Seamus J. Wilson

Do the subject vehicles have timing belts or chain? Do they use
interference engines?
Seamus J. Wilson

hyundaitech

2006 and 2007 Sonatas use chains on both the 2.4 and 3.3 engines. To my
knowledge, both are interference engines, but I've never seen this
published anywhere.

hyundaitech

2006 and 2007 Sonatas use chains on both the 2.4 and 3.3 engines. To my
knowledge, both are interference engines, but I've never seen this
published anywhere.

hyundaitech

2006 and 2007 Sonatas use chains on both the 2.4 and 3.3 engines. To my
knowledge, both are interference engines, but I've never seen this
published anywhere.

Darby OGill

71 characters post to ask what has been dsicussed and is readily available
on 'net(an.. ......Google query first, post second. Sorry to sound like an
*** but geesh........

"Seamus J. Wilson" <sligo@***.net> wrote in message
news:Jzrzg.5644$Mz3.3538@fed1read07...
> Do the subject vehicles have timing belts or chain? Do they use
> interference engines?
> Seamus J. Wilson
>

Darby OGill

71 characters post to ask what has been dsicussed and is readily available
on 'net(an.. ......Google query first, post second. Sorry to sound like an
*** but geesh........

"Seamus J. Wilson" <sligo@***.net> wrote in message
news:Jzrzg.5644$Mz3.3538@fed1read07...
> Do the subject vehicles have timing belts or chain? Do they use
> interference engines?
> Seamus J. Wilson
>

Darby OGill

71 characters post to ask what has been dsicussed and is readily available
on 'net(an.. ......Google query first, post second. Sorry to sound like an
*** but geesh........

"Seamus J. Wilson" <sligo@***.net> wrote in message
news:Jzrzg.5644$Mz3.3538@fed1read07...
> Do the subject vehicles have timing belts or chain? Do they use
> interference engines?
> Seamus J. Wilson
>

Bob Adkins

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:54:28 GMT, "Darby OGill" <bark@woof.net> wrote:

>71 characters post to ask what has been dsicussed and is readily available
>on 'net(an.. ......Google query first, post second. Sorry to sound like an
>*** but geesh........


Do you suppose we should close down this forum and just google everything?
Don't be so anti-social man. Instead of bellyaching and being lazy, be nice
and take your turn helping out by answering simple questions like this one.

Apology accepted!
--
Bob

Bob Adkins

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:54:28 GMT, "Darby OGill" <bark@woof.net> wrote:

>71 characters post to ask what has been dsicussed and is readily available
>on 'net(an.. ......Google query first, post second. Sorry to sound like an
>*** but geesh........


Do you suppose we should close down this forum and just google everything?
Don't be so anti-social man. Instead of bellyaching and being lazy, be nice
and take your turn helping out by answering simple questions like this one.

Apology accepted!
--
Bob

Bob Adkins

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:54:28 GMT, "Darby OGill" <bark@woof.net> wrote:

>71 characters post to ask what has been dsicussed and is readily available
>on 'net(an.. ......Google query first, post second. Sorry to sound like an
>*** but geesh........


Do you suppose we should close down this forum and just google everything?
Don't be so anti-social man. Instead of bellyaching and being lazy, be nice
and take your turn helping out by answering simple questions like this one.

Apology accepted!
--
Bob

Seamus J. Wilson

Regret the inconvenience but I thank the positive informative respondents!
Best,
Seamus J.
"Bob Adkins" <bobad@charter.net> wrote in message
news:l971d2dlehv8jiunfsjfbhefcju1hl938l@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:54:28 GMT, "Darby OGill" <bark@woof.net> wrote:
>
>>71 characters post to ask what has been dsicussed and is readily available
>>on 'net(an.. ......Google query first, post second. Sorry to sound like an
>>*** but geesh........
>
>
> Do you suppose we should close down this forum and just google everything?
> Don't be so anti-social man. Instead of bellyaching and being lazy, be
> nice
> and take your turn helping out by answering simple questions like this
> one.
>
> Apology accepted!
> --
> Bob

Seamus J. Wilson

Regret the inconvenience but I thank the positive informative respondents!
Best,
Seamus J.
"Bob Adkins" <bobad@charter.net> wrote in message
news:l971d2dlehv8jiunfsjfbhefcju1hl938l@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:54:28 GMT, "Darby OGill" <bark@woof.net> wrote:
>
>>71 characters post to ask what has been dsicussed and is readily available
>>on 'net(an.. ......Google query first, post second. Sorry to sound like an
>>*** but geesh........
>
>
> Do you suppose we should close down this forum and just google everything?
> Don't be so anti-social man. Instead of bellyaching and being lazy, be
> nice
> and take your turn helping out by answering simple questions like this
> one.
>
> Apology accepted!
> --
> Bob

Seamus J. Wilson

Regret the inconvenience but I thank the positive informative respondents!
Best,
Seamus J.
"Bob Adkins" <bobad@charter.net> wrote in message
news:l971d2dlehv8jiunfsjfbhefcju1hl938l@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:54:28 GMT, "Darby OGill" <bark@woof.net> wrote:
>
>>71 characters post to ask what has been dsicussed and is readily available
>>on 'net(an.. ......Google query first, post second. Sorry to sound like an
>>*** but geesh........
>
>
> Do you suppose we should close down this forum and just google everything?
> Don't be so anti-social man. Instead of bellyaching and being lazy, be
> nice
> and take your turn helping out by answering simple questions like this
> one.
>
> Apology accepted!
> --
> Bob

Matt Whiting

Bob Adkins wrote:

> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:54:28 GMT, "Darby OGill" <bark@woof.net> wrote:
>
>
>>71 characters post to ask what has been dsicussed and is readily available
>>on 'net(an.. ......Google query first, post second. Sorry to sound like an
>>*** but geesh........
>
>
>
> Do you suppose we should close down this forum and just google everything?
> Don't be so anti-social man. Instead of bellyaching and being lazy, be nice
> and take your turn helping out by answering simple questions like this one.

Yes, and he posted a lot more than 71 characters just to complain about
71 characters.

Matt

Matt Whiting

Bob Adkins wrote:

> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:54:28 GMT, "Darby OGill" <bark@woof.net> wrote:
>
>
>>71 characters post to ask what has been dsicussed and is readily available
>>on 'net(an.. ......Google query first, post second. Sorry to sound like an
>>*** but geesh........
>
>
>
> Do you suppose we should close down this forum and just google everything?
> Don't be so anti-social man. Instead of bellyaching and being lazy, be nice
> and take your turn helping out by answering simple questions like this one.

Yes, and he posted a lot more than 71 characters just to complain about
71 characters.

Matt