Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
08-03-2006, 12:12 PM
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
My 2005 Santa Fe has had zero problems whatsoever. Fit and finish and
overall quality just as good as the wife's 2006 Accord.
The only difference might be a *slightly* lower quality of interior
materials. However the price differential between similar models (even more
so when you factor in the warranty Hyundai comes with) makes this extremely
acceptable.
Jon
"Bob Palmer" <jenbobkatelyn@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:0uedncgu_4iDp0zZnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@adelphia.com ...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:SoydnZn9GM8svkzZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Hyundai recently outscored Toyota and Honda in a recent consumer survey
>> of initial quality, among new 2006 vehicle owners.
>>
>>
>> mike
>
> My company has had 2 new Hyundais in the past year and I find that hard to
> believe. The initial quality to me was above the "Big" 3 but well behind
> Toyota and Honda. The Santa Fe and the Elantra we have, have many many
> small but annoying problems within the first 5000 miles.
>
overall quality just as good as the wife's 2006 Accord.
The only difference might be a *slightly* lower quality of interior
materials. However the price differential between similar models (even more
so when you factor in the warranty Hyundai comes with) makes this extremely
acceptable.
Jon
"Bob Palmer" <jenbobkatelyn@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:0uedncgu_4iDp0zZnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@adelphia.com ...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:SoydnZn9GM8svkzZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Hyundai recently outscored Toyota and Honda in a recent consumer survey
>> of initial quality, among new 2006 vehicle owners.
>>
>>
>> mike
>
> My company has had 2 new Hyundais in the past year and I find that hard to
> believe. The initial quality to me was above the "Big" 3 but well behind
> Toyota and Honda. The Santa Fe and the Elantra we have, have many many
> small but annoying problems within the first 5000 miles.
>
08-03-2006, 12:12 PM
#62
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
My 2005 Santa Fe has had zero problems whatsoever. Fit and finish and
overall quality just as good as the wife's 2006 Accord.
The only difference might be a *slightly* lower quality of interior
materials. However the price differential between similar models (even more
so when you factor in the warranty Hyundai comes with) makes this extremely
acceptable.
Jon
"Bob Palmer" <jenbobkatelyn@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:0uedncgu_4iDp0zZnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@adelphia.com ...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:SoydnZn9GM8svkzZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Hyundai recently outscored Toyota and Honda in a recent consumer survey
>> of initial quality, among new 2006 vehicle owners.
>>
>>
>> mike
>
> My company has had 2 new Hyundais in the past year and I find that hard to
> believe. The initial quality to me was above the "Big" 3 but well behind
> Toyota and Honda. The Santa Fe and the Elantra we have, have many many
> small but annoying problems within the first 5000 miles.
>
overall quality just as good as the wife's 2006 Accord.
The only difference might be a *slightly* lower quality of interior
materials. However the price differential between similar models (even more
so when you factor in the warranty Hyundai comes with) makes this extremely
acceptable.
Jon
"Bob Palmer" <jenbobkatelyn@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:0uedncgu_4iDp0zZnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@adelphia.com ...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:SoydnZn9GM8svkzZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Hyundai recently outscored Toyota and Honda in a recent consumer survey
>> of initial quality, among new 2006 vehicle owners.
>>
>>
>> mike
>
> My company has had 2 new Hyundais in the past year and I find that hard to
> believe. The initial quality to me was above the "Big" 3 but well behind
> Toyota and Honda. The Santa Fe and the Elantra we have, have many many
> small but annoying problems within the first 5000 miles.
>
08-03-2006, 12:12 PM
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
My 2005 Santa Fe has had zero problems whatsoever. Fit and finish and
overall quality just as good as the wife's 2006 Accord.
The only difference might be a *slightly* lower quality of interior
materials. However the price differential between similar models (even more
so when you factor in the warranty Hyundai comes with) makes this extremely
acceptable.
Jon
"Bob Palmer" <jenbobkatelyn@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:0uedncgu_4iDp0zZnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@adelphia.com ...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:SoydnZn9GM8svkzZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Hyundai recently outscored Toyota and Honda in a recent consumer survey
>> of initial quality, among new 2006 vehicle owners.
>>
>>
>> mike
>
> My company has had 2 new Hyundais in the past year and I find that hard to
> believe. The initial quality to me was above the "Big" 3 but well behind
> Toyota and Honda. The Santa Fe and the Elantra we have, have many many
> small but annoying problems within the first 5000 miles.
>
overall quality just as good as the wife's 2006 Accord.
The only difference might be a *slightly* lower quality of interior
materials. However the price differential between similar models (even more
so when you factor in the warranty Hyundai comes with) makes this extremely
acceptable.
Jon
"Bob Palmer" <jenbobkatelyn@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:0uedncgu_4iDp0zZnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@adelphia.com ...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:SoydnZn9GM8svkzZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Hyundai recently outscored Toyota and Honda in a recent consumer survey
>> of initial quality, among new 2006 vehicle owners.
>>
>>
>> mike
>
> My company has had 2 new Hyundais in the past year and I find that hard to
> believe. The initial quality to me was above the "Big" 3 but well behind
> Toyota and Honda. The Santa Fe and the Elantra we have, have many many
> small but annoying problems within the first 5000 miles.
>
08-03-2006, 12:21 PM
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
Hachiroku wrote:
>
>
> GM/Toyota have been manufacturing cars for a LONG time as NUMMI, mostly in
> California.
> They gave us some of the worst Toyotas ever, namely the Nova (~85-87) and
> the Prizm.
> They are currently manufacturing Tacomas. All the ground work is there,
> just time for the
> proposal and the acceptance.
>
> As for what Toy would get out of it? Definitely the #1 spot in the world!
> And, hopefully, GM would pick up Toyota's Quality habits, and NOT vice
> versa!!!!
> (That would be my bigger concern! "We can show YOU how to make more cars
> more cheaply."
> NOT a good idea!!!)
>
>
>
I am well aware of Nummi and have toured the plant twice. Toyota got
into that venture in order to learn how to build cars in the US. GM got
into it hoping to learn Toyota's production system. The goal was for
the output to be sold 50:50 by the two companies, but GM has never been
able to move it's 50%. Currently the Pontiac Vibe is built there along
with Toyota Corollas and Tacomas. The Vibe is selling badly mostly
because GM's marketing and distribution are a complete disaster. GM can
only seem to figure out how to actually sell a few of it's dozens of
models at any given time and the Vibe isn't one of those.
Toyota, on the other hand, manages to make solid sales on almost every
model in it's line up. Discipline and focus are part of what makes
Toyota run. GM wouldn't know discipline if it met her!
That said, Nummi is in no way the ground work for a buy out of GM.
Toyota management is too smart for such a move.
John
>
>
> GM/Toyota have been manufacturing cars for a LONG time as NUMMI, mostly in
> California.
> They gave us some of the worst Toyotas ever, namely the Nova (~85-87) and
> the Prizm.
> They are currently manufacturing Tacomas. All the ground work is there,
> just time for the
> proposal and the acceptance.
>
> As for what Toy would get out of it? Definitely the #1 spot in the world!
> And, hopefully, GM would pick up Toyota's Quality habits, and NOT vice
> versa!!!!
> (That would be my bigger concern! "We can show YOU how to make more cars
> more cheaply."
> NOT a good idea!!!)
>
>
>
I am well aware of Nummi and have toured the plant twice. Toyota got
into that venture in order to learn how to build cars in the US. GM got
into it hoping to learn Toyota's production system. The goal was for
the output to be sold 50:50 by the two companies, but GM has never been
able to move it's 50%. Currently the Pontiac Vibe is built there along
with Toyota Corollas and Tacomas. The Vibe is selling badly mostly
because GM's marketing and distribution are a complete disaster. GM can
only seem to figure out how to actually sell a few of it's dozens of
models at any given time and the Vibe isn't one of those.
Toyota, on the other hand, manages to make solid sales on almost every
model in it's line up. Discipline and focus are part of what makes
Toyota run. GM wouldn't know discipline if it met her!
That said, Nummi is in no way the ground work for a buy out of GM.
Toyota management is too smart for such a move.
John
08-03-2006, 12:21 PM
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
Hachiroku wrote:
>
>
> GM/Toyota have been manufacturing cars for a LONG time as NUMMI, mostly in
> California.
> They gave us some of the worst Toyotas ever, namely the Nova (~85-87) and
> the Prizm.
> They are currently manufacturing Tacomas. All the ground work is there,
> just time for the
> proposal and the acceptance.
>
> As for what Toy would get out of it? Definitely the #1 spot in the world!
> And, hopefully, GM would pick up Toyota's Quality habits, and NOT vice
> versa!!!!
> (That would be my bigger concern! "We can show YOU how to make more cars
> more cheaply."
> NOT a good idea!!!)
>
>
>
I am well aware of Nummi and have toured the plant twice. Toyota got
into that venture in order to learn how to build cars in the US. GM got
into it hoping to learn Toyota's production system. The goal was for
the output to be sold 50:50 by the two companies, but GM has never been
able to move it's 50%. Currently the Pontiac Vibe is built there along
with Toyota Corollas and Tacomas. The Vibe is selling badly mostly
because GM's marketing and distribution are a complete disaster. GM can
only seem to figure out how to actually sell a few of it's dozens of
models at any given time and the Vibe isn't one of those.
Toyota, on the other hand, manages to make solid sales on almost every
model in it's line up. Discipline and focus are part of what makes
Toyota run. GM wouldn't know discipline if it met her!
That said, Nummi is in no way the ground work for a buy out of GM.
Toyota management is too smart for such a move.
John
>
>
> GM/Toyota have been manufacturing cars for a LONG time as NUMMI, mostly in
> California.
> They gave us some of the worst Toyotas ever, namely the Nova (~85-87) and
> the Prizm.
> They are currently manufacturing Tacomas. All the ground work is there,
> just time for the
> proposal and the acceptance.
>
> As for what Toy would get out of it? Definitely the #1 spot in the world!
> And, hopefully, GM would pick up Toyota's Quality habits, and NOT vice
> versa!!!!
> (That would be my bigger concern! "We can show YOU how to make more cars
> more cheaply."
> NOT a good idea!!!)
>
>
>
I am well aware of Nummi and have toured the plant twice. Toyota got
into that venture in order to learn how to build cars in the US. GM got
into it hoping to learn Toyota's production system. The goal was for
the output to be sold 50:50 by the two companies, but GM has never been
able to move it's 50%. Currently the Pontiac Vibe is built there along
with Toyota Corollas and Tacomas. The Vibe is selling badly mostly
because GM's marketing and distribution are a complete disaster. GM can
only seem to figure out how to actually sell a few of it's dozens of
models at any given time and the Vibe isn't one of those.
Toyota, on the other hand, manages to make solid sales on almost every
model in it's line up. Discipline and focus are part of what makes
Toyota run. GM wouldn't know discipline if it met her!
That said, Nummi is in no way the ground work for a buy out of GM.
Toyota management is too smart for such a move.
John
08-03-2006, 12:21 PM
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
Hachiroku wrote:
>
>
> GM/Toyota have been manufacturing cars for a LONG time as NUMMI, mostly in
> California.
> They gave us some of the worst Toyotas ever, namely the Nova (~85-87) and
> the Prizm.
> They are currently manufacturing Tacomas. All the ground work is there,
> just time for the
> proposal and the acceptance.
>
> As for what Toy would get out of it? Definitely the #1 spot in the world!
> And, hopefully, GM would pick up Toyota's Quality habits, and NOT vice
> versa!!!!
> (That would be my bigger concern! "We can show YOU how to make more cars
> more cheaply."
> NOT a good idea!!!)
>
>
>
I am well aware of Nummi and have toured the plant twice. Toyota got
into that venture in order to learn how to build cars in the US. GM got
into it hoping to learn Toyota's production system. The goal was for
the output to be sold 50:50 by the two companies, but GM has never been
able to move it's 50%. Currently the Pontiac Vibe is built there along
with Toyota Corollas and Tacomas. The Vibe is selling badly mostly
because GM's marketing and distribution are a complete disaster. GM can
only seem to figure out how to actually sell a few of it's dozens of
models at any given time and the Vibe isn't one of those.
Toyota, on the other hand, manages to make solid sales on almost every
model in it's line up. Discipline and focus are part of what makes
Toyota run. GM wouldn't know discipline if it met her!
That said, Nummi is in no way the ground work for a buy out of GM.
Toyota management is too smart for such a move.
John
>
>
> GM/Toyota have been manufacturing cars for a LONG time as NUMMI, mostly in
> California.
> They gave us some of the worst Toyotas ever, namely the Nova (~85-87) and
> the Prizm.
> They are currently manufacturing Tacomas. All the ground work is there,
> just time for the
> proposal and the acceptance.
>
> As for what Toy would get out of it? Definitely the #1 spot in the world!
> And, hopefully, GM would pick up Toyota's Quality habits, and NOT vice
> versa!!!!
> (That would be my bigger concern! "We can show YOU how to make more cars
> more cheaply."
> NOT a good idea!!!)
>
>
>
I am well aware of Nummi and have toured the plant twice. Toyota got
into that venture in order to learn how to build cars in the US. GM got
into it hoping to learn Toyota's production system. The goal was for
the output to be sold 50:50 by the two companies, but GM has never been
able to move it's 50%. Currently the Pontiac Vibe is built there along
with Toyota Corollas and Tacomas. The Vibe is selling badly mostly
because GM's marketing and distribution are a complete disaster. GM can
only seem to figure out how to actually sell a few of it's dozens of
models at any given time and the Vibe isn't one of those.
Toyota, on the other hand, manages to make solid sales on almost every
model in it's line up. Discipline and focus are part of what makes
Toyota run. GM wouldn't know discipline if it met her!
That said, Nummi is in no way the ground work for a buy out of GM.
Toyota management is too smart for such a move.
John
08-03-2006, 02:58 PM
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
So do I LOL
mike
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:iN9Ag.14791$PO.6754@dukeread03...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:SoydnZn9GM8svkzZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>
>>
>> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:329Ag.14787$PO.7806@dukeread03...
>>>
>>> "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uH8Ag.3649$8v.1563@trnddc05...
>>>> My prediction for the 2016 *retail* US sales rankings:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Toyota
>>>> 2) Honda
>>>> 3) Hyundai
>>>> 4) GM-Ford (as a merged company)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why is Hyundai on the list? Everything I have seen made by them is a
>>> piece of compared to anything Japaneese or American.
>>>
>>
>>> Hyundai recently outscored Toyota and Honda in a recent consumer survey
>>> of
>> initial quality, among new 2006 vehicle owners.
>>
>>
>> mike
>
>
> Oh, I haven't looked at anything new. I only buy what I can pay cash for.
>
mike
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:iN9Ag.14791$PO.6754@dukeread03...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:SoydnZn9GM8svkzZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>
>>
>> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:329Ag.14787$PO.7806@dukeread03...
>>>
>>> "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uH8Ag.3649$8v.1563@trnddc05...
>>>> My prediction for the 2016 *retail* US sales rankings:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Toyota
>>>> 2) Honda
>>>> 3) Hyundai
>>>> 4) GM-Ford (as a merged company)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why is Hyundai on the list? Everything I have seen made by them is a
>>> piece of compared to anything Japaneese or American.
>>>
>>
>>> Hyundai recently outscored Toyota and Honda in a recent consumer survey
>>> of
>> initial quality, among new 2006 vehicle owners.
>>
>>
>> mike
>
>
> Oh, I haven't looked at anything new. I only buy what I can pay cash for.
>
08-03-2006, 02:58 PM
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
So do I LOL
mike
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:iN9Ag.14791$PO.6754@dukeread03...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:SoydnZn9GM8svkzZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>
>>
>> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:329Ag.14787$PO.7806@dukeread03...
>>>
>>> "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uH8Ag.3649$8v.1563@trnddc05...
>>>> My prediction for the 2016 *retail* US sales rankings:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Toyota
>>>> 2) Honda
>>>> 3) Hyundai
>>>> 4) GM-Ford (as a merged company)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why is Hyundai on the list? Everything I have seen made by them is a
>>> piece of compared to anything Japaneese or American.
>>>
>>
>>> Hyundai recently outscored Toyota and Honda in a recent consumer survey
>>> of
>> initial quality, among new 2006 vehicle owners.
>>
>>
>> mike
>
>
> Oh, I haven't looked at anything new. I only buy what I can pay cash for.
>
mike
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:iN9Ag.14791$PO.6754@dukeread03...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:SoydnZn9GM8svkzZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>
>>
>> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:329Ag.14787$PO.7806@dukeread03...
>>>
>>> "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uH8Ag.3649$8v.1563@trnddc05...
>>>> My prediction for the 2016 *retail* US sales rankings:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Toyota
>>>> 2) Honda
>>>> 3) Hyundai
>>>> 4) GM-Ford (as a merged company)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why is Hyundai on the list? Everything I have seen made by them is a
>>> piece of compared to anything Japaneese or American.
>>>
>>
>>> Hyundai recently outscored Toyota and Honda in a recent consumer survey
>>> of
>> initial quality, among new 2006 vehicle owners.
>>
>>
>> mike
>
>
> Oh, I haven't looked at anything new. I only buy what I can pay cash for.
>
08-03-2006, 02:58 PM
#69
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
So do I LOL
mike
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:iN9Ag.14791$PO.6754@dukeread03...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:SoydnZn9GM8svkzZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>
>>
>> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:329Ag.14787$PO.7806@dukeread03...
>>>
>>> "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uH8Ag.3649$8v.1563@trnddc05...
>>>> My prediction for the 2016 *retail* US sales rankings:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Toyota
>>>> 2) Honda
>>>> 3) Hyundai
>>>> 4) GM-Ford (as a merged company)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why is Hyundai on the list? Everything I have seen made by them is a
>>> piece of compared to anything Japaneese or American.
>>>
>>
>>> Hyundai recently outscored Toyota and Honda in a recent consumer survey
>>> of
>> initial quality, among new 2006 vehicle owners.
>>
>>
>> mike
>
>
> Oh, I haven't looked at anything new. I only buy what I can pay cash for.
>
mike
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:iN9Ag.14791$PO.6754@dukeread03...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:SoydnZn9GM8svkzZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>
>>
>> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:329Ag.14787$PO.7806@dukeread03...
>>>
>>> "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uH8Ag.3649$8v.1563@trnddc05...
>>>> My prediction for the 2016 *retail* US sales rankings:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Toyota
>>>> 2) Honda
>>>> 3) Hyundai
>>>> 4) GM-Ford (as a merged company)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why is Hyundai on the list? Everything I have seen made by them is a
>>> piece of compared to anything Japaneese or American.
>>>
>>
>>> Hyundai recently outscored Toyota and Honda in a recent consumer survey
>>> of
>> initial quality, among new 2006 vehicle owners.
>>
>>
>> mike
>
>
> Oh, I haven't looked at anything new. I only buy what I can pay cash for.
>
08-03-2006, 03:02 PM
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
Aveo MSRP starts at $9,995
mike
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:YJdAg.7816$oz.2741@trnddc07...
> JohnR66 wrote:
>> Yes GM has the Aveo, but what's with the crappy fuel mileage?
>
> Old technology from the Daewoo fire-sale. GM slapped the Chevy name on a
> failed Korean car and is selling 'em cheap.
>
> Honda Fit - 33 City, 38 Highway
> Toyota Yaris - 34 City, 40 Highway
> Chevy Aveo - 27 City, 35 Highway
>
> Fit MSRP $13,850 Yaris MSRP $11,825
> Aveo MSRP $13,050
>
> So much for the Chevy being bargain priced. Of course you can probably
> get "deals" on the Chevy while the Honda and Toyota are sold out and not
> being discounted, but that again speaks to the desireability of the
> vehicles.
>
>
> John
>
>
mike
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:YJdAg.7816$oz.2741@trnddc07...
> JohnR66 wrote:
>> Yes GM has the Aveo, but what's with the crappy fuel mileage?
>
> Old technology from the Daewoo fire-sale. GM slapped the Chevy name on a
> failed Korean car and is selling 'em cheap.
>
> Honda Fit - 33 City, 38 Highway
> Toyota Yaris - 34 City, 40 Highway
> Chevy Aveo - 27 City, 35 Highway
>
> Fit MSRP $13,850 Yaris MSRP $11,825
> Aveo MSRP $13,050
>
> So much for the Chevy being bargain priced. Of course you can probably
> get "deals" on the Chevy while the Honda and Toyota are sold out and not
> being discounted, but that again speaks to the desireability of the
> vehicles.
>
>
> John
>
>
08-03-2006, 03:02 PM
#71
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
Aveo MSRP starts at $9,995
mike
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:YJdAg.7816$oz.2741@trnddc07...
> JohnR66 wrote:
>> Yes GM has the Aveo, but what's with the crappy fuel mileage?
>
> Old technology from the Daewoo fire-sale. GM slapped the Chevy name on a
> failed Korean car and is selling 'em cheap.
>
> Honda Fit - 33 City, 38 Highway
> Toyota Yaris - 34 City, 40 Highway
> Chevy Aveo - 27 City, 35 Highway
>
> Fit MSRP $13,850 Yaris MSRP $11,825
> Aveo MSRP $13,050
>
> So much for the Chevy being bargain priced. Of course you can probably
> get "deals" on the Chevy while the Honda and Toyota are sold out and not
> being discounted, but that again speaks to the desireability of the
> vehicles.
>
>
> John
>
>
mike
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:YJdAg.7816$oz.2741@trnddc07...
> JohnR66 wrote:
>> Yes GM has the Aveo, but what's with the crappy fuel mileage?
>
> Old technology from the Daewoo fire-sale. GM slapped the Chevy name on a
> failed Korean car and is selling 'em cheap.
>
> Honda Fit - 33 City, 38 Highway
> Toyota Yaris - 34 City, 40 Highway
> Chevy Aveo - 27 City, 35 Highway
>
> Fit MSRP $13,850 Yaris MSRP $11,825
> Aveo MSRP $13,050
>
> So much for the Chevy being bargain priced. Of course you can probably
> get "deals" on the Chevy while the Honda and Toyota are sold out and not
> being discounted, but that again speaks to the desireability of the
> vehicles.
>
>
> John
>
>
08-03-2006, 03:02 PM
#72
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
Aveo MSRP starts at $9,995
mike
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:YJdAg.7816$oz.2741@trnddc07...
> JohnR66 wrote:
>> Yes GM has the Aveo, but what's with the crappy fuel mileage?
>
> Old technology from the Daewoo fire-sale. GM slapped the Chevy name on a
> failed Korean car and is selling 'em cheap.
>
> Honda Fit - 33 City, 38 Highway
> Toyota Yaris - 34 City, 40 Highway
> Chevy Aveo - 27 City, 35 Highway
>
> Fit MSRP $13,850 Yaris MSRP $11,825
> Aveo MSRP $13,050
>
> So much for the Chevy being bargain priced. Of course you can probably
> get "deals" on the Chevy while the Honda and Toyota are sold out and not
> being discounted, but that again speaks to the desireability of the
> vehicles.
>
>
> John
>
>
mike
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:YJdAg.7816$oz.2741@trnddc07...
> JohnR66 wrote:
>> Yes GM has the Aveo, but what's with the crappy fuel mileage?
>
> Old technology from the Daewoo fire-sale. GM slapped the Chevy name on a
> failed Korean car and is selling 'em cheap.
>
> Honda Fit - 33 City, 38 Highway
> Toyota Yaris - 34 City, 40 Highway
> Chevy Aveo - 27 City, 35 Highway
>
> Fit MSRP $13,850 Yaris MSRP $11,825
> Aveo MSRP $13,050
>
> So much for the Chevy being bargain priced. Of course you can probably
> get "deals" on the Chevy while the Honda and Toyota are sold out and not
> being discounted, but that again speaks to the desireability of the
> vehicles.
>
>
> John
>
>
08-03-2006, 03:08 PM
#73
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
Hondas employees in the US do not get as good a wage, benefits, including
healthcare, or pensions as do GMs employees. Surely you do not believe that
national health coverage will be free, do you? Why do you think gas cost
$6 or more in Europe and they have a VAT tax? LOL
mike
"dgk" <dgk@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:cqo3d2938dth3uoul4aacjs9354e04iuee@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:18:00 GMT, " dbu." <howard@dynoisadork.com>
> wrote:
>
>>In article <JnbAg.208187$mF2.71992@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
>> "JohnR66" <nospam@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:329Ag.14787$PO.7806@dukeread03...
>>> >
>>> > "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:uH8Ag.3649$8v.1563@trnddc05...
>>> >> My prediction for the 2016 *retail* US sales rankings:
>>> >>
>>> >> 1) Toyota
>>> >> 2) Honda
>>> >> 3) Hyundai
>>> >> 4) GM-Ford (as a merged company)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Why is Hyundai on the list? Everything I have seen made by them is a
>>> > piece
>>> > of compared to anything Japaneese or American.
>>> >
>>> Hundai is a heck of a success story. Near death after selling a bunch of
>>> crappy cars, they turned things completely around in recent years.
>>>
>>> Don't give up on Ford or GM they can make a comeback.
>>>
>>> IMHO, their fist big step is making cars that appeal to younger people.
>>> All
>>> the teens want Hondas and Toyotas and probably continue buying them as
>>> they
>>> age. I've worked for the same emplyer for 17 years and know many people
>>> well. If they're not driving a Ford or GM truck, then it is a Toyota,
>>> Honda
>>> or Mazda. Many of the US passenger cars are older models. One minor
>>> trend is
>>> a couple of new Ford Fusions out in the lot.
>>
>>
>>Their first big step is unloading all the union contracts. They are
>>watching Northwest do in their unions. GM will follow. Cut overhead
>>first.
>>
>>
>
> If you want to level the playing field, then let's have national
> health coverage like all the other industrialized countries. Get it
> off the back of the corporations. Why should GM have to pay for it
> while Honda doesn't?
>
>
healthcare, or pensions as do GMs employees. Surely you do not believe that
national health coverage will be free, do you? Why do you think gas cost
$6 or more in Europe and they have a VAT tax? LOL
mike
"dgk" <dgk@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:cqo3d2938dth3uoul4aacjs9354e04iuee@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:18:00 GMT, " dbu." <howard@dynoisadork.com>
> wrote:
>
>>In article <JnbAg.208187$mF2.71992@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
>> "JohnR66" <nospam@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:329Ag.14787$PO.7806@dukeread03...
>>> >
>>> > "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:uH8Ag.3649$8v.1563@trnddc05...
>>> >> My prediction for the 2016 *retail* US sales rankings:
>>> >>
>>> >> 1) Toyota
>>> >> 2) Honda
>>> >> 3) Hyundai
>>> >> 4) GM-Ford (as a merged company)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Why is Hyundai on the list? Everything I have seen made by them is a
>>> > piece
>>> > of compared to anything Japaneese or American.
>>> >
>>> Hundai is a heck of a success story. Near death after selling a bunch of
>>> crappy cars, they turned things completely around in recent years.
>>>
>>> Don't give up on Ford or GM they can make a comeback.
>>>
>>> IMHO, their fist big step is making cars that appeal to younger people.
>>> All
>>> the teens want Hondas and Toyotas and probably continue buying them as
>>> they
>>> age. I've worked for the same emplyer for 17 years and know many people
>>> well. If they're not driving a Ford or GM truck, then it is a Toyota,
>>> Honda
>>> or Mazda. Many of the US passenger cars are older models. One minor
>>> trend is
>>> a couple of new Ford Fusions out in the lot.
>>
>>
>>Their first big step is unloading all the union contracts. They are
>>watching Northwest do in their unions. GM will follow. Cut overhead
>>first.
>>
>>
>
> If you want to level the playing field, then let's have national
> health coverage like all the other industrialized countries. Get it
> off the back of the corporations. Why should GM have to pay for it
> while Honda doesn't?
>
>
08-03-2006, 03:08 PM
#74
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
Hondas employees in the US do not get as good a wage, benefits, including
healthcare, or pensions as do GMs employees. Surely you do not believe that
national health coverage will be free, do you? Why do you think gas cost
$6 or more in Europe and they have a VAT tax? LOL
mike
"dgk" <dgk@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:cqo3d2938dth3uoul4aacjs9354e04iuee@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:18:00 GMT, " dbu." <howard@dynoisadork.com>
> wrote:
>
>>In article <JnbAg.208187$mF2.71992@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
>> "JohnR66" <nospam@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:329Ag.14787$PO.7806@dukeread03...
>>> >
>>> > "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:uH8Ag.3649$8v.1563@trnddc05...
>>> >> My prediction for the 2016 *retail* US sales rankings:
>>> >>
>>> >> 1) Toyota
>>> >> 2) Honda
>>> >> 3) Hyundai
>>> >> 4) GM-Ford (as a merged company)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Why is Hyundai on the list? Everything I have seen made by them is a
>>> > piece
>>> > of compared to anything Japaneese or American.
>>> >
>>> Hundai is a heck of a success story. Near death after selling a bunch of
>>> crappy cars, they turned things completely around in recent years.
>>>
>>> Don't give up on Ford or GM they can make a comeback.
>>>
>>> IMHO, their fist big step is making cars that appeal to younger people.
>>> All
>>> the teens want Hondas and Toyotas and probably continue buying them as
>>> they
>>> age. I've worked for the same emplyer for 17 years and know many people
>>> well. If they're not driving a Ford or GM truck, then it is a Toyota,
>>> Honda
>>> or Mazda. Many of the US passenger cars are older models. One minor
>>> trend is
>>> a couple of new Ford Fusions out in the lot.
>>
>>
>>Their first big step is unloading all the union contracts. They are
>>watching Northwest do in their unions. GM will follow. Cut overhead
>>first.
>>
>>
>
> If you want to level the playing field, then let's have national
> health coverage like all the other industrialized countries. Get it
> off the back of the corporations. Why should GM have to pay for it
> while Honda doesn't?
>
>
healthcare, or pensions as do GMs employees. Surely you do not believe that
national health coverage will be free, do you? Why do you think gas cost
$6 or more in Europe and they have a VAT tax? LOL
mike
"dgk" <dgk@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:cqo3d2938dth3uoul4aacjs9354e04iuee@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:18:00 GMT, " dbu." <howard@dynoisadork.com>
> wrote:
>
>>In article <JnbAg.208187$mF2.71992@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
>> "JohnR66" <nospam@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:329Ag.14787$PO.7806@dukeread03...
>>> >
>>> > "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:uH8Ag.3649$8v.1563@trnddc05...
>>> >> My prediction for the 2016 *retail* US sales rankings:
>>> >>
>>> >> 1) Toyota
>>> >> 2) Honda
>>> >> 3) Hyundai
>>> >> 4) GM-Ford (as a merged company)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Why is Hyundai on the list? Everything I have seen made by them is a
>>> > piece
>>> > of compared to anything Japaneese or American.
>>> >
>>> Hundai is a heck of a success story. Near death after selling a bunch of
>>> crappy cars, they turned things completely around in recent years.
>>>
>>> Don't give up on Ford or GM they can make a comeback.
>>>
>>> IMHO, their fist big step is making cars that appeal to younger people.
>>> All
>>> the teens want Hondas and Toyotas and probably continue buying them as
>>> they
>>> age. I've worked for the same emplyer for 17 years and know many people
>>> well. If they're not driving a Ford or GM truck, then it is a Toyota,
>>> Honda
>>> or Mazda. Many of the US passenger cars are older models. One minor
>>> trend is
>>> a couple of new Ford Fusions out in the lot.
>>
>>
>>Their first big step is unloading all the union contracts. They are
>>watching Northwest do in their unions. GM will follow. Cut overhead
>>first.
>>
>>
>
> If you want to level the playing field, then let's have national
> health coverage like all the other industrialized countries. Get it
> off the back of the corporations. Why should GM have to pay for it
> while Honda doesn't?
>
>
08-03-2006, 03:08 PM
#75
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who will be the US "Big 3" in 2016?
Hondas employees in the US do not get as good a wage, benefits, including
healthcare, or pensions as do GMs employees. Surely you do not believe that
national health coverage will be free, do you? Why do you think gas cost
$6 or more in Europe and they have a VAT tax? LOL
mike
"dgk" <dgk@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:cqo3d2938dth3uoul4aacjs9354e04iuee@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:18:00 GMT, " dbu." <howard@dynoisadork.com>
> wrote:
>
>>In article <JnbAg.208187$mF2.71992@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
>> "JohnR66" <nospam@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:329Ag.14787$PO.7806@dukeread03...
>>> >
>>> > "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:uH8Ag.3649$8v.1563@trnddc05...
>>> >> My prediction for the 2016 *retail* US sales rankings:
>>> >>
>>> >> 1) Toyota
>>> >> 2) Honda
>>> >> 3) Hyundai
>>> >> 4) GM-Ford (as a merged company)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Why is Hyundai on the list? Everything I have seen made by them is a
>>> > piece
>>> > of compared to anything Japaneese or American.
>>> >
>>> Hundai is a heck of a success story. Near death after selling a bunch of
>>> crappy cars, they turned things completely around in recent years.
>>>
>>> Don't give up on Ford or GM they can make a comeback.
>>>
>>> IMHO, their fist big step is making cars that appeal to younger people.
>>> All
>>> the teens want Hondas and Toyotas and probably continue buying them as
>>> they
>>> age. I've worked for the same emplyer for 17 years and know many people
>>> well. If they're not driving a Ford or GM truck, then it is a Toyota,
>>> Honda
>>> or Mazda. Many of the US passenger cars are older models. One minor
>>> trend is
>>> a couple of new Ford Fusions out in the lot.
>>
>>
>>Their first big step is unloading all the union contracts. They are
>>watching Northwest do in their unions. GM will follow. Cut overhead
>>first.
>>
>>
>
> If you want to level the playing field, then let's have national
> health coverage like all the other industrialized countries. Get it
> off the back of the corporations. Why should GM have to pay for it
> while Honda doesn't?
>
>
healthcare, or pensions as do GMs employees. Surely you do not believe that
national health coverage will be free, do you? Why do you think gas cost
$6 or more in Europe and they have a VAT tax? LOL
mike
"dgk" <dgk@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:cqo3d2938dth3uoul4aacjs9354e04iuee@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:18:00 GMT, " dbu." <howard@dynoisadork.com>
> wrote:
>
>>In article <JnbAg.208187$mF2.71992@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
>> "JohnR66" <nospam@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:329Ag.14787$PO.7806@dukeread03...
>>> >
>>> > "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:uH8Ag.3649$8v.1563@trnddc05...
>>> >> My prediction for the 2016 *retail* US sales rankings:
>>> >>
>>> >> 1) Toyota
>>> >> 2) Honda
>>> >> 3) Hyundai
>>> >> 4) GM-Ford (as a merged company)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Why is Hyundai on the list? Everything I have seen made by them is a
>>> > piece
>>> > of compared to anything Japaneese or American.
>>> >
>>> Hundai is a heck of a success story. Near death after selling a bunch of
>>> crappy cars, they turned things completely around in recent years.
>>>
>>> Don't give up on Ford or GM they can make a comeback.
>>>
>>> IMHO, their fist big step is making cars that appeal to younger people.
>>> All
>>> the teens want Hondas and Toyotas and probably continue buying them as
>>> they
>>> age. I've worked for the same emplyer for 17 years and know many people
>>> well. If they're not driving a Ford or GM truck, then it is a Toyota,
>>> Honda
>>> or Mazda. Many of the US passenger cars are older models. One minor
>>> trend is
>>> a couple of new Ford Fusions out in the lot.
>>
>>
>>Their first big step is unloading all the union contracts. They are
>>watching Northwest do in their unions. GM will follow. Cut overhead
>>first.
>>
>>
>
> If you want to level the playing field, then let's have national
> health coverage like all the other industrialized countries. Get it
> off the back of the corporations. Why should GM have to pay for it
> while Honda doesn't?
>
>