fixed in a few years.
Actually, the Fit has been around for about 5 years in other countries
(known as the Jazz in some places) and has proven to be just as reliable as
most other Hondas. The Aveo is built by Daewoo, a Korean company who
products, unlike Hyundai for example, are not of the high Korean quality you
speak of. If you haven't had any problems with your Aveo yet, you can
consider yourself lucky for the moment.
> I am
> only trying to be helpful since you were complaining about the long wait
> for the Fit. Buying a new car style or model in its 1st or 2nd year of
> production is an expensive idea and time consuming as well.
I wasn't complaining about the long wait; the only Honda dealer in my area
has about 4 of them on the lot. Somebody else was lamenting about it. But
like I said above, the Fit (Jazz) has been around longer elsewhere and has
been reliable as expected.
09-15-2006, 08:51 AM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
RickaTTic wrote:
> yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
> strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
> for the Fit.
If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
took with it. The Fit, along with the Civic and the Toyota Corolla and
Yaris, can get upwards of 40mpg if not more.
> I have a 2001 CRV that is full of problems the dealers cant remedy and
> when they do repairs it costs a fortune.
You either got a rare lemon, or your dealer was incompetent.
> I used to think the Japanese cars
> were good but not anymore because most of the parts on american cars are
> Japanese anyway and Korean parts are known for quality as well. My point
> is that there are good alternatives and since its the 1st year for the Fit
> you may be better off waiting till the bugs are fixed in a few years.
Actually, the Fit has been around for about 5 years in other countries
(known as the Jazz in some places) and has proven to be just as reliable as
most other Hondas. The Aveo is built by Daewoo, a Korean company who
products, unlike Hyundai for example, are not of the high Korean quality you
speak of. If you haven't had any problems with your Aveo yet, you can
consider yourself lucky for the moment.
> I am
> only trying to be helpful since you were complaining about the long wait
> for the Fit. Buying a new car style or model in its 1st or 2nd year of
> production is an expensive idea and time consuming as well.
I wasn't complaining about the long wait; the only Honda dealer in my area
has about 4 of them on the lot. Somebody else was lamenting about it. But
like I said above, the Fit (Jazz) has been around longer elsewhere and has
been reliable as expected.
> yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
> strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
> for the Fit.
If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
took with it. The Fit, along with the Civic and the Toyota Corolla and
Yaris, can get upwards of 40mpg if not more.
> I have a 2001 CRV that is full of problems the dealers cant remedy and
> when they do repairs it costs a fortune.
You either got a rare lemon, or your dealer was incompetent.
> I used to think the Japanese cars
> were good but not anymore because most of the parts on american cars are
> Japanese anyway and Korean parts are known for quality as well. My point
> is that there are good alternatives and since its the 1st year for the Fit
> you may be better off waiting till the bugs are fixed in a few years.
Actually, the Fit has been around for about 5 years in other countries
(known as the Jazz in some places) and has proven to be just as reliable as
most other Hondas. The Aveo is built by Daewoo, a Korean company who
products, unlike Hyundai for example, are not of the high Korean quality you
speak of. If you haven't had any problems with your Aveo yet, you can
consider yourself lucky for the moment.
> I am
> only trying to be helpful since you were complaining about the long wait
> for the Fit. Buying a new car style or model in its 1st or 2nd year of
> production is an expensive idea and time consuming as well.
I wasn't complaining about the long wait; the only Honda dealer in my area
has about 4 of them on the lot. Somebody else was lamenting about it. But
like I said above, the Fit (Jazz) has been around longer elsewhere and has
been reliable as expected.
09-15-2006, 09:00 AM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
In article <6oailtpapnu3$.dlg@hightech.misfit>,
High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net> wrote:
> > yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
> > strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
> > for the Fit.
>
> If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
> a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
> took with it.
Shoot, my 2000 Accord got 35mpg--in the middle of summer, on the freeway
through mountainous terrain (US 68 through WV/MD).
Buy a 4 cylinder, manual transmission Accord and get Fit-type mileage
with a nicer car.
High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net> wrote:
> > yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
> > strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
> > for the Fit.
>
> If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
> a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
> took with it.
Shoot, my 2000 Accord got 35mpg--in the middle of summer, on the freeway
through mountainous terrain (US 68 through WV/MD).
Buy a 4 cylinder, manual transmission Accord and get Fit-type mileage
with a nicer car.
09-15-2006, 09:00 AM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
In article <6oailtpapnu3$.dlg@hightech.misfit>,
High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net> wrote:
> > yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
> > strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
> > for the Fit.
>
> If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
> a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
> took with it.
Shoot, my 2000 Accord got 35mpg--in the middle of summer, on the freeway
through mountainous terrain (US 68 through WV/MD).
Buy a 4 cylinder, manual transmission Accord and get Fit-type mileage
with a nicer car.
High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net> wrote:
> > yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
> > strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
> > for the Fit.
>
> If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
> a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
> took with it.
Shoot, my 2000 Accord got 35mpg--in the middle of summer, on the freeway
through mountainous terrain (US 68 through WV/MD).
Buy a 4 cylinder, manual transmission Accord and get Fit-type mileage
with a nicer car.
09-15-2006, 09:00 AM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
In article <6oailtpapnu3$.dlg@hightech.misfit>,
High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net> wrote:
> > yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
> > strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
> > for the Fit.
>
> If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
> a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
> took with it.
Shoot, my 2000 Accord got 35mpg--in the middle of summer, on the freeway
through mountainous terrain (US 68 through WV/MD).
Buy a 4 cylinder, manual transmission Accord and get Fit-type mileage
with a nicer car.
High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net> wrote:
> > yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
> > strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
> > for the Fit.
>
> If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
> a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
> took with it.
Shoot, my 2000 Accord got 35mpg--in the middle of summer, on the freeway
through mountainous terrain (US 68 through WV/MD).
Buy a 4 cylinder, manual transmission Accord and get Fit-type mileage
with a nicer car.
09-15-2006, 12:33 PM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:00:22 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
<elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>In article <6oailtpapnu3$.dlg@hightech.misfit>,
> High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> > yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
>> > strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
>> > for the Fit.
>>
>> If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
>> a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
>> took with it.
>
>Shoot, my 2000 Accord got 35mpg--in the middle of summer, on the freeway
>through mountainous terrain (US 68 through WV/MD).
>
>Buy a 4 cylinder, manual transmission Accord and get Fit-type mileage
>with a nicer car.
I don't think I can get an Accord anywhere near the price of the Fit,
but the manual transmission is a killer. I love them, in fact my
Accord is the first car I ever got with AT, but neither my Significant
Other, nor any of my friends, can drive MT and that's a problem.
About seven years ago I broke an ankle at a convention and only one
girl out of fifty something people could drive my car. That's why I
got the Accord with AT. Besides that, almost all my driving is in New
York City and MT is a pain in that kind of driving.
<elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>In article <6oailtpapnu3$.dlg@hightech.misfit>,
> High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> > yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
>> > strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
>> > for the Fit.
>>
>> If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
>> a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
>> took with it.
>
>Shoot, my 2000 Accord got 35mpg--in the middle of summer, on the freeway
>through mountainous terrain (US 68 through WV/MD).
>
>Buy a 4 cylinder, manual transmission Accord and get Fit-type mileage
>with a nicer car.
I don't think I can get an Accord anywhere near the price of the Fit,
but the manual transmission is a killer. I love them, in fact my
Accord is the first car I ever got with AT, but neither my Significant
Other, nor any of my friends, can drive MT and that's a problem.
About seven years ago I broke an ankle at a convention and only one
girl out of fifty something people could drive my car. That's why I
got the Accord with AT. Besides that, almost all my driving is in New
York City and MT is a pain in that kind of driving.
09-15-2006, 12:33 PM
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:00:22 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
<elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>In article <6oailtpapnu3$.dlg@hightech.misfit>,
> High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> > yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
>> > strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
>> > for the Fit.
>>
>> If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
>> a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
>> took with it.
>
>Shoot, my 2000 Accord got 35mpg--in the middle of summer, on the freeway
>through mountainous terrain (US 68 through WV/MD).
>
>Buy a 4 cylinder, manual transmission Accord and get Fit-type mileage
>with a nicer car.
I don't think I can get an Accord anywhere near the price of the Fit,
but the manual transmission is a killer. I love them, in fact my
Accord is the first car I ever got with AT, but neither my Significant
Other, nor any of my friends, can drive MT and that's a problem.
About seven years ago I broke an ankle at a convention and only one
girl out of fifty something people could drive my car. That's why I
got the Accord with AT. Besides that, almost all my driving is in New
York City and MT is a pain in that kind of driving.
<elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>In article <6oailtpapnu3$.dlg@hightech.misfit>,
> High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> > yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
>> > strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
>> > for the Fit.
>>
>> If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
>> a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
>> took with it.
>
>Shoot, my 2000 Accord got 35mpg--in the middle of summer, on the freeway
>through mountainous terrain (US 68 through WV/MD).
>
>Buy a 4 cylinder, manual transmission Accord and get Fit-type mileage
>with a nicer car.
I don't think I can get an Accord anywhere near the price of the Fit,
but the manual transmission is a killer. I love them, in fact my
Accord is the first car I ever got with AT, but neither my Significant
Other, nor any of my friends, can drive MT and that's a problem.
About seven years ago I broke an ankle at a convention and only one
girl out of fifty something people could drive my car. That's why I
got the Accord with AT. Besides that, almost all my driving is in New
York City and MT is a pain in that kind of driving.
09-15-2006, 12:33 PM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:00:22 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
<elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>In article <6oailtpapnu3$.dlg@hightech.misfit>,
> High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> > yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
>> > strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
>> > for the Fit.
>>
>> If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
>> a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
>> took with it.
>
>Shoot, my 2000 Accord got 35mpg--in the middle of summer, on the freeway
>through mountainous terrain (US 68 through WV/MD).
>
>Buy a 4 cylinder, manual transmission Accord and get Fit-type mileage
>with a nicer car.
I don't think I can get an Accord anywhere near the price of the Fit,
but the manual transmission is a killer. I love them, in fact my
Accord is the first car I ever got with AT, but neither my Significant
Other, nor any of my friends, can drive MT and that's a problem.
About seven years ago I broke an ankle at a convention and only one
girl out of fifty something people could drive my car. That's why I
got the Accord with AT. Besides that, almost all my driving is in New
York City and MT is a pain in that kind of driving.
<elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>In article <6oailtpapnu3$.dlg@hightech.misfit>,
> High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> > yes I am serious..we have one (Aveo) and it is great. 35 mpg and runs
>> > strong and is cheap to own. You think the Hondas are better well then wait
>> > for the Fit.
>>
>> If that 35mpg is highway driving, then yes, that is a joke. My '93 Accord,
>> a heavier car with an automatic, got 33mpg on the last few highway trips I
>> took with it.
>
>Shoot, my 2000 Accord got 35mpg--in the middle of summer, on the freeway
>through mountainous terrain (US 68 through WV/MD).
>
>Buy a 4 cylinder, manual transmission Accord and get Fit-type mileage
>with a nicer car.
I don't think I can get an Accord anywhere near the price of the Fit,
but the manual transmission is a killer. I love them, in fact my
Accord is the first car I ever got with AT, but neither my Significant
Other, nor any of my friends, can drive MT and that's a problem.
About seven years ago I broke an ankle at a convention and only one
girl out of fifty something people could drive my car. That's why I
got the Accord with AT. Besides that, almost all my driving is in New
York City and MT is a pain in that kind of driving.
09-16-2006, 01:05 AM
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
dgk wrote:
> About seven years ago I broke an ankle at a convention and only one
> girl out of fifty something people could drive my car. That's why I
> got the Accord with AT. Besides that, almost all my driving is in New
> York City and MT is a pain in that kind of driving.
I see a Versa SL with CVT in your future...
09-16-2006, 01:05 AM
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Still no Fit
dgk wrote:
> About seven years ago I broke an ankle at a convention and only one
> girl out of fifty something people could drive my car. That's why I
> got the Accord with AT. Besides that, almost all my driving is in New
> York City and MT is a pain in that kind of driving.
I see a Versa SL with CVT in your future...