2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
Well, I checked some of your other posts in this group and found that
this really isn't about anything I said. You're just another
belligerant, mouthy jag-off in general:
- "go pay another 20K and get yerself a REAL 4WD then and quit yer
bitching...
..;-) "
this really isn't about anything I said. You're just another
belligerant, mouthy jag-off in general:
- "go pay another 20K and get yerself a REAL 4WD then and quit yer
bitching...
..;-) "
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
WuzYoungOnceToo wrote:
:: I experienced something a bit different from the way you are describing
:: it with my 2005 3.5L Santa Fe.
::
:: The car would either hesitate when the gas was depressed or surge as if I
:: had tromped on it. The dealer reprogrammed the ETCS and this fixed it. I
:: believe these is a TSB out for the problem as well.
:
: It's more mechanical in nature (and yes, I realize its an electronic
: accelerator). The problem is that the pedel is very "stiff" (for lack
: of a better word) when I first begin to apply pressure to it with my
: foot. Rather than giving way gradually and smoothly, it "breaks" in
: that it just suddenly gives way. As a result, acceleration is also
: sudden and jerky from a dead stop. I can overcome it with effort by
: stiffening my foot and ankle muscles so that the pressure I apply is
: even and compensates for the sudden give by the pedel.
Nah, never had that filling on my 03, cannot remember mpg during break-in,
but it was baaaad, after second tank of gas start to improve, now I get
20-22 in the city, 24-26 in the hwy, if I keep the hwy speed under 65 then
it goes up to 28, but no fun at all.
03 XL 3.5/5Auto.
:: I experienced something a bit different from the way you are describing
:: it with my 2005 3.5L Santa Fe.
::
:: The car would either hesitate when the gas was depressed or surge as if I
:: had tromped on it. The dealer reprogrammed the ETCS and this fixed it. I
:: believe these is a TSB out for the problem as well.
:
: It's more mechanical in nature (and yes, I realize its an electronic
: accelerator). The problem is that the pedel is very "stiff" (for lack
: of a better word) when I first begin to apply pressure to it with my
: foot. Rather than giving way gradually and smoothly, it "breaks" in
: that it just suddenly gives way. As a result, acceleration is also
: sudden and jerky from a dead stop. I can overcome it with effort by
: stiffening my foot and ankle muscles so that the pressure I apply is
: even and compensates for the sudden give by the pedel.
Nah, never had that filling on my 03, cannot remember mpg during break-in,
but it was baaaad, after second tank of gas start to improve, now I get
20-22 in the city, 24-26 in the hwy, if I keep the hwy speed under 65 then
it goes up to 28, but no fun at all.
03 XL 3.5/5Auto.
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
WuzYoungOnceToo wrote:
:: I experienced something a bit different from the way you are describing
:: it with my 2005 3.5L Santa Fe.
::
:: The car would either hesitate when the gas was depressed or surge as if I
:: had tromped on it. The dealer reprogrammed the ETCS and this fixed it. I
:: believe these is a TSB out for the problem as well.
:
: It's more mechanical in nature (and yes, I realize its an electronic
: accelerator). The problem is that the pedel is very "stiff" (for lack
: of a better word) when I first begin to apply pressure to it with my
: foot. Rather than giving way gradually and smoothly, it "breaks" in
: that it just suddenly gives way. As a result, acceleration is also
: sudden and jerky from a dead stop. I can overcome it with effort by
: stiffening my foot and ankle muscles so that the pressure I apply is
: even and compensates for the sudden give by the pedel.
Nah, never had that filling on my 03, cannot remember mpg during break-in,
but it was baaaad, after second tank of gas start to improve, now I get
20-22 in the city, 24-26 in the hwy, if I keep the hwy speed under 65 then
it goes up to 28, but no fun at all.
03 XL 3.5/5Auto.
:: I experienced something a bit different from the way you are describing
:: it with my 2005 3.5L Santa Fe.
::
:: The car would either hesitate when the gas was depressed or surge as if I
:: had tromped on it. The dealer reprogrammed the ETCS and this fixed it. I
:: believe these is a TSB out for the problem as well.
:
: It's more mechanical in nature (and yes, I realize its an electronic
: accelerator). The problem is that the pedel is very "stiff" (for lack
: of a better word) when I first begin to apply pressure to it with my
: foot. Rather than giving way gradually and smoothly, it "breaks" in
: that it just suddenly gives way. As a result, acceleration is also
: sudden and jerky from a dead stop. I can overcome it with effort by
: stiffening my foot and ankle muscles so that the pressure I apply is
: even and compensates for the sudden give by the pedel.
Nah, never had that filling on my 03, cannot remember mpg during break-in,
but it was baaaad, after second tank of gas start to improve, now I get
20-22 in the city, 24-26 in the hwy, if I keep the hwy speed under 65 then
it goes up to 28, but no fun at all.
03 XL 3.5/5Auto.
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
WuzYoungOnceToo wrote:
:: I experienced something a bit different from the way you are describing
:: it with my 2005 3.5L Santa Fe.
::
:: The car would either hesitate when the gas was depressed or surge as if I
:: had tromped on it. The dealer reprogrammed the ETCS and this fixed it. I
:: believe these is a TSB out for the problem as well.
:
: It's more mechanical in nature (and yes, I realize its an electronic
: accelerator). The problem is that the pedel is very "stiff" (for lack
: of a better word) when I first begin to apply pressure to it with my
: foot. Rather than giving way gradually and smoothly, it "breaks" in
: that it just suddenly gives way. As a result, acceleration is also
: sudden and jerky from a dead stop. I can overcome it with effort by
: stiffening my foot and ankle muscles so that the pressure I apply is
: even and compensates for the sudden give by the pedel.
Nah, never had that filling on my 03, cannot remember mpg during break-in,
but it was baaaad, after second tank of gas start to improve, now I get
20-22 in the city, 24-26 in the hwy, if I keep the hwy speed under 65 then
it goes up to 28, but no fun at all.
03 XL 3.5/5Auto.
:: I experienced something a bit different from the way you are describing
:: it with my 2005 3.5L Santa Fe.
::
:: The car would either hesitate when the gas was depressed or surge as if I
:: had tromped on it. The dealer reprogrammed the ETCS and this fixed it. I
:: believe these is a TSB out for the problem as well.
:
: It's more mechanical in nature (and yes, I realize its an electronic
: accelerator). The problem is that the pedel is very "stiff" (for lack
: of a better word) when I first begin to apply pressure to it with my
: foot. Rather than giving way gradually and smoothly, it "breaks" in
: that it just suddenly gives way. As a result, acceleration is also
: sudden and jerky from a dead stop. I can overcome it with effort by
: stiffening my foot and ankle muscles so that the pressure I apply is
: even and compensates for the sudden give by the pedel.
Nah, never had that filling on my 03, cannot remember mpg during break-in,
but it was baaaad, after second tank of gas start to improve, now I get
20-22 in the city, 24-26 in the hwy, if I keep the hwy speed under 65 then
it goes up to 28, but no fun at all.
03 XL 3.5/5Auto.
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
not the one WHINIG about my gas mileage. YOU ARE...;-) did your mommy throw
you out of the sandbox too early in life?? ;-)
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140484090.413166.244550@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>> what do you expect from an SUV, didnt you do ANY research BEFORE you
>> bought
>> it??? maybe you be better suited with a horse and buggy... then you
>> wont
>> have to WHINE about your fuel mileage... I own a 2006 Santa Fe.. LOVE it
>> dont care bout the fuel mileage because I knew what it was BEFORE I
>> purchased it...
>
> I know that UseNet is the home of ignorant knee-jerk reactions, but the
> level of stupidity behind them never ceases to amaze me. Yes, I did
> research before I bought. What I expected was mileage at least
> approximating the EPA estimates as well as what the company itself
> touts. I also read many reports from owners (like those above)
> describing much better mileage than I'm seeing. There is absolutely
> nothing in any of my posts to suggest otherwise.
>
> So, in short, trying giving those two brain cells that are desperately
> clinging to a lonely existence on the inside of that otherwise empty
> skull of yours some exercise before shooting off your ill-informed
> mouth next time.
>
you out of the sandbox too early in life?? ;-)
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140484090.413166.244550@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>> what do you expect from an SUV, didnt you do ANY research BEFORE you
>> bought
>> it??? maybe you be better suited with a horse and buggy... then you
>> wont
>> have to WHINE about your fuel mileage... I own a 2006 Santa Fe.. LOVE it
>> dont care bout the fuel mileage because I knew what it was BEFORE I
>> purchased it...
>
> I know that UseNet is the home of ignorant knee-jerk reactions, but the
> level of stupidity behind them never ceases to amaze me. Yes, I did
> research before I bought. What I expected was mileage at least
> approximating the EPA estimates as well as what the company itself
> touts. I also read many reports from owners (like those above)
> describing much better mileage than I'm seeing. There is absolutely
> nothing in any of my posts to suggest otherwise.
>
> So, in short, trying giving those two brain cells that are desperately
> clinging to a lonely existence on the inside of that otherwise empty
> skull of yours some exercise before shooting off your ill-informed
> mouth next time.
>
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
not the one WHINIG about my gas mileage. YOU ARE...;-) did your mommy throw
you out of the sandbox too early in life?? ;-)
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140484090.413166.244550@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>> what do you expect from an SUV, didnt you do ANY research BEFORE you
>> bought
>> it??? maybe you be better suited with a horse and buggy... then you
>> wont
>> have to WHINE about your fuel mileage... I own a 2006 Santa Fe.. LOVE it
>> dont care bout the fuel mileage because I knew what it was BEFORE I
>> purchased it...
>
> I know that UseNet is the home of ignorant knee-jerk reactions, but the
> level of stupidity behind them never ceases to amaze me. Yes, I did
> research before I bought. What I expected was mileage at least
> approximating the EPA estimates as well as what the company itself
> touts. I also read many reports from owners (like those above)
> describing much better mileage than I'm seeing. There is absolutely
> nothing in any of my posts to suggest otherwise.
>
> So, in short, trying giving those two brain cells that are desperately
> clinging to a lonely existence on the inside of that otherwise empty
> skull of yours some exercise before shooting off your ill-informed
> mouth next time.
>
you out of the sandbox too early in life?? ;-)
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140484090.413166.244550@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>> what do you expect from an SUV, didnt you do ANY research BEFORE you
>> bought
>> it??? maybe you be better suited with a horse and buggy... then you
>> wont
>> have to WHINE about your fuel mileage... I own a 2006 Santa Fe.. LOVE it
>> dont care bout the fuel mileage because I knew what it was BEFORE I
>> purchased it...
>
> I know that UseNet is the home of ignorant knee-jerk reactions, but the
> level of stupidity behind them never ceases to amaze me. Yes, I did
> research before I bought. What I expected was mileage at least
> approximating the EPA estimates as well as what the company itself
> touts. I also read many reports from owners (like those above)
> describing much better mileage than I'm seeing. There is absolutely
> nothing in any of my posts to suggest otherwise.
>
> So, in short, trying giving those two brain cells that are desperately
> clinging to a lonely existence on the inside of that otherwise empty
> skull of yours some exercise before shooting off your ill-informed
> mouth next time.
>
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
not the one WHINIG about my gas mileage. YOU ARE...;-) did your mommy throw
you out of the sandbox too early in life?? ;-)
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140484090.413166.244550@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>> what do you expect from an SUV, didnt you do ANY research BEFORE you
>> bought
>> it??? maybe you be better suited with a horse and buggy... then you
>> wont
>> have to WHINE about your fuel mileage... I own a 2006 Santa Fe.. LOVE it
>> dont care bout the fuel mileage because I knew what it was BEFORE I
>> purchased it...
>
> I know that UseNet is the home of ignorant knee-jerk reactions, but the
> level of stupidity behind them never ceases to amaze me. Yes, I did
> research before I bought. What I expected was mileage at least
> approximating the EPA estimates as well as what the company itself
> touts. I also read many reports from owners (like those above)
> describing much better mileage than I'm seeing. There is absolutely
> nothing in any of my posts to suggest otherwise.
>
> So, in short, trying giving those two brain cells that are desperately
> clinging to a lonely existence on the inside of that otherwise empty
> skull of yours some exercise before shooting off your ill-informed
> mouth next time.
>
you out of the sandbox too early in life?? ;-)
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140484090.413166.244550@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>> what do you expect from an SUV, didnt you do ANY research BEFORE you
>> bought
>> it??? maybe you be better suited with a horse and buggy... then you
>> wont
>> have to WHINE about your fuel mileage... I own a 2006 Santa Fe.. LOVE it
>> dont care bout the fuel mileage because I knew what it was BEFORE I
>> purchased it...
>
> I know that UseNet is the home of ignorant knee-jerk reactions, but the
> level of stupidity behind them never ceases to amaze me. Yes, I did
> research before I bought. What I expected was mileage at least
> approximating the EPA estimates as well as what the company itself
> touts. I also read many reports from owners (like those above)
> describing much better mileage than I'm seeing. There is absolutely
> nothing in any of my posts to suggest otherwise.
>
> So, in short, trying giving those two brain cells that are desperately
> clinging to a lonely existence on the inside of that otherwise empty
> skull of yours some exercise before shooting off your ill-informed
> mouth next time.
>
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
making friends all over I see.. hmmmmmmmmmmmm makes ya wonder dont it???
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140484602.285710.24880@z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com...
> Well, I checked some of your other posts in this group and found that
> this really isn't about anything I said. You're just another
> belligerant, mouthy jag-off in general:
>
> - "go pay another 20K and get yerself a REAL 4WD then and quit yer
> bitching...
> ..;-) "
>
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140484602.285710.24880@z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com...
> Well, I checked some of your other posts in this group and found that
> this really isn't about anything I said. You're just another
> belligerant, mouthy jag-off in general:
>
> - "go pay another 20K and get yerself a REAL 4WD then and quit yer
> bitching...
> ..;-) "
>
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
making friends all over I see.. hmmmmmmmmmmmm makes ya wonder dont it???
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140484602.285710.24880@z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com...
> Well, I checked some of your other posts in this group and found that
> this really isn't about anything I said. You're just another
> belligerant, mouthy jag-off in general:
>
> - "go pay another 20K and get yerself a REAL 4WD then and quit yer
> bitching...
> ..;-) "
>
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140484602.285710.24880@z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com...
> Well, I checked some of your other posts in this group and found that
> this really isn't about anything I said. You're just another
> belligerant, mouthy jag-off in general:
>
> - "go pay another 20K and get yerself a REAL 4WD then and quit yer
> bitching...
> ..;-) "
>
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
making friends all over I see.. hmmmmmmmmmmmm makes ya wonder dont it???
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140484602.285710.24880@z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com...
> Well, I checked some of your other posts in this group and found that
> this really isn't about anything I said. You're just another
> belligerant, mouthy jag-off in general:
>
> - "go pay another 20K and get yerself a REAL 4WD then and quit yer
> bitching...
> ..;-) "
>
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140484602.285710.24880@z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com...
> Well, I checked some of your other posts in this group and found that
> this really isn't about anything I said. You're just another
> belligerant, mouthy jag-off in general:
>
> - "go pay another 20K and get yerself a REAL 4WD then and quit yer
> bitching...
> ..;-) "
>
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
You might have something sticking then. I'd ask the dealer to look at it
again and make sure they understand you have an issue with the pedal
sticking when begin to apply pressure. Could be either the cable or the
mechanical dealie to which the sensor attaches.
again and make sure they understand you have an issue with the pedal
sticking when begin to apply pressure. Could be either the cable or the
mechanical dealie to which the sensor attaches.
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
You might have something sticking then. I'd ask the dealer to look at it
again and make sure they understand you have an issue with the pedal
sticking when begin to apply pressure. Could be either the cable or the
mechanical dealie to which the sensor attaches.
again and make sure they understand you have an issue with the pedal
sticking when begin to apply pressure. Could be either the cable or the
mechanical dealie to which the sensor attaches.
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
You might have something sticking then. I'd ask the dealer to look at it
again and make sure they understand you have an issue with the pedal
sticking when begin to apply pressure. Could be either the cable or the
mechanical dealie to which the sensor attaches.
again and make sure they understand you have an issue with the pedal
sticking when begin to apply pressure. Could be either the cable or the
mechanical dealie to which the sensor attaches.
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
There are often trade-offs for better fuel economy -- many times higher
compression, which allows more power but exerts more force on the engine
components. Hyundai has never been known to be on the upper spectrum of
engine compression.
If you rate a design poor just because of fuel economy, then you're being
rather narrow-minded as to all the variables of powertrain design.
compression, which allows more power but exerts more force on the engine
components. Hyundai has never been known to be on the upper spectrum of
engine compression.
If you rate a design poor just because of fuel economy, then you're being
rather narrow-minded as to all the variables of powertrain design.
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Santa Fe Accelerator
There are often trade-offs for better fuel economy -- many times higher
compression, which allows more power but exerts more force on the engine
components. Hyundai has never been known to be on the upper spectrum of
engine compression.
If you rate a design poor just because of fuel economy, then you're being
rather narrow-minded as to all the variables of powertrain design.
compression, which allows more power but exerts more force on the engine
components. Hyundai has never been known to be on the upper spectrum of
engine compression.
If you rate a design poor just because of fuel economy, then you're being
rather narrow-minded as to all the variables of powertrain design.