Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4?
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 12:59:05 -0600, "tflfb" <fuksatw@qwest.net> wrote:
>What's that mileage in U S terms. 160K km is about 100K miles. >Tom >"Tony Hwang" <dragon40@shaw.ca> wrote in message >news:uU6wb.476616$6C4.257413@pd7tw1no... >> >> >> Judy wrote: >> >> > "jwacom201" <none@jwacom201.com> wrote in message >news:<1sadne0DOuGY512iRVn-gw@comcast.com>... >> > >> >>Im looking for a car (snip)> now im looking at the CR-V which is a 98 >EX. >> > >> > >> > ........... >> > >> > Hmmm...I just got a 1998 5-speed manual CR-V (base model, no A/C), >> > which I am comparing to the 2000 CR-V automatic we already have (with >> > A/C). Interesting to see the differences between the 2 years. >> > >> > I believe the 1998 has a slightly larger, boxier body, but the real >> > (not good) surprise has been the gas mileage. I have always been told >> > that manual trannies should get better gas mileage than automatics, >> > all other things being equal. The 1998 has been getting only 22 mpg in >> > mixed driving conditions. This car came with the typical Honda dealer >> > guarantees & it has been recently looked over and tuned up. >> > >> > When you look into various websites for gas mileage on this model you >> > hear anything from 22 to 26 to 31 mpg. I'm not too happy to be at the >> > bottom of that scale with the '98 model. Our '00 automatic gets an >> > average of 26-28 mpg even with the a/c on. >> > >> > Otherwise the 1998 CR-V is superb. The CR-V is built on a Civic base >> > and handles like a tall car. The gearbox is a dream. >> > >> > So I'd suggest you find a way to verify fuel consumption on the '98 >> > you're checking out. >> > >> > Good luck! >> > >> > Cranky >> Hi, >> I have a 98 CR-V with ~160K Km on it. Still original brake pads/linings, >> second set of tires, one rad flush, regular oil change, topped up diff. >> fluid for making noise when turning. Now time to replace timing belt. >> Nothing else done or happened. Just keeps on going without any trouble. >> It is auto tranny. Oh, I installed NGK platinum plugs at 100K Km. >> Gas mileage is consistent 10km/liter. >> Tony >> > |
Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4?
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 12:59:05 -0600, "tflfb" <fuksatw@qwest.net> wrote:
>What's that mileage in U S terms. 160K km is about 100K miles. >Tom >"Tony Hwang" <dragon40@shaw.ca> wrote in message >news:uU6wb.476616$6C4.257413@pd7tw1no... >> >> >> Judy wrote: >> >> > "jwacom201" <none@jwacom201.com> wrote in message >news:<1sadne0DOuGY512iRVn-gw@comcast.com>... >> > >> >>Im looking for a car (snip)> now im looking at the CR-V which is a 98 >EX. >> > >> > >> > ........... >> > >> > Hmmm...I just got a 1998 5-speed manual CR-V (base model, no A/C), >> > which I am comparing to the 2000 CR-V automatic we already have (with >> > A/C). Interesting to see the differences between the 2 years. >> > >> > I believe the 1998 has a slightly larger, boxier body, but the real >> > (not good) surprise has been the gas mileage. I have always been told >> > that manual trannies should get better gas mileage than automatics, >> > all other things being equal. The 1998 has been getting only 22 mpg in >> > mixed driving conditions. This car came with the typical Honda dealer >> > guarantees & it has been recently looked over and tuned up. >> > >> > When you look into various websites for gas mileage on this model you >> > hear anything from 22 to 26 to 31 mpg. I'm not too happy to be at the >> > bottom of that scale with the '98 model. Our '00 automatic gets an >> > average of 26-28 mpg even with the a/c on. >> > >> > Otherwise the 1998 CR-V is superb. The CR-V is built on a Civic base >> > and handles like a tall car. The gearbox is a dream. >> > >> > So I'd suggest you find a way to verify fuel consumption on the '98 >> > you're checking out. >> > >> > Good luck! >> > >> > Cranky >> Hi, >> I have a 98 CR-V with ~160K Km on it. Still original brake pads/linings, >> second set of tires, one rad flush, regular oil change, topped up diff. >> fluid for making noise when turning. Now time to replace timing belt. >> Nothing else done or happened. Just keeps on going without any trouble. >> It is auto tranny. Oh, I installed NGK platinum plugs at 100K Km. >> Gas mileage is consistent 10km/liter. >> Tony >> > |
Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4?
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 12:59:05 -0600, "tflfb" <fuksatw@qwest.net> wrote:
>What's that mileage in U S terms. 160K km is about 100K miles. >Tom >"Tony Hwang" <dragon40@shaw.ca> wrote in message >news:uU6wb.476616$6C4.257413@pd7tw1no... >> >> >> Judy wrote: >> >> > "jwacom201" <none@jwacom201.com> wrote in message >news:<1sadne0DOuGY512iRVn-gw@comcast.com>... >> > >> >>Im looking for a car (snip)> now im looking at the CR-V which is a 98 >EX. >> > >> > >> > ........... >> > >> > Hmmm...I just got a 1998 5-speed manual CR-V (base model, no A/C), >> > which I am comparing to the 2000 CR-V automatic we already have (with >> > A/C). Interesting to see the differences between the 2 years. >> > >> > I believe the 1998 has a slightly larger, boxier body, but the real >> > (not good) surprise has been the gas mileage. I have always been told >> > that manual trannies should get better gas mileage than automatics, >> > all other things being equal. The 1998 has been getting only 22 mpg in >> > mixed driving conditions. This car came with the typical Honda dealer >> > guarantees & it has been recently looked over and tuned up. >> > >> > When you look into various websites for gas mileage on this model you >> > hear anything from 22 to 26 to 31 mpg. I'm not too happy to be at the >> > bottom of that scale with the '98 model. Our '00 automatic gets an >> > average of 26-28 mpg even with the a/c on. >> > >> > Otherwise the 1998 CR-V is superb. The CR-V is built on a Civic base >> > and handles like a tall car. The gearbox is a dream. >> > >> > So I'd suggest you find a way to verify fuel consumption on the '98 >> > you're checking out. >> > >> > Good luck! >> > >> > Cranky >> Hi, >> I have a 98 CR-V with ~160K Km on it. Still original brake pads/linings, >> second set of tires, one rad flush, regular oil change, topped up diff. >> fluid for making noise when turning. Now time to replace timing belt. >> Nothing else done or happened. Just keeps on going without any trouble. >> It is auto tranny. Oh, I installed NGK platinum plugs at 100K Km. >> Gas mileage is consistent 10km/liter. >> Tony >> > |
Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4? -- fuel economy
Just a couple of additional points about CR-V fuel economy.....
The 1998 5-speed Honda CR-V to which I referred is in England where they did indeed make'em without air conditioning. Also more manual transmissions in the UK than in the US, where the likelihood of finding a 5-speed was, I believe, about 1 in 1000. The cost of fuel in the UK is so high compared to the US that we are forced to drive with a high regard for fuel economy. We've both actually taken classes to become more adept at fuel-conscious driving. There's also a lot of info available on-line. US city gas mileage of 26 mpg was achieved with a small number of longer town trips in which speed rarely was allowed to exceed 25-30 mph. US freeway mileage of 28-29 mpg was achieved using cruise control at about 65-70 mph with a/c OFF whenever physically possible. We still consider these models to be the best SUV for the money anywhere. Best wishes, Cranky |
Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4? -- fuel economy
Just a couple of additional points about CR-V fuel economy.....
The 1998 5-speed Honda CR-V to which I referred is in England where they did indeed make'em without air conditioning. Also more manual transmissions in the UK than in the US, where the likelihood of finding a 5-speed was, I believe, about 1 in 1000. The cost of fuel in the UK is so high compared to the US that we are forced to drive with a high regard for fuel economy. We've both actually taken classes to become more adept at fuel-conscious driving. There's also a lot of info available on-line. US city gas mileage of 26 mpg was achieved with a small number of longer town trips in which speed rarely was allowed to exceed 25-30 mph. US freeway mileage of 28-29 mpg was achieved using cruise control at about 65-70 mph with a/c OFF whenever physically possible. We still consider these models to be the best SUV for the money anywhere. Best wishes, Cranky |
Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4? -- fuel economy
Just a couple of additional points about CR-V fuel economy.....
The 1998 5-speed Honda CR-V to which I referred is in England where they did indeed make'em without air conditioning. Also more manual transmissions in the UK than in the US, where the likelihood of finding a 5-speed was, I believe, about 1 in 1000. The cost of fuel in the UK is so high compared to the US that we are forced to drive with a high regard for fuel economy. We've both actually taken classes to become more adept at fuel-conscious driving. There's also a lot of info available on-line. US city gas mileage of 26 mpg was achieved with a small number of longer town trips in which speed rarely was allowed to exceed 25-30 mph. US freeway mileage of 28-29 mpg was achieved using cruise control at about 65-70 mph with a/c OFF whenever physically possible. We still consider these models to be the best SUV for the money anywhere. Best wishes, Cranky |
Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4? -- fuel economy
Just a couple of additional points about CR-V fuel economy.....
The 1998 5-speed Honda CR-V to which I referred is in England where they did indeed make'em without air conditioning. Also more manual transmissions in the UK than in the US, where the likelihood of finding a 5-speed was, I believe, about 1 in 1000. The cost of fuel in the UK is so high compared to the US that we are forced to drive with a high regard for fuel economy. We've both actually taken classes to become more adept at fuel-conscious driving. There's also a lot of info available on-line. US city gas mileage of 26 mpg was achieved with a small number of longer town trips in which speed rarely was allowed to exceed 25-30 mph. US freeway mileage of 28-29 mpg was achieved using cruise control at about 65-70 mph with a/c OFF whenever physically possible. We still consider these models to be the best SUV for the money anywhere. Best wishes, Cranky |
Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4?
What is G1? is it a 98? consumer report says that cr-v is 2.8 secs faster on
0-60 ..but thats about it. "Gordon McGrew" <gRmEcMgOrVeEw@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:nia3svcrvfjbvs7bkuh1ei85h09hmra28f@4ax.com... > On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 04:12:37 -0500, "jwacom201" <none@jwacom201.com> > wrote: > > > > >Im looking for a car. First it was the jetta but heard bad reviews regarding > >reliability. (very far from an SUV right? i think im really a small suv > >type, i never liked lowered cars where i have to steer away from small > >potholes and risking myself in ramming a truck instead.) > > > > now im looking at the CR-V which is a 98 EX. Since its a honda i expect it > >to be reliable. Is this a good car? i want something that has a high profile > >but not too much like standard SUVs. I want something that still rides like > >a car. how is the aftermarket parts on the cr-vs? > > > >Im also looking at the Rav4 and debating which one i should look into. Seems > >like cr-vs have more aftermarkets like roofracks, bike racks, bras and > >etccc... > > > >Reports says that rav4 takes 13secs on 0-60 while crv takes 11.3. > > I helped a friend shopping G1 CR-V vs. RAV4. With AT, the RAV4 was > actually scary it was so slow. The CR-V was superior in other ways as > well, but that was the big one. > > >Should i be concerned to see mileages of up to 85k on toyota rav4s and honda > >cr-vs? It seems that on the VW's its scary to have mileages that high. > > It shouldn't be too scary with Honda or Toyota. Just check it out > closely and understand that you may need to do some service or repair. > > > > >btw, im not a speedfreak. I want something that is rugged, sporty, not too > >big and has a good MPG. (did i mention reliable?) > > > >I also carry wide & long cargos. some are illustration boards that are 3x4 > >feet and rollled paper that are 107 inches long. > > > |
Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4?
What is G1? is it a 98? consumer report says that cr-v is 2.8 secs faster on
0-60 ..but thats about it. "Gordon McGrew" <gRmEcMgOrVeEw@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:nia3svcrvfjbvs7bkuh1ei85h09hmra28f@4ax.com... > On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 04:12:37 -0500, "jwacom201" <none@jwacom201.com> > wrote: > > > > >Im looking for a car. First it was the jetta but heard bad reviews regarding > >reliability. (very far from an SUV right? i think im really a small suv > >type, i never liked lowered cars where i have to steer away from small > >potholes and risking myself in ramming a truck instead.) > > > > now im looking at the CR-V which is a 98 EX. Since its a honda i expect it > >to be reliable. Is this a good car? i want something that has a high profile > >but not too much like standard SUVs. I want something that still rides like > >a car. how is the aftermarket parts on the cr-vs? > > > >Im also looking at the Rav4 and debating which one i should look into. Seems > >like cr-vs have more aftermarkets like roofracks, bike racks, bras and > >etccc... > > > >Reports says that rav4 takes 13secs on 0-60 while crv takes 11.3. > > I helped a friend shopping G1 CR-V vs. RAV4. With AT, the RAV4 was > actually scary it was so slow. The CR-V was superior in other ways as > well, but that was the big one. > > >Should i be concerned to see mileages of up to 85k on toyota rav4s and honda > >cr-vs? It seems that on the VW's its scary to have mileages that high. > > It shouldn't be too scary with Honda or Toyota. Just check it out > closely and understand that you may need to do some service or repair. > > > > >btw, im not a speedfreak. I want something that is rugged, sporty, not too > >big and has a good MPG. (did i mention reliable?) > > > >I also carry wide & long cargos. some are illustration boards that are 3x4 > >feet and rollled paper that are 107 inches long. > > > |
Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4?
What is G1? is it a 98? consumer report says that cr-v is 2.8 secs faster on
0-60 ..but thats about it. "Gordon McGrew" <gRmEcMgOrVeEw@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:nia3svcrvfjbvs7bkuh1ei85h09hmra28f@4ax.com... > On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 04:12:37 -0500, "jwacom201" <none@jwacom201.com> > wrote: > > > > >Im looking for a car. First it was the jetta but heard bad reviews regarding > >reliability. (very far from an SUV right? i think im really a small suv > >type, i never liked lowered cars where i have to steer away from small > >potholes and risking myself in ramming a truck instead.) > > > > now im looking at the CR-V which is a 98 EX. Since its a honda i expect it > >to be reliable. Is this a good car? i want something that has a high profile > >but not too much like standard SUVs. I want something that still rides like > >a car. how is the aftermarket parts on the cr-vs? > > > >Im also looking at the Rav4 and debating which one i should look into. Seems > >like cr-vs have more aftermarkets like roofracks, bike racks, bras and > >etccc... > > > >Reports says that rav4 takes 13secs on 0-60 while crv takes 11.3. > > I helped a friend shopping G1 CR-V vs. RAV4. With AT, the RAV4 was > actually scary it was so slow. The CR-V was superior in other ways as > well, but that was the big one. > > >Should i be concerned to see mileages of up to 85k on toyota rav4s and honda > >cr-vs? It seems that on the VW's its scary to have mileages that high. > > It shouldn't be too scary with Honda or Toyota. Just check it out > closely and understand that you may need to do some service or repair. > > > > >btw, im not a speedfreak. I want something that is rugged, sporty, not too > >big and has a good MPG. (did i mention reliable?) > > > >I also carry wide & long cargos. some are illustration boards that are 3x4 > >feet and rollled paper that are 107 inches long. > > > |
Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4?
What is G1? is it a 98? consumer report says that cr-v is 2.8 secs faster on
0-60 ..but thats about it. "Gordon McGrew" <gRmEcMgOrVeEw@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:nia3svcrvfjbvs7bkuh1ei85h09hmra28f@4ax.com... > On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 04:12:37 -0500, "jwacom201" <none@jwacom201.com> > wrote: > > > > >Im looking for a car. First it was the jetta but heard bad reviews regarding > >reliability. (very far from an SUV right? i think im really a small suv > >type, i never liked lowered cars where i have to steer away from small > >potholes and risking myself in ramming a truck instead.) > > > > now im looking at the CR-V which is a 98 EX. Since its a honda i expect it > >to be reliable. Is this a good car? i want something that has a high profile > >but not too much like standard SUVs. I want something that still rides like > >a car. how is the aftermarket parts on the cr-vs? > > > >Im also looking at the Rav4 and debating which one i should look into. Seems > >like cr-vs have more aftermarkets like roofracks, bike racks, bras and > >etccc... > > > >Reports says that rav4 takes 13secs on 0-60 while crv takes 11.3. > > I helped a friend shopping G1 CR-V vs. RAV4. With AT, the RAV4 was > actually scary it was so slow. The CR-V was superior in other ways as > well, but that was the big one. > > >Should i be concerned to see mileages of up to 85k on toyota rav4s and honda > >cr-vs? It seems that on the VW's its scary to have mileages that high. > > It shouldn't be too scary with Honda or Toyota. Just check it out > closely and understand that you may need to do some service or repair. > > > > >btw, im not a speedfreak. I want something that is rugged, sporty, not too > >big and has a good MPG. (did i mention reliable?) > > > >I also carry wide & long cargos. some are illustration boards that are 3x4 > >feet and rollled paper that are 107 inches long. > > > |
Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4?
Tom Resi <tomresi@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<%18wb.32429$IZ1.25555@edtnps84>...
> Assuming that it is tuned up, don't be too quick to blame the car for > poor mileage. The simple fact that you know how to shift gears doesn't > mean that you know how to drive it for good mileage. Always standard > will have better mileage than auto, but most people will get actually > the opposite (like you) for the simple reason they don't know how to do > it correctly, is just simple as that. > > Judy wrote: > > Hey Tom, could you please explain HOW to develop the correct technique for getting the best milege/kilometrage in regards of CRV? I get 23-25 mpg city only (2000 CRV 5-spd.), which I'm satisfied with, but of course would like to know if I could have a little more... Thanks, Dmitry. |
Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4?
Tom Resi <tomresi@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<%18wb.32429$IZ1.25555@edtnps84>...
> Assuming that it is tuned up, don't be too quick to blame the car for > poor mileage. The simple fact that you know how to shift gears doesn't > mean that you know how to drive it for good mileage. Always standard > will have better mileage than auto, but most people will get actually > the opposite (like you) for the simple reason they don't know how to do > it correctly, is just simple as that. > > Judy wrote: > > Hey Tom, could you please explain HOW to develop the correct technique for getting the best milege/kilometrage in regards of CRV? I get 23-25 mpg city only (2000 CRV 5-spd.), which I'm satisfied with, but of course would like to know if I could have a little more... Thanks, Dmitry. |
Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4?
Tom Resi <tomresi@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<%18wb.32429$IZ1.25555@edtnps84>...
> Assuming that it is tuned up, don't be too quick to blame the car for > poor mileage. The simple fact that you know how to shift gears doesn't > mean that you know how to drive it for good mileage. Always standard > will have better mileage than auto, but most people will get actually > the opposite (like you) for the simple reason they don't know how to do > it correctly, is just simple as that. > > Judy wrote: > > Hey Tom, could you please explain HOW to develop the correct technique for getting the best milege/kilometrage in regards of CRV? I get 23-25 mpg city only (2000 CRV 5-spd.), which I'm satisfied with, but of course would like to know if I could have a little more... Thanks, Dmitry. |
Re: 98 CR-V reliable? or 98 rav4?
Tom Resi <tomresi@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<%18wb.32429$IZ1.25555@edtnps84>...
> Assuming that it is tuned up, don't be too quick to blame the car for > poor mileage. The simple fact that you know how to shift gears doesn't > mean that you know how to drive it for good mileage. Always standard > will have better mileage than auto, but most people will get actually > the opposite (like you) for the simple reason they don't know how to do > it correctly, is just simple as that. > > Judy wrote: > > Hey Tom, could you please explain HOW to develop the correct technique for getting the best milege/kilometrage in regards of CRV? I get 23-25 mpg city only (2000 CRV 5-spd.), which I'm satisfied with, but of course would like to know if I could have a little more... Thanks, Dmitry. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands