chevy / gmc corvette, cobalt, chevelle, cavalier, camaro, beretta, blazer, avalanche/silverado/suburban/tahoe, safari, jimmy, sierra , yukon

supercharger

Old Jul 17, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #1  
10secZ-28's Avatar
Thread Starter
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 762
10secZ-28 street rep is low. keep going
supercharger

i wanna throw a supercharge in my 95 Z-28 and i was wondering what was a good supercharger to go with thats not to pricey.
Old Jul 17, 2005 | 06:20 PM
  #2  
ryann's Avatar
"Got Torque?"
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,369
From: Jacksonville
Rep Power: 794
ryann street rep is low. keep going
so you wanna throw and sc and n20 on there?...or are just trying to find out which'll work better...if u ask me n20 is a cheaper way to go, and if you use it right and have it setup correctly then everything will be fine.

i personally would rather go sc than n20 but since im buying an engine and tranny along w/ redoing the paint,inertior, ect...n20 will be a cheaper way to go. i'll probly end up going w/ a 100 shot.
Old Jul 17, 2005 | 06:37 PM
  #3  
Sinister95Z's Avatar
GTcars Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,257
From: Bullhead City, AZ
Rep Power: 815
Sinister95Z street rep is low. keep going
In my opinion, a ATI Procharger would be the BEST and make the most power, but is is also prolly one of the highest priced. I would just keep an eye out on ebay for one. They are on there alll the time.
Old Jul 17, 2005 | 10:13 PM
  #4  
archemedes's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,868
From: Saraland AL
Rep Power: 1126
archemedes street rep is low. keep going
ati is good.Forcefedz can give the best recomendation since he just did a complete build.You can do both n2o and sc you just have to be careful
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 10:55 AM
  #5  
69z-28's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,626
From: palatine,il (chicago)
Rep Power: 922
69z-28 street rep is low. keep going
yea procharger is the way to go. about 4 grand i think.
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 12:26 AM
  #6  
FORCE_FED_Z's Avatar
~~~ SITE SPONSOR ~~~
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,101
From: Grand Ol' WNY
Rep Power: 886
FORCE_FED_Z street rep is low. keep going
If you get a used one and are mechanically inclined you can save a BUNCH of money, esp if all the parts aren't there. I bought mine for about a 1/4 of new since it was missing some spacers and lines, but a couple trips to the hardware store and some engineering it was make to work.

As far as brands- I would go with either Vortech or ATI. I am runnin the ATI 600B, its a small one, and it does the job for now. I will more than likely upgrade someday but if its not broke I am not gonna fix it. I would stay away Powerdyne IMO- I don't really like the idea of an internal belt on a blower- it seems more likely to slip or break to me. If you want sleeper a Vortech SQ is barely noticeable whereas the ATI's make more noise and will get you noticed. Either way you go- get some kind of cooling, either air/air (easier and quicker) or air/water.

As soon as I have a way to upload my dyno runs to my computer I will post them.
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 06:21 PM
  #7  
jessica2112's Avatar
Kansas Twister
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 116
From: Kansas native-Boca Fl. resident
Rep Power: 772
jessica2112 street rep is low. keep going
I got the Powerdyne, but I only paid 1,500 for it all. And it went on a V6. It's worked well for me. But I agree the others ^^ are a better units. I have mine at 9psi. I won't part with it now though
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
baneviper
Car Parts For Sale
0
Apr 17, 2005 01:46 PM
scotlim
Car Parts For Sale
0
Apr 7, 2005 11:48 AM
krazylx1990
Car Parts For Sale
7
Mar 30, 2005 03:31 PM
scotlim
Car Parts For Sale
10
Mar 20, 2005 02:43 AM
B16A2
Want To Buy
0
Feb 14, 2005 08:35 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:23 AM.

Page generated in 0.08555 seconds with 17 queries