2003 Cobra
#17
Definitely not kidding. I think that body style mustang/cobra is ugly as all hell. It's a box with a few added lines on wheels. Atleast the F-bodies have some actual styling to them.
#18
that, and I've driven a mustang before and a mustang is like a Mac... redundant in every way possible.
#19
I love the way f-bodies look. I would take a Cobra if I could keep my Z28 too but never trade it in for one.
#21
There ok I like the way they look much better then the regular mustang and GT mustang. But I would have to say I wouldnt take one. They are qucik though.
#22
Originally Posted by adamp
but also, you see alot of f-bodies tossing rear ends like it's nothing.
I would still drive one, don't get me wrong- lots of horsepower potential for very little money, but I would prefer my Z since you can have a more 'sleeper' look a lot easier-
#23
No way a mustang over any f-body is crazy mustangs suck a$$ if you ask me I mean they are fast and all but still a ford
#24
Originally Posted by adamp
sorry guys, but i'm gonna hafta disagree with alot of these post, a black cobra looks, IMHO, 10x better than a t/a and camaro, and to cam and LS1 (not by yourself) is well over 800 dollars (install, cam, springs, rods, tuning software, tuning, etc.), where-as you can simply throw on some pulleys for the supercharger and have that ***** quite a bit over 400 at the wheels. I can understand what ya'll are saying, but **** I would love to have one.
A Cobra is great if you think going from a roll is racing. But I don't. A race is from a stop.
#25
Originally Posted by TorqueDog
A Cobra is great if you think going from a roll is racing. But I don't. A race is from a stop.
#26
People are too concerned these days with their peak dyno numbers. In all honesty, they're useless unless you've got the power under the curve to make 'em count.
#27
I am sure RK would have been a dyno queen too- 476RWHP but with no rear end and slicks it would have ran a mid 11 too-
But dyno numbers are impressive either way- but so is a quick 1/4 mile time so it goes both ways I guess.
But dyno numbers are impressive either way- but so is a quick 1/4 mile time so it goes both ways I guess.
#28
Well yes and no. It's like the argument import owners give that their DOHC engines are better because they have greater volumetic efficiency... but that is just a spec yanked from an engineer's notepad, they're useless if they don't translate to performance. Same with dyno numbers.