Of course I do you dumb !
This 'part' of the forum is ****ing retarded and it seems like you are as well. I was merely stating that by going that fast he was endangering others on the road.
Now, how can I make that more clearer for you? Do you want me to publish a book about it and send you a copy?

If you get your kicks out of reading about tools like this guy being unsafe on the road, then ****, you must be enjoying life as an under achiever.

There's no place for people like this and for those who think it's cool that someone got a 'kill', well you're just all idiots.

I was almost killed awhile back because of a ****ing racer being totally irresponsible on city roads.

Why do you think insurance rates are on the rise?

Think before you speak nimrod.

...so says the king of the retards. I hope you get booked the next time you pull speeds like that. It's ****ing morons like you that I hate sharing the road with.

Check post histories before you call someone out. Show me where I condone street racing.

It was a simple question.

This is the forum where you get to laugh at the retards who post idiotic stories that usually make no sense at all. As well as the forum where you get to laugh at intense overreactions such as yours.

It was a dumb question. I was trying to prove a point.

No where did I state that 'you' were condoning street racing. If in fact you had supported his 'story' then I would have said 'you're a total moron' for doing so.

Whether it's made up or not, it's still a foolish thing to do. If he had truthfully done what he claims, then my *intense over-reaction* stands as logical and justifiable. If not, then it's irrelevant, yet it still proves a point.

I understand your description of this part of the forum, but in all honesty, what separates truth from fiction? Is it all not foolish when it's on the street? Do you understand what this 'part' of the site is encouraging? whether true or false? Think about it.

A 'kill' at the track is totally fine. That's what this part of the forum should only be about...somewhere legal. Other than that it's simply creative writing.

200 km/hr on a pursuit . lol. how long did it take u to reach that speed ?

btw, i was on the highway with no one else but the 2 of us when we were driving fast and when i was in the city, the set of lights were maybe 200 meters away from each other and by the time i hit about 70 kph before he did i stoped right away not to endanger anyone! i know it was stupid and i only did it because i was in a bad mood (on the highway)

Even an older 3.0L X5 runs the 1/4 in the very low 16's, something your pursuit probably doesn't quite do.

Shens.

i work for a budget. we have tonnes of cobalts/pursuits on the lot. took a pursuit out to Old finch road. Scarborough residents may be familiar with the area. and i dont promote speeding or racing. i was juss testing the car and pushed it to the limit hit 140 ish...wudnt budge after.

how did u hit 200.

most of the cars have factory limiters at 180 or 200 .. so its very possible to hit those speeds.

RRebel u know what website started gtcars.ca? if u did u would know what this section means.

Are you sure he was racing you???? LOL

i know about those limiters. i deal with these cars on a daily basis. im saying it cant make it to those limiters. the engine isnt powerful enough. if you want to get a personal experience out of them..rent 1 and try to make it past the 140ish level..put it on a dyno... if you can..take a pic or a vid..then ill admit i was wrong and you were right.

i'll take a vid of me going 200 if you want! lol

sure do that

someone's a lier here ... a friggin honda odessey beat my 1.7EL after 2nd gear (cuz i drive stick), and thats a minivan!! and you are telling me you beat an X5? My friend ... ive driven in an X5 and let me tell u that thing is everything but slower then a persuit. I woulda beleived you if you had the GT model or whatever the 170hp model is.

Even though it's heavy, my money's on the X5