stock_boost

1...did you just try and compare and SRT-4 to an NSX?? wow...get a life!

2...the nsx was designed circa 1990...

3...where in the name of god did you get these numbers...stock srt-4's run mid 14's

Young gun

You should go to the track more often or at least know what ur talkin about.
Do your research before u try and be smart. and im just comparing it to the NSX because it is the fastest honda car. I could easily compare it to s2000, but wait its fast than that.

stock_boost

haha...go to the track more often...and what is that gonna prove...that a stock srt-4 runs 14's ..lol

so you think you go to the track more often then i do? buddy you have no clue...


you just tell me how you would like me to prove you worng...i know the car and driver website has all the stats you will need to look at. so i suggest you start there!!!

judgez24

sites dont mean man, go to the track and watch real [people run real numbers. ive seen stock srt'4 in the 13's man.

Z-Tuned

^^^ Really I've never seen a stock SRT-4, period. So unless you checked it all over to ensure it had no filter, no chip, cat, no clutch , stock rubber, and all OE gear...

Regardless why are we debating stock anything, that is very homosexual and has no place on GTCARS, thank you and good day.

stock_boost

right...car and driver are nothing...sure... and i understand that its an average. but at the same time this can go both ways....

regardless of what you have "seen" to compare a srt-4 to a nsx is just ****ing gay.

i agree...

im not even anti srt-4, i almost bought one... but compare cars that are in the same class!

Young gun

The only car in the srt's class is the rsx-s and according to C&D that runs
14.9... either way thats not the point

stock_boost

ya your point was that its faster then an NSX...which was wrong...the NSX will destroy it on a hot lap, Braking, acceleration, everything!!!!! its like comparing Apples to Oranges, or Night to Day...

in all actual facts it doesnt compare at all...it would get pajama'd!!!!!!! put to sleep and tucked in, and if it was lucky get told a bed time story, so that it would have pleasant dreams after the beating it got from the NSX on the track all day!

judgez24

ive seen jbodies stock run half a econd faster than they were rated and ive seen them go much slower. the srt in question belonged to a buddy of imne, bone stock. ****er still has stock tires on it oo mind you thats all thats left thats stock at this point, lol. they come with a good tire out of the box, the make enough hp and tq to get them into the 13's. it just takes abuse and a warm tire but it can be done and it has been

stock_boost

ya they came with BFG KDW's...

regardless, im not gonna dispute what you saw...but like i said, this can go both ways!

judgez24

i realise that. and there are factory freak cars out there aswell. cars that were just put together right

and yeah they do go both ways, ive seen cars with great drivers that jsut turn **** poor times, those are the ones built on a friday, or even saturday hah

Z-Tuned

Turbo cars definitely go both ways. When I lst dyno'ed my car I got an extra 18whp by hosing down the intercooler on a hot day.

When it is cold out its hard to control. Magazines test on 91 as it is the most widely avail.

stock_boost

ummm...i was the one that hosed down your intercooler! and that was ****ed up!

judgez24

i notice a huge increase in power to a cool nite over a warm day while driving. car feels sluggish on hot days compared to cool nites.

Z-Tuned

ya I mean I know the physics behind it, it was just cool to see the jump in actual numbers 11ft-lbs I think.

Now I have a bigger Trust fromt mount the 750hp badboy and seems to be better, just more predictable, no heatsoak like the standard Calsonic.