General Automotive Chat all general talk about cars. if they dont have a home below or you feel it doesnt fit, post in here.

c5 vs. LS1 F-Body

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 06:59 PM
  #16  
TorqueDog's Avatar
Experienced GTcars Poster
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,608
From: Calgary, AB
Rep Power: 817
TorqueDog street rep is low. keep going
You can't just lower an F-Body and expect it to handle like it's on rails. And those gears are not ideal for AutoX. You need to upgrade your suspension as a whole. Sway bars, shocks and springs, Subframe connectors, STB, hell, even your tires are a factor. For gears, I find 3.42s to be the optimal gear if you intend on going to AutoX, but still want to kick some *** on the drag strip.

Originally Posted by camaro94
my dad agrees with that. He said his '87 IROC handled better than my '94 does. He sais it just felt like it hugging the ground better.
The IROC/Z28s have always had more performance oriented suspension than their V6 counterparts. You put your dad in a Z28 of the same year as yours, and he'll agree that it handles better.
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 05:25 AM
  #17  
WarHawK R's Avatar
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 750
WarHawK R street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by NCamaro94
well what i'm curious is mainly how much more exspensive aftermarket performance parts are for a vette compared to an f-body.
Well if anything some parts for the c5 are more expensive than the f-body because they fetch a premium, it seems like aftermarket power adders cost alot more than f-body variants.the manufacturers of c5 specific parts jack up the price because they can, like blowers and turbo kits.when it comes to internals like cranks,rods,cams, etc. they are the same.if its a c5 with stock untouched ls1 heads and an f-body also with ls1 heads with an aftermarket cam the cars put out the basic same numbers with the same parts with an equal tune.the c5 might be a bit kwiker though because its lighter than an f-body
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 11:47 PM
  #18  
camaro94's Avatar
Post Wench
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,392
From: Nemacolin, PA
Rep Power: 1046
camaro94 street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by TorqueDog
You can't just lower an F-Body and expect it to handle like it's on rails. And those gears are not ideal for AutoX. You need to upgrade your suspension as a whole. Sway bars, shocks and springs, Subframe connectors, STB, hell, even your tires are a factor. For gears, I find 3.42s to be the optimal gear if you intend on going to AutoX, but still want to kick some *** on the drag strip.

The IROC/Z28s have always had more performance oriented suspension than their V6 counterparts. You put your dad in a Z28 of the same year as yours, and he'll agree that it handles better.
he's been in one. And he still says the 'ROC handled better. He feels that it was one of the best handling, if not the best, cars that he has ever had.
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 12:16 AM
  #19  
archemedes's Avatar
GTcars - Post God !
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,868
From: Saraland AL
Rep Power: 1126
archemedes street rep is low. keep going
even the racers agree the 4th gen doesn't handle as well as the third gen, the third gen was designed as a road racer, teh 4th gen was designed as a street car
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
honda video
Honda Videos
0
Jul 21, 2008 02:19 AM
~Leading Lady~
honda / acura
3
Jun 25, 2007 05:40 PM
69z-28
Automotive Pictures & videos
8
Nov 25, 2006 02:13 AM
2tone_93gt
Automotive Pictures & videos
2
May 1, 2005 01:37 AM
Zlatko
Automotive Pictures & videos
7
Mar 30, 2005 03:42 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 AM.

Page generated in 0.08393 seconds with 16 queries