Lower ball joints on Santa Fe
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lower ball joints on Santa Fe
What "class action suit"? Also, is your cited warranty for 2nd owner?
--
KWW
"Richard" <richard147@hotmail.com> wrote in message
newsbPCg.14177$uH6.1221@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> hyundaitech wrote:
>> Well, them's the breaks sometimes.
>>
> My warranty is good for 6 years or 72000 miles (as per the class action
> suit) so I have time to see if the current ball joints are any better than
> the previous ones.
--
KWW
"Richard" <richard147@hotmail.com> wrote in message
newsbPCg.14177$uH6.1221@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> hyundaitech wrote:
>> Well, them's the breaks sometimes.
>>
> My warranty is good for 6 years or 72000 miles (as per the class action
> suit) so I have time to see if the current ball joints are any better than
> the previous ones.
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lower ball joints on Santa Fe
What "class action suit"? Also, is your cited warranty for 2nd owner?
--
KWW
"Richard" <richard147@hotmail.com> wrote in message
newsbPCg.14177$uH6.1221@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> hyundaitech wrote:
>> Well, them's the breaks sometimes.
>>
> My warranty is good for 6 years or 72000 miles (as per the class action
> suit) so I have time to see if the current ball joints are any better than
> the previous ones.
--
KWW
"Richard" <richard147@hotmail.com> wrote in message
newsbPCg.14177$uH6.1221@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> hyundaitech wrote:
>> Well, them's the breaks sometimes.
>>
> My warranty is good for 6 years or 72000 miles (as per the class action
> suit) so I have time to see if the current ball joints are any better than
> the previous ones.
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lower ball joints on Santa Fe
KWW wrote:
> What "class action suit"? Also, is your cited warranty for 2nd owner?
>
We are the original owners of the 2002 Santa Fe. The class action suit
had to do with Hyundai misreporting the actual horsepower of their
motors because of the US smog requirements. They offered a large group
of owners a cash settlement ($125 I think), increasing the 10/100,000 to
12/120,000 or increasing the 5/60,000 to 6/72,000. We took the 6/72,000
offer.
> What "class action suit"? Also, is your cited warranty for 2nd owner?
>
We are the original owners of the 2002 Santa Fe. The class action suit
had to do with Hyundai misreporting the actual horsepower of their
motors because of the US smog requirements. They offered a large group
of owners a cash settlement ($125 I think), increasing the 10/100,000 to
12/120,000 or increasing the 5/60,000 to 6/72,000. We took the 6/72,000
offer.
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lower ball joints on Santa Fe
KWW wrote:
> What "class action suit"? Also, is your cited warranty for 2nd owner?
>
We are the original owners of the 2002 Santa Fe. The class action suit
had to do with Hyundai misreporting the actual horsepower of their
motors because of the US smog requirements. They offered a large group
of owners a cash settlement ($125 I think), increasing the 10/100,000 to
12/120,000 or increasing the 5/60,000 to 6/72,000. We took the 6/72,000
offer.
> What "class action suit"? Also, is your cited warranty for 2nd owner?
>
We are the original owners of the 2002 Santa Fe. The class action suit
had to do with Hyundai misreporting the actual horsepower of their
motors because of the US smog requirements. They offered a large group
of owners a cash settlement ($125 I think), increasing the 10/100,000 to
12/120,000 or increasing the 5/60,000 to 6/72,000. We took the 6/72,000
offer.
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lower ball joints on Santa Fe
I think you made a wise choice. It's a pretty good bet that something
stupid will break within that year based on the age or mileage on the
vehicle. Chances of getting back you $125 or more in warranty work are
actually pretty good.
stupid will break within that year based on the age or mileage on the
vehicle. Chances of getting back you $125 or more in warranty work are
actually pretty good.
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lower ball joints on Santa Fe
I think you made a wise choice. It's a pretty good bet that something
stupid will break within that year based on the age or mileage on the
vehicle. Chances of getting back you $125 or more in warranty work are
actually pretty good.
stupid will break within that year based on the age or mileage on the
vehicle. Chances of getting back you $125 or more in warranty work are
actually pretty good.
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lower ball joints on Santa Fe
hyundaitech wrote:
> I think you made a wise choice. It's a pretty good bet that something
> stupid will break within that year based on the age or mileage on the
> vehicle. Chances of getting back you $125 or more in warranty work are
> actually pretty good.
>
It's nice to know that at least once in 56 years I made a wise choice!
> I think you made a wise choice. It's a pretty good bet that something
> stupid will break within that year based on the age or mileage on the
> vehicle. Chances of getting back you $125 or more in warranty work are
> actually pretty good.
>
It's nice to know that at least once in 56 years I made a wise choice!
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lower ball joints on Santa Fe
hyundaitech wrote:
> I think you made a wise choice. It's a pretty good bet that something
> stupid will break within that year based on the age or mileage on the
> vehicle. Chances of getting back you $125 or more in warranty work are
> actually pretty good.
>
It's nice to know that at least once in 56 years I made a wise choice!
> I think you made a wise choice. It's a pretty good bet that something
> stupid will break within that year based on the age or mileage on the
> vehicle. Chances of getting back you $125 or more in warranty work are
> actually pretty good.
>
It's nice to know that at least once in 56 years I made a wise choice!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
anthonya
Car Parts For Sale
3
03-16-2005 05:44 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)