98 mustang stats?
#18
Originally Posted by meissenation
Aren't the GTs the v8? Why would anyone say the v6 could beat a v8?
GT's have 225hp and V6 Camaro's have 200hp which is just sad considering you're paying the gas and insurance of a V8 but have the performance of a V6.
#21
i don't understand why you guys spend so much time bashing stangs. ya they aren't gonna make as much power as our cars cause your comparing 5.7s to 5.0 and modular 4.6s, its still american muscle just on the other end of the spectrum, and what the ****, if stangs are so shitty then why are they still in production and f-bodys got cut. plus you talk about them like they're ****** eclipses runnin 17s, i never realized that 14 sec quarters were bad times for stock vehicles. am i the only person that thinks this way on the whole site????
#22
Originally Posted by SLPowerZ
i don't understand why you guys spend so much time bashing stangs. ya they aren't gonna make as much power as our cars cause your comparing 5.7s to 5.0 and modular 4.6s, its still american muscle just on the other end of the spectrum, and what the ****, if stangs are so shitty then why are they still in production and f-bodys got cut. plus you talk about them like they're ****** eclipses runnin 17s, i never realized that 14 sec quarters were bad times for stock vehicles. am i the only person that thinks this way on the whole site????
#24
i just think its funny that 93-95 stang gt's have 215 hp...wow what a v8. ALSO...Look at the camaro 3.8's for the stang, 150 horses up until 98, then its 190 horses. Camaros are just overall better cars...plus...who wants to drive a ford?
#28
Originally Posted by Rockford Fosgate Fan
Of course it will be a rebadged Holden but it will have a Camaro badge.
#30
Originally Posted by jamilz28
do you think they will have a 5th gen ?