Is the dodge neon that bad of a car?
#91
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
So STROKERACE shall we meet up and you can tell me how full of I am? I know many older car nuts who can back up claims. Its a common fact these cars were underrated. People have ran these times. They are not "guessed" as you speak. But yet you drive a vega so that say alote about you right there. Yet again we cna meet up in person and you can tell me your sad stories.
Dude, you better put your money were your mouth is. There is one thing that I know and that is GM. You better have a 73 too other wise you are just a bench racer like most. I don't care if you know a guy who knows a guy that might have ran this time. I know all about the cars from back then and how they underrated alot of them to meet specs for their sales. Its also kinda funny how there is no times for the 71's or 72's that had a higher HP, but the 73 with the lower posted HP had such a strange 1/4 mile time. Dude, give it up. Been to the track, saw these boat anchors go. Seen them tubed, tuned and thousands of dollars thrown at them and do this time to mid 12's. I will and can show up and tell you to your face that you are full of and any other wax ****** that has a 73 T/A too that they are full of crap too.
#92
Originally Posted by Strokerace
Go back to the hole you crawled out of. THe 73 can not and could not get out of the 14's stock The 455 was and is a boat anchor. Lucky to get 225HP out of them on a good day. I know exactly what the boxes came with, thus the part about either.
You're talking out of your ***, again.
I've read road tests on the TransAm 455 SuperDuty in Road & Track and Car & Driver way back when, and both mags had the Firebird TransAm 455SD in the 13s at 103.5 mph or so, and that was with an automatic transmission.
#93
Originally Posted by gldwngr
You're talking out of your ***, again.
I've read road tests on the TransAm 455 SuperDuty in Road & Track and Car & Driver way back when, and both mags had the Firebird TransAm 455SD in the 13s at 103.5 mph or so, and that was with an automatic transmission.
I've read road tests on the TransAm 455 SuperDuty in Road & Track and Car & Driver way back when, and both mags had the Firebird TransAm 455SD in the 13s at 103.5 mph or so, and that was with an automatic transmission.
Read them again. The one artical read CAPABLE of doing 13.54. You should never believe everything in print until someone here actually can do these times.
#94
Originally Posted by Strokerace
Read them again. The one artical read CAPABLE of doing 13.54. You should never believe everything in print until someone here actually can do these times.
And everyone is supposed to belive you when you don't even know what engines came in what? You thought 454s came with t/as as well as 350s. Showing you clearly have no info whatsoever. People have dyno'd these cars in modern times too. It was underrated on paper per HP spec.
NUMBER 50
50 1970 Trans Am 13.90@102 400 RA 345 four-speed 3.91 HR 2/70
this was common fact by 73-74. The 70-72 also had high compression ratios and would never run on regular 87 octane.
You have never driven ANY sd-455 car so shut up. The only thing you drove to races was momys vega in which you still own today. Quite pathetic. The only thing you saw at the track were base model firebirds. Nobody drags a car of this value and they were too damn rare back then as well. TAKE YOUR head out of your ***. You can tell the difference between a 81 firebird and 73 trans am. Stop contracdiction yourself. You claim only 80 were made then go on to tell me you see them tubbed out at the track all the time. So when are we meeting up? anytime after 6 is good. Thanks
Last edited by Nastyzed; 10-24-2006 at 08:33 AM.
#95
Originally Posted by Strokerace
Read them again. The one artical read CAPABLE of doing 13.54. You should never believe everything in print until someone here actually can do these times.
Fact is, you're wrong, again. The C&D and R&T articles were observed 1/4 mile times as performed by their own testers.
#96
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
And everyone is supposed to belive you when you don't even know what engines came in what? You thought 454s came with t/as as well as 350s. Showing you clearly have no info whatsoever. People have dyno'd these cars in modern times too. It was underrated on paper per HP spec.
NUMBER 50
50 1970 Trans Am 13.90@102 400 RA 345 four-speed 3.91 HR 2/70
this was common fact by 73-74. The 70-72 also had high compression ratios and would never run on regular 87 octane.
You have never driven ANY sd-455 car so shut up. The only thing you drove to races was momys vega in which you still own today. Quite pathetic. The only thing you saw at the track were base model firebirds. Nobody drags a car of this value and they were too damn rare back then as well. TAKE YOUR head out of your ***. You can tell the difference between a 81 firebird and 73 trans am. Stop contracdiction yourself. You claim only 80 were made then go on to tell me you see them tubbed out at the track all the time. So when are we meeting up? anytime after 6 is good. Thanks
NUMBER 50
50 1970 Trans Am 13.90@102 400 RA 345 four-speed 3.91 HR 2/70
this was common fact by 73-74. The 70-72 also had high compression ratios and would never run on regular 87 octane.
You have never driven ANY sd-455 car so shut up. The only thing you drove to races was momys vega in which you still own today. Quite pathetic. The only thing you saw at the track were base model firebirds. Nobody drags a car of this value and they were too damn rare back then as well. TAKE YOUR head out of your ***. You can tell the difference between a 81 firebird and 73 trans am. Stop contracdiction yourself. You claim only 80 were made then go on to tell me you see them tubbed out at the track all the time. So when are we meeting up? anytime after 6 is good. Thanks
Like I said before, seen them raced at the track. Same set up you are spouting on about. Mid 14's with a driver better then you ever will be. Like Isaid before, you and your wax ****** buddies are just bench racers.Or should I say book racers. Just pulling numbers out of your asses because the book says so. Wake up and smell the coffee and come back to reality fool.
I really don't care what you children see posted in teh books or a magazine. Lets see, a 71 having 310 HP runs 13.9 yet a 73 with 290 HP runs 13.54. Thats funny. Thats the best I have heard in a long time. A car with the same weight, but 20 hp less runs faster. Please, just lay off the crack.You interleck is starting to show.It shows you only have pipe dreams and know how to read something that was posted back before you were born.
#97
Originally Posted by Strokerace
Moron. they never had 87 octane back in 73. It was leaded fuel and I believe it was in the high 90's or 100's for octane. Why do you think they started to see octane boost and lead additive. The valve seats on those engines back then was soft and used the lead to help reduce wear. That is why when leaded gas was dropped, alot of the older engines had new valve seats and valves added.
Like I said before, seen them raced at the track. Same set up you are spouting on about. Mid 14's with a driver better then you ever will be. Like Isaid before, you and your wax ****** buddies are just bench racers.Or should I say book racers. Just pulling numbers out of your asses because the book says so. Wake up and smell the coffee and come back to reality fool.
I really don't care what you children see posted in teh books or a magazine. Lets see, a 71 having 310 HP runs 13.9 yet a 73 with 290 HP runs 13.54. Thats funny. Thats the best I have heard in a long time. A car with the same weight, but 20 hp less runs faster. Please, just lay off the crack.You interleck is starting to show.It shows you only have pipe dreams and know how to read something that was posted back before you were born.
Like I said before, seen them raced at the track. Same set up you are spouting on about. Mid 14's with a driver better then you ever will be. Like Isaid before, you and your wax ****** buddies are just bench racers.Or should I say book racers. Just pulling numbers out of your asses because the book says so. Wake up and smell the coffee and come back to reality fool.
I really don't care what you children see posted in teh books or a magazine. Lets see, a 71 having 310 HP runs 13.9 yet a 73 with 290 HP runs 13.54. Thats funny. Thats the best I have heard in a long time. A car with the same weight, but 20 hp less runs faster. Please, just lay off the crack.You interleck is starting to show.It shows you only have pipe dreams and know how to read something that was posted back before you were born.
#98
Originally Posted by YellowCavy
Just wait until im done the swap. Im swapping my 2200 ohv for an ecotec. Its going in november. Springtime when the track re-opens ill have a timeslip to proove all it takes is a few n/a mods to get into the 14s.
Wheres your timeslip buddy? My car currently runs mid-high 16s, and I beat older neons all the time...how do they run low 15s stock?
Wheres your timeslip buddy? My car currently runs mid-high 16s, and I beat older neons all the time...how do they run low 15s stock?
Haha how old are you? 16? Can you please tell me when you're going to be at the track so I can show up and laugh at you in person when you FAIL and realize your car is still a boat anchor even with that Ecotec?
#100
i test drove an 02 r/t 5spd, that thing pushed alright still, although iv hated neons for a long time. and the srt-4 is ****** quik in comparison to anythin else in its class
ugly ugly car
ugly ugly car
Last edited by AK420; 10-24-2006 at 11:30 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#101
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
Ok since you don't know how to read. I can read it to you in person when we meet up. HP NUMBERS WHERE INCORRECT THIS IS COMMON FACT. The reason the 71 was rated at more HP was because it was all on paper. In reality the 73 had more HP. I know they didnt have 87 octane back then moron I was talking now. KID? really? perhaps you will think twice when you call me that in person. You have no idea my age. Have you ever driven a 1973-74 SD-455? Trans am?? NO? so shut your mouth. It clearly shows in this thread you have no clue.
#102
OMG. I'm done with this clown. The onylt hing you test drove was a 1981 turbo trans am. You have probibly never laid eyes on a real SD-455 car in your life. I posted countless amount of arguments that you could not reply too. You simply overlooked anything valid and rambled on about how you were there , etc. BULLSHIT. Go back through this thread and post production numbers of 454 , 350 , 307 and 305 powered trans ams from 69-86. I would be delighted to see your links. Better yet go back up EVERYTHING you said. Fact of the matter is Nobody buys your rubbish.
You dont even have the ***** to meet me in person. So **** you very much.
You dont even have the ***** to meet me in person. So **** you very much.
#103
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
OMG. I'm done with this clown. The onylt hing you test drove was a 1981 turbo trans am. You have probibly never laid eyes on a real SD-455 car in your life. I posted countless amount of arguments that you could not reply too. You simply overlooked anything valid and rambled on about how you were there , etc. BULLSHIT. Go back through this thread and post production numbers of 454 , 350 , 307 and 305 powered trans ams from 69-86. I would be delighted to see your links. Better yet go back up EVERYTHING you said. Fact of the matter is Nobody buys your rubbish.
You dont even have the ***** to meet me in person. So **** you very much.
You dont even have the ***** to meet me in person. So **** you very much.
#104
The York Region Administrative Centre is loccated at 17250 Yonge Street, Newmarket, Ontario.
From Downtown Toronto: Take the DVP / HWY 404 north to Mulock Drive. On Mulock Drive, travel west to Yonge Street and turn right.
Travel north approximately 1.5 kilometres. The York Region Administrative Centre is located on the northwest corner of Yonge Street and Eagle Street. Main entrance is located off Yonge Street. Visitor Parking is located off Gladman Avenue.
(Approximate travel time: 60 minutes)
Nice try dumb ****.. Pm me your first and last name and I will find you.
From Downtown Toronto: Take the DVP / HWY 404 north to Mulock Drive. On Mulock Drive, travel west to Yonge Street and turn right.
Travel north approximately 1.5 kilometres. The York Region Administrative Centre is located on the northwest corner of Yonge Street and Eagle Street. Main entrance is located off Yonge Street. Visitor Parking is located off Gladman Avenue.
(Approximate travel time: 60 minutes)
Nice try dumb ****.. Pm me your first and last name and I will find you.
#105
nastyzed, do you even own a ****ing car? i see you post day in day out, not even sure if you have a job with how much youre on the forums... youve got some piece of firechicken in your signature, and you wonder why stroker is giving you . i dont care for either one of you, but at least strokerace has some actual race experience. only thing youve raced is your mouth. i agree with him that all youre doing is repeating you read in a magazine.
Nastyzed
<signature>
A paradise lost... once you woke up from your ****ing mazgazine inspired dream
Nastyzed
<signature>
A paradise lost... once you woke up from your ****ing mazgazine inspired dream
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
The York Region Administrative Centre is loccated at 17250 Yonge Street, Newmarket, Ontario.
From Downtown Toronto: Take the DVP / HWY 404 north to Mulock Drive. On Mulock Drive, travel west to Yonge Street and turn right.
Travel north approximately 1.5 kilometres. The York Region Administrative Centre is located on the northwest corner of Yonge Street and Eagle Street. Main entrance is located off Yonge Street. Visitor Parking is located off Gladman Avenue.
(Approximate travel time: 60 minutes)
Nice try dumb ****.. Pm me your first and last name and I will find you.
From Downtown Toronto: Take the DVP / HWY 404 north to Mulock Drive. On Mulock Drive, travel west to Yonge Street and turn right.
Travel north approximately 1.5 kilometres. The York Region Administrative Centre is located on the northwest corner of Yonge Street and Eagle Street. Main entrance is located off Yonge Street. Visitor Parking is located off Gladman Avenue.
(Approximate travel time: 60 minutes)
Nice try dumb ****.. Pm me your first and last name and I will find you.