No you ing moron, get it through your thick ing head, no1 is talking bout honda cept you. I said, if you are knowledgable, act knowledgable, dont act like a little immature bitch.
Thats all there is to it. No honda, no cavalier, NOTHING, cept you acting like a pansy ass bitch, and it's making you look like a retard.

I'll leave you with this thought, treat others the way you would like to be treated.

and ill repeat myself, ALL I SAID WAS THAT I HATE HONDAS, YET FOR SOME REASON THAT MEANS I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT CARS. i have never said anything that would classify me as not being knowledgeable about cars.

congrats, you must know everything about everything. oh wait, nevermind, 95 cavs had a diff engine then all other years, 95-99 had one body, slight changes were made to the body for 00-02 along with 5 more lb tq, then in 03-04 the body and engine changed completely. so next time anyone asks what year or model their car is in geneal, stfu if you have no ing clue what you are talking about. ignorance is bliss.

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Since when are body panels, skirts and an engine considered a chassis? :lmao: :lmao: :appl: :appl:

Wow, you really are as dumb as you act.

stealth i asked what car do u have (engine/year).

also why did they stop using the 2.4liter engine on 2003+ cavaliers?

wow, i dont remember saying ANYTHING about the chassis you ing tool. i pointed out that maybe he asked about the year because of the other differences, not the chassis. wow you must be a ing moron. stop trying to find something thats not there. do me a fav and reread my post, i didnt even say chassis once... i dont know where you come up with this .

in the words of yourself...
[QUOTE=SuprAdam]Once again your lack of reading comprehension is evident.

Do you read the posts before you reply or do you just prematurely splurt out? :smilie_da QUOTE]

ill let you laugh anyways, cause its kinda sad.you look around here trying to be the big shot with the supra (a very respectable car in the right persons hands, in your hands, your just an with it) and look down on people with slower cars. the funny part is, all this is done ONLINE beause you wouldnt say in person. i pity you...
and ill save you the response...let me guess "i pity you cause you drive a cav" then about 10 of :fing02: and :lmao: and :retard: . happy? oh and even tho its elsewhere, when u posted that everyone can come see your thread right here so that everyone can come see how cool you are...sad man...sad.

2001 z24

they stopped putting the 2.4L in cavs mid 2002 because the 2.2L ecotec was standard in all models.

but is 2.4 faster then 2.2? since theres only 10 hp difference?

not really...

Is the body and engine considered the chassis? No. Shut the up man, you're so stupid. Saying I'm the one who doesn't know what they're talking about when you don't even know what a chassis is... :lmao:

look down 5 posts you ing moron before you go calling me stupid. i never mentioned the chassis, i know they have the same chassis, and him asking me the year and engine has no bearing on the chassis since its the same. which is why i said maybe he asked because of the other differences, NOT THE CHASSIS.

you guys are really ing stupid here arent you.

if im the stupid one, how come you retards cant ing read before you run your mouths.

Then if you knew the chassis were the same, why the did you reply to my post? I obviously know the other differences and I don't need your STUPID ass to point them out. Oh but I guess you need to show everyone how much you know about those cars...

B6T your wasting your time. Cleary this guy is a moron he bought a Cav and thinks it is fast!

it is fast depends on what you compare it to....

I guess when u compare it to a bigwheel.

Hey bag, if you were not talking about the chassis differences then why did you quote B6T's repsonse about how the CHASSIS' are all the same and then begin to list off bolt-on production differences between the years? Who the asked you to list that ? Nobody. You thought for once you could appear smart by displaying your wholesome wealth of jbody knowledge, yet you failed, miserably. Even the you think you know everything about, you still suck at. You just stuck your head up your own ass even further. , I think you just made an all time new high for your stupidity.

I am not even going to touch the attacks made to me and my vehicle choice, its far to easy to embarass you in that department, I will let the little miata and festiva have there fun anhilating you.

, common sense. ill show you...

he posted what year/engine i have.

b6t posted Why does it matter what year it is, they all use the same chassis.

and i said maybe because he wants to know about other details, like how even tho its the same chassis, diff years have diff body styling and diff engines. maybe thats why he wated to know.

i swear you guys cant read.

i didnt fail, i proved a point as to why he might have wanted to know the year and engine, and it had nothing to do with chassis.

its amazing how smart you guys really THINK you are, but if you were really smart, then you can read, as i posted this a couple times already.

Not once in that original post did you actually state you were NOT refering to the chassis and refer to the "other" stuff. You dug yourself a hole and you can't get out. You are not very intelligent. As for face to face bullshit, I would gladly PM you my cell number but I don't trust you to not go posting it all over this site, so go eat a dick.

lol, man you must be a ing idiot if you honestly believe i didnt know it was always a j-body. im not even gonna try to defend this anymore cause its sad how much you guys are trying to prove that i dont know anything, meanwhile so far you havent, and you wont. everyone knows what a j-body is, and know your trying to prove that an owner of one doesnt...nice.

you are the only one who doesn't know what a J-body is. the rest of us can see that they are disposable box cars. did you eat paint chips when you were a kid?

k... good comeback... i guess :retard:

well, i'm new here, but just reading through i realize that you guys like to talk a lot of smack, what you guys should do is either line up your cars (no, not your boss's minivans) but the cars you own that are supposely fast and see who comes out on top, or if that is too hard to arrange, post your time slips

but i'm just a stranger so who really cares what i think.......

also, cav is piece of crap...... i don't know how fast they are.... but no they cannot beat a v6 mustang, well neither could a stock civic. but bottom line about cav is that they are unreliable (i consider you lucky if you get your cav over 100k miles without being on verge of breaking down), but they are cheap though.... and i try to be unbias when it comes to cars long as they could match their price in performance, durability/reliability, and styling, and cav just doesn't match up

do you even know how fast a v6 mustang is? no? so stfu.

V6 mudstang is for sure faster then your rustalier

hate to break it to you, but no, sadly, they are slow as .

Why dont you guys get your facts straight 1st!!! 1/4mile and 0-60 times for MOST stock cars out there in ALPHABETICAL order!
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
:appl:

looking through that list i can see quite a few unrealistic times.

k I'm jumping in!

Nontoxic- How do you know that the cavalier is unreliable? Have you ever owned one before? They are also not the fastest car out there, but they do the job.

I know Im going to get flamed for this but I own 2 cavalier right now. I have a 97 2.2, that has 345.000km's on it... I replaced the engine at 280.000km. from a blown headgasket. Is that unreliable? All Ive ever done is normal maintenance on it.

Please, if you've never owned " a crapalier " dont state that you know everything about them. And I'm not looking for fight now guys! Just putting my 2 cents in about the cavies!

Ok, I've looked over that list, and I'd say they are all pretty damn close. All the VW times are pretty well right on. Why are you questioning what are likely times posted by Road and Track, Car and Driver, and I saw a couple of Car Craft times? Those times are likely the fastest times acheivable by those cars. Eg:
1983 Volkswagen Rabbit GTI 10.6 17.7 That is right on.
1993 Chevrolet Cavalier Z24 8.3 17.3 That sounds about right, for the weight, and power. Sooo... what's the problem?

i know for a fact that cavaqueers and sunfagots are not good cars, i work on them all the time. but the same goes for every other cars out there, they all have thier good points and bad, but when people start to fall in love with cars that are built to go shopping in and think they can't be beat makes me laugh.

cavaqueers? LOL. You work on them all the time? Do you work at a GM dealership or something? Just curious.

Your right, theres always the chance of coming across a lemon....

a garage that works on mostly gm's, there are worst cars from gm out there but they still hold there own with problems, but like i said every car does.

Just like your Mustang

I drive a 01 Z24 and I can say that yes they have there share of problems..but for what i payed who cares, its a car not a race car. Just so everyone knows the Z24 is a decently quick car for the money, comparable to the Civic SIR. They are able to run anywhere from high 15s to low 15s and yes i have seen low 15 runs with just intake. It can hold its own agaist a good amount of cars but it is in no way fast.The people who drive the car like it is are just plain rediculous this car was designed to get from point a to point b. If you wanna see some quick Jbodies go check out jbody.org and look for hypsy or skillz or even Hanh. The people on the board will even admit to the problems with these cars. Not bashing on anyone here just informing.

The low 15 sec passes may be becasue of factory freaks, but other than that they are capeable of those times, just check out the.org, and yes i have 111000 kms on my cav and its doing fine, better than i expected thats for sure.

why do u keep running your mouth i drive a v6 mustang and let me tell you how z24's arent fast at all. cant count how many of you guys think your fast but then i always end up beating them. im not saying my cars fast but neither is your car so give it up

at least if ur gonna buy a rustang, buy a quick one. you bought the slowest one, way to go champ.

oh thats right you bought the fastest cavalier and guess what....its still slow. why do you think i didnt buy a 5.0? cuz mommy and daddy dont pay for my car. if insurance was to be lower id have a 5.0. so do me a fav dont start bad mouthing cars and saying there slow when your pos car isnt anything to brag about

neither is your v6 rustang

shit cav
 

I'm not a big fan of mudstangs but they are a million times better then any sunflower or cav.