2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

My apologies if this is a re-hash of an existing topic, but I was unble
to locate anything via a search of the group.

I just bought a '05 Santa Fe (unbeatable set of clearance rebates),
new, and am so far happy with the vehicle, save for one annoyance. The
accelerator pedal offers what I consider to be excessive physical
resistance before giving way, making it being very difficult to
smoothly accelerate from a dead stop. I'm wondering if:

1) This is common to all new '05 Santa Fes.

2) If so, is it something that will ease after break-in?

Anyone have any experience with this?

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

I have also got myself a 05 Santy 3.5L v6 but even thought I don't find
the pedal 'excessively resistant' but the pickup is. Invariably the car
needs reving to 2.5-3K rpm before settling down to 2K rpm to take it
from stationary to 30-40mph from stop .
I have driven 3000 miles but the 'proverbial' break-in hasnt't
happened.

anyone can help?

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

I have also got myself a 05 Santy 3.5L v6 but even thought I don't find
the pedal 'excessively resistant' but the pickup is. Invariably the car
needs reving to 2.5-3K rpm before settling down to 2K rpm to take it
from stationary to 30-40mph from stop .
I have driven 3000 miles but the 'proverbial' break-in hasnt't
happened.

anyone can help?

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

I have also got myself a 05 Santy 3.5L v6 but even thought I don't find
the pedal 'excessively resistant' but the pickup is. Invariably the car
needs reving to 2.5-3K rpm before settling down to 2K rpm to take it
from stationary to 30-40mph from stop .
I have driven 3000 miles but the 'proverbial' break-in hasnt't
happened.

anyone can help?

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

What engine do you have?

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

What engine do you have?

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

What engine do you have?

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

> What engine do you have?

I replied to this 2 days ago from another account, but for some reason
the post never showed up here. In any event, I have the 3.5L.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

> What engine do you have?

I replied to this 2 days ago from another account, but for some reason
the post never showed up here. In any event, I have the 3.5L.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

> What engine do you have?

I replied to this 2 days ago from another account, but for some reason
the post never showed up here. In any event, I have the 3.5L.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

Also, after my first tank of gas, and mostly highway driving, I'm
getting 16.7 mpg. The much heavier, 10 year-old 4.0L Ford Explorer my
Santa Fe replaced was giving me just over 17 mpg with the same driving.
Someone please tell me that this is going to improve after break-in.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

Also, after my first tank of gas, and mostly highway driving, I'm
getting 16.7 mpg. The much heavier, 10 year-old 4.0L Ford Explorer my
Santa Fe replaced was giving me just over 17 mpg with the same driving.
Someone please tell me that this is going to improve after break-in.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

Also, after my first tank of gas, and mostly highway driving, I'm
getting 16.7 mpg. The much heavier, 10 year-old 4.0L Ford Explorer my
Santa Fe replaced was giving me just over 17 mpg with the same driving.
Someone please tell me that this is going to improve after break-in.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

WuzYoungOnceToo wrote:
> Also, after my first tank of gas, and mostly highway driving, I'm
> getting 16.7 mpg. The much heavier, 10 year-old 4.0L Ford Explorer my
> Santa Fe replaced was giving me just over 17 mpg with the same driving.
> Someone please tell me that this is going to improve after break-in.
>

I have a 2004 3.5L 4WD. Im getting 25mpg. All hwy.

Cathy
Diamond Bell, AZ

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

WuzYoungOnceToo wrote:
> Also, after my first tank of gas, and mostly highway driving, I'm
> getting 16.7 mpg. The much heavier, 10 year-old 4.0L Ford Explorer my
> Santa Fe replaced was giving me just over 17 mpg with the same driving.
> Someone please tell me that this is going to improve after break-in.
>

I have a 2004 3.5L 4WD. Im getting 25mpg. All hwy.

Cathy
Diamond Bell, AZ

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

WuzYoungOnceToo wrote:
> Also, after my first tank of gas, and mostly highway driving, I'm
> getting 16.7 mpg. The much heavier, 10 year-old 4.0L Ford Explorer my
> Santa Fe replaced was giving me just over 17 mpg with the same driving.
> Someone please tell me that this is going to improve after break-in.
>

I have a 2004 3.5L 4WD. Im getting 25mpg. All hwy.

Cathy
Diamond Bell, AZ

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

I've got a '05 Santa Fe (funny....I too had a '94 Ford Explorer before!)

oNce the breakin was over, my milage improved to 24 highway...18 city with a
3.5l engine
Len

--
.....Order the "Accordion Evolution" documentary of the Las Vegas
International Accordion Convention from my website:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/limbery/
....Del Sur Al Norte...Regina Sk. Canada Latin and South American Folk dance
band:
www.DelSurAlNorte.com
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140450497.298179.290790@g44g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> Also, after my first tank of gas, and mostly highway driving, I'm
> getting 16.7 mpg. The much heavier, 10 year-old 4.0L Ford Explorer my
> Santa Fe replaced was giving me just over 17 mpg with the same driving.
> Someone please tell me that this is going to improve after break-in.
>

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

I've got a '05 Santa Fe (funny....I too had a '94 Ford Explorer before!)

oNce the breakin was over, my milage improved to 24 highway...18 city with a
3.5l engine
Len

--
.....Order the "Accordion Evolution" documentary of the Las Vegas
International Accordion Convention from my website:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/limbery/
....Del Sur Al Norte...Regina Sk. Canada Latin and South American Folk dance
band:
www.DelSurAlNorte.com
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140450497.298179.290790@g44g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> Also, after my first tank of gas, and mostly highway driving, I'm
> getting 16.7 mpg. The much heavier, 10 year-old 4.0L Ford Explorer my
> Santa Fe replaced was giving me just over 17 mpg with the same driving.
> Someone please tell me that this is going to improve after break-in.
>

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

I've got a '05 Santa Fe (funny....I too had a '94 Ford Explorer before!)

oNce the breakin was over, my milage improved to 24 highway...18 city with a
3.5l engine
Len

--
.....Order the "Accordion Evolution" documentary of the Las Vegas
International Accordion Convention from my website:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/limbery/
....Del Sur Al Norte...Regina Sk. Canada Latin and South American Folk dance
band:
www.DelSurAlNorte.com
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140450497.298179.290790@g44g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> Also, after my first tank of gas, and mostly highway driving, I'm
> getting 16.7 mpg. The much heavier, 10 year-old 4.0L Ford Explorer my
> Santa Fe replaced was giving me just over 17 mpg with the same driving.
> Someone please tell me that this is going to improve after break-in.
>

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

The 3.5 has an electronic throttle. Depressing the accelerator simply
activates a sensor under the hood. The computer controls everything from
there. It'll probably take a little time to become familiar with its
idosyncracies.

As for the fuel economy, I don't know that it will improve. We've had
many complaints about fuel economy on the 3.5 Santa Fes. I've never been
able to find anything conclusively wrong with any of them. I replaced an
oxygen sensor in one of them because the values looked a little funny, but
the customer was still getting poor fuel economy.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

The 3.5 has an electronic throttle. Depressing the accelerator simply
activates a sensor under the hood. The computer controls everything from
there. It'll probably take a little time to become familiar with its
idosyncracies.

As for the fuel economy, I don't know that it will improve. We've had
many complaints about fuel economy on the 3.5 Santa Fes. I've never been
able to find anything conclusively wrong with any of them. I replaced an
oxygen sensor in one of them because the values looked a little funny, but
the customer was still getting poor fuel economy.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

The 3.5 has an electronic throttle. Depressing the accelerator simply
activates a sensor under the hood. The computer controls everything from
there. It'll probably take a little time to become familiar with its
idosyncracies.

As for the fuel economy, I don't know that it will improve. We've had
many complaints about fuel economy on the 3.5 Santa Fes. I've never been
able to find anything conclusively wrong with any of them. I replaced an
oxygen sensor in one of them because the values looked a little funny, but
the customer was still getting poor fuel economy.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

I also do not know whether fuel economy will improve.

This I do know - that powertrain combo is used in some other Hyundais and
Kias. It is a nice, smooth and responsive powertrain, and seems to be able
to handle whatever is given it. It also seems to have given VERY few
problems in its years of operation (since about '01 or '02).

But one thing this powertrain has never been is very fuel efficient. I've
had this powertrain combo in two different vehicles - one was an '02, and
now I have an '04. The '04 is decidedly better than the '02, and I love it
in my vehicle. But I will never jump for joy over its fuel economy.

But I will gladly keep running it and running it and running it - as long as
I keep the timing belt replaced. It is one of the most impressive
powertrains I have ever had.

Tom Wenndt


"hyundaitech" <notpublic@not.public.com> wrote in message
news:9911ce3d12b15d780570de4a76c11d43@localhost.ta lkaboutautos.com...
> The 3.5 has an electronic throttle. Depressing the accelerator simply
> activates a sensor under the hood. The computer controls everything from
> there. It'll probably take a little time to become familiar with its
> idosyncracies.
>
> As for the fuel economy, I don't know that it will improve. We've had
> many complaints about fuel economy on the 3.5 Santa Fes. I've never been
> able to find anything conclusively wrong with any of them. I replaced an
> oxygen sensor in one of them because the values looked a little funny, but
> the customer was still getting poor fuel economy.
>

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

I also do not know whether fuel economy will improve.

This I do know - that powertrain combo is used in some other Hyundais and
Kias. It is a nice, smooth and responsive powertrain, and seems to be able
to handle whatever is given it. It also seems to have given VERY few
problems in its years of operation (since about '01 or '02).

But one thing this powertrain has never been is very fuel efficient. I've
had this powertrain combo in two different vehicles - one was an '02, and
now I have an '04. The '04 is decidedly better than the '02, and I love it
in my vehicle. But I will never jump for joy over its fuel economy.

But I will gladly keep running it and running it and running it - as long as
I keep the timing belt replaced. It is one of the most impressive
powertrains I have ever had.

Tom Wenndt


"hyundaitech" <notpublic@not.public.com> wrote in message
news:9911ce3d12b15d780570de4a76c11d43@localhost.ta lkaboutautos.com...
> The 3.5 has an electronic throttle. Depressing the accelerator simply
> activates a sensor under the hood. The computer controls everything from
> there. It'll probably take a little time to become familiar with its
> idosyncracies.
>
> As for the fuel economy, I don't know that it will improve. We've had
> many complaints about fuel economy on the 3.5 Santa Fes. I've never been
> able to find anything conclusively wrong with any of them. I replaced an
> oxygen sensor in one of them because the values looked a little funny, but
> the customer was still getting poor fuel economy.
>

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

I also do not know whether fuel economy will improve.

This I do know - that powertrain combo is used in some other Hyundais and
Kias. It is a nice, smooth and responsive powertrain, and seems to be able
to handle whatever is given it. It also seems to have given VERY few
problems in its years of operation (since about '01 or '02).

But one thing this powertrain has never been is very fuel efficient. I've
had this powertrain combo in two different vehicles - one was an '02, and
now I have an '04. The '04 is decidedly better than the '02, and I love it
in my vehicle. But I will never jump for joy over its fuel economy.

But I will gladly keep running it and running it and running it - as long as
I keep the timing belt replaced. It is one of the most impressive
powertrains I have ever had.

Tom Wenndt


"hyundaitech" <notpublic@not.public.com> wrote in message
news:9911ce3d12b15d780570de4a76c11d43@localhost.ta lkaboutautos.com...
> The 3.5 has an electronic throttle. Depressing the accelerator simply
> activates a sensor under the hood. The computer controls everything from
> there. It'll probably take a little time to become familiar with its
> idosyncracies.
>
> As for the fuel economy, I don't know that it will improve. We've had
> many complaints about fuel economy on the 3.5 Santa Fes. I've never been
> able to find anything conclusively wrong with any of them. I replaced an
> oxygen sensor in one of them because the values looked a little funny, but
> the customer was still getting poor fuel economy.
>

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

I experienced something a bit different from the way you are describing it
with my 2005 3.5L Santa Fe.

The car would either hesitate when the gas was depressed or surge as if I
had tromped on it. The dealer reprogrammed the ETCS and this fixed it. I
believe these is a TSB out for the problem as well.

Could that be what you are experiencing?

Jon

"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140450253.738497.310810@g43g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> > What engine do you have?
>
> I replied to this 2 days ago from another account, but for some reason
> the post never showed up here. In any event, I have the 3.5L.
>

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

I experienced something a bit different from the way you are describing it
with my 2005 3.5L Santa Fe.

The car would either hesitate when the gas was depressed or surge as if I
had tromped on it. The dealer reprogrammed the ETCS and this fixed it. I
believe these is a TSB out for the problem as well.

Could that be what you are experiencing?

Jon

"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140450253.738497.310810@g43g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> > What engine do you have?
>
> I replied to this 2 days ago from another account, but for some reason
> the post never showed up here. In any event, I have the 3.5L.
>

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

I experienced something a bit different from the way you are describing it
with my 2005 3.5L Santa Fe.

The car would either hesitate when the gas was depressed or surge as if I
had tromped on it. The dealer reprogrammed the ETCS and this fixed it. I
believe these is a TSB out for the problem as well.

Could that be what you are experiencing?

Jon

"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140450253.738497.310810@g43g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> > What engine do you have?
>
> I replied to this 2 days ago from another account, but for some reason
> the post never showed up here. In any event, I have the 3.5L.
>

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

> I experienced something a bit different from the way you are describing it
> with my 2005 3.5L Santa Fe.
>
> The car would either hesitate when the gas was depressed or surge as if I
> had tromped on it. The dealer reprogrammed the ETCS and this fixed it. I
> believe these is a TSB out for the problem as well.

It's more mechanical in nature (and yes, I realize its an electronic
accelerator). The problem is that the pedel is very "stiff" (for lack
of a better word) when I first begin to apply pressure to it with my
foot. Rather than giving way gradually and smoothly, it "breaks" in
that it just suddenly gives way. As a result, acceleration is also
sudden and jerky from a dead stop. I can overcome it with effort by
stiffening my foot and ankle muscles so that the pressure I apply is
even and compensates for the sudden give by the pedel.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

> I experienced something a bit different from the way you are describing it
> with my 2005 3.5L Santa Fe.
>
> The car would either hesitate when the gas was depressed or surge as if I
> had tromped on it. The dealer reprogrammed the ETCS and this fixed it. I
> believe these is a TSB out for the problem as well.

It's more mechanical in nature (and yes, I realize its an electronic
accelerator). The problem is that the pedel is very "stiff" (for lack
of a better word) when I first begin to apply pressure to it with my
foot. Rather than giving way gradually and smoothly, it "breaks" in
that it just suddenly gives way. As a result, acceleration is also
sudden and jerky from a dead stop. I can overcome it with effort by
stiffening my foot and ankle muscles so that the pressure I apply is
even and compensates for the sudden give by the pedel.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

> I experienced something a bit different from the way you are describing it
> with my 2005 3.5L Santa Fe.
>
> The car would either hesitate when the gas was depressed or surge as if I
> had tromped on it. The dealer reprogrammed the ETCS and this fixed it. I
> believe these is a TSB out for the problem as well.

It's more mechanical in nature (and yes, I realize its an electronic
accelerator). The problem is that the pedel is very "stiff" (for lack
of a better word) when I first begin to apply pressure to it with my
foot. Rather than giving way gradually and smoothly, it "breaks" in
that it just suddenly gives way. As a result, acceleration is also
sudden and jerky from a dead stop. I can overcome it with effort by
stiffening my foot and ankle muscles so that the pressure I apply is
even and compensates for the sudden give by the pedel.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

> I've got a '05 Santa Fe (funny....I too had a '94 Ford Explorer before!)
>
> oNce the breakin was over, my milage improved to 24 highway...18 city with a
> 3.5l engine

What was it like before the break-in?

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

> I've got a '05 Santa Fe (funny....I too had a '94 Ford Explorer before!)
>
> oNce the breakin was over, my milage improved to 24 highway...18 city with a
> 3.5l engine

What was it like before the break-in?

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

> I've got a '05 Santa Fe (funny....I too had a '94 Ford Explorer before!)
>
> oNce the breakin was over, my milage improved to 24 highway...18 city with a
> 3.5l engine

What was it like before the break-in?

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

> As for the fuel economy, I don't know that it will improve. We've had
> many complaints about fuel economy on the 3.5 Santa Fes. I've never been
> able to find anything conclusively wrong with any of them. I replaced an
> oxygen sensor in one of them because the values looked a little funny, but
> the customer was still getting poor fuel economy.

Since I got superior fuel economy from a substantially heavier 10
year-old vehicle (with 154,000+ miles on the all-original hardware)
with a larger, more powerful engine I'm forced to conclude that either
there IS something wrong with my Santa Fe or its drivetrain is very
poorly designed/constructed.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

> As for the fuel economy, I don't know that it will improve. We've had
> many complaints about fuel economy on the 3.5 Santa Fes. I've never been
> able to find anything conclusively wrong with any of them. I replaced an
> oxygen sensor in one of them because the values looked a little funny, but
> the customer was still getting poor fuel economy.

Since I got superior fuel economy from a substantially heavier 10
year-old vehicle (with 154,000+ miles on the all-original hardware)
with a larger, more powerful engine I'm forced to conclude that either
there IS something wrong with my Santa Fe or its drivetrain is very
poorly designed/constructed.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

> As for the fuel economy, I don't know that it will improve. We've had
> many complaints about fuel economy on the 3.5 Santa Fes. I've never been
> able to find anything conclusively wrong with any of them. I replaced an
> oxygen sensor in one of them because the values looked a little funny, but
> the customer was still getting poor fuel economy.

Since I got superior fuel economy from a substantially heavier 10
year-old vehicle (with 154,000+ miles on the all-original hardware)
with a larger, more powerful engine I'm forced to conclude that either
there IS something wrong with my Santa Fe or its drivetrain is very
poorly designed/constructed.

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

what do you expect from an SUV, didnt you do ANY research BEFORE you bought
it??? maybe you be better suited with a horse and buggy... then you wont
have to WHINE about your fuel mileage... I own a 2006 Santa Fe.. LOVE it
dont care bout the fuel mileage because I knew what it was BEFORE I
purchased it...

Pete...


"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140478777.523496.60680@o13g2000cwo.googlegro ups.com...
>> As for the fuel economy, I don't know that it will improve. We've had
>> many complaints about fuel economy on the 3.5 Santa Fes. I've never been
>> able to find anything conclusively wrong with any of them. I replaced an
>> oxygen sensor in one of them because the values looked a little funny,
>> but
>> the customer was still getting poor fuel economy.
>
> Since I got superior fuel economy from a substantially heavier 10
> year-old vehicle (with 154,000+ miles on the all-original hardware)
> with a larger, more powerful engine I'm forced to conclude that either
> there IS something wrong with my Santa Fe or its drivetrain is very
> poorly designed/constructed.
>

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

what do you expect from an SUV, didnt you do ANY research BEFORE you bought
it??? maybe you be better suited with a horse and buggy... then you wont
have to WHINE about your fuel mileage... I own a 2006 Santa Fe.. LOVE it
dont care bout the fuel mileage because I knew what it was BEFORE I
purchased it...

Pete...


"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140478777.523496.60680@o13g2000cwo.googlegro ups.com...
>> As for the fuel economy, I don't know that it will improve. We've had
>> many complaints about fuel economy on the 3.5 Santa Fes. I've never been
>> able to find anything conclusively wrong with any of them. I replaced an
>> oxygen sensor in one of them because the values looked a little funny,
>> but
>> the customer was still getting poor fuel economy.
>
> Since I got superior fuel economy from a substantially heavier 10
> year-old vehicle (with 154,000+ miles on the all-original hardware)
> with a larger, more powerful engine I'm forced to conclude that either
> there IS something wrong with my Santa Fe or its drivetrain is very
> poorly designed/constructed.
>

Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
 

what do you expect from an SUV, didnt you do ANY research BEFORE you bought
it??? maybe you be better suited with a horse and buggy... then you wont
have to WHINE about your fuel mileage... I own a 2006 Santa Fe.. LOVE it
dont care bout the fuel mileage because I knew what it was BEFORE I
purchased it...

Pete...


"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140478777.523496.60680@o13g2000cwo.googlegro ups.com...
>> As for the fuel economy, I don't know that it will improve. We've had
>> many complaints about fuel economy on the 3.5 Santa Fes. I've never been
>> able to find anything conclusively wrong with any of them. I replaced an
>> oxygen sensor in one of them because the values looked a little funny,
>> but
>> the customer was still getting poor fuel economy.
>
> Since I got superior fuel economy from a substantially heavier 10
> year-old vehicle (with 154,000+ miles on the all-original hardware)
> with a larger, more powerful engine I'm forced to conclude that either
> there IS something wrong with my Santa Fe or its drivetrain is very
> poorly designed/constructed.
>