07 Camry SE V6
#16
#17
I just found it hard to believe they would have enough space to go flat out, a 250, while not huge would for sure rock him from the start, and while it may be faster in the 1/4, I find it hard to find a open stretch of road that long these days. And what some consider a "race" is very differnt then what others call a race, idkjust saying. Find it hard to beleive. And no, if the camry ran 13's then it would be like the biggest car since the model t, I know 300rwhp mustangs that just break 13.
#18
I just found it hard to believe they would have enough space to go flat out, a 250, while not huge would for sure rock him from the start, and while it may be faster in the 1/4, I find it hard to find a open stretch of road that long these days. And what some consider a "race" is very differnt then what others call a race, idkjust saying. Find it hard to beleive. And no, if the camry ran 13's then it would be like the biggest car since the model t, I know 300rwhp mustangs that just break 13.
I find it very easy to believe that a 250 got beat by a camry. From a start, ill put my money on an automatic camry that anyone could launch over a beginner on a small displacement bike. Its not like he said he raced a gsxr 1000 or r1 and won....
#19
As per Motocycle news, http://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/bikereviews/searchresults/Bike-Reviews/Kawasaki/Kawasaki-250R-Ninja-2008-current/ and best beginner motorcycles.com http://www.bestbeginnermotorcycles.com/kawasaki-ninja-250-review the 250r completes 0-60 in 5.75 seconds (depending on the year) out of about 5 sources only cycle world says its high 7's. Even still Toyota it's self claims the camry will reach 60 in about 7 seconds.
Regardless of the facts, you are proabaly correct, what it comes down to is that someone is out on the streets racing cars in a 2007 toyota camry...
Regardless of the facts, you are proabaly correct, what it comes down to is that someone is out on the streets racing cars in a 2007 toyota camry...
Last edited by Browntown_01; 11-15-2008 at 02:39 PM.
#20
#22
do have any idea how fast (or should i say slow?) a 250 bike is? they only have 30 hp and run 0-60 in the high 7's and finish the quarter mile in 15.7@88 mph..... with a professional rider as per cycle world magazine. A 250 is typically ridden by newbies, who likely dont know how to ride that well either.
I find it very easy to believe that a 250 got beat by a camry. From a start, ill put my money on an automatic camry that anyone could launch over a beginner on a small displacement bike. Its not like he said he raced a gsxr 1000 or r1 and won....
I find it very easy to believe that a 250 got beat by a camry. From a start, ill put my money on an automatic camry that anyone could launch over a beginner on a small displacement bike. Its not like he said he raced a gsxr 1000 or r1 and won....
#23
just saying i have/had a 250 hyosung and i raced a friends saab 9-3 the 4-door one it was boosted stock and tell u the truth i killed him on the take off obviously he got me pretty soon but if u race from stand still the 250 will kill cause its exremly easy to takeof and its ultra light only 280lbs with full tank.
#25
It's decent for a 4 door FWD sedan but it's nowhere near as fast you're saying it is lol.
Lowest recorded 0-60 I know if is 5.8s.
When the cars had just come out some chick ran a 14.3 bone stock, with the MXV4 all seasons, and traction control on.
Traction off there were a couple guys claiming 14.0s and 14.1s. With a good tire that's capable of minimal wheelspin on a good launch, I could MAYBE believe a 13.9 under perfect conditions and perfect track preperation.
I've got one myself for a daily driver and even though it's nowhere near fast, it's a fair bit quicker than the previous gen's 3.3L, and it surprises everyone that goes for a boot in it. I've never taken this particular car to the strip but the closest thing to a valid time I could claim is me vs. my buddy's 3rd gen Camaro that was lightly modified and ran a 13.9, had me by 2 car lengths at the end when we did a roll from 40kmh-200kmh, traction off, minimal wheelspin. The car is limited at 228kmh at which it still has a bit of pull left.
It's sweetspot is on the highway, from a standstill it kinda goes like a bag of until about 3,000rpm or so, but by then either traction control is kicking in or if that's off, the factory all seasons start breaking traction.
Lowest recorded 0-60 I know if is 5.8s.
When the cars had just come out some chick ran a 14.3 bone stock, with the MXV4 all seasons, and traction control on.
Traction off there were a couple guys claiming 14.0s and 14.1s. With a good tire that's capable of minimal wheelspin on a good launch, I could MAYBE believe a 13.9 under perfect conditions and perfect track preperation.
I've got one myself for a daily driver and even though it's nowhere near fast, it's a fair bit quicker than the previous gen's 3.3L, and it surprises everyone that goes for a boot in it. I've never taken this particular car to the strip but the closest thing to a valid time I could claim is me vs. my buddy's 3rd gen Camaro that was lightly modified and ran a 13.9, had me by 2 car lengths at the end when we did a roll from 40kmh-200kmh, traction off, minimal wheelspin. The car is limited at 228kmh at which it still has a bit of pull left.
It's sweetspot is on the highway, from a standstill it kinda goes like a bag of until about 3,000rpm or so, but by then either traction control is kicking in or if that's off, the factory all seasons start breaking traction.
#26
Hey, I've drove newer toyota's and I've found they all have a cut off at 195 kph. Is yours chipped??
#29
#30
it wouldnt make a lick of difference if the bikes knew the camry wanted to race or not.... a 250 ninja with the typical owner will be lucky to see 15s. its not beating a v6 camry in a drag race. thats the bottom line. but then again, what do I know... i have never had the pleasure of owning a 250 cc bike.... just 2 600's, a gsxr 750 and currently an R1.