i know of many hatch backs with stock h22 swaps that cost alot less then 6gs making 200hp and eating talons for breakfast

a stock 92 talon with a boost controller is MUCH faster LOL. Considering how many people have broken 11's with the stock turbo.

God, Stop posting in here already

Seriously, I ****in hate these 16 year old honda fagboys

bwahahah type-r.. GTFO with that garbage beater :smilie_d0


Fooken straight. Honduh's can't even be compared to DSM's. That weak little type-r engine wouldn't stand a chance.

Honda's have gotta be the easiest car to make fast. Not saying I dont like em. Just think that ppl should learn, that when you put money into any car you can make it go fast, just that hondas are CHEAP, and VERY EASY to modify (switch parts between integra/civic/accord/prelude) than other cars. I mean that is old...

I dont think a civic is the cheapest thing to modify. I've always felt that cars turbo'd from the factory are easier to modify, just because the motors are already built. I dont hate civics, I just hate the retards that come with the territory.

LOL yeah they get the impression that they are faster than the rest.

yup very true, any factory boosted car is steps ahead of anything n/a. hell look at the srt4, guys are making 400+ whp on stock motors for a couple grand. take the dsm's, you add some fuel, up the boost, and open up the exhaust and your laughing.

was it 92-95...or 96-00?

That's like me saying you drive a 91-97 Eclipse.

fart cannons.. when will they learn

and thats why this thread was entitled such. its all about the owners. some of which are in this thread. backing up honda like its your mom. "oh yeah, if i had a type-r, or, wait till i get a turbo" I've got friends who modify hondas, they're not douchebags, but an astounding majority of the honda population is, especially when you consider the % of douchebags in the honda community vs the % of douchebags in other communities. albeit i've got a camaro and we've definitely got our share of redneck dipshits.

btw, props on the kill, I can't believe he stalled, Roflcopters!

He stalled the car because he was so hyped up about racing you that he left it in 3rd... dumbass didnt even down shift before he got to the light.

I drive a TSX, and im going southbound on the 400 like 4 in the morning. Im doing 120 in the fast lane. I was doing that same speed from Newmarket until I got to hwy 7/ Langstaff area where I spotted an EK hatch.
He was probably doing 100 but whatever speed he was going, was slower than 120. Anyhow, I passed by him as he was more in the middle lane.
I pass by him and this guy thinks I'm trying to racing him to the 401...
I pass him, and I hear him downshift and I see him accelerating
Im like fu*k this guy, i down shift from 6th to 3rd. He didn't even get a chance to pass me, and he technically got a head start in terms acceleration and he was atleast 2 cars behind me when he started accelerating.
Needless to say, I raped his car because my Motor actually knows what it is to have torque
Now people say, its the driver, not the car. Well what that deal with these Civic guys trying to race everybody? I always get challenge by Civics.

BTW, you will need more than an LS, B16, TypeR or B20Vtec to beat my TSX from a 'dig'. And from a roll, dont bother unless you have a K20 or a K24 in your civic
If you'd like to come test your car out against my 'fat heavy pig' aka TSX as one ex friend called my car, please PM me, the 407 is always open.

End of story, this dude drove by and gave me a thumbs up LMFAO

from a roll, the faster car is determined.
from a dig, the faster driver is determined.

If this is true, then Power-to-weight is disregarded?

it's an expression. calm down.
but someone with a slower car CAN win if they're a faster driver, but only from a dig. and obviously the cars have to be relatively close matched.

So what makes a faster driver, with a slower car compared to a slower driver with a faster car?

Wouldn't someone have to win before that car is determined faster than the other?