3rd gen v6ers?
02-05-2005, 12:34 AM
#16
GTcars - Post God !
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: palatine,il (chicago)
Posts: 6,626
Rep Power: 849 
bull honkey.http://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/techdb.shtml. my TBI 305 has alot more power than any 2.8 on there. I got some videos of Niceroc's 305 Iroc tonight. I'll get some more clips maybe and make a small video for everyone who thinks 305's are weak. shouldnt be too long but then ill have to get chad to host it.
02-05-2005, 12:44 AM
#17
GTcars - Post God !
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Saraland AL
Posts: 15,868
Rep Power: 1052
Originally Posted by 69z-28
bull honkey.http://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/techdb.shtml. my TBI 305 has alot more power than any 2.8 on there. I got some videos of Niceroc's 305 Iroc tonight. I'll get some more clips maybe and make a small video for everyone who thinks 305's are weak. shouldnt be too long but then ill have to get chad to host it.
02-05-2005, 12:49 AM
#18
GTcars - Post God !
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: palatine,il (chicago)
Posts: 6,626
Rep Power: 849
in perfect conditions brand new my car is 170 horse but close enough. the 2.8 says 107 or something. if you have a different cam and some modified heads whats so bad about the design?
02-05-2005, 12:51 AM
#19
GTcars - Post God !
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Saraland AL
Posts: 15,868
Rep Power: 1052
the size of the cylinders is too small to have an efficient head design (to get a good head design the chamber is actually bigger than the cylinder bore) my 2.8 in my 3rd gen had more than 107 also
02-05-2005, 12:54 AM
#20
GTcars - Post God !
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: palatine,il (chicago)
Posts: 6,626
Rep Power: 849
just goin by the posted numbers. is the DZ 302 the same way with the heads? all im saying is a lot of people look down on them but i think they can be pretty efficient for building a good street car.
02-05-2005, 01:01 AM
#24
GTcars - Post God !
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: palatine,il (chicago)
Posts: 6,626
Rep Power: 849
o i got it, 305 has a 3.48 stroke but alot smaller bore, but thats why 302s were still good with the 4" bore but could rev like none other with there short stroke. yea that 305 design is kinda stupid but hey, if it can run 13's and lower than i like it.lol
02-05-2005, 10:55 AM
#25
GTcars - Post God !
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Saraland AL
Posts: 15,868
Rep Power: 1052
Originally Posted by 69z-28
o i got it, 305 has a 3.48 stroke but alot smaller bore, but thats why 302s were still good with the 4" bore but could rev like none other with there short stroke. yea that 305 design is kinda stupid but hey, if it can run 13's and lower than i like it.lol
02-05-2005, 02:59 PM
#26
Experienced GTcars Poster
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Posts: 1,757
Rep Power: 752
Originally Posted by archemedes
it can't do it for cheap, or easy
You must not remember my vid of the 14.1 pass with a 2.23 60ft (street tires). 305 with a 170k on the bottom end.
...
R.I.P 305....R.I.P 355...Welcome To The Familia 406, may you have a long and prosperous life with me.
...
But ya 305s are piece of **** motors lol.
thank you 