Spam in this newsgroup
I'd like some discussion about this.
First, in my experience, most people who spam newsgroups nowadays do so from gmail accounts. Another source has been google groups. These Google services are a "wild west" because Google refuses to do anything about the problem. It's been a severe problem on the freeware group, so much so that we've had to employ heavy built-in filtration in clients such as Thunderbird. In addition, I use a free program named "NFilter." NFilter provides more sophisticated filtration ahead of the news reader. Spammers get around simple filters (like Thunderbird's) by posting from phony names and continuously changing the names so that your filter is continuously obsolete. As an example, check out a spammer in this NG who uses variations on the name "jenney." So, the only way to categorically dump them is by dumping the entire domain from whence they come. Of course, many nice people don't know about this and use gmail accounts. On the other group, the gmail signal-noise ratio is so bad that it's simply not worth it: I dump all gmail posts. Period. It makes participation sane. On another usenet group, there's one outstanding poster who comes in via gmail. We (in the freeware group) devised a strategy of passing the desired poster with an individual rule, and then dumping everyone else from gmail right after that. It would be too difficult to have to create individual "whitelist" rules for each unique poster who might come in from gmail. What do y'all think of this issue? Richard |
Re: Spam in this newsgroup
"Richard Steinfeld" <rgsteinBUTREMOVETHIS@sonicANDTHISTOO.net> wrote in message news:YeedncpDmLrDBynXnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@posted.sonic net... > I'd like some discussion about this. Why? It's been beaten to death and what you proposed in your full text (snipped), offered no new thinking on how to deal with the issue. Further discussion is just keeping the noise level up. Not worth it. > First, in my experience, most people who spam newsgroups nowadays do so > from gmail accounts. Another source has been google groups. > Gee, ya think? -- -Mike- mmarlowREMOVE@windstream.net |
Re: Spam in this newsgroup
"Richard Steinfeld" <rgsteinBUTREMOVETHIS@sonicANDTHISTOO.net> wrote in message news:YeedncpDmLrDBynXnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@posted.sonic net... > I'd like some discussion about this. > First, in my experience, most people who spam newsgroups nowadays do so > from gmail accounts. Another source has been google groups. > What is there to discuss? They would not spam if idiots did not respond and buy their crap. They are the ones to blame. No easy solution to stop them either. Set your filters with the right key words in the subject line and you'll miss most of them. |
Re: Spam in this newsgroup
In article <YeedncpDmLrDBynXnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@posted.sonicnet> ,
rgsteinBUTREMOVETHIS@sonicANDTHISTOO.net says... > What do y'all think of this issue? > In essence you're spamming this group with an Off-Topic thread, there are abuse groups for your discussion. -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address) |
Re: Spam in this newsgroup
Richard Steinfeld wrote:
> > What do y'all think of this issue? > > Richard I personally just don't download anything with a message ID containing googlegroups. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_september |
Re: Spam in this newsgroup
Richard Steinfeld wrote:
> I'd like some discussion about this. > > What do y'all think of this issue? The resolution to the problem of internet spam is obvious. Government intervention in the form of a take-over and buy out of all i-net service providers using tax payer money, followed by extremely stiff censorship rules. Now, if any of you think that's stupid or an impossibility, you've had your head buried in the sand for the past year or so... |
Re: Spam in this newsgroup
> On another usenet group, there's one outstanding poster who comes in via
> gmail. We (in the freeware group) devised a strategy of passing the > desired poster with an individual rule, and then dumping everyone else > from gmail right after that. It would be too difficult to have to create > individual "whitelist" rules for each unique poster who might come in from > gmail. > > What do y'all think of this issue? > > Richard Interestingly enough, this is one of the few NGs I don't see much spam in. I use 'news.individual.net' and hardly see any spam in any of the .alt groups I monitor. Most of the .rec groups are OK as well with the exception of the high volume groups. Jon |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands