Rep Power: 0

http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....D-9486F01242C7

total sleeper!

 
Rep Power: 788

What a POS, a ****ing twin engine car, total displacement is 6.2 liters 12 cylinders, 310hp and 370 lb/ft, and it runs only 14???? ha ha , what a waste of money, an old mustang with minor mods will run 14. and total cost for a car and mods will be 00 times less than this car.

 
Rep Power: 0

actually i think his best et was a 13.8

front engine STOCK 3.1L 150HP give or take

REAR STOCK 3.8L 165HP.


with a trand total of 315hp... running 13s its prolly dead on. On top of which the project was made from misc GM parts so the swap was cheap and done well. ALSO since he has already mounted the rear engine a L67 front and back swap could be done easily. That should pull some serious numbers!

 
Rep Power: 842

still crazy idea

 
Rep Power: 766

that car is so slow

 
Rep Power: 745

yah... seems like a lot of work for 14.00

 
Rep Power: 863

waste of money, waste of time...
cost him more in time to do that than if he had of gone and bought a 88 5L mustang, added a gear and nitrous and would have been hella faster...

What was this guy thinking

thing looks like it popped out of Unique Whips

 
Rep Power: 859

They did that in the 60's with a hurst olds. Called it the Hairy Hurst, or something like that. Twin blown big blocks, it was almost impossible to drive.

 
Rep Power: 0

id rather have a tein engine 90s family sedan then another 5.slow on the street..


but thats just me