Bye Bye Si!
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 778 
no its called 4000km break in period you're not suspose to beat it untill after 4k meaning 3,000rpm shifts
thats what i had to do with my '06 g35
thats what i had to do with my '06 g35
Last edited by Aaron; Sep 10, 2006 at 05:09 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Junior GTcars Poster
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 307
From: Mississauga, Ontario
Rep Power: 779
Originally Posted by Aaron
no its called 4000km break in period you're not suspose to beat it untill after 4k meaning 3,000rpm shifts
thats what i had to do with my '06 g35
thats what i had to do with my '06 g35
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8
From: Whitby
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Aaron
no its called 4000km break in period you're not suspose to beat it untill after 4k meaning 3,000rpm shifts
thats what i had to do with my '06 g35
thats what i had to do with my '06 g35
i've even thought the cobalt ss was a pretty decent overall car, hearing crap like this reminds me its just a cavalier on steroids, just faster but breaks down just as much.
Junior GTcars Poster
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 290
Rep Power: 766
shagpower ur russian?
and no its not cavalier on steroids. it on new platform build by opel and gm...opel astra kinda looks the same except its a hatch.
Aaron might be right, cause theres a period of time for a new car you shouldnt rape it. otherwise even if it wont break it might perform worse in future
and no its not cavalier on steroids. it on new platform build by opel and gm...opel astra kinda looks the same except its a hatch.
Aaron might be right, cause theres a period of time for a new car you shouldnt rape it. otherwise even if it wont break it might perform worse in future
Experienced GTcars Poster
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,518
From: Mississauga
Rep Power: 807
Yeah a break-in period has nothing to do with a supercharger pulley. If they can't even make a simple pulley, what makes you think they can make a reliable and long lasting engine?
Haha, what makes you think you're right? Because you read something on the internet?! Get outta here. I tell you what, rebuild your 7MGTE (probably not going to be an option soon), then go out and boost the out of your fresh engine and then tell us how its doing 50,000km later.
Originally Posted by CryoSLASH
ummm 4000km breaking is way to hard. oh and hte best way to break in an engine is to beat on it. don't try to argue my point, as you will be wrong!
GTcars Regular
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,437
From: Brampton
Rep Power: 0 
Originally Posted by B6T
Yeah a break-in period has nothing to do with a supercharger pulley. If they can't even make a simple pulley, what makes you think they can make a reliable and long lasting engine?
Haha, what makes you think you're right? Because you read something on the internet?! Get outta here. I tell you what, rebuild your 7MGTE (probably not going to be an option soon), then go out and boost the out of your fresh engine and then tell us how its doing 50,000km later.
Haha, what makes you think you're right? Because you read something on the internet?! Get outta here. I tell you what, rebuild your 7MGTE (probably not going to be an option soon), then go out and boost the out of your fresh engine and then tell us how its doing 50,000km later.
Probably less tha 5000km on that engine.
Junior GTcars Poster
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 307
From: Mississauga, Ontario
Rep Power: 779
Originally Posted by B6T
Haha, what makes you think you're right? Because you read something on the internet?! Get outta here. I tell you what, rebuild your 7MGTE (probably not going to be an option soon), then go out and boost the out of your fresh engine and then tell us how its doing 50,000km later.
Junior GTcars Poster
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 264
Rep Power: 758
jus throwing in my 2 cents,
gm cars = peices of ish
gm trucks = amazing quality, style and performance
had a 99 sierra ext short box, truck looked insane even stock, had sum *****
and for 230 thousand clicks when it was sold after 6 years had, brakes, oil changes, no tuneups after warrenty was up, and no suspension, motor, tranny or body work, n id still hop in it and drive as far as u dare me lol
but i would never touch a cavalier, grand am , sunflower or nething
gm cars = peices of ish
gm trucks = amazing quality, style and performance
had a 99 sierra ext short box, truck looked insane even stock, had sum *****
and for 230 thousand clicks when it was sold after 6 years had, brakes, oil changes, no tuneups after warrenty was up, and no suspension, motor, tranny or body work, n id still hop in it and drive as far as u dare me lol
but i would never touch a cavalier, grand am , sunflower or nething
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 137
From: Scarborough
Rep Power: 748
The pulley breaking is Eaton's fault. Not GM's.
And how did a broken pully F*** your motor ? Doesn't the Ecotec use a seperate belt for the supercharger ? so if you broke your pulley it should have jsut let the belt come off and then you'd jsut be running around N/A ...
And how did a broken pully F*** your motor ? Doesn't the Ecotec use a seperate belt for the supercharger ? so if you broke your pulley it should have jsut let the belt come off and then you'd jsut be running around N/A ...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
