Car Care / Detailing / Paint / Visual Mods detailing, washing, paint, body kits, rims and all other car care and body mods.
View Poll Results: Which hood do you like best?
Harwood
8
44.44%
VFN Sunoco
5
27.78%
SS
5
27.78%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Hoods poll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 05:38 PM
  #1  
96camaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Skilled GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 834
From: Brandon, MB Canada
Rep Power: 750
96camaro street rep is low. keep going
Hoods poll

Which hood out of these three do you think looks the best. At first I liked the SS the best, but now I'm leaning more towards a cowl. The only thing I have against that is I think it can look kinda weird if your car doesn't actually need one, but they definately are growing on me.

Harwood 2.5 inch cowl





VFN Sunoco

Name:  100_2909.jpg
Views: 14
Size:  48.5 KB



Or the SS, I'm not gonna post pics of that cause I'm sure everyone knows what it looks like.
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 06:21 PM
  #2  
sman's Avatar
Average GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 694
From: Burton, Michigan
Rep Power: 745
sman street rep is low. keep going
I dont like the 93 -97 ss, i say sunoco.
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 06:42 PM
  #3  
1hottcamaro's Avatar
GTcars Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,262
From: Florida
Rep Power: 810
1hottcamaro street rep is low. keep going
I vote harwood for sure! I have the ss hood i have had it for a couple years, it looks good and all but the harwood is deff. less common and bad as$
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 07:17 PM
  #4  
blue89vert's Avatar
~~~ SITE SPONSOR ~~~
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,374
From: northwest IN
Rep Power: 870
blue89vert street rep is low. keep going
harwood or the ss. i dont like the sunoco
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 07:22 PM
  #5  
ITSA6's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,499
From: IOWA!!!
Rep Power: 817
ITSA6 street rep is low. keep going
i actually really like the sunco on the 93-97 i wish mine was worthy to have one though
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #6  
FrYd-RyS's Avatar
Skilled GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 844
From: Sac, California
Rep Power: 725
FrYd-RyS street rep is low. keep going
as much as i hate cowl hoods the harwood is pretty nice on your car.

btw ITSA6 lol u sound so depressed about your car all the time
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 08:14 PM
  #7  
paarman97maro's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,092
From: Holmen, WI
Rep Power: 1088
paarman97maro will become famous soon enoughpaarman97maro will become famous soon enough
Sucks youll have to redo your stripes... but i say the SS would look sick with your stripes... Get the 97 anny style
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 09:20 PM
  #8  
96camaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Skilled GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 834
From: Brandon, MB Canada
Rep Power: 750
96camaro street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by paarman97maro
Sucks youll have to redo your stripes... but i say the SS would look sick with your stripes... Get the 97 anny style
It's no big about the stripes, they're just vinyls anyway the guy who did it charged me $10 a foot. I was considering getting a complete paint job actually, that's why I was looking into hoods, since I know I want to get a different one in the future as well as a spoiler and since I'm gonna need to get the GFX painted too I figure I'll look into it. The little scratches and chips get rather annoying so I was thinking about taking care of all that in one go.

The SS hood and the 30th anniversary stripes were the plan before, I think the Harwood would look really good with the stripes too though.
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 10:29 PM
  #9  
NoRiceInside's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,173
From: Valencia, CA
Rep Power: 962
NoRiceInside street rep is low. keep going
i dont like the sunoco on the 93-97 so im going to have to say SS. ive never been fond of the harwood but that first pic that car looks sick as hell.
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 10:56 PM
  #10  
Mike Jones's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,249
Rep Power: 0
Mike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep goingMike Jones street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by NoRiceInside
i dont like the sunoco on the 93-97 so im going to have to say SS. ive never been fond of the harwood but that first pic that car looks sick as hell.
Couldn't have said it better myself. This is exactly how I feel.
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 11:00 PM
  #11  
98CamaroZ28's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,408
From: WA
Rep Power: 780
98CamaroZ28 street rep is low. keep going
The SS looks killer on Camaro's, you wanted my opinion so I gave it, the cowl hoods just look funky on the 93-97 camaro's.
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 11:35 PM
  #12  
mxracerbrian's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,045
From: Hudson, WI
Rep Power: 819
mxracerbrian street rep is low. keep going
SS would look sick on your car
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 11:58 PM
  #13  
Phate's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,119
From: North Carolina
Rep Power: 778
Phate street rep is low. keep going
I voted Harwood definately. The SS is too common, not to mention your putting SS things on a non SS car? Can we say poser?

Anywayyy, as said previously, the Sunoco hood on a 93-97 looks odd, so definately the harwood.
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 01:44 AM
  #14  
NoRiceInside's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,173
From: Valencia, CA
Rep Power: 962
NoRiceInside street rep is low. keep going
haha are you kidding phate? look at your wheels!
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 02:51 AM
  #15  
2000v6cam's Avatar
~~~ SITE SPONSOR ~~~
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,083
From: tucson, az
Rep Power: 789
2000v6cam street rep is low. keep going
i like the harwood, probably cause mainly i wouldnt put SS stuff on a non SS car but some people do and thats fine i just wouldnt myself



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 AM.

Page generated in 0.22951 seconds with 26 queries