98 mustang stats?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Rate Thread

Mar 20, 2005 | 01:11 AM

#61

JimmyFrance

Skilled GTcars Poster

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 951

From: Gilbert AZ

Rep Power: 0

JimmyFrance street rep is low. keep going

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProjectCamaro

What do you mean other than that I'm right, no everything I posted was right.

If you ever read GMHTP you'll see a couple LS1's that have run 12's 100% STOCK

...forget it.

Mar 20, 2005 | 03:10 AM

#62

archemedes

GTcars - Post God !

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 15,868

From: Saraland AL

Rep Power: 1126

archemedes street rep is low. keep going

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rockford Fosgate Fan

I thought the GTP models ran better then the 16's?

guys on my board are running mid 13's stock, I was refering to the mustang 13.8 time also

Mar 21, 2005 | 08:05 PM

#63

jamilz28

Average GTcars Poster

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 558

From: oklahoma city

Rep Power: 0

http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosins...A01-123402.htm

**** it

Quote:

Originally Posted by JesasaurusRex

If not its cuz you jinxed it. So if theres no camaro and your kids someday ask you about it. Say it was all your daddys fault.

Mar 22, 2005 | 02:47 AM

#64

JesasaurusRex

Experienced GTcars Poster

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 1,757

From: Pittsburg, CA

Rep Power: 825

JesasaurusRex street rep is low. keep going

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamilz28

http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosins...A01-123402.htm

**** it

Ya that sux, first i was

now im just

Mar 24, 2005 | 04:47 PM

#65

red9450

Resident Mustang Guy

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 541

From: NEPA

Rep Power: 783

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamilz28

why did ford only give the 05 mustag gt 300hp when a 98 z28 has way more?

What did the 98z have anyway? wasn't it 305? not much more than a K&N.

Mar 25, 2005 | 12:08 AM

#66

archemedes

GTcars - Post God !

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 15,868

From: Saraland AL

Rep Power: 1126

Quote:

Originally Posted by red9450

What did the 98z have anyway? wasn't it 305? not much more than a K&N.

no '98 didn't have a 305

Mar 25, 2005 | 12:16 AM

#67

red9450

Resident Mustang Guy

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 541

From: NEPA

Rep Power: 783

Quote:

Originally Posted by archemedes

no '98 didn't have a 305

No man :banghead: 305hp. I know that 98 came with the ls1.

Mar 25, 2005 | 12:17 AM

#68

archemedes

GTcars - Post God !

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 15,868

From: Saraland AL

Rep Power: 1126

ok thought you were really confused keep in mind the mustang outweighs tha f body

Mar 25, 2005 | 02:51 PM

#69

red9450

Resident Mustang Guy

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 541

From: NEPA

Rep Power: 783

these are the figures that internet auto guide has for the two vehicles, which differ by very little. Just to back it up, i'll look for more sources in case these numbers aren't good enough.
here is the search i did. came in with the 2005 GT at 3425lbs, and the 1998 Z28 at 3439.

Weight is just not an issue

Mar 25, 2005 | 10:17 PM

#70

archemedes

GTcars - Post God !

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 15,868

From: Saraland AL

Rep Power: 1126

hmm that's strange I've always been told how heavy the mustang is, of course I haven't followed the new model much

Mar 26, 2005 | 02:00 PM

#71

red9450

Resident Mustang Guy

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 541

From: NEPA

Rep Power: 783

Quote:

Originally Posted by archemedes

hmm that's strange I've always been told how heavy the mustang is, of course I haven't followed the new model much

the difference between the new model's weight, and the new edge(1999-2004),sn95 (1994-1998) is no more than a hundred lbs. either way. they stayed right around 3400 lbs. for those years, and the fox bodies were as light as 3200lbs. for a notchback.