98 mustang stats?
#32
Originally Posted by meissenation
The Camaro will be back by 2009 at the latest, probably will see them either 2007 earliest, more than likely 2008, but definitely by 2009.
#33
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New York City, Queens
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 718
I only got the stang because it looks sweet as hell, has low mileage, its still american rather then me getting rice and all the camaros that are v8's that i see around are either dogged out or to expensive. I tried working with my 90 iroc but had to keep pooring money into it. My friend had a convertible 97 gt and i raced him with my 90 iroc and we were equal on one run, he beat me on one and i beat him on one so i mean the car isnt that bad.
#37
Originally Posted by JimmyFrance
dude did you ebver get your bike back?
I never even posted pics of it done up here i gotta get a digi cam so i can post some pics 4 yawll.
#38
Originally Posted by SLPowerZ
i don't understand why you guys spend so much time bashing stangs. ya they aren't gonna make as much power as our cars cause your comparing 5.7s to 5.0 and modular 4.6s, its still american muscle just on the other end of the spectrum, and what the ****, if stangs are so shitty then why are they still in production and f-bodys got cut. plus you talk about them like they're ****** eclipses runnin 17s, i never realized that 14 sec quarters were bad times for stock vehicles. am i the only person that thinks this way on the whole site????
#39
also don't forget the crappy ttransmissions the mustangs carry. and yes do you notice all the mustnags now? at least half are women driving them. so they got the bigger market. i think ford said **** performance and lets just concentrate on styling to sell to more people.
#40
i don't mean to be an ******* about this but ya know, mustangs aren't the best cars in the world but they're not garbage, at least i don't think so. i like em, i just get frustrated with this topic i guess
#41
Originally Posted by archemedes
they are being made because women are buying them (ford even says over 60% of them are being bought by women) the f-body wasn't pretty and harder to get into and srive. the 4.6 modular motorwas fine in the big cars but it sucked in the mustang 14's is slow for a performance car then it's a ford even their engineers won't buy their cars (had an uncle who helped design themid 90's mustang said it was one of the worst designes they had, but ford wanted to save money with the fox platform that originated in teh '60s)
#43
x(infinity)^2
I can name off the top of my head atleast 3 ladies over 45 that drive Mustangs, and there's a commercial about St. Mercy Hospital in Michigan or something ( I never really pay attention to it ) but it goes on about how this lady had a heart transplant and now she drives her mustang GT. Seriously, this lady sounds like she needs help talking because she's so old, yet she drives a mustang.
I can name off the top of my head atleast 3 ladies over 45 that drive Mustangs, and there's a commercial about St. Mercy Hospital in Michigan or something ( I never really pay attention to it ) but it goes on about how this lady had a heart transplant and now she drives her mustang GT. Seriously, this lady sounds like she needs help talking because she's so old, yet she drives a mustang.
#45
Originally Posted by SLPowerZ
i don't mean to be an ******* about this but ya know, mustangs aren't the best cars in the world but they're not garbage, at least i don't think so. i like em, i just get frustrated with this topic i guess
If I didn't buy my Vette I was going to pick up a Ford.