98 mustang stats?
#61
Originally Posted by ProjectCamaro
What do you mean other than that I'm right, no everything I posted was right.
If you ever read GMHTP you'll see a couple LS1's that have run 12's 100% STOCK
If you ever read GMHTP you'll see a couple LS1's that have run 12's 100% STOCK
#62
Originally Posted by Rockford Fosgate Fan
I thought the GTP models ran better then the 16's?
#63
http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosins...A01-123402.htm
**** it
**** it
Originally Posted by JesasaurusRex
If not its cuz you jinxed it. So if theres no camaro and your kids someday ask you about it. Say it was all your daddys fault.
#64
Originally Posted by jamilz28
#69
no
these are the figures that internet auto guide has for the two vehicles, which differ by very little. Just to back it up, i'll look for more sources in case these numbers aren't good enough.
here is the search i did. came in with the 2005 GT at 3425lbs, and the 1998 Z28 at 3439.
Weight is just not an issue
here is the search i did. came in with the 2005 GT at 3425lbs, and the 1998 Z28 at 3439.
Weight is just not an issue
#71
Originally Posted by archemedes
hmm that's strange I've always been told how heavy the mustang is, of course I haven't followed the new model much
the difference between the new model's weight, and the new edge(1999-2004),sn95 (1994-1998) is no more than a hundred lbs. either way. they stayed right around 3400 lbs. for those years, and the fox bodies were as light as 3200lbs. for a notchback.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2TONE_93GT
Automotive Pictures & videos
3
07-16-2006 03:53 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)