Bye Bye Si!
09-10-2006, 05:07 PM
#16
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 705 
no its called 4000km break in period you're not suspose to beat it untill after 4k meaning 3,000rpm shifts
thats what i had to do with my '06 g35
thats what i had to do with my '06 g35
Last edited by Aaron; 09-10-2006 at 05:09 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
09-10-2006, 05:42 PM
#17
Junior GTcars Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 307
Rep Power: 706
Originally Posted by Aaron
no its called 4000km break in period you're not suspose to beat it untill after 4k meaning 3,000rpm shifts
thats what i had to do with my '06 g35
thats what i had to do with my '06 g35
09-19-2006, 10:36 PM
#20
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Whitby
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Aaron
no its called 4000km break in period you're not suspose to beat it untill after 4k meaning 3,000rpm shifts
thats what i had to do with my '06 g35
thats what i had to do with my '06 g35
i've even thought the cobalt ss was a pretty decent overall car, hearing crap like this reminds me its just a cavalier on steroids, just faster but breaks down just as much.
09-20-2006, 06:17 PM
#21
Junior GTcars Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 290
Rep Power: 693
shagpower ur russian?
and no its not cavalier on steroids. it on new platform build by opel and gm...opel astra kinda looks the same except its a hatch.
Aaron might be right, cause theres a period of time for a new car you shouldnt rape it. otherwise even if it wont break it might perform worse in future
and no its not cavalier on steroids. it on new platform build by opel and gm...opel astra kinda looks the same except its a hatch.
Aaron might be right, cause theres a period of time for a new car you shouldnt rape it. otherwise even if it wont break it might perform worse in future
09-20-2006, 06:40 PM
#22
Experienced GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 1,518
Rep Power: 734
Yeah a break-in period has nothing to do with a supercharger pulley. If they can't even make a simple pulley, what makes you think they can make a reliable and long lasting engine?
Haha, what makes you think you're right? Because you read something on the internet?! Get outta here. I tell you what, rebuild your 7MGTE (probably not going to be an option soon), then go out and boost the out of your fresh engine and then tell us how its doing 50,000km later.
Originally Posted by CryoSLASH
ummm 4000km breaking is way to hard. oh and hte best way to break in an engine is to beat on it. don't try to argue my point, as you will be wrong!
09-20-2006, 07:25 PM
#23
GTcars Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brampton
Posts: 1,437
Rep Power: 0 
Originally Posted by B6T
Yeah a break-in period has nothing to do with a supercharger pulley. If they can't even make a simple pulley, what makes you think they can make a reliable and long lasting engine?
Haha, what makes you think you're right? Because you read something on the internet?! Get outta here. I tell you what, rebuild your 7MGTE (probably not going to be an option soon), then go out and boost the out of your fresh engine and then tell us how its doing 50,000km later.
Haha, what makes you think you're right? Because you read something on the internet?! Get outta here. I tell you what, rebuild your 7MGTE (probably not going to be an option soon), then go out and boost the out of your fresh engine and then tell us how its doing 50,000km later.
Probably less tha 5000km on that engine.
09-20-2006, 11:25 PM
#24
Junior GTcars Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 307
Rep Power: 706
Originally Posted by B6T
Haha, what makes you think you're right? Because you read something on the internet?! Get outta here. I tell you what, rebuild your 7MGTE (probably not going to be an option soon), then go out and boost the out of your fresh engine and then tell us how its doing 50,000km later.
10-19-2006, 11:49 PM
#25
Junior GTcars Poster
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 264
Rep Power: 685
jus throwing in my 2 cents,
gm cars = peices of ish
gm trucks = amazing quality, style and performance
had a 99 sierra ext short box, truck looked insane even stock, had sum *****
and for 230 thousand clicks when it was sold after 6 years had, brakes, oil changes, no tuneups after warrenty was up, and no suspension, motor, tranny or body work, n id still hop in it and drive as far as u dare me lol
but i would never touch a cavalier, grand am , sunflower or nething
gm cars = peices of ish
gm trucks = amazing quality, style and performance
had a 99 sierra ext short box, truck looked insane even stock, had sum *****
and for 230 thousand clicks when it was sold after 6 years had, brakes, oil changes, no tuneups after warrenty was up, and no suspension, motor, tranny or body work, n id still hop in it and drive as far as u dare me lol
but i would never touch a cavalier, grand am , sunflower or nething
10-20-2006, 12:02 AM
#26
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scarborough
Posts: 137
Rep Power: 675
The pulley breaking is Eaton's fault. Not GM's.
And how did a broken pully F*** your motor ? Doesn't the Ecotec use a seperate belt for the supercharger ? so if you broke your pulley it should have jsut let the belt come off and then you'd jsut be running around N/A ...
And how did a broken pully F*** your motor ? Doesn't the Ecotec use a seperate belt for the supercharger ? so if you broke your pulley it should have jsut let the belt come off and then you'd jsut be running around N/A ...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)