View Poll Results: Which car would you take?
VW
53
50.96%
SUNFIRE
11
10.58%
neither, ill stick with my bus pass
40
38.46%
Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll
ATTN RACERS: What Car would u take?
04-19-2005, 06:21 PM
#31
Experienced GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: cruizin on a street near you
Posts: 2,087
Rep Power: 745 
Originally Posted by 2tone_93gt
precidias
4cyclinder 92 mustangs
95 v6 mustangs
there sure is alot of chick cars out there
4cyclinder 92 mustangs
95 v6 mustangs
there sure is alot of chick cars out there
04-19-2005, 08:37 PM
#32
Average GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 570
Rep Power: 715
Originally Posted by biggy
im just wondering who these 8people are that picked sunfire? I mean, at least 6 of them must be joking right? :supergay: Thats like saying a sunfire is a guys car, i mean common everyone knows that chicks drive sunfires, mx3s, bugs, and celicas. 
I guess it would be me. But 2.2L turbocharged engine would be not a bad idea
04-19-2005, 09:35 PM
#33
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 702
Aww...no love for the MX-3??? Ah well, I see more guys driving and swapping motors into these cars nowadays. Thats okay, I like being the underdog.
04-20-2005, 08:23 AM
#34
Average GTcars Poster
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Waterloo/Mississauga
Posts: 491
Rep Power: 712
Originally Posted by mazdubber
Aww...no love for the MX-3??? Ah well, I see more guys driving and swapping motors into these cars nowadays. Thats okay, I like being the underdog.
At least a lightly modded crx can beat a stock stang. MX-3's can't even beat my GrandFathers Caprice Wagon. :hah:
04-20-2005, 08:25 AM
#35
Average GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Scarborough
Posts: 480
Rep Power: 713
I just saw the guy with the golf wants $5500 for a 94 golf CL with a 90 hp engine :hah:
04-20-2005, 01:13 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Stang6589
Those things are nuttin but WOOD. Even with a engine swamp.
At least a lightly modded crx can beat a stock stang. MX-3's can't even beat my GrandFathers Caprice Wagon. :hah:
At least a lightly modded crx can beat a stock stang. MX-3's can't even beat my GrandFathers Caprice Wagon. :hah:
04-20-2005, 02:27 PM
#37
Experienced GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: cruizin on a street near you
Posts: 2,087
Rep Power: 745
hey guys wheres the 88hp 4 cyl mx3 love......i just cant wait to get mine for gas mileage no more 75 bucks every 2 days :thumbsup but indeed there not racers i know its gonna be slow but meh
04-20-2005, 02:33 PM
#38
Originally Posted by Stang6589
Those things are nuttin but WOOD. Even with a engine swamp.
At least a lightly modded crx can beat a stock stang. MX-3's can't even beat my GrandFathers Caprice Wagon. :hah:
At least a lightly modded crx can beat a stock stang. MX-3's can't even beat my GrandFathers Caprice Wagon. :hah:
04-20-2005, 05:52 PM
#39
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 702
HAHAHA...thats alright, I can take the abuse. My car was never meant to be a drag racing terror anyways. It's a solo 1 car plain and simple. A Type R killer where the Type R's are supposed to be. On a road course. The less you know about MX3's the better though. 
04-20-2005, 11:17 PM
#40
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 704
i dunno if i agree with that whats the stock skidpad rating on those mx-3s, i can bet typeRs have a better rating, and its probably not even close to a miata etc
04-21-2005, 04:39 PM
#41
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York Region
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 706
theres no "ill stick to my supra" option :supergay:
04-22-2005, 12:56 AM
#42
Junior GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 275
Rep Power: 709
^u want a 13 second 900HP car too huh? 
-Jay
-Jay
04-22-2005, 09:09 AM
#43
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York Region
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 706
Originally Posted by Z28 MeTaL HeAd
^u want a 13 second 900HP car too huh?
-Jay
-Jay
nah i just think these are shitty choices.
04-22-2005, 12:16 PM
#44
Average GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 620
Rep Power: 716
04-23-2005, 12:50 AM
#45
Experienced GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 1,518
Rep Power: 734
^ Why don't you compare apples to apples. A stock MX3 doesn't not have the factory tuning that a Type-R does... try comparing a tuned Integra to a tuned MX3 and then see how they stack up. And IMO, skidpad isn't really a good way to judge a car's handling performance... it's just a rating of overall grip and not how the car responds to steering or how balanced it is. A car can have an awesome skidpad number and still handle like .
And you guys are right, MX3s are slow. Especially the ones with a BPT or a KLZE (you guys don't know what those are).
BTW, the Mazdaspeed Protege supposedly handles better then an ITR. That's right, the high-performance version Mazda's entry level sedan beats out the all-conquering Integra Type-R. That's what happens when Mazda builds their "Type-R"
And you guys are right, MX3s are slow. Especially the ones with a BPT or a KLZE (you guys don't know what those are).
BTW, the Mazdaspeed Protege supposedly handles better then an ITR. That's right, the high-performance version Mazda's entry level sedan beats out the all-conquering Integra Type-R. That's what happens when Mazda builds their "Type-R"